Olsen Halkier NORTHORS Sep 2013

advertisement

Higher Education Institutions and tourism destination development

A challenge for triple-helix policies?

1. The challenge: Triple-helix in a different environment

2. Research design: Explorative case studies

3. Results: Nordland and North Jutland

4: Conclusions: Diversity and intermediaries

Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se

Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk

The challenge:

TRIPLE HELIX IN A NEW ENVIRONMENT

From a high-tech manufacturing concept…

 Interaction between firms and public/private knowledge producers

 Informal institutional context and organised interaction

 Triple helix: Universities/government/industry with overlapping roles

 Wide appeal among policy-makers

… to a high-touch service context

 SMEs, low education, seasonality, life-style entrepreneurs

 Importance of tacit knowledge in incremental innovation

 What role for HEIs/universities in tourist destination development?

 Importance of destination and HEI characteristics!

Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se

Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk

RESEARCH DESIGN

 Two case studies of Nordic peripheral regions

 Nordland, Norway

 North Jutland, Denmark

 Interviews with policy-makers and HEIs, not firms

 Identify patterns of collaboration, not impact evaluation

 Focus on

 Actor resources

 Actors strategies

 Interaction patterns

Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se

Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk

NORDLAND

Coordinated research and development?

Actor resources

 Nature-based tourism, small private firms dominate

 National funding for R&D (InnovationNorway, Research Council)

 University with general teaching programmes and applied research

Actor strategies

 Firms: select few interest in access to HEI knowledge

 HEI: from student projects to applied research centre

 DMO marginal, region with geo-political concerns

Interactions

 Feed-back loop from research to firms via project manager

Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se

Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk

NORTH JUTLAND

Arm’s-length project interaction?

Actor resources

 Nature-based tourism, small private firms dominate

 Regional funding via DMO

 University with triple-helix profile and dedicated tourism profile

Actor strategies

 Firms: Limited interest, except very large/innovative

 HEI: empirical data and dual publication (dissemination, academic)

 DMO: building consortia, translating/endorsing knowledge

Interactions

 HEI as plug-in in DMO projects (occasionally proactive agenda)

Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se

Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk

CONCLUSIONS

 Importance of education/labour market relations in knowledge dynamics

 Funding: National versus regional

 Agenda setting: HEI versus DMO

 Important commonality: Importance of knowledge brokers

 Translation taking tacit knowledge of firms into consideration

 Importance of destination and HEI characteristics

 What firms, DMOs, and HEIs?

 Several types of tourism triple helix

Lise Smed Olsen – lise.smed.olsen@nordregio.se

Henrik Halkier– halkier@cgs.aau.dk

Download