The PRS: Evolution in London and international perspective LB Lewisham Housing Select Committee

advertisement

The PRS:

Evolution in London and international perspective

Kath Scanlon

London School of Economics

LB Lewisham Housing Select Committee affordability review

1 December 2015

Some recent headlines

Councils urged to build homes for private rent

Local councils should set targets for building homes for the private rented sector, says new report (Telegraph 24/2)

A better private rented sector can weed out rogue landlords for good It's the fastest growing area of the market, but rented homes are dominated by amateur landlords. It's time for that to change (Guardian 26/2)

We need rent controls to solve London's housing crisis

Too many essential workers are being priced out of the capital. Rent controls could address the uncertainty and unaffordability they face (New Statesman

27/2)

Historic PRS provision in

London: Du Cane Court

Dolphin Square

What happened?

• Post-deregulation (starting in the 1950s) companies wanted to sell – and did over the next twenty years

• Owner-occupation grew rapidly with welldeveloped leasehold arrangements and the possibility of buying long leases

• Tax benefits and other incentives meant private sector building was almost always for owner-occupation

• New rented housing provided in the social sector

Decline and revival

• PRS declined to 11% of total stock in England by the mid-1980s

• Deregulation of rents in 1988 led to slow increase in supply

• Owner-occupation for young people badly hit in early 1990s

• Buy-to-Let mortgages introduced in late

1990s – PRS started to increase quite quickly

• Affordability crisis in early 2000s added to pressure on PRS

The financial crisis and its aftermath

• Credit and housing markets dried up

• Sellers could not sell; purchasers could not buy – so PRS grew rapidly

• New construction fell by more than half; while

• Immigration and natural growth increased the population of London very rapidly

• Crisis of supply with all net growth concentrated in PRS and among individual amateur/part-time landlords

• Policy makers looked for more housing overall and new build in PRS in particular

Figure 1: Housing tenure, London

International perspective:

Size of PRS

Country %

Germany

USA

Australia

France

Belgium

Norway

Sweden

England

Netherlands

Spain

59

32

25

22

18.5

17

17

17

10

7

In most countries tenants are

• Young or old

• Low-income

• Singles or single parents

• Mobile

– Young professionals

– Students

– High-income corporate transfers

• Those who can’t afford owner-occupation

– Housing benefit recipients

– Migrants

– Those who can’t afford mortgage deposits

Who doesn’t live in the PRS?

• Middle- and upper-income families almost always own their homes

• Very few of the elderly rent privately in the UK (not the case in some other countries)

Rent regulation

Country Rent regulation on first on new of rent renting tenant rises on existing leases

Landlord can pass on cost increases

Tenant has first refusal on sale of unit

Australia

Belgium

Finland

France

Norway

Spain

Sweden

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

Germany Sometimes Sometimes

Netherlands

Switzerland

USA*

Y Y

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

Y

Some

Y

N

N

N

Y

New owner bound by tenancy.

New owner bound by tenancy.

N

N

N

Y

Y

Y

N

N

N

N

Rents based on rents for similar units owned by municipal housing companies.

Y

N

Y

N

Y

N

Y

N

N

N

UK N** N N Y

*

Rent controls apply in some cities (e.g. New York City)

**Rent caps apply for beneficiaries of Local Housing Allowance

N

Country

Germany

Sweden

Switzerland

Netherlands

Spain

Norway

France

Belgium

Finland

USA

UK

Australia

Leases

Typical lease period

Indefinite

Indefinite

Indefinite

Indefinite

5 years

3 years or indefinite

3 years

1-3 years

One year

1 year

1 year

6 months

Security beyond lease period

High

High

High

High

Low

Low

Medium

Low

Medium

Low

Low

Low

The German example

Terms and conditions of renting

• Tenants get indefinite leases

• Landlords can evict only for reasons set out in the law; notice period 3 – 9 months depending on how long tenancy has lasted

• If the landlord sells, the lease binds the new owner

• Initial rent can be freely set, but not more than

20-50% above average rents in the local area— but new restrictions in Berlin, Munich …

• Rent can go up every 15 months by average in the area

Some typical

new

rents

Munich

Frankfurt

City

Hamburg

Stuttgart

Cologne

Dusseldorf

Berlin

Monthly rent for 769 ft 2 flat

£711

£602

£553

£537

£490

£463

£429

The German example

The rental offer

• Most PRS units are in rental-only blocks in single ownership

• Tenants stay for long time (average 11 years)

• Landlords invest into the longer term

• Landlords provide minimal facilities beyond the dwelling itself: usually no furniture or kitchens

The German example

Economic environment

• Over most of last thirty years real house prices fell in most areas

• General inflation also very low so costs fairly predictable, though some problems as standards have risen eg re energy efficiency

• Some areas where pressures on rental market and difficulties in finding accommodation - extending to more cities since 2008

• Owner-occupation and house prices in these areas now rising quite rapidly

Conclusions

• PRS has grown quickly in London since early

1990s, mostly through transfer of existing homes rather than new build

• 1988 deregulation of rents and leases contributed. English rental market much less regulated than in most European countries

• PRS rents higher in London than almost anywhere else—as are house prices

• Effects of policies like rent control depend on legal, cultural and economic frameworks.

What works well elsewhere might work very differently here.

Download