Max Tegmark

advertisement
SDSS slideshow
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
COSMOLOGY BASICS
Max Tegmark, MIT
Midsummer holiday, Leksand, Sweden
Max Tegmark
Where I was born and raised
University of Pennsylvania
Who are you?
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
The cosmic plan:
L1: • Overview of cosmology theory & observation
- 0th order: cosmic expansion history
Sarah Church
- 1st order: cosmic clustering history
- Observational tools: supernovae, CMB, galaxy clustering,
. clusters, lensing, Ly forest, etc
L2: - Cosmological parameters
Sean Carroll,
Phil Marshall
• Revolutions on the horizon:
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
- Nature of dark energy
How will the Universe end? Will it?
Neal Weiner
- Nature of dark matter
What is the Universe made of?
- Nature of our early universe
Sean Carroll
How did the Universe begin? Did it?
- String theory? Multiverse?
- 21 cm tomography
Galaxy surveys
Microwave
background
Supernovae Ia
THE COSMIC
SMÖRGÅSBORD
Gravitational
lensing
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Big Bang
nucleosynthesis
Galaxy clusters
Lyman  forest
Neutral hydrogen
tomography
What have
we learned?
OUR PLACE IN
SPACE
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
DSE
SDSS movie
OUR PLACE IN
TIME
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
The sky as a time machine
Dark matter creation?
Antimatter annihilation
Creation of atomic nuclei
Brief History of
our Universe
Dark energy evidence
400
(Graphics from Gary Hinshaw/WMAP team)
Formation movies
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Fluctuation generator
To 0th order:
Fluctuation amplifier
386
400
(Graphics from Gary Hinshaw/WMAP team)
Fluctuation generator
To 1st order:
Fluctuation amplifier
386
400
(Graphics from Gary Hinshaw/WMAP team)
(Figure courtesy of COBE team)
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
0th order: a(t)
1st order: g(z,k)
400
Higher order:
gastrophysics
13.7
0th order:
Measuring
Expansion:
a(t)
<=> H(z)
(More on this in the lectures of Sean Carroll & Phil Marshall)
Figure from WMAP team
Distant light is
-dimmed
-redshifted
Redshift
Distant light is
-dimmed
-redshifted
Dimming
Redshift
Distant light is
-dimmed
-redshifted
Dimming
Standard candles,
rulers or clocks
Standardizable candles
(From Saul Perlmutter’s web site)
QuickTime™ and a
YUV420 codec decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Using CMB blobs as a standardizable ruler:
Open
universe
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Guth & Kaiser 2005 (Science) + WMAP3
Inflation
with 
Inflation
without 
Cosmic strings
Using galaxy correlations as a standardizable ruler:
(Eisenstein, Hu & MT 1998; Eisenstein et al 2005; Cole et al 2005)
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Easiest to understand in real space
(Bashinsky & Bertschinger, PRL, 87, 1301, 2001; PRD 123008, 2002)
(Eisenstein et al 2005, for the SDSS collaboration astro-ph/050112)
We’ve measured distance
to z=0.35 to 5% accuracy
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Updates in Reid et al 0907.1659, Percival et al 0907.1660,
Kazin et al 2009 in prep
George Gamow 1904-1968
Big Bang nucleosynthesis as a standardizable clock:
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Kirkman et al 2003, astro-ph/0302006
George Gamow 1904-1968
Big Bang nucleosynthesis as a standardizable clock:
H = dlna/dt,
H2  
Assumes k=0
SN Ia+CMB+LSS constraints
Yun Wang & MT 2004, PRL 92, 241302
a = 1/(1+z)
Inflationary gravitational waves as a standardizable clock:
Qt ~ H/mplanck
What we’ve learned about H(z) from
SN Ia, CMB, BAO, BBN, etc:
Assumes k=0
SN Ia+CMB+LSS constraints
Yun Wang & MT 2004, PRL 92, 241302
Vanilla rules OK!
What we’ve learned about H(z) from SN Ia
Riess et al, astro-ph/0611572
• curvature:
consistent with vanilla (k = 0)
• topology:
consistent with vanilla
1st order:
measuring
clustering
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Foreground-cleaned WMAP map from Tegmark, de Oliveira-Costa & Hamilton, astro-ph/0302496
CMB
z = 1000
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Mathis, Lemson, Springel, Kauffmann, White & Dekel 2001
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
z = 2.4
Mathis, Lemson, Springel, Kauffmann, White & Dekel 2001
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
z = 0.8
Mathis, Lemson, Springel, Kauffmann, White & Dekel 2001
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
z=0
CMB
Clusters
LSS
Lensing
Ly
Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Galaxy power spectrum measurements 1999
(Based on compilation by Michael Vogeley)
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
LSS
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Clusters
LSS
Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
CMB
Clusters
LSS
(More from
Sarah
Church)
Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
(Figure from Wayne Hu)
(Figure from WMAP team)
Foreground-cleaned WMAP map from Tegmark, de Oliveira-Costa & Hamilton, astro-ph/030
CMB
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Why are there any
CMB fluctuations at
all?
Why the wiggles?
What’s their scale?
Open
universe
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Guth & Kaiser 2005 (Science) + WMAP3
Inflation
with 
Inflation
without 
Cosmic strings
3
CMB
Clusters
LSS
Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
CMB
Clusters
LSS
Ly
Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Lyman Alpha Forest Simulation: Cen et al 2001
LyF
Quasar
You
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
CMB
Clusters
LSS
Ly
Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
CMB
Clusters
LSS
Lensing
Ly
Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
GRAVITATIONAL LENSING:
A1689 imaged by Hubble ACS, Broadhurst et al 2004
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Lensing
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
CMB
Clusters
LSS
Lensing
Ly
Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Galaxy power spectrum measurements 1999
(Based on compilation by Michael Vogeley)
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
CMB
Clusters
LSS
Lensing
Ly
Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
But the best is
yet to come…
Precision, 21cm tomography, …
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Our observable
universe
LSS
DO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS CONFUSE YOU?
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
1.
What is the Universe expanding into?
2.
How can stuff be more than 14 billion light years away when
the Universe is only 14 billion light years old?
3.
Where in space did the Big Bang explosion happen?
4.
Did the Big Bang happen at a single point?
5.
How could a the Big Bang create an infinite space in a finite
time?
6.
How could space not be infinite?
7.
If the Universe is only 10 billion years old, how can we see
objects that are now 30 billion light years away?
8.
Don’t galaxies receeding faster than c violate relativity theory?
9.
Are galaxies really moving away from us, or is space just
expanding?
10. Is the Milky Way expanding?
11. Do we have evidence for a Big Bang singularity?
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
12. What came before the Big Bang?
13. Should I feel insignificant?
END OF
LECTURE I
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Tegmark 2002, Science, 296, 1427-33
Onion
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Summary
of last
lecture
Fluctuation generator
Summary of
last lecture
Fluctuation amplifier
400
(Graphics from Gary Hinshaw/WMAP team)
0th order: what we’ve learned
about our expansion history
Summary of
last lecture
Assumes k=0
SN Ia+CMB+LSS constraints
Yun Wang & MT 2004, PRL 92, 241302
Vanilla rules OK!
1st order: what we’ve learned
about cosmic clustering
CMB
Summary of
last lecture
Clusters
LSS
Lensing
Ly
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 +
updates
1st order: what we’ve learned
about cosmic clustering
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Summary of
last lecture
DO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS CONFUSE YOU?
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
1.
What is the Universe expanding into?
2.
How can stuff be more than 14 billion light years away when
the Universe is only 14 billion light years old?
3.
Where in space did the Big Bang explosion happen?
4.
Did the Big Bang happen at a single point?
5.
How could a the Big Bang create an infinite space in a finite
time?
6.
How could space not be infinite?
7.
If the Universe is only 10 billion years old, how can we see
objects that are now 30 billion light years away?
8.
Don’t galaxies receeding faster than c violate relativity theory?
9.
Are galaxies really moving away from us, or is space just
expanding?
10. Is the Milky Way expanding?
11. Do we have evidence for a Big Bang singularity?
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
12. What came before the Big Bang?
13. Should I feel insignificant?
Measuring
cosmological
parameters
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
par movies
Using
WMAP3 +
SDSS LRGs:
Ordinary Matter
Dark Energy
Cold Dark Matter
75%
Hot Dark Matter
Photons
Budget Deficit
Ordinary Matter
4% 5%
Cold Dark Matter
23%
21%
386
430
13.8
Cosmology
Particle physics
Standard model parameters:
C = h = G = kb = qe = 1
How flat is space?
Why are we
cosmologists
so excited?
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
How flat is space?
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
How flat is space?
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Somewhat.
How flat is space?
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
tot=1.003
CMB+SN Ia
CMB+LRG
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Reid et al, arXiv 0907.1559
CMB
+
LSS
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
CMB
+
LSS
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
CMB
+
LSS
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
CMB
+
LSS
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Planck + SDSS: n=0.008, r=0.012
CMB
+
LSS
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
THE FUTURE
It's tough to make predictions,
especially about the future.
Yogi Berra
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Cosmological
data
75%
Cosmological
Parameters
4%
21%
Cosmological
data
75%
Cosmological
Parameters
4%
21%
ARE WE
DONE?
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Cosmological
data
75%
Cosmological
Parameters
21%
4%
Why these particular values?
Nature of dark matter?
Fundamental
theory
?
Nature of dark energy?
Nature of early Universe?
What’s dark
energy?
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
DARK ENERGY SUMMARY:
Observation:
•
Still no observed departures from “vanilla”
•
#1 goal is searching for any non-vanilla behavior
(density changing with time, clustering) (never mind w’
etc)
Theory:
•
Zillions of papers and models, wide open:
- cosmological constant + ground state density?
- evolving scalar field?
- modified gravity?
•
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
The least unsuccessful solution to the coincidence problem
is probably anthropic - but this depends on the inflationary
measure problem, which remains unsolved
What’s dark
matter?
Bullet Cluster, Clowe et al 2006, ApJ, 648, L109
100dpi
Four roads to dark matter: catch it, infer it, make it, weigh it
Direct:
Indirect:
Production:
LHC restarts
in ‘09
Gravitational:
Fermi (né
GLAST)
launched
6/11-08,
Pamela
Planck launched
May 2009
21 cm
tomography
coming
DARK MATTER SUMMARY:
Observation:
•
Make it: LHC may discover SUSY
•
Catch it: Direct detection experiments may succeed soon
•
Weigh it: Still no observed departures from “vanilla” observing this would be sensational (non-vanilla fluctuation
growth, evidence of interaction)
•
Infer it: Indirect detection possible from annihilation
Theory:
•
Zillions of papers and models, wide open:
- WIMP?
- axion?
- multiple dark matters?
- modified gravity?
•
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Why is its density comparable to that for baryons?
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Measured
value=4eV
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
WHAT DO WE
WANT TO
MEASURE?
Cosmological
data
75%
Cosmological
Parameters
21%
4%
Why these particular values?
Nature of dark matter?
Fundamental
theory
?
Nature of dark energy?
Nature of early Universe?
Map our
universe!
Physics with
21 cm
tomography
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Foreground-cleaned WMAP map from Tegmark, de Oliveira-Costa & Hamilton, astro-ph/030
History
CMB
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Our observable
universe
Our observable
universe
LSS
The time
frontier
LSS
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
The
scale
frontier
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Physics of the 21 cm Line:
GMRT = Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope
Experiment
GMRT
PAST/21CMA
# of Antennas(Total)
30 dishes
10,000
# of Antennas(Installed)
30 dishes
# of Tiles
NA
LOFAR
2,000 (4 Tiles)
20 (1 Tile=500 ant)
MWA
PAPER
8,192
16 (4)
512 (32 Tiles)
96(1 Tile=16 ant)
SKA
8 (0)
512 (1 Tile=16 ant)
NA
96 V crossed Dipoles
Effective Area (m 2)
5.104
Imaging Field of View
7.0.104
1.0.105
~ 104
1.0.104
2o
3o - 7.5o
~ 5o
30o - 1o
< 0.1’
Angular Resolution
3.8o - 0.4o
3’
25” - 3.5”
~ 15’
Frequency Range (MHz)
50 - 1420
50 - 200
10 - 240
80 - 300 110 - 200
Australia USA/AUS
15mK/(day)1/2
Mapping Sensitivity
Site
India
China
Netherlands
Year
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
AUS(?)
2015(?)
1.0.106
Physics of the 21 cm Line:
21CMA/PaST = Primeval Structure Telescope
Experiment
GMRT
PAST/21CMA
# of Antennas(Total)
30 dishes
10,000
# of Antennas(Installed)
30 dishes
# of Tiles
NA
LOFAR
2,000 (4 Tiles)
20 (1 Tile=500 ant)
MWA
PAPER
8,192
16 (4)
512 (32 Tiles)
96(1 Tile=16 ant)
SKA
8 (0)
512 (1 Tile=16 ant)
NA
96 V crossed Dipoles
Effective Area (m 2)
5.104
Imaging Field of View
7.0.104
1.0.105
~ 104
1.0.104
2o
3o - 7.5o
~ 5o
30o - 1o
< 0.1’
Angular Resolution
3.8o - 0.4o
3’
25” - 3.5”
~ 15’
Frequency Range (MHz)
50 - 1420
50 - 200
10 - 240
80 - 300 110 - 200
Australia USA/AUS
15mK/(day)1/2
Mapping Sensitivity
Site
India
China
Netherlands
Year
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
AUS(?)
2015(?)
1.0.106
Physics of the 21 cm Line:
2 Km
100 Km
77 sta.
32 sta.
LOFAR = Low Frequency ARray
Experiment
GMRT
PAST/21CMA
# of Antennas(Total)
30 dishes
10,000
# of Antennas(Installed)
30 dishes
# of Tiles
NA
LOFAR
2,000 (4 Tiles)
20 (1 Tile=500 ant)
MWA
PAPER
8,192
16 (4)
512 (32 Tiles)
96(1 Tile=16 ant)
SKA
8 (0)
512 (1 Tile=16 ant)
NA
96 V crossed Dipoles
Effective Area (m 2)
5.104
Imaging Field of View
7.0.104
1.0.105
~ 104
1.0.104
2o
3o - 7.5o
~ 5o
30o - 1o
< 0.1’
Angular Resolution
3.8o - 0.4o
3’
25” - 3.5”
~ 15’
Frequency Range (MHz)
50 - 1420
50 - 200
10 - 240
80 - 300 110 - 200
Australia USA/AUS
15mK/(day)1/2
Mapping Sensitivity
Site
India
China
Netherlands
Year
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
AUS(?)
2015(?)
1.0.106
Physics of the 21 cm Line:
MWA = Murchison Widefield Array
Experiment
GMRT
PAST/21CMA
# of Antennas(Total)
30 dishes
10,000
# of Antennas(Installed)
30 dishes
# of Tiles
NA
LOFAR
2,000 (4 Tiles)
20 (1 Tile=500 ant)
MWA
PAPER
8,192
16 (4)
512 (32 Tiles)
96(1 Tile=16 ant)
SKA
8 (0)
512 (1 Tile=16 ant)
NA
96 V crossed Dipoles
Effective Area (m 2)
5.104
Imaging Field of View
7.0.104
1.0.105
~ 104
1.0.104
2o
3o - 7.5o
~ 5o
30o - 1o
< 0.1’
Angular Resolution
3.8o - 0.4o
3’
25” - 3.5”
~ 15’
Frequency Range (MHz)
50 - 1420
50 - 200
10 - 240
80 - 300 110 - 200
Australia USA/AUS
15mK/(day)1/2
Mapping Sensitivity
Site
India
China
Netherlands
Year
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
AUS(?)
2015(?)
1.0.106
Physics of the 21 cm Line:
Cas A
Cygnus A
3C 392
PAPER = Precision Array to Probe Epoch of Reionization
Experiment
GMRT
PAST/21CMA
# of Antennas(Total)
30 dishes
10,000
# of Antennas(Installed)
30 dishes
# of Tiles
NA
LOFAR
2,000 (4 Tiles)
20 (1 Tile=500 ant)
MWA
PAPER
8,192
16 (4)
512 (32 Tiles)
96(1 Tile=16 ant)
SKA
8 (0)
512 (1 Tile=16 ant)
NA
96 V crossed Dipoles
Effective Area (m 2)
5.104
Imaging Field of View
7.0.104
1.0.105
~ 104
1.0.104
2o
3o - 7.5o
~ 5o
30o - 1o
< 0.1’
Angular Resolution
3.8o - 0.4o
3’
25” - 3.5”
~ 15’
Frequency Range (MHz)
50 - 1420
50 - 200
10 - 240
80 - 300 110 - 200
Australia USA/AUS
15mK/(day)1/2
Mapping Sensitivity
Site
India
China
Netherlands
Year
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
AUS(?)
2015(?)
1.0.106
Physics of the 21 cm Line:
SKA = Square Kilometer Array
Experiment
GMRT
PAST/21CMA
# of Antennas(Total)
30 dishes
10,000
# of Antennas(Installed)
30 dishes
# of Tiles
NA
LOFAR
2,000 (4 Tiles)
20 (1 Tile=500 ant)
MWA
PAPER
8,192
16 (4)
512 (32 Tiles)
96(1 Tile=16 ant)
SKA
8 (0)
512 (1 Tile=16 ant)
NA
96 V crossed Dipoles
Effective Area (m 2)
5.104
Imaging Field of View
7.0.104
1.0.105
~ 104
1.0.104
2o
3o - 7.5o
~ 5o
30o - 1o
< 0.1’
Angular Resolution
3.8o - 0.4o
3’
25” - 3.5”
~ 15’
Frequency Range (MHz)
50 - 1420
50 - 200
10 - 240
80 - 300 110 - 200
Australia USA/AUS
15mK/(day)1/2
Mapping Sensitivity
Site
India
China
Netherlands
Year
2007
2007
2007
2008
2008
AUS(?)
2015(?)
1.0.106
21 cm tomography experiments:
PAPER
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
LOFAR
GMRT
PAST/21CMA
Image: FORTE satellite
SKA ?
MWA
LARC: Lunar Array for Radio Cosmology
Participants:
MIT,
Harvard,
Washington,
Berkeley,
JPL, NRAO
PI: Jacqueline
Hewitt, MIT
The Omniscope
MT & Matias Zaldarriaga, arXiv 0805.4414 [astro-ph]
How get huge sensitivity at low cost?
Sensitivity T (A)-1/2
Single-dish telescope:
cost A1.35
Interferometer:
cost N2  A2
FFTT telescope idea:
cost A, ~2
Telescopes as Fourier transformers
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
The
sensitivity
frontier
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Omniscope
Tegmark & Zaldarriaga 2008
Our observable
universe
LSS
Our observable
universe
LSS
Spatial curvature:
WMAP+SDSS: tot= 0.01
Planck:
tot= 0.003
21cm:
tot=0.0002
Mao, MT,
McQuinn,
Zahn &
Zaldarriaga
2008
Our observable
universe
LSS
Spectral index running:
Planck:  =0.005
21cm =0.00017
2-potential: 0.0007
4-potential: 0.008
Mao, MT,
McQuinn,
Zahn &
Zaldarriaga
2008
Neutrino mass:
WMAP+SDSS: m <0.3 eV
+LyF:
m <0.17 eV
Oscillations
m>0.04 eV
LSS
Future lensing: m~0.03 eV
21cm:
m=0.007 eV
Mao, MT,
McQuinn,
Zahn &
Zaldarriaga
2008
Our observable
universe
DO ANY OF THESE QUESTIONS CONFUSE YOU?
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
1.
What is the Universe expanding into?
2.
How can stuff be more than 14 billion light years away when
the Universe is only 14 billion light years old?
3.
Where in space did the Big Bang explosion happen?
4.
Did the Big Bang happen at a single point?
5.
How could a the Big Bang create an infinite space in a finite
time?
6.
How could space not be infinite?
7.
If the Universe is only 10 billion years old, how can we see
objects that are now 30 billion light years away?
8.
Don’t galaxies receeding faster than c violate relativity theory?
9.
Are galaxies really moving away from us, or is space just
expanding?
10. Is the Milky Way expanding?
11. Do we have evidence for a Big Bang singularity?
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
12. What came before the Big Bang?
13. Should I feel insignificant?
Got to here
Max Tegmark
Dept. of Physics, MIT
tegmark@mit.edu
SLAC Summer Institute
August 3-4, 2009
Download