Document 15980945

advertisement
GHRowell
1
Topic: Comparing Two Proportions
Today you will learn two-sample procedures that apply to comparing proportions rather than
comparing means.
Let X be a binomial random variable with parameters nx and px, and let Y be an independent
binomial random variable with parameters ny and py.
(a) Identify a reasonable point estimator of px- py.
(b) Show that this point estimator is unbiased.
(c) Derive an expression for the standard deviation of this point estimator.
(d) Suppose that px=py, and denote its common value by p. In this case what is the standard
deviation of your point estimator?
Inference procedures for comparing two proportions, based on this derivation, are:
H 0 : px  p y  0
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
H a : p x  p y  0 or
H a : p x  p y  0 or
H a : px  p y  0
Rejection region:
z   z or
z  z or
z  z 2
Test statistic:
z
pˆ x  pˆ y
P-value:
 1
1 
pˆ 1  pˆ   
n

 x ny 
PZ  z  or
PZ  z  or
Confidence interval:
 pˆ
Technical conditions:
x
 pˆ y   z 2
pˆ x 1  pˆ x  pˆ y 1  pˆ y 

nx
ny
2PZ  z 
independent random samples or randomization to treatment groups
n x pˆ x  5 , n x 1  pˆ x   5 , n y pˆ y  5 , n y 1  pˆ y   5
Minitab: Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Proportions
x y
nx  n y
because it is based on the null hypothesis that px=py, but the confidence interval expression
makes no such assumption and so uses the separate sample proportions for the two groups.
Note that the denominator of the test statistic using the overall sample proportion pˆ 
______________________________________________________________________________
 2002 Rossman-Chance project, supported by NSF
Used and modified with permission by Lunsford-Espy-Rowell project, supported by NSF
GHRowell
2
Activity: AZT and HIV
In an experiment reported in the March 7, 1994 issue of Newsweek, 164 pregnant, HIV-positive
women were randomly assigned to receive the drug AZT during pregnancy and 160 such women
were randomly assigned to a control group that received a placebo. The results of the
experiment were that 13 of the mothers in the AZT group had babies who tested HIV-positive,
compared to 40 HIV-positive babies in the placebo group.
(a) State the hypotheses for testing whether the experimental data provide evidence that the
proportion of HIV-positive babies among mothers receiving AZT is less than that among
mothers receiving a placebo.
(b) Determine the overall proportion of babies in the study who were born HIV-positive.
(c) Calculate the value of the test statistic.
(d) If AZT were no better than the placebo, what is the probability that the sample results would
have favored AZT by at least as much as these results did?
(e) Summarize and explain your conclusion for this study.
Activity: Perceptions of Self-Attractiveness
A survey conducted by the Gallup organization in 1999 asked American adults whether they are
satisfied with their physical attractiveness or wish they could be more attractive. 71% of the
women and 81% of the men said that they were satisfied with their appearance.
(a) What additional information is necessary to determine whether this difference in sample
proportions is statistically significant?
(b) Use Minitab (Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Proportions) to determine the
test statistic and p-value of the appropriate significance test for the different sample sizes
listed in the table below. Also record whether or not the difference in sample proportions is
statistically significant at the .10, .05, and .01 levels.
sample size
100
200
400
women
71
142
284
men
81
162
324
test stat
p-value
 = .10?
 = .05?
 = .01?
(c) Write a sentence or two commenting on the role of sample size in determining whether a
difference between two sample proportions is statistically significant.
______________________________________________________________________________
 2002 Rossman-Chance project, supported by NSF
Used and modified with permission by Lunsford-Espy-Rowell project, supported by NSF
Download