iCMAs for Computing
Courses
Michael Isherwood
Associate Teaching Fellow, COLMSCT
Centre for Open Learning of Mathematics, Science, Computing and Technology (COLMSCT)
Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning
The Open University is incorporated by Royal Charter (RC 000391), an exempt charity in England & Wales and a charity registered in Scotland (SC 038302).
Presentation Summary
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Project Aims
Background
The Quizzes (including demonstration)
Initial Analyses
Student Views
Developing Questions and Quizzes
A Way Forward
A Vision
Project Aims - summary
• Support students in their understanding of new and
difficult parts of M150 (in effect, Block 2)
• Confirm understanding prior to tma feedback
• Investigate extension to other computing courses
• Through better understanding, aid retention
Background
• Students find getting to grips with programming difficult
• This leads to frustration and dropping out of M150 (and
therefore further computing courses)
Background – 2006J TMAs
Background - TMA02/03 Marks
On-Line Quizzes
• 6 Quizzes on 2008J and 2009B presentations
–
–
–
–
–
–
Structured English
Conditions, truth and trace tables
Basic JavaScript
Selection - the if statement
Repetition - the while statement
Repetition - the for statement
• Question Types
– Selecting tick boxes, radio buttons
– Free text and expression entry
– Entering values
– Drag and drop
if constructs – Q1
• 67% correct at 1st try
• further 21% at 2nd attempt
• 3% correct at 3rd attempt
• 10% remained wrong
Most errors were
• < > instead of !=
• = rather than ==
feedback for this Q is to indicate wrong answers. As always, correct
answer is shown at the end
if constructs – Q2
• 83% correct at 1st attempt
• Only 4% wrong after 3rd
attempt
Note Feedback after
1st attempt
After 2nd attempt the
correct answers
remain, so student
concentrates on
incorrect answer(s)
if construct – Q2 cont
if constructs – Q3
•75% of responses correct
at 1st attempt
• 3% wrong after 3rd
attempt.
The majority of the
errors were at the
boundary, as here,
though several
students reversed
After a 2nd attempt, the correct answers were retained, as shown, for
the final attempt.
if constructs – Q6
On 1st attempt the number of wrong answers is given along with a
reminder of the OR (||) operator's effect. The 2nd attempt has feedback as
above and the 3rd attempt starts with all the correct responses retained.
Conclusions on Questions
• Most students complete quizzes in 10 – 15 minutes
• Most/many students get questions right first time and
few fail to be correct after third attempt – there are
exceptions
• Most students find the quizzes valuable and the
feedback helpful
• Only one question “didn’t work” on 1st pilot - discarded
• Variants of a question generally seemed equivalent
iCMAs on Courses
• Philosophy is generally to use formatively
• However Students need “encouragement”
– hence must form part of assessment
• M150 has 10-20% attempting as not part of assessment
• S104 has similar number as attempt tma (effectively 100 in
my TG)
• Students take seriously if part of assessment
• Courses using iCMAs (some in pilot form) include
MU120, M150, MST121, M256, S104, S342
Building a Quiz for Assessment
•
•
•
•
Scope of Quiz
Each Question needs 5 variants – must be equivalent
3 attempts allowed for each question
Each Question requires feedback after each attempt
– feedback targeted to answer given
• therefore must anticipate wrong answers
• free text (or symbol) entry much harder to anticipate
• Correct answers may not be apparent, particularly with
free text entry
Validating Questions
• Initial testing by Setter
• Further testing by Others
• Reviewing Student Responses
– for variant equivalence
– for errors – then zero rated
Learning from Questions
• What is understood
• What is misunderstood
• How course material might be amended
Moodle and/or OpenMark
• OpenMark questions very versatile
• It is intended to run OpenMark questions through
Moodle – work is proceding
• OpenMark feedback highly tailored
• Openmark requires specialist programming
• Moodle has question types
• Moodle feedback is available, though fairly rigid
• Moodle questions can be set up by anyone who is
reasonably logical – but there is a learning curve
• Within Moodle a mixture of OpenMark and Moodle
questions should soon be possible
A Way Forward (i)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Identify Question Setter(s) for each iCMA
Appoint Coordinator / iCMA expert
Workshop(s) on Question and Feedback setting
Set Questions with Feedback
Review Questions
Program Qs (OpenMark and Moodle Qs separately)
Test Quiz
} iterative
Make Corrections
}
Review Quiz
} iterative
Further changes }
A Way Forward (ii)
• Coordinator could run workshops
• Reviewers may be others associated with Block
• Coordinator reviewing could facilitate uniformity of
approach
• Perhaps Coordinator could interface with developers
• OpenMark Developer would be needed
• Moodle Developer probably desirable (could be
Coordinator)
A Vision for Student
Studies
Does
Next
Section
Quiz
Section
“Pod” +
Ppt (IC)
Tutor Advice
Special
Session
0
