Accelerating Momentum: National Movement for Change Betsy Lee, RN, BSN, MSPH Patient Safety and Quality Consultant James (Jeb) Buchanan, M.D. Fort Wayne Med Ed Program Disclosure Neither Betsy Lee nor James Buchanan have relevant conflicts of financial interest to report. Neuroscience of Learning • • • • • • • • State the new information Repeat in 30 seconds Repeat in 60-90 minute Overnight – sleep – 1000x processing – Dendrite formation Review next morning - additional 10% Increase memory retention from the normal 10% to 60% Visual cortex 6 x Multisensory input and emotion enhance retention “The Brain Rules” John Medina, PhD. Applied Adult Learning Theory The KSA (Knowledge, Skill, and Attitudes) needed to master performance improvement tools are best acquired by participating and leading change projects with clinical teams. Workshop Outline • Human Factors/System Science • Use of learning tools and documentation forms • References at end for deeper dive • Slides designed for mitigating note taking Adult Learning Theory Building the case for relevance Medical Error To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System – 44-98,000 patients die from errors each year in the hospital = one jumbo jet/day – Institute of Medicine - 1999 Deaths From Medical Error Using CDC Data: #9 cause of death if use 44,000 #5 if use 98,000 Serious Harm • 1 in 7 Medicare patients experience serious harm secondary to medical errors and nosocomial infections. • 1 in 80,000 die (nearly double) the previous 98,000 estimated deaths IOM estimated in 1999). November 2010 study by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (Adverse events in hospitals: National incidence among Medicare beneficiaries) Medical Error • Inspector General of DHHS 1/2012 – 130,000 Medicare patients/month experience hospital adverse events – Only 1 in 7 reported – Of 293 investigated cases of harm • 40 reported to hospital managers • 28 investigated • 5 led to change in policies/practices January 2012 study by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (Hospital incident reporting systems do not capture most patient harm) Medical Error • Why errors were not reported? – Hospital employees not understanding what constitutes harm. – Employees thought error was an isolated incident and unlikely to recur. – Employees thought error was so common that it didn’t need to be reported. Journal of Patient Safety September 2013 • IOM report 1999 based on 1984 data • Lit review – four studies stood out (data 20022008) • 210,000 – 440,000 deaths/yr = 1/6 deaths in US – Used IHI Global Trigger Tool – Upper number includes Diagnostic Failure, incomplete medical records, and originally undetected errors with delay of months/years before death. • Serious harm without death 10-20x above James, J A; New Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care; Journal of Patient Safety; Sept 2013;Vol 9 –Issue 3: 122-128. Medical Error Number 3 cause of death in US Public Interest Van In Terre Haute, IN LeapFrog Group; August 2013 National Quality Strategy Aims and Priorities 1. Making care safer by reducing harm caused in the delivery of care. 2. Ensuring that each person and family are engaged as partners in their care 3. Promoting Effective Communication & Care Coordination Healthy People/Healthy Communities Better Care National Quality Strategy 4. Prevention & Treatment of Leading Causes of Mortality 5. Working with communities to promote wide use of best practices to enable healthy living 6. Making quality care more affordable for individuals, families, employers, and governments by developing and spreading new health care delivery models Affordable Care 17 Partnership for Patients - Aims • 40% Reduction in Preventable Hospital Acquired Conditions – 1.8 Million Fewer Injuries – 60,000 Lives Saved • 20% Reduction in 30-Day Readmissions – 1.6 Million Patients Recover Without Readmission • Save up to $35 Billion Dollars 19 National PfP Targeted Harm Categories 1) Adverse drug events 2) Birth-related injuries a) Elimination of Early Elective Deliveries 3) Central line-associated blood stream infections 4) Catheter-acquired urinary tract infections 5) Falls with injury 6) Surgical infections and complications 7) Venous thromboembolism 8) Pressure ulcers 9) Readmissions 10)Ventilator-associated pneumonia 20 PfP Additional Topics • • • • • • • • Leadership Systems Patient and Family Centered Care Culture of Safety Teamwork and Communications Lean Training Innovation and Transformation Preventing Harm Across the Board Health Care Disparities National Results – HHS Report May 7, 2014 • Overall 9% reduction in harm during 2011 and 2012 – – – – 15,000 deaths prevented 560,000 patient injuries avoided $4.1 Billion cumulative savings from the beginning of PfP 145 to 132 HACs per 1,000 discharges from 2010 to 2012 • Medicare all-cause 30-day readmissions dropped 8% – 150,000 fewer hospital readmissions among Medicare beneficiaries between January 2012 and December 2013 – 19 - 19.5% between 2007 and 2011 to 17.5% in 2013 Chasing Zero • Leading national indicator datasets (CDC, NDNQI, CMS) confirm harm reduction from 2010 through 4th quarter 2013: – – – – – – Ventilator Associated Pneumonia - 53.2% Early Elective Delivery - 64.5% Obstetric Trauma Rate - 15.8% Venous Thromboembolic Complications - 12.9% Falls and Trauma - 14.7% Pressure Ulcers - 25.2% Etiology of Errors Systems/Engineering - 80% Human Factors - 15% Negligence - 5% Start of a different paradigm in quality review IOM Report 1999 Errors are not made by bad people, rather bad systems. Variation Dartmouth Map Variation Quality of Care Delivered to Medicare Beneficiaries – JAMA, October 4, 2000 Evidence-Based Medicine The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States; NEJM, 6/26/03 – 30 Quality Indicators – 55% EBM recommended care given – Same rate for preventative and acute care Coin toss medicine Medical Error The Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century – Institute of Medicine - 2001 IOM 2001 Systematizing quality management has the potential to improve health and healthcare outcomes more than any foreseeable tech or scientific breakthroughs in the next 20 years, including cures for diabetes, heart disease and cancer. Institute of Medicine Aims • • • • • • Safe – no patient harm Effective – no needless deaths, pain or suffering Patient-centered – no helplessness Timely – no unnecessary waiting Efficient – no waste Equitable – for all *Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm, 2001. 31 How Hazardous Is Health Care? DANGEROUS (>1/1000) 100,000 REGULATED ULTRA-SAFE (<1/100K) HealthCare Total lives lost per year Driving 10,000 1,000 Scheduled Airlines 100 Mountain Climbing Bungee Jumping 10 Chemical Manufacturing Chartered Flights European Railroads Nuclear Power 1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 1,000,000 10,000,000 Number of encounters for each fatality Source: Berwick, D.M. 32 Four Levels of Change Required • Changes at Level A: experience of the patients and communities • Changes at Level B: “microsystems” of care • Changes at Level C: health care organizations • Changes at Level D: health care environment Berwick DM. A user's manual for the IOM's 'Quality Chasm' Report. Health Affairs. 2002; 21(3):80-90. 33 Published in February 2013 Issue of Health Affairs What the Evidence Shows About Patient Activation: Better Health Outcomes and Care Experiences; Fewer Data on Costs Patients with Lower Activation Associated with Higher Costs; Delivery Systems Should Know Their Patients’ ‘Scores’ Enhanced Support for Shared Decision-Making Reduced Costs of Care for Patients with Preference-Sensitive Conditions Survey Shows That Fewer Than a Third of Patient-Centered Medical Home Practices Engage Patients in Quality Improvement 34 Patient Engagement and Adverse Events “[T]here was an inverse relationship between [patient] participation [in their care] and adverse events . . . [P]atients with high participation were half as likely to have at least one adverse event during the admission. ” Source: Weingart SN et al., Hospitalized patients’ participation and its impact on quality of care and patient safety, International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2011; 1-9. 35 Nursing Education Redesign • Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) - http://qsen.org/ • Competency-based approach to nursing education supported by AACN and RWJF • Focus on preparing future nurses with the knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSAs) necessary to continuously improve the quality and safety of the healthcare systems within which they work Commitment to Change Statement Next Accreditation System (NAS) Feb 22, 2012 – Learn both the technical skills of being a physician AND systems understanding for high quality/safe care. – Problem solve errors/causation – Patient safety and quality improvement is not a spectator sport / team-based. – Effective Institutional reporting systems NAS • Understand and apply Human Factors and System/Reliability Science to reduce errors and improve quality. • Engage residents in detection of errors and quality improvement. (Moral agents) • Use near misses and unsafe conditions as educational/learning opportunities for resident learners (Relevance). • Feedback to GMEC for its oversight role ACGME CLER October 10, 2013 • Reporting of adverse events/near misses – Not reporting to faculty who in-turn reports (Easy Button) • Education on patient safety • Learning environment culture of safety • Resident experience in patient safety investigations and follow-up • Clinical site monitoring of resident and faculty engagement in patient safety • Resident training in disclosure of patient safety events ACGME CLER • Receiving feedback post reporting • Perform Root Cause Analysis • Know hospital’s quality and patient safety projects and somehow meaningfully involved • Receive and review hospital’s quality and patient safety measures/data CME • What percent of physicians after a CME event will implement what they have learned? 7 – 12%1,2 (JAMA 1995, AHRQ 2007) • How long to incorporate sound EBM into physician practices? 17 yrs3,4 (IOM 2001) – Lacked strategy on how to implement new knowledge – Encountered a barrier – Strategies, tools, and handouts at this presentation will hopefully increase this percent. System Design Management Focus on systems and not individuals. System redesign is more efficient than clinical education. Patient Safety Medical Errors • Human error and adverse events which may follow are problems of cognitive psychology (human factors) and engineering, not of medicine. • We didn’t receive training in these in medical school or residency. • Easy principles Reporting Barriers Residents • Don’t think report would result in any changes being made. • No time to report • Don’t want to get team member in trouble • Don’t want my name on the report • Don’t know how to report • Harper, M.L. & Helmreich, R.L.; 2005; Identifying barriers to the success of a reporting system; Advances in Patient Safety; AHRQ. Adverse Event WHO • An injury related to medical management, in contrast to complications of disease. Medical management includes all aspects of care, including diagnosis and treatment, failure to diagnose or treat, and the systems and equipment used to deliver care. Adverse events may be preventable (error) or nonpreventable. Patient Safety VA National Center for Patient Safety • Patient Safety is the identification and control of hazards/vulnerabilities that could cause harm to patients • Patient safety is the prevention of inadvertant harm or injury to patients. Residents • 23% reported a “close call” or “near miss” in last week for which they felt responsible. • Procedure and medication error most common. • Most common reasons: Excessive work hours, inadequate supervision, and handoffs • Jagsi, R et al; 2005; Residents report on aderse events and their causes. Arch Intern Med, 165, 2607-2613 Professional Pause Reflect on the gap of best care not provided; the need for physicians, nurses and other members of the interprofessional team need to assess their practices for the gap; and the need to train human factors and systems science to empower teams to close this gap. References – CME Effectiveness 1 Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance: A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700-705. 2 Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, et al. Effectiveness of Continuing Medical Education; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); January 2007.Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=hstat1b.chapter.105720). 3 Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press, 2001, page 13. 4 Balas EA, Boren SA. Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement. In: Bemmel J, McCray AT, editors. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2000: Patient-Centered Systems. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH; 2000:65-70.