A challenge for triple-helix policies?
1. The challenge: Triple-helix in a different environment
2. Research design: Explorative case studies
3. Results: Nordland and North Jutland
4: Conclusions: Diversity and intermediaries
Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se
Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk
From a high-tech manufacturing concept…
Interaction between firms and public/private knowledge producers
Informal institutional context and organised interaction
Triple helix: Universities/government/industry with overlapping roles
Wide appeal among policy-makers
… to a high-touch service context
SMEs, low education, seasonality, life-style entrepreneurs
Importance of tacit knowledge in incremental innovation
What role for HEIs/universities in tourist destination development?
Importance of destination and HEI characteristics!
Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se
Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk
Two case studies of Nordic peripheral regions
Nordland, Norway
North Jutland, Denmark
Interviews with policy-makers and HEIs, not firms
Identify patterns of collaboration, not impact evaluation
Focus on
Actor resources
Actors strategies
Interaction patterns
Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se
Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk
Actor resources
Nature-based tourism, small private firms dominate
National funding for R&D (InnovationNorway, Research Council)
University with general teaching programmes and applied research
Actor strategies
Firms: select few interest in access to HEI knowledge
HEI: from student projects to applied research centre
DMO marginal, region with geo-political concerns
Interactions
Feed-back loop from research to firms via project manager
Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se
Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk
Actor resources
Nature-based tourism, small private firms dominate
Regional funding via DMO
University with triple-helix profile and dedicated tourism profile
Actor strategies
Firms: Limited interest, except very large/innovative
HEI: empirical data and dual publication (dissemination, academic)
DMO: building consortia, translating/endorsing knowledge
Interactions
HEI as plug-in in DMO projects (occasionally proactive agenda)
Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se
Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk
Importance of education/labour market relations in knowledge dynamics
Funding: National versus regional
Agenda setting: HEI versus DMO
Important commonality: Importance of knowledge brokers
Translation taking tacit knowledge of firms into consideration
Importance of destination and HEI characteristics
What firms, DMOs, and HEIs?
Several types of tourism triple helix
Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se
Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk