INDIVIDUAL FACULTY EVALUATION: [Insert Academic Year]
Name:
Position Number:
College/School/Division:
Department:
A.
Evaluation Summary
Qualitative
Evaluation
Numerical
Equivalent
% of
Total Duties
= Totals
1. Teaching
X
.
=
2. Research/Creative
Activity:
X
.
=
3. Service:
X
.
=
4. Patient Care:
X
.
=
5. Other Duties:
X
.
=
Cumulative Totals
=
*
*Must total 1.0
=
**
**Must not exceed 5.0
Overall:
B. Justification
Teaching (Please include comments on advising here):
Research/Creative Activity:
Service:
Patient Care:
Other Duties:
Overall:
Approved and Submitted by: ___________________________________________
Date: ______________
Faculty Member’s Signature: ___________________________________________
Date: ______________
(does not necessarily imply concurrence)
cc: Personnel File
USE OF THE FACULTY EVALUATION FORM
1.
Categories of Faculty Performance
Five categories of performance are indicated on this form. In many cases, however, only three (Teaching,
Research/Creative Activity, and Service) will apply. The category of “Patient Care” applies only to units
whose faculty have such responsibilities. “Other Duties” may include assigned administrative duties and
other responsibilities which, in the view of the unit, do not fit into the first four categories. If there are no
such “Other Duties,” the evaluation for that category should be left blank.
2.
“Qualitative Evaluation”
The “Qualitative Evaluation” in each applicable category of faculty performance must be indicated by using
one of the following terms:
Outstanding
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Application of these terms should reflect standards determined by the unit in accord with the general
criteria explained in Appendix C of the Faculty Manual.
3.
“Numerical Equivalent”
The “Numerical Equivalent” for each qualitative term must be a whole or a half number from the following
scale:
Outstanding……….4.5 or 5
Very Good…………3.5, 4, or 4.5
Good……………….2.5, 3, or 3.5
Fair…………………1.5, 2, or 2.5
Poor………………..0, 0.5, 1, or 1.5
4.
“Cumulative Total”
This figure represents the simple total of the weighted numerical equivalents for each category of
performance. The highest possible total, of course, is 5.0
5.
“Overall”
One of the qualitative terms must be used here to represent the faculty member’s overall performance for the
year. If the cumulative total is a number for which either of two qualitative terms is appropriate, the
evaluator must use that term which best describes the faculty member’s overall performance.
6.
“Justification”
Justify the qualitative evaluation in each category. Provide a brief but appropriate statement for each
category. If additional space is required, attach a second page.