Colorado Department of Education EDAC Committee November 6th 2015 9:30 AM – 4:00 PM Colorado Talking Book Library 180 Sheridan Blvd Denver, CO 80226 EDAC Meeting called by: Educational Data Advisory Committee Type of meeting: Scheduled Data Review Meeting Facilitator: Jan Rose Petro Note taker: Dennis St. Hilaire Timekeeper: Dennis St. Hilaire Attendees: Wendy Wyman David Schneiderman Lynn Bamberry Marcia Bohannon Natalie Morin Rick Tanski Jan Petro Nikki Johnson Lisa Humberd Janet Dinnen Agenda topics General Business Minutes Approved Data Pipeline Advisory Committee Syncplicity Introduction - EDAC will use this to securely communicate collection documentation. Jill Stacey – Summary of CDE Privacy Consolidated Application Discussion Educator Effectiveness – Toby King discussed some changes to Educator Effectiveness and discussed adding a new collection that would reduce reporting requirements. Update Approval ESL-405A CO Services for Children and Youth with Combined Vision and Hearing Loss – Approved DPSE-001 Expelled and At-risk Student Services (EARSS) Grant Mid-year Survey – Small edits were requested and EDAC recommended changing collection from Voluntary to Required to Obtain Benefit. – Approved DMC-112 Colorado ACCESS for ELLs 2.0 SBD – EDAC asked if blanks are allowed. There seems to be some contradiction on the file layout concerning blanks. EDAC was curious on why the file goes from 0/1 to Y/N in file layout. (reason vendor requirements) – Approved State Board Rules Proposed Revision of the Colorado Educator Licensing Act of 1991 1 CCR 301-37 – No recommendations to the Board of Education. Discussions Grant Distribution – Lynn Bamberry discussed how many grants were given out and percentage of district approved for funds and amount of funds given. There was a focus on rural districts in how funds were distributed. Kindergarten Readiness Assessment – Melissa Colsman asked a question for districts on submitting aggregate or student level data for kindergarten readiness assessments. 30 Minutes ESL-401 ESCAPE Eliminate Student cost of Advance Placement Exams Kim Burnham Overview: ESCAPE provides the Colorado Department of Education with funds to pay Advanced Placement (AP) fees and reimburse International Baccalaureate (IB) fees for low income students. To benefit from the program, high school AP and IB coordinators must submit the application to participate form and assurance pages according to due dates in the packet. Additionally, for AP exams the eligible student’s answer sheet must have the fee reduction bubble filled in appropriately. Discussion: Jan has small edits. Conclusion: Approved 30 Minutes CGA-207 School Turnaround Leaders Development Program Grant Kim Burnham Overview: Leadership is a critical factor in creating a welcoming, equitable, and productive school environment in which students learn and consistently demonstrate strong academic achievement and growth and in which teachers are empowered to learn and grow professionally and collaboratively. In low-performing schools, leadership is acutely important and must extend in a coherent fashion to teacher leaders as well as to district and charter leaders in order to create a system of support that is responsive to student needs. Given the current levels of performance in many of Colorado’s public schools, there is a tremendous opportunity for Colorado to recruit, develop, and facilitate new and existing leadership development programs that are specifically focused on developing leaders to serve students in lowperforming schools. 2014-2015 was the first year of our School Turnaround Leaders Development Grant Program that identified high-quality program providers that focus on developing leaders to serve lowperforming schools. Nine Colorado school districts and charter schools received over $1.6 million to participate in four turnaround leadership programs, resulting in over 80 eligible aspiring and current leaders attending these programs. Discussion: EDAC has a few recommendations, by clarifying that districts and CSI can both apply on behalf of eligible schools. There were some small wording edits for clarification. Conclusion: Approved 30 Minutes CGA-206 Pathways in Technology Early College High Schools (P-Tech) Kim Burnham Overview: In 2015, Governor Hickenlooper signed the Pathways in Technology Early College High Schools (P-TECH) bill into law (HB 15-1270). P-TECH is intended to create a public-private partnership to prepare thousands of Colorado students for high-skill jobs of the future. To implement this program, the Colorado Department of Higher Education (CDHE) and Colorado Department of Education (CDE) seek proposals from partnerships of school districts, charters or Boards of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES), postsecondary education institutions, and dedicated high-growth industry employer(s) partners for the development and operation of six-year high school focused on career and technical education programming that spans grades 9-14. Discussion: EDAC had some concern with hiring part of the survey and the requirements for hiring. Conclusion: Approved 30 Minutes CGA-205 Right 4 Rural Grant Program Kim Burnham Overview: Right 4 Rural is made available through a federally funded Jacob K. Javits state grant for leadership and instructional practices in gifted programs, specifically for implementing identification and programming in underrepresented populations. Right 4 Rural provides resources to scale up existing state initiatives and guidance for local program plans, identification, and programming. Products developed during the grant period will be shared across the state and nation. Discussion: Charter School Institute asked for a list of eligible schools or districts? There was a question on if follow-up surveys come back through EDAC from RFP’s? Answer, yes once it is completed. There was a question about grant progress data and if that progress data could be considered PII. EDAC would like it defined. Conclusions: Approved 30 Minutes CGA-204 ESEA In-person Training Topics and Locations Survey Kim Burnham Overview: The survey will attempt to ensure that the training and networking opportunities offered by the Unit of Federal Program Administration meet the needs of Colorado school administrators. Discussion: EDAC asked it this survey has something about professional development. EDAC asked to clarify how much time this takes to fill out and if the survey is anonymous. Would like webinar. Conclusions: Approved 30 Minutes CGA-203 Customer Support Survey – Office of Learning Supports Kim Burnham Overview: The OLS Customer Survey is designed to collect specific information about needed professional development and technical assistance requested by LEA/AU personnel. Survey responses will inform the activities for the next application of the State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) issued by the US DoE, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Discussion: EDAC asked to add a close date. Conclusions: Approved 30 Minutes DMC-123 LEA Data Pipeline Improvement Survey Kevin Smith Overview: This collection has been designed to improve the collections and processes associated with CDE’s data collection system, Data Pipeline, by obtaining feedback from local education agency data respondents. Discussion: Collection took about 20 minutes. It was asked of EDAC, what would be the best timing in the year to take this survey? Some suggestions were to make sure that it could be submitted once. EDAC asked about the organization of questions and gave the recommendation to keep the collection open for 6 months. Conclusions: Approved 30 Minutes NU-136 CDE OSN Smarter Lunchrooms Survey Heather Schoen Hauswirth Overview: The purpose of this survey is to determine the Smarter Lunchrooms training and technical assistance (TA) needs of Colorado’s School Food Authorities (SDAs). Discussion: More instructions and make SFA questions optional. Small edits. Conclusions: Approved 30 Minutes NU-137 Free and Reduced Price Program Survey Julie Griffith Overview: A brief survey will be distributed to collect information from local school district staff regarding feedback on current training practices, training preferences and training logistics. Discussion: EDAC asked if submitting was anonymous and the time it took to complete the survey. There was a recommendation to add a drop down for district name and change the format for question 8. Conclusions: Approved 30 Minutes DMC-104 Report Card March Dennis St. Hilaire Overview: The Report Card March collection is used to populate SchoolView with general descriptions of school offerings, programs, health, and courses. Discussion: EDAC spotted a duplicate question and asked for its removal. Conclusions: Approved 30 Minutes Gifted Education Comprehensive Program Plan Jacquelin Medina Overview: The comprehensive program plan is submitted to CDE every 4-5 years. This submission is for the 2016-2020 program plan cycle. The comprehensive program plan submission is a requirement under the Education of Exceptional Children’s Act: 22-20-204. The Program Plan must include, but is not limited to the following elements: definition, communication, identification, programming, personnel, accountability, reporting, record keeping, and resolution of disagreements. Program plans must also include procedures to identify gifted students; programming options that will be implemented; and, actions and tools for accountability of the academic achievement of gifted aligned with state accountability and evaluation of the gifted program. Early Access provisions are also included in a comprehensive program plan, if the AU determines to utilize and early access addendum. Discussion: This collection is used every 4 to 5 years. There were education groups that reviewed this plan that work with the Gifted unit. Changes with the plan are that is will now be web based, where as in the past it was paper based. The completion of this plan will be the roadmap for gifted program going forward. The gifted unit will use this to have transparency so the AUs can comply. Some small edits were recommended. Conclusions: Approved