Toilet Training Children with Moderate-Severe Disability Lisa Samson-Fang MD University of Utah and Salt Lake City School District Objectives Background/ literature Practical programming Supportive equipment Adolescent issues Can This Child Be Toilet Trained? Case I • 5 year old • autism • no functional verbalizations • assistance for ADLs. finger feeds. • Social quotient (Vineland Social Matuirty Scale) 0.36. Case II 7 year old total body involved CP cognitive impairments Communication: differential cries and eye gaze. Is this an important goal? Impacts on – independence – caregivers Impacts In the institutional setting. • Incontinence reduced • Decreased linen usage • Work load minimally decreased. Therapeutic vs. Custodial role • Positive impacts in other areas of self care Not studied in the home or school setting. Important? Removes negative impacts on social interactions Increased freedom in more environments Privacy Who’s Job Is It?? The child with disability Not just an adaptation of the process used for “the typical toddler” Cognitive Impairments Understanding goal Attention Initiation Impulse control Generalization Birth Cohort Follow-up Wendt et al. Information available on 105 of 132 individuals with mental retardation. Bowel continence. – 70% by age 7 and 80% by age 20. Bladder continence. – 63% by age seven, 83% by age 20. Autism Social motivation Language Sequencing/attendi ng Routine changes – The diaper is a routine Sensory – Sensation – function – Sensory overload – Enjoyment of Survey of Parents Dalrymple et al. Overall results Training required urine 1.6 yrs bowel 2.1 years Start at 4-5 years 95% successfully trained 78% self initiated Common issues Regression Night incontinence Constipation Behavioral concerns Cerebral Palsy Motor Issues – Mobility – Safety – Upper extremity function Medical issues – Chronic constipation – Neurogenic bladder Preschool children with Shaw CP Population n = 27 2.5 - 4 years old Results 6 dry at entry 7 immediately dry 12 achieved 2 wet Factors in success Higher expectations Routine Shared aim w/ peers More appropriate toilets Access to PT/OT advice CP: Neurogenic Bladder McNeal et.al. 30% prevalence of symptoms Enuresis Stress incontinence Urgency Frequency Dribbling Difficulty urinating History of a UTI. Urologic Findings Decter et al. Referred population for symptoms Significant findings - 86% – – – – – Uninhibited contractions Detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia Small capacity bladder Bladder hypertonia Periodic relaxation of the external sphincter Improved w/ treatment - 78% Constipation Bowel training – difficult – unpleasant. Affects bladder – Lower volume – Uninhibited contractions Optimize treatment Monitor for recurrence Multi-modal Treatment Nickel and Desch Positioning and seating Behavioral issues Dietary changes Cleanout procedure Maintenance medications Emptying program Note: The behavioral protocols discussed are not intended for the achievement of continence in individuals who lack bowel and bladder control (e.g., individuals with spinal cord lesions). The Literature Populations: – Cognitive disability, autism, physical disability Settings: – Institutional, school, home Designs: – Case studies/ small cohorts The Literature Methods: – Timed and Regular – Group vs. Individual Goal: – Trained vs. Conditioned – Degree of independence – Attainment of “sub-skills” – Generalize to other situations Most Replicated Azrin and Foxx Induce frequency Timed toilet sitting Positive reinforcement Dry pants checks Minimal assistance/prompt for dressing/ faded Modeling Pants and potty alarm devices Verbal reprimandcleanliness training Comparing Methods Smith Individualized regular potting – Monitor child’s rhythms – Toilet when high probability – Stimulus to void is full bladder Arbitrary timed potting: – Set schedule – Stimulus to void is toileting routine Comparing Methods Method Nursing Hours (5 Children, 12 weeks) Intensive Regular Potting Group Regular Potting Timed Potting 2330 1260 2079 Preschool Setting Richmond Frequent potting (q15minutes faded to q 2 hours over 1 month) Praise, liquid rewards Brief reprimand and simple correction Self initiation not a goal 4 children 4.5 hours / day No equipment Otherwise no change in classroom routine Weekly Accident Rates Child’s Chronologic and Developmental Age School Accident (per wk) Baseline Post q2hrs CA36m, DA12m 6 2 CA46m, DA13m 6 1.4 CA 36m, DA12m 5.3 0.9 CA=32m DA= 8 m 7.3 0.6 Is continuity important Dunlap et.al. 3 children with Autism (5-7 yrs) 1 new to toileting, 2 w/ 2 years of no success Baseline training program in 1 environment vs. training in ALL environments. Results Alarms