PAGE 1 OF 2
Final Portfolio Review Panel Report
The final evaluation of this portfolio is based on its overall quality. The portfolio is
considered to be more than the sum of its parts. Each ILP Review Panel will base
assessments on Valencia College Portfolio Evaluation Rubric.
Complete the gray form fields below. Advance by using the “tab” key.
 A final Portfolio will be considered unacceptable only if a majority of the ILP Review
Panel members considers the Portfolio as a whole to be unacceptable. A Portfolio that is
considered acceptable by two out of the four panel members will be considered
acceptable.
 If one element is not at the acceptable level, the overall review of the Portfolio is not
necessarily unacceptable.
Faculty Candidate’s Name
Meeting Date
(if applicable)
Dean’s Name
Date Report
Reviewed
Panelist Name
Date Report
Reviewed
Panelist Name
Date Report
Reviewed
Panelist Name
Date Report
Reviewed
Date Report Sent to Candidate, Tenure Review Committee, and TLA
EACH OF THE FOLLOWING MAJOR REQUIRED ELEMENTS OF A VALENCIA FACULTY PORTFOLIO MUST BE
PRESENT.
CHECK
OFF
THOSE
PRESENT
MUST BE PRESENT IN EACH ELEMENT
PORTFOLIO ELEMENTS
Educational and
Professional Background
Vitae/Resume
Philosophy
Individualized Learning
Plan (ILP)
Faculty Learning Outcomes (FLOs)
Year-1 and Year-2 Review Panel Reports
Adequate Preparation
Supporting
Documentation for each
Faculty Learning
Outcome
Appropriate Method
Significant Results
Reflective Critique of the FLO
Reflective Critique of each Essential Competency that is demonstrated In the FLO
Each Essential Competency must be demonstrated once throughout the Portfolio.
COMPETENCIES
Check those
that have been
deomonstrated.
Revised 7.2.13
Assessment
Inclusion and
Diversity
L-C Teaching
Strategies
LIfeMap
Outcomes-based
Practice
Professional
Commitment
SoTL
PAGE 2 OF 2
Final Portfolio Review Panel Report
FINAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PORTFOLIO
 ONE
ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL
Acceptable
CRITERIA STATEMENTS
All Required Elements of a Valencia Faculty Portfolio demonstrated
Valencia Standards of Scholarship generally satisfied to the acceptable level according to the Portfolio
Evaluation Rubric
Not all Required Elements of a Valencia Faculty Portfolio demonstrated
Incomplete /
Not Yet Acceptable
Valencia Standards of Scholarship generally not satisfied to the acceptable level according to the Portfolio
Evaluation Rubric
IN THE SPACE BELOW, WRITE ANY OVERALL REMARKS AND/OR COMMENTS EXPRESSING EXEMPLARY
PERFORMANCE OR SUBSTANTIAL CONCERNS
Revised 7.2.13