Expanding the Horizon of Learning: Critical Thinking in the Composition Classroom Dr. Joan Kennedy Definition of Critical Thinking It is the art of analyzing and evaluating thinking with a view of improving it Dr. Richard Paul defines it as “thinking about your thinking so you know what it is that you are thinking” emphasizing its self-reflective nature It is the cornerstone of teaching composition in a college classroom Goal: encourage students to become “citizens of the world” who engage in enlightened dialogue with others Critical Thinking Requirements Coordinating Board mandates it as an objective for all college courses Students must be guided through the process to attain higher order thinking skills Heuristic strategy for initial stages of developing critical thinking requires exploratory exercises, prewriting, collaborative activities to expand horizon of learning Students must explore the breadth of the issue Multiple-Step Heuristic To initiate critical thinking, students begin with exploratory steps of thinking and questioning to examine creatively the possibilities for topic development in essays While the creative stage is recursive, Aristotle identified invention as the first step in his Five Canons of Rhetoric My heuristic employs a multiple-step plan to explore a topic from a variety of perspectives Initial Step Social issues persuasive research essay assignment Use journal for exploratory thinking Offers low risk space for exploration Flexible tool for instructors to assign creative thinking activities Short, timed “off the top of their head” response— Looping Students discover what they know Mark Twain’s Imperative: “Sail away from the safe harbor. . . .Explore. Dream. Discover” Next Step In journal make list of 4-5 items that are of interest to student Example: dining at a restaurant; riding a bike; playing tennis; attending the movies Link items on list to plausible connections to the their topic Examples Student topic: legalization of marijuana Connect restaurant dining to question: “What are the effects of marijuana on the appetite?” Bike riding question: “Does routine exercise stimulate the effects of the drug?” Tennis playing question: “What types of rules concerning drug use exist for professional athletes?” Movie going question: “How is marijuana depicted in film?” Result Lures students into a new territory of ideas Allows personal perspective as guide for selecting potential areas of topic development—student “voice” emerges Can move topic from “boring to interesting” Viewpoint Wheel A visual diagram to explore broad spectrum of appeals Eighteen categories: history, music, law, literature, drama, film, social life, future, feminism, children, TV, people, newspapers, morality, agriculture, architecture, economics, health Viewpoint Wheel Viewpoint Wheel Students place subject in middle of wheel and move around circle asking questions Considering my subject from a historical perspective, what could I write about? Considering my subject from the perspective of the future, what could I write about? Considering my subject from the perspective of morality, what could I write about? Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy Students move into more focused, critical thinking territory Ask questions utilizing the six categories of the learning pyramid Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create Final Stage of Creative Thinking Document from National Collegiate Honors Council Conference in Washington DC Focuses on abstract concepts: Rights, Privileges, Responsibilities List of ten questions apply the concepts to specific situations Results of Creative Thinking Plethora of possibilities to pursue as students begin researching their topics It guides them into areas of discussion they may not have considered initially avoiding “tunnel vision” Students shift into a critical thinking mindset to sift through the material Provides a sound basis to begin critical thinking Gives students confidence that they have something significant to say Essential to expand students’ horizon of learning Works Cited Adelstein, Michael and Jean Pival. The Writing Commitment. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 5th ed, 1993. Print. Anderson, Lorin W. and David R. Krathwohl, ed. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 2001. Print. Bloom Benjamin S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman, 1956; 1984. Print. Bullock, Richard, Maureen Daly Goggin, and Francine Weinberg. The Norton Field Guide to Writing with Readings and Handbook. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2013. Print. Channell, Carolyn E. and Timothy W. Crusius. Engaging Questions: A Guide to Writing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012. Print. Kant, Immanuel. “What Is Enlightenment?” The Norton Anthology of World Literature. Ed. Martin Puchner et al. 3rd ed. Vol. D. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2012. 3 vol. 105-109. Print. Paul Richard and Linda Elder. The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking: Concepts and Tools. New York: Penguin Express, 2009. Print. Phillips, Harry and Patricia Bostian. The Purposeful Argument: A Practical Guide. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2012. Print. Works Cited Pohl, Michael. Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn: Models and Strategies to Develop A Classroom Culture of Thinking. Cheltenham, Vic.: Hawker Brownlow, 2000. Print. Stolarek, Elizabeth A. and Larry R. Juchartz. Classical Techniques and Contemporary Arguments. New York: Pearson/Longman, 2007. Print.