Motlow State Community College
Action Plan & Outcome Assessment Report for Institutional Effectiveness
Planning Year: July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2012
Assessing Year: July 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011
Unit: Languages
Related Strategic Goal:
3.1 Monitor and improve the effectiveness of educational programs and services.
Action Plan #: LANG-03
Action Plan Title: Internationalization of Languages Department Courses
Desired Outcome: It is expected that internationalization modules will be prepared for selected
languages courses in accordance with the college’s QEP schedule of courses to be internationalized and
the Language’s Department’s internationalization plan. It is also expected that students participating in
the internationalized courses will satisfactorily complete the objectives and intended international
student learning outcomes of the internationalized modules as specified by the applicable module
rubrics.
Description of Action Plan and Related Activities: The Business and Technology Department will
internationalize eight business and business-related courses in accordance with the following schedule.
Internationalization Plan
Course
ENGL 1010, Composition I
ENGL 1020, Composition II
ENGL 2130, Survey of American Literature
ENGL 2330, Survey of World Literature
ENGL 2230, Survey of British Literature
ENGL 2130, World Literature I
ENGL 2320, World Literature II
Preparation/Approval
Spring 2011
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Spring 2012
Spring 2012
Implementation
Fall 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Fall 2012
Fall 2012
The internationalization of the different courses will satisfy the college’s QEP and the need to more fully
globalize the department’s programs of study. The accomplishment or effectiveness of each
internationalized course will be evaluated and measured based on (1) the course modules being
prepared, approved and implemented in accordance with the internationalization plan, and (2) the
achievement of the objectives and intended international student learning outcomes of the approved
international modules.
Each international module will include three objectives and each objective will include at least two
student learning outcomes relating to a specifically identified and pertinent outcome category, as
provided below.
International Module Objectives and Outcomes
Objective
1. Students in internationalized classes will
develop greater knowledge of cultures
other than their own and the impact of
diverse cultural perspectives on world
events.
2. Students in internationalized classes will
acquire increased understanding of the
international aspects of the respective
subject area/course discipline.
Outcome Category
Knowledge
Student Learning Outcomes (SLO)
Two SLOs (1a. & 1b.) will be developed by
the module developer to evaluate student
knowledge acquired from the content of
the instructional module.
Comprehension
Two SLOs (2a. & 2b.) will be developed by
the module developer to evaluate student
comprehension of the material contained
in the instructional module.
3. Students in internationalized classes will
demonstrate an awareness and
understanding of the interdependency and
consequences of international events and
issues.
Application
Two SLOs (3a. & 3b.) will be developed by
the module developer to evaluate student
application of the material contained in the
instructional module.
In applying the objectives and the specific outcome categories, two student learning outcomes per
outcome category will be developed by the module developer to be used by the individual course
instructors to determine if the objectives and student learning outcomes are satisfactorily achieved. The
three main outcome categories will then subdivided into more specific categories as they relate to the
student learning outcomes—reference Evaluation Rubrics provided below. The module developer will
select at least one of the two student learning outcomes for each of the three outcome categories for
implementation in the identified courses, and as the basis for determining if the student learning
outcomes are being satisfied.
Evaluation Rubrics
Category
1a. Knowledge
1b. Recognition
2a. Understanding
2b. Comprehension
3a. Recognition
3b. Articulation/Use
of Facts
Evaluation Ratings
2
4
3
All topics are addressed
and all questions
answered with at least 2
sentences about each.
Information clearly
relates to the main topic.
It includes several
supporting details
and/or examples.
Shows a full
understanding of the
topic.
All topics are addressed
and most questions
answered with at least 2
sentences about each.
Information clearly
relates to the main topic.
It provides 1-2
supporting details
and/or examples.
Shows a good
understanding of the
topic.
All topics are addressed,
and most questions
answered with 1
sentence about each.
Information clearly
relates to the main topic.
No details and/or
examples are given.
1
One or more topics were
not addressed.
Shows a good
understanding of parts of
the topic.
Does not seem to
understand the topic
very well.
Student is able to
accurately answer
almost all questions
posed by classmates
about the topic.
Actively looks for and
suggests solutions to
problems.
Student is able to
accurately answer most
questions posed by
classmates about the
topic.
Refines solutions
suggested by others.
Student is unable to
accurately answer
questions posed by
classmates about the
topic.
Does not try to solve
problems or help others
solve problems. Lets
others do the work.
Every major point was
well supported with
several relevant facts,
statistics and/or
examples.
Every major point was
adequately supported
with relevant facts,
statistics and/or
examples.
Student is able to
accurately answer a few
questions posed by
classmates about the
topic.
Does not suggest or
refine solutions, but is
willing to try out
solutions suggested by
others.
Every major point was
supported with facts,
statistics and/or
examples, but the
relevance of some was
questionable.
Information has little or
nothing to do with the
main topic.
Every point was not
supported.
As each course, or courses, are prepared, approved and/or implemented according to the projected
plan, the course(s) and the applicable module rubrics will be included as part of this Institutional
Effectiveness Plan.
At the end of each semester, the language’s faculty will evaluate the plan to determine if the expected
outcomes were achieved for the indicated course(s). As appropriate and required, corrective actions
will be undertaken in those instances were either the modules were not prepared, approved and
implemented in accordance with the internationalized plans, or the objectives and intended
international student learning outcomes were not achieved in accordance with the rubrics developed
and approved for the international modules. Additionally, the faculty will also evaluate the overall
process to ensure that the internationalization module is complementing and promoting course
material/content pertaining to the expected program and student learning outcomes as outlined in the
Business and Technology Department Assessment and Improvement Plan.
Planned Courses/Instructional Modules
ENGL 2130
Spring 2012
Course
ENGL 2130
Strategic
Planning
Priorities
& Goals
Q3.1-Q3.2
General
Education
SLOs
(Rubrics)
GE1-GE6
InterNational
Education
SLOs
(Rubrics)
1a-3b
Method & Summary of Results:
Corrective Actions/Program Improvement Plan:
Module
Approved &
Implemented
on Time
Approved &
in the process
of being
implemented.
Expected
Outcomes
At least 70% or
more of the
students
participating in
the module
will achieve an
evaluation
rating of three
or higher on
each of the
selected SLOs.
Student Learning
Outcomes (SLO)
Of Selected Categories
(Rubrics)
Outcome
1a.
1b.
2a.
2b.
3a.
3b.
Achieved
Yes No
ENGL 2330
Spring 2012
Course
ENGL 2330
Strategic
Planning
Priorities
& Goals
Q3.1-Q3.2
General
Education
SLOs
(Rubrics)
GE1-GE6
InterNational
Education
SLOs
(Rubrics)
1a-3b
Module
Approved &
Implemented
on Time
Approved &
in the process
of being
implemented.
Expected
Outcomes
At least 70% or
more of the
students
participating in
the module
will achieve an
evaluation
rating of three
or higher on
each of the
selected SLOs.
Student Learning
Outcomes (SLO)
Of Selected Categories
(Rubrics)
Outcome
1a.
1b.
2a.
2b.
3a.
3b.
Achieved
Yes No
Method & Summary of Results:
Corrective Actions/Program Improvement Plan:
Implemented Courses/Instructional Modules
ENGL 1010
Fall 2011
Course
ENGL 1010
Strategic
Planning
Priorities
& Goals
Q3.1-Q3.2
General
Education
SLOs
(Rubrics)
GE1-GE6
International
Education
SLOs
(Rubrics)
1a-3b
Module
Approved &
Implemented
on Time
Yes
Expected
Outcomes
At least 70% or
more of the
students
participating in
the module
will achieve an
evaluation
rating of three
or higher on
each of the
selected SLOs.
Student Learning
Outcomes (SLO)
Of Selected Categories
(Rubrics)
Outcome
1a. 92%
1b. 91%
2a. 66%
2b. 71%
3a. 91%
3b. 92%
Achieved
Yes No
X
X
X
X
X
X
Method & Summary of Results:
As part of the approved instructional module, students submitted a written essay analyzing and comparing specific
aspects and issues associated with literature in different countries, with those of the United States. Students were then
evaluated on their submitted material in accordance with the Evaluation Rubrics. Of the selected categories, students
exceeded the expected outcome, with the exception of 2a, at 66%.
Corrective Actions/Program Improvement Plan:
The languages faculty reviewed the instructional module and agreed that emphasis could not be placed upon cultural
diversity as it shapes various academic disciplines and related occupations in a narrow, prescribed piece of literature. The
department has decided to omit the 2a SLO from future evaluation.
ENGL 1020
Fall 2011
Course
ENGL 1020
Strategic
Planning
Priorities
& Goals
Q3.1-Q3.2
General
Education
SLOs
(Rubrics)
GE1-GE6
InterNational
Education
SLOs
(Rubrics)
1a-3b
Module
Approved &
Implemented
on Time
Yes
Expected
Outcomes
At least 70% or
more of the
students
participating in
the module
will achieve an
evaluation
rating of three
or higher on
each of the
selected SLOs.
Student Learning
Outcomes (SLO)
Of Selected Categories
(Rubrics)
Outcome
1a. 94%
1b. 91%
2a. 89%
2b. 92%
3a. 92%
3b. 92%
Achieved
Yes No
X
X
X
X
X
X
Method & Summary of Results:
As part of the approved instructional module, students submitted a written essay analyzing and comparing specific
aspects and issues associated with literature in different countries, with those of the United States. Students were then
evaluated on their submitted material in accordance with the Evaluation Rubrics. Of the selected categories, students
exceeded the expected outcome.
Corrective Actions/Program Improvement Plan:
No corrective actions or program improvements are scheduled at this time.
Completion Date: Annual
Est. Cost: $50
Budgeted: Included in current budget
Evidence of Success: The international modules are developed and implemented in accordance with
the internationalization plan and the identified program and student learning outcomes. Achievement
of the international educational modules will be determined by successfully accomplishing the expected
outcomes for each course module.
Current Status: On Schedule
Describe Progress:
The first international modules have been developed and implemented during the fall 2011 semester.
Describe Needed Changes: Reference the Corrective Actions/Program Improvement Plan provided for
each of the aforementioned courses and international education modules.
List of Supporting Documentation:
Departmental meeting minutes
Date Last Updated: January 30, 2012