The Role of Law Enforcement in Public Health Emergencies Edward P. Richards, Katharine C. Rathbun, Corina Solé Brito, and Andrea Luna Available at: www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA www.dr-kate.com Email me - richards@lsu.edu The Report Driven by bird flu fears Started as a study of quarantine and isolation Darlings of the DHS and CDC and others who have never done public health Became an all hazards approach Why not Quarantine and Isolation? Logistics of a wide spread quarantine Limited response options SARS Experience Why All Hazards? Difficult to maintain readiness for a low probability event Plan must provide short term benefits to be supported in the long term Impossible to change behavior patterns on short notice Plan must incorporate new behaviors and attitudes into everyday situations Overview of All Hazards Institute vaccination programs for all recommended adult immunizations Address policies that encourage employees to work sick Develop and implement workplace surveillance for infectious disease risks Include families in these plans because officers cannot work effectively if their families are at risk Management Oversight Advantages Provides measurable outcomes, which disaster only planning does not Provides an economic and workplace benefits which will make the program easier to continue Requires policies to be worked out with unions and other stakeholders Assures buy in Identifies problems The Next Step: Resilient Communities Bring All Hazards Planning for Public Health Emergencies to the Community Defining Characteristics of Public Health Emergencies Long term Days to longer Depletes manpower and resources The affected population requires support Widespread Affects a region or significant urban area Affects everyone, including the police Significant Risk Examples Epidemic Bird flu Hazmat incident with long term risks Anthrax Dirty bomb Natural disaster Hurricanes, Winter storms Earthquakes Traditional Emergency Response Scenarios Geographically limited Crime scenes Parade routes Look at the problems with riot control when whole neighborhoods become involved Temporarily limited No one is staffed to do a 100% mobilization for weeks Limited Response Options in Public Health Emergencies You cannot shoot people who are just trying to take care of their families You cannot arrest large numbers of persons to restore order You cannot occupy significant territory Your People are also Victims Widespread public health and environmental crises affect law enforcement personnel Most personnel will look to their families first Law enforcement families cannot be protected outside of the context of their communities Day to Day Life Goes On No federal plan acknowledges that there are criminals and the homeless Biggest joke - Pandemic flu plan says they will close the borders Too many plans can only be staffed by assuming that no other law enforcement or first response activities will take place Only works for short periods Why 9/11 is the Wrong Model Deaths, but not injuries - limited impact on health care Relatively small percentage of the population displaced for a long period of time Relatively little infrastructure destroyed Why Katrina is a Better Model Widespread Long-term Foreseeable The risks could have been mitigated The response needs outstripped all available resources What Do Communities Need in Public Health Emergencies Food, water Environmental management such as heat Transportation and shelter if an evacuation Health care Family support - where are the kids? Complicating Factors Physical and Personnel Infrastructure Mismatch Failure to do maintenance Allowing development to outstrip infrastructure Efficiency v. Reliability Will your $100 microwave work in 5 years? Will your low cost electric power company give you power 24/7/365 at 99.99%? Who Will Provide for the Public? Federal model Local first responders Supported by the military and federal support State Models Public health, supported by law enforcement Reality In most areas the police are the organizations with the most staff and resources Who Will Fund This? The existing money is coming from other essential services that cannot be postponed forever Priorities will shift as fears of disaster abate Many health departments are losing net money Bottom-line: No one is funding real public support Objectives of Resilient Communities Reduce the need for support from public services Reduce suffering and death Reduce the risk of public disorder Most important: Build trust and credibility so the community will cooperate with needed mitigation measures Building Blocks for Resilient Communities Honest risk communication Realistic preventive strategies Start with your own people Working with other organizations Reinforcing the message when disasters are no longer fashionable Honest Risk Communications Be realistic about the risk Bird flu v. yearly flu Hurricane v. terrorist attack Just say No to Potemkin planning Big issue in public health Hurricane Pam Being a team player puts the public at risk Do not suppress market risk signals Realistic Preventive Strategies Must fit in with real household management Being Prepared Examples Gasoline What to take in evacuations How to keep food and water on hand How to treat water and what is safe to eat when the refrigerator goes off When to go back and what to do when you get there Start with Your Own People Get the families of your own people involved Builds support - they become part of the solution Direct benefits to the department Encourage them to involve their neighbors Stabilizes the neighborhood, making their own situation more secure Do not be the only person on your block with water Working with Other Organizations Find out if your local public health plans are really staffed and supported Find out the plans of the local hospitals and other health care providers Coordinate with retailers Work with churches and other private organizations Walmart and Home Depot can move goods more effectively than Northcom Reinforcing the Message when Disasters are out of Fashion Priorities are going to shift No politician will keep supporting prevent measures once the public gets interested in other things FEMA has already punted on realistic building standards in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast We have a lot of social problems we have been ignoring The problems will still be there Political Benefits Most communities do not trust public health (some do not trust the police) Anti-vaccination forces Equating trans-fat with the plague Incompetent political appointees in critical positions Law enforcement will bear the risk of failed public health response