Nineteenth Century Evolutionary Perspectives Power, Privilege and Prejudice 7/17/2016 Power, Privilege and Prejudice 1 The Context of Evolutionary Thought Came from mainly England and America in the middle and late nineteenth century. Industrial Revolution had produced major technical changes in society. The emergence of a powerful middle class that saw itself as prime shapers of human history. Emergence of large divisions of wealth within both Europe and America. Later nineteenth century was the highpoint of colonial empires. Idea of progress became a kind of secular faith of the middle classes. State the main ideas you’ll be talking about 7/17/2016 Power, Privilege and Prejudice 2 Lewis Henry Morgan, 1818-1881 Studied classics in New York. Admired the Seneca and became adopted into one of their clans. Studied their kinship system extensively. Saw the clan organization of the Senecas as similar to Greek and Roman clans. Travelled to England, met Edward Tyler and Charles Darwin, major evolutionary thinkers, and became a convert. 7/17/2016 Power, Privilege and Prejudice 3 Ancient Society 7/17/2016 Unilinear Evolution: All societies passed through similar stages. These stages were: Savagery, Barbarism, and Civilization. These stages were reflected in various aspects of society and social organization. Power, Privilege and Prejudice 4 Institutions, Stages, and Social Organization Each society had certain institutions that Morgan considered important and universal: Arts of subsistence Government Language Family forms Religion Houses and Architecture Forms of Property Each institution was related to the other institutions. Each stage of evolution had characteristic social institutions. 7/17/2016 Power, Privilege and Prejudice 5 Example: Arts of Subsistence and Family Forms and their Relation Savagery Subsistence Family Lower: Gathering Middle: Fishing Upper: Hunting Promiscuous horde Consanguine Barbarism: Lower: Middle: Upper: Civilization: Agriculture and industry 7/17/2016 Punuluan Syndyasmian Patriarchal/polygamous Monogamous Power, Privilege and Prejudice 6 Morgan’s Contributions to Kinship Studies Morgan differentiated between ‘biological’ systems of kinship and classificatory systems. Classificatory systems were defined as those in which a kinship term applied to a wide range of ‘relatives’, e.g. father could apply to all men of the (biological) father’s generation on the father’s side (in a patrilineal system), sister to all women of one’s own generation on the father’s side (in a patrilineal system). Although our system also contains classificatory relatives, e.g. cousin, aunt and uncle, classificatory systems are characterized by all kinspeople falling under a ‘class’ of relatives and not applying to one individual alone. Much debate about this, even in Morgan’s day, but many anthropologists still use the term ‘classificatory’ system. Even during Morgan’s lifetime, many (e.g. McLennan) objected to the concept of ‘promiscuous horde’ and subsequent ethnographic work proved this to be untrue. 7/17/2016 Power, Privilege and Prejudice 7 Space and Time in Evolutionary Thought Later on, evolutionary thought was criticized for the fact that it lacked fieldwork and was highly speculative and ethnocentric. However, what we have to deal with today is the thought processes at work in creating schemes of unilineal evolution. With colonialism, Europeans and Euro-North Americans encountered societies that were quite different than their own, in terms of kinship relations, family forms, technologies. All these societies co-existed in space, but in relations of power between them. Evolutionary thought ‘ordered’ this diversity through plotting differences in space and translated them into differences in time. Provided a secular form of unilineal time that derived from JudeoChristian theories of time and added to it the concept of progress. Unilineal schemes of evolution also provided reassurance to the powerful middle-classes of Europe and America that their territorial conquests were for a larger, global purpose of human progress. 7/17/2016 Power, Privilege and Prejudice 8 Biological and ‘Racial’ Evolution Pseudo-sciences like craniometry attempted to translate cultural differences into biological differences. e.g. ‘The Mismeasure of Man’ by Stephen Gould. Nota bene: Morgan and other evolutionary thinkers such as Edward Tyler and McLennan clearly differentiated themselves from studies of ‘racial’ evolution: Morgan: assumed that humankind always, everywhere possessed the same mental faculties: Saw the arts of subsistence, property and technology as the driving forces of social evolution. 7/17/2016 Power, Privilege and Prejudice 9