Application Workshop— Basic Skills and Student Outcomes Transformation Program Welcome! 1 Workshop Presentations • Presentations are being recorded • Wi-Fi • Slides are available at: http://extranet.cccco.edu/Divisions/InstitutionalEffectivene ss/BasicSkillsandStudentOutcomes.aspx or • cccco.edu – “Institutional Effectiveness” • “Application Workshop: Basic Skills” – “Presentation Materials” 2 • Paul D. Steenhausen – Executive Director, Success Center for CCC – Member of Executive Committee of Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative (IEPI), Co-Chair of IEPI Professional Development Workgroup • Theresa Tena – Vice Chancellor, Institutional Effectiveness Division, CCC Chancellor’s Office 3 Workshop Goals/Purpose • Provide information on and examples of evidence-based strategies that improve student success • Promote a lively and engaged environment for peer-to-peer collaboration • Leave today with potential or final set of strategies for inclusion in funding application 4 Workshop Goals/Purpose (Cont.) • Workshop is NOT intended to: – Walk through RFA instructions and requirements – Provide full range of variations for each strategy • Once grants are awarded, IEPI intends to assist colleges with plan implementation 5 Agenda • Opening Plenary – Overview of the day’s purpose and activities • Provide background on IEPI – Presentations on evidence-based strategies – Table discussions with your team • Breakout (Concurrent) Sessions – Find out more about the principles and practices • Plenary – Focus in on the strategies to include in your college’s funding application 6 About IEPI • Student Success Task Force Recommendation 7.1 and 7.2 identified need for stronger State Chancellor’s Office that: – Coordinates development of indicator and goalsetting framework for colleges – Identifies effective practices – Provides technical assistance and professional development to help colleges achieve success goals 7 IEPI is: • An initiative funded by the Legislature $2.5 million for Year One (2014-15) $17.5 million for Year Two (2015-16) $27.5 million anticipated for Year Three (2016-17) • Administered by the CCC Chancellor’s Office 8 The Desired IEPI Outcomes are to: • Help make the California Community Colleges the most effective system of higher education in the world • Eliminate accreditation sanctions and audit findings at colleges • Enhance access, success, and equity for our students 9 IEPI Structure • Executive Committee Chancellor’s Office College of the Canyons Chabot-Las Positas CCD Academic Senate for California Community Colleges Success Center Advisory Committee 66 members from 20 statewide organizations Workgroups provide input to Executive Committee on the initiative’s four major components 10 IEPI Major Components • Indicators / Goal Setting • Professional Development • Technical Assistance - Partnership Resource Teams • Policy, Practice and Procedures 11 Professional Development • Regional workshops and other face-to-face events • Online clearinghouse of effective practices, trainings, and other resources 12 Professional Development Events • To date, more than 2,000 attendees have participated in IEPI-sponsored workshops • The IEPI Approach to Workshops Held at colleges whenever possible Sessions are interactive Teams from each institution attend Product is a list of specific steps going forward Follow Up 13 Professional Development Events (Cont.) • Student Support (Re)defined Workshops March 18, 2016: City College of San Francisco • Inmate Education • Integrated Planning February 26, 2016: College of the Canyons • Diversity in Hiring • Audit and Fiscal Issues • Basic Skills Transformation – Today! March 2, 2016: Riverside 14 Professional Development Online Clearinghouse • Online Clearinghouse (Prof. Learning Network) Pulls together hundreds of resources by topic (e.g., basic skills, SLO assessment, integrated planning, etc.), highlighting exemplary practices Will include system-wide calendar and other features Official launch in Spring 2016 • The Professional Learning Network: pln.cccco.edu 15 Partnership Resource Teams • Expertise is matched to Areas of Focus from pool of more than 230 experts • Each team commits to 3 visits or more as needed • The visits are designed to: 1. Understand issues and identify scope of support 2. Develop ideas for institution’s Innovation and Effectiveness Plan to address Areas of Focus 3. Provide follow up support as needed 16 Partnership Resource Teams • Team visits started in May and June 2015. • 31 institutions selected to date to receive technical assistance by PRTs Spring 2015 cohort 8 institutions; Fall 2015 cohort 15 colleges, 1 center, and 1 district; 10 institutions designated for Spring 2016 • Institution CEO completes short letter of interest • Grants of up to $150,000 as seed money to expedite implementation of institution’s Innovation and Effectiveness Plan (available until funds run out) 17 Examples of Areas of Focus Identified by Institutions • Integrated planning at all levels. • Using student success and achievement data for improving decision-making and institutional effectiveness. • Selecting and effective deployment of Learning Management Systems. 18 Call to Action ! Volunteer to Join the PRT pool Participate in Professional Development Activity IEPI Communication • Current non-faculty survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/IEPI-PRTExpertiseInventory2015-2 • Current faculty survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/Faculty_PRT_team_survey 19 Basic Skill Education— A Key to Advancing Equity and Social Mobility in California The Challenge and Opportunities 20 Three-quarters of firsttime students fall into this category (unprepared) ….Yet, research has shown that commonly used assessment instruments misplace many “unprepared” students. 23 Notable Publications on Basic Skills http://www.jff.org/publications/coreprinciples-transforming-remedial-educationjoint-statement http://extranet.cccco.edu/Portals/1/AA/BasicSkills/2013Files/B SI_E-Resource_10-18-13.pdf http://rpgroup.org/publications/StudentSuccessBook.htm 24 Multi-Term Remedial Sequences Erode Student Completion Rates 25 ….Yet, colleges have successfully reorganized instruction and curriculum to shorten—if not eliminate—basic skills course sequences for students. 26 Changing Practices and Policies Teaching that relies heavily on using abstract concepts Teaching in way that references students’ interests and career aspirations Instruction and student support services siloed Instruction and support services integrated, mutually reinforcing Limited collaboration between K-12 and CCC Policies and efforts that reflect belief in co-responsibility for student success 27 45.0% Basic Skills Success Rates Trending Upward…But Slowly 42.8% 40.0% 41.7% 43.5% 43.4% 41.9% 35.0% English Math 30.0% 30.7% 31.0% 30.0% 28.4% 28.9% 28.4% 27.1% 26.3% 25.0% 25.4% 24.4% 20.0% 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 ESL Building on Work to Date • Need to address and connect multiple components impacting student success • and SCALE “what works” 29 Basic Skills Transformation Grants • $60 million in one-time grants to colleges • In funding application, must propose to adopt or expand two or more “evidence-based” (high impact) practices and principles • Goal: Increase number, percentage, and speed of students (1) completing college-level math and English and (2) continuing on to graduate from community college 30 Evidence-Based Principles and Practices in Basic Skills Transformation Grant • Strategy 1: Assessment reform • Strategy 2: Direct placement into college-level math and English—with appropriate supports • Strategy 3: Align content in basic skills courses with students’ intended program of study • Strategy 4: Teaching basic skills in context of a career or industry 31 Evidence-Based Principles and Practices in Basic Skills Transformation Grant (Cont.) • Strategy 5: Integrate instruction with student support services 32 Evidence-Based Principles and Practices in Basic Skills Transformation Grant (Cont.) • Colleges also may: – Use technology to enhance adoption of Strategies 1 through 5 – Implement “other” basic skills strategies that college shows (using evidence) is effective 33 Presentations • Practitioners and other CCC experts representing evidence-based and nationally recognized programs and practices – Where relevant, will discuss role technology plays in supporting program • Focus on design principles behind the practice—what makes these approaches “high impact” 34