Rev. 08-15 LIBS 6991 Professional Internship Syllabus Instructor Information Dr. Kaye B. Dotson E-mail: dotsonl@ecu.edu Office Telephone Number: 252-328-2878 Office Hours: *Note* I am available by appointment if you need assistance or have concerns. You can contact me via email at dotsonl@ecu.edu Course Description: LIBS 6991. 110 hours of practical experience. P. 30 semester hours LIBS or consent of the Chair. Placement in library setting appropriate to student’s field of concentration. Goals This course provides an internship in selected library settings appropriate to a student's field of concentration under the supervision of university staff and a certified librarian. Interns will utilize a variety of experiences to apply knowledge gained from previous coursework, research and independent study while benefiting from the guidance of an experienced and professionally qualified librarian. Observations, shadowing, attending professional conferences and meetings, and participating in numerous practical experiences are among the activities which will provide future librarians opportunities for enrichment. Assigned professional readings will provide the student with a necessary background to discuss and apply research in the professional experience. As you read for LIBS 6991 please identify the connection between standards, performance indicators, and competencies that are reflected in your practical experience. The documentation for your final portfolio should be descriptive of how and why you made these connections. Requirements The internship begins with contact, initiated by the student, between the student, university internship supervisor, site supervisor and, if required a district-level representative during which a site and site supervisor for the internship experience is established. The student is required to submit the designated documentation forms which may be found in the Professional Internship Guidebook located on the department's webpage. 110 contact hours are required. Contact hours must be documented by the site supervisor and initialed. At least 15 contact hours must be completed in an academic, public, or school library with different grade levels or focus than the site where the intern is primarily based. School library interns are strongly encouraged to serve these 15 contact hours in a public or academic setting, while public/academic library interns are encouraged to serve at least 15 hours in a schools setting. Interns are required to interact with peers via video analysis tools, wikis, online Rev. 08-15 discussions, blogging and chats, sharing experiences and perspectives. Interns should attend one or more professional school, committee or district level meetings. Interns should seek opportunities to interact with diverse groups and cultures within the school Students should also determine the expectations of conduct and dress that are required by the system in which they are serving an internship and carefully abide by those standards. In addition, interns must complete a “Self Disclosure” form to be included in their file prior to the beginning of the internship. Objectives of the Course To test theoretical knowledge against reality of practice 2. To interact and communicate with library professionals To develop a professional self-awareness To develop To To pursue a special interest, where appropriate 5. To develop professional library leadership skills To develop an To develop understanding of the role of the sponsoring library/site To become aware of employment opportunities To begin development of a professional portfolio To share the experience with the other candidates enrolled in the internship Suggested Course Textbook: A 21st-Century Approach to School Librarian Evaluation by American Association of School Librarians Course Policies Attendance and Participation: This is an online course that will use wikis, online discussions, blogging and chats for participants to communicate with one another. You are required to actively participate in these discussions as topics are presented - commenting, synthesizing, and reflecting upon the thoughts and works of your peers. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY Academic integrity is expected of every East Carolina University student. Academically violating the Honor Code consists of the following: cheating, the giving or receiving of any unauthorized aid or assistance or the giving or receiving of unfair advantage on any form of academic work; plagiarism, copying the language, structure, ideas, and/or thoughts of another and adopting those as one's original work; falsification, statement of untruth, either verbal or written, regarding any circumstances relating Rev. 08-15 to academic work; and attempting any act which if completed would constitute an academic integrity violation as defined above. Procedures governing academic integrity violations are described in the East Carolina University Student Handbook and in the Faculty Manual. ECU provides guidelines to students regarding academic integrity while enrolled. The instructors of this course adhere to the established policies and will not tolerate acts of cheating, plagiarism, falsification or attempts to cheat, plagiarize or falsify. Should the instructors determine that an academic violation has taken place, we reserve the right to assign a grade sanction, which can include failure of the course and dismissal from Graduate School and your program of study, and/or refer the case to the Office of Student Conflict Resolution for a hearing. No student may drop the involved course or withdraw from school prior to resolving an academic integrity charge. It is important for students to understand that the policy of ECU is to remove students who commit academic integrity violations from the school. http://www.ecu.edu/cs-acad/grcat/University.cfm#integrity ADA COMPLIANCE East Carolina University seeks to comply fully with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Students requesting accommodations based on a disability must be registered with the Department for Disability Support Services located in Slay 138 (252) 737-1016 (Voice/TTY). HARDWARE & SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS Students will need reliable access to a computer and the Internet. Familiarity with BlackBoard, ECU’s web-based course delivery system and the platform used for delivering this online course, is required and high-speed Internet connection is recommended. Students must also utilize VoiceThread.com for classroom discussions and will need to establish a free VoiceThread.com account. Students must also be able to develop a 30-45 minute video in digital format and upload it to the discussion board. It is possible for students to use a digital camera (video function), smartphone or webcam to record the video or students can use a more traditional digital video camera. The key is that you must be able to load your video onto your computer and upload it to BlackBoard's Discussion Board. Students will also need to be able to access files and information delivered using Microsoft Word, Acrobat Reader, PowerPoint, and wmv formats (video delivery). Additional programs that may be used include Skype & Centra. ECU’s email system and addresses are the only addresses that can be supported/used with the BlackBoard system. Course Guidelines for Email Interaction: 1. When sending emails to your instructor always include LIBS 6991 in the RE: section of your email I will do the same. The RE: should also include what the message is about. 2. When sending emails to your instructor with work or with attachments - be sure that your full name is within the attached document AND the body of the email. 3. Wit, sarcasm, and humor are very difficult to get across within email - we don't have the body signals Rev. 08-15 and voice inflections to make these work so let's not try- be professional and specific in each email. 4. All caps does mean that you are yelling or very upset. To let someone know that you are making a point - you can underline or bold the text or use an *. 5. Be sure that you understand that email communication is written documentation - be very careful about what you choose to write. 6. Do not add instructors or classmates to listserv's or send email that contains the following: hoaxes, chain mail, virus warnings or pleadings from people who do not exist for money, body parts or further email responses. Grading Scale A = 93-100 points B = 86-92 points C = 79-85 points F = below 79 points In the interest of fairness, assignments submitted after the due date will not be accepted. I = Incomplete: In the event of a necessary incomplete, please discuss the possibility of an Incomplete with me prior to 2 weeks before classes end. If I choose to grant you an incomplete for the semester, I will give you a due date for all work and no other extensions will be provided to you. By accepting an incomplete for the semester you understand that your grade may drop one letter grade. Course Assignments: Component 1 (10%): Seminars: Blogs/Discussions Component 2 (15%): Student Log (complete log is due with final portfolio submission) Component 3 (25%): In-Service Learning Initiative: School-Wide Research Model Component 4 (15%): Final Reflective Impressions Component 5 (25%): Portfolio Component 6 (10%): Evaluation Checklist - Interns should make sure site supervisor submits *** Projects and assignments in this course are often unique to the setting. The products you create, lesson units, portfolios, or in-service programs require careful stewardship, thought, and planning. The development of these or other digital products is not straightforward; instruction and technology are dynamic and because I do not want to inhibit innovation, I do not prescribe or share an example that would certainly become quickly outdated. Instead, your assignment Rev. 08-15 description defines the assets your projects should achieve and the rubrics play a critical role in determining all the major components of the products. Please refer to this information as you work on each assignment. Course Assignment Descriptions: Component 1 (10%): Seminars: Blogs/Discussions The candidate will participate in electronic seminars, online discussions, blogging and/or chats, as scheduled. The first meeting will be during the first week of the semester and additional dates determined as needed. Announcement of each new seminar will be posted. Seminar topics will be drawn from the Internship Guidelines. A minimum of two posts per forum is required. **Participation in the discussion forum is mandatory. Please make at least three substantive postings (good or excellent contributions) on two-three different days during the discussion period. One of the three postings should be your response to the questions. The other two (or more) postings should be replies to your peers’ postings or responses to additional ideas that might arise in the conversation during the week. Substantive contributions are thoughtful, insightful, interesting, and/or well-developed responses that extend the conversation, add new ideas, and/or pose questions to consider. Remember, drive-by or minimal contribution postings such as “I agree” are not considered substantive. The forum will be open to read for the full semester. Following is the guideline for self pacing and participation in the seminar discussions: Criteria Post an initial substantive response to the questions Post 2 substantive replies to your peers’ postings or respond to additional ideas that might arise in the conversation or the readings during the week. Posts are made on at least 2 different days. Rubric for Seminar Discussion Seminar Discussion AP=10 points P=9-5 points BP= 4 points or below Above Proficient Comments are consistently thoughtful; reflect deep understanding of the issue; all prompts addressed. Proficient Thoughtful comments reflect understanding of the issue; all prompts addressed. Some blog postings are better than others. Below Proficient Short comments that communicate little understanding of the topic. Rev. 08-15 Component 2 (10%): Student Log (complete log is due with final portfolio submission) Candidates will maintain an "Internship Log" of experiences during the internship period. Student log forms may be found on the department webpage under internships. This log will reflect an overall view of the internship and the hours worked. At least 15 hours must be logged in a library on a different level or focus than the primary internship school. Please fax a copy of the entire student log to Dr. Kaye Dotson at 252-328-4368 or either email attachments to dotsonl@ecu.edu. Maintain a running file of your internship log to be included in your final course portfolio for documentation purposes. Rubric for School’s Pathway Log Completion Student Log AP=15-14 points P=14-11 points BP= 11 points or below Above Proficient Evidence showing experience in addressing all AASL Standards for Initial Preparation of School Librarians Proficient Evidence showing experience in addressing most AASL Standards for Initial Preparation of School Librarians Below Proficient Minimal Evidence showing experience in addressing AASL Standards for Initial Preparation of School Librarians (4 items of documentation for each standard) (3 items of documentation for each standard) (less than 3 items of documentation for each standard) Component 3 (25%): In-Service Learning Initiative For this assignment, the integrative data driven in-service learning initiative is designed to have you complete each of the following steps: Consult with a local librarian to identify and address the need for a school-wide research model Review the literature on selected topic Survey faculty to determine knowledge of research models Develop an initiative (the service learning component) to address the topic Present findings to faculty in a formal videotaped presentation Plan and deliver lesson(s) to selected group using chosen research models Reflect upon strengths and weaknesses of the in-service and class lessons Two components are required for this project: 1. Development and Presentation of In-Service to Faculty or Stakeholders (must be videoed 20-30 min). AASL Standards or ALA Competences must be identified and addressed. Rev. 08-15 The topic for this in-service is “Three Research Models for use in K12 Schools”. Interns will begin with a review the document titled “Three Research Models for use in K12 Schools” that can be found in Course Documents. Use the PowerPoint Lesson Plan (found in Course Documents) as a guide for your research lesson. It is clear that following a school wide, library endorsed research model supports inquiry and research. These research models identified here are designed specifically for K-12 students and you will use this information to share a professional development in-service with your faculty or a group of faculty from your school site. This is beneficial to both intern and classroom teacher. Any lesson plans or activities developed as a result of this project should all be featured in your course portfolio as documentation of intern’s work during the internship. 2. Summary/Reflection (3-5 pages) of the in-service learning initiative a. This reflection should begin with a brief description of why the research models you chose were important. This explanation should be based in any consultations, research and/or professional literature that were used. Please remember that your explanation should be brief (it is not expected to be a lengthy literature review). b.. Explain your perspectives as to the usability of the model(s); which grade levels it best fits; which serves best to help students evaluate a source; use of a learning log; and compare and contrast the research models. c. After your explanation of why research model is important professionally, please briefly explain why it is important for your school to have a designated research model in place; share how this was beneficial in the lesson you collaborated with a classroom teacher on. This will be based upon your interactions and teaching with the classroom teacher, teacher input, student outcomes, etc. d. Share what you did in preparing and presenting your service-learning initiative. Include a link to your presentation. e. State the meaningful contribution you intended for the service-learning initiative and if and/or how it might continue to be used or have an impact at your site. Group Collaboration and Video Analysis Following the presentation you will share your video with your assigned group members. Each group member will critique the videos of all group members. Please offer constructive feedback as shown in the recent blog Ted Talk. The second part of this assignment includes group collaboration and analysis of each group member’s video, primarily to allow constructive student feedback. Upon completion of the presentation all interns will be placed in groups within our course. Interns in each group will view and Rev. 08-15 critique group member videos. Interns should thoughtfully address any areas of need identified, as well as recognize strengths of each presentation. Prior to viewing group videos, interns should view the following Ted Talk which emphasizes the need for serious feedback: http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_teachers_need_real_feedback A discussion via the course blog will feature this Ted Talk. The following rubric should be used as a guideline to critique each video and each intern’s interaction in the group. Group Critique and Interaction In-Service Initiative Accountability as a group member Pts Possible Described why a research model is important as supported by professional literature 10 pts. Described why the specific research model was personally meaningful for the chosen school or library 15 pts. Fully described service learning initiative (what was done): from the beginning of the process (sharing the need for a research model) through the completion of the classroom project using the chosen model 15 pts. Shared intended meaningful impact and how it will/might continue to have an impact at your site; compare/contrast models; discussed usability, learning logs, grade level readiness, resource evaluation etc. 20 pts. Intern’s information regarding research models was presented in a manner that was clear and easily understood by a wide range of stakeholders 10 pts. Intern participated fully in group interaction 15 pts. Participation was timely and within dates as determined by the group 15 pts. Points Possible 100 Each group will evaluate group member projects. How you determine to meet as a group is up to you. Your group should determine meeting dates, and final dates for any information to be Rev. 08-15 shared. Group members who do not adhere to group consensus and participate fully can expect to lose points. Be sure to be fair and honest in your assessment of each presentation. Remember, the goal here is to help each intern improve and develop skills and to gain ideas for in-service for your own sites. Make every effort to realistically ascertain and reflect on the quality of the intern’s efforts. Some of the questions you might address and explain are what worked, what you looked for in each video, what words of wisdom you have for your peers, etc. These are a few ideas to think about in addition to the rubric above, but certainly many other thoughts could, and should, be considered. This exercise will help you and your fellow interns. You will learn from each other’s experience. In most cases you will be able to reach a consensus as to what you expect from each other. As a group, compose a brief narrative on each individual project and email that to me with any comments you feel are significant. Each intern will also send the completed video and summary to me for a final grade, but your critique as a group is especially important. The in-service workshop/presentation summary/reflection document with a link to the video will serve as the course artifact. You should post the summary and include the link to your video artifact on Task Stream. This should be posted on Task Stream as soon as possible after you receive your grade for this component. Upon completion of this unit, a survey will be sent by the instructor to gage individual intern reaction to research models and their use. Rubric for In-Service Learning Initiative Assignment In-Service Initiative Above Proficient Proficient Below Proficient 20 pts. 15-19 pts. 14 pts. or Below Assessment of Faculty and Identification of Target Audience Needs Multiple evidence is provided demonstrating that candidates design and deliver instruction based on needs of the learning community regarding a schoolwide research model Little or no evidence is provided demonstrating that candidates design and deliver instruction based on needs of the learning community regarding information on a school-wide research model Survey, Consultation, and Observation Multiple evidence is provided to demonstrate use of networking with colleagues teaching and using a schoolwide research model Literature Review Multiple evidence is provided to Some evidence is provided demonstrating that candidates design and deliver instruction based on needs of the learning community regarding a school-wide research model Some evidence is provided to demonstrate use of networking with colleagues teaching and using a school-wide research model Some evidence is provided to Little or no evidence is provided to demonstrate use of networking with colleagues teaching or using a school-wide research model Little or no evidence is provided to demonstrate Rev. 08-15 demonstrate use of a school-wide research model demonstrate use of a school-wide research model use of a school-wide research model Promotion of library Program Resources and Services Multiple evidence is provided that candidate articulates the role of the school library program in contributing to use of a school-wide research model Little or no evidence is provided that candidate articulates the role of the school library program in contributing to use of a school-wide research model In-Service Topic and Significance to School or organization is identified Multiple evidence is provided demonstrating that candidates can document and communicate the impact of this inservice initiative on supporting learning and student achievement Delivery/Video of InService Presentation Multiple evidence is provided showing candidate presentation is designed to promote teaching, learning and access to information Some evidence is provided that candidate articulates the role of the school library program in contributing to use of a schoolwide research model Some evidence is provided demonstrating that candidates can document and communicate the impact of this inservice initiative on supporting learning and student achievement Some evidence is provided showing candidate presentation was designed to promote teaching, learning and access to information Skills Instruction Multiple evidence is provided to indicate candidate advocates for skills to support the learning needs of the school community through use of a school-wide research model Little or no evidence is provided to indicate candidate advocates for skills to support the learning needs of the school community through use of a schoolwide research model Reflective Summary Multiple evidence is provided to demonstrate candidate has reflected on practice and can identify Some evidence is provided to indicate candidate advocates for skills to support the learning needs of the school community through use of a school-wide research model Some evidence is provided to demonstrate candidate has reflected on practice and can Little or no evidence is provided demonstrating that candidates can document and communicate the impact of this in-service initiative on supporting learning and student achievement Little or no evidence is provided showing candidate presentation was designed to promote teaching, learning and access to information Little to no evidence is provided to demonstrate candidate has reflected on practice and can identify meaningful adjustments to improve Rev. 08-15 AP=20 points P=15-19 points meaningful adjustments to improve teaching identify meaningful adjustments to improve teaching teaching BP=below 14 points Component 4 (25%): Portfolio A portfolio reflecting specific areas of the internship, including a reflection, will be prepared and presented to the Internship supervisor two weeks before the last day of class. Look closely at the portfolio guidelines to determine areas, competences, standards, and indicators that should be addressed. Multiple examples of evidence to be included can be found in your text A 21st-Century Approach to School Librarian Evaluation by the American Association of School Librarians. Refer to the academic calendar to determine this date for submission. The portfolio will be compiled and submitted electronically. Rubric for School Library Portfolio Completion AP=20-25 points Above Proficient Evidence showing experience for all defined standards and Proficient Evidence showing experience for most defined standards and Below Proficient Minimal evidence showing experience for defined standards P=15-20 points competencies are reflected competencies is reflected and competencies is reflected Portfolio BP=below 14 points Component 5 (15%): Final Reflective Impressions In writing your final reflective paper please revisit the initial impressions essay you wrote in LIBS 6010. Note any changes in perception that you may have realized as a result of your internship experiences in the reality of practice. Please include your reflections of your experiences within the overall internship experience and your growth as you see it through the program. The summary should be a minimum of three pages. The final reflective paper will be submitted by the end of the Internship and should be sent to the internship supervisor. It is also recommended that this be included in the final portfolio as representative of your development in the profession. The reflective paper should support what is demonstrated in the portfolio. Rubric for Final Internship Reflection Final Above Proficient Proficient Below Proficient 15 Points Multiple evidence is provided to 10-15 Points Some evidence is provided to Below 10 Points Minimal evidence is provided to Rev. 08-15 Reflection/Summary AP=15 points P=10-15 points BP=below 10 points demonstrate candidate has reflected on the practical experience, personal leadership style and demonstrates meaningful understanding of the librarian role demonstrate candidate has reflected on the practical experience, personal leadership style and demonstrates meaningful understanding of the librarian role demonstrate candidate has reflected on the practical experience, personal leadership style and demonstrates meaningful understanding of the librarian role Component 6 (15%): Evaluation Checklist In order for a grade to be posted for you, this item must be submitted on or before final day of class. If mailing the form please be aware of the time issues. Please provide your site supervisor with a copy of the Internship: Evaluation Checklist which is located in the forms section of your guidebook. This must be completed and signed by the site supervisor and submitted to the Internship Supervisor. Competed forms may be faxed to 252-328-4368 or mailed to Dr. Kaye Dotson, 2334 Tar Landing Road, Williamston, NC 27892. Evaluation Checklist Above Proficient Proficient Below Proficient 15 Points 10-15 Points Below 10 Points Comments and scores indicate full internship experience with positive observation. Comments and scores indicate average internship experience with both positive and constructive observation. Comments from site supervisor are less than positive. AP=15 points P=10-15 points BP=below 10 points Portfolio Guidelines for School Internship: The Internship Portfolio is a documentation of activities of during the Internship. This is not to be confused with the program electronic portfolio. The contents should include but not be limited to: Mission of the school Personal philosophy of library service Setting: Description of the library size, community served physical layout, and staffing. A section should be included in the portfolio for specified activities and function including the Rev. 08-15 following: The standards for the school library portfolio are from the NCDPI Media Coordinators Standards http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/dtl/standards/professional/rubric-slmc.pdf Standard 1: School Library Media Coordinators demonstrate leadership. Standard 2. School library media coordinators build a learning environment that meets the instructional needs of a diverse population of students. Standard 3: School library media coordinators demonstrate implement a comprehensive 21 century library media program. Standard 4: School library media coordinators demonstrate knowledge of learners and learning and promote effective instructional practices. Standard 5: School Library Media Coordinators reflect on their practice. 1. st Also please include documentation in the portfolio for AASL Standards for Initial Preparation of School Librarians (2010). Documentation may be used more than once in NCDPI or AASL as the materials apply. The link for AASL 2010 is: ALA/AASL Standards for Initial Preparation of School Librarians (2010) Standard 1: Teaching for Learning Standard2: Literacy and Reading Standard 3: Information and Knowledge Standard 4: Advocacy and Leadership Standard 5: Program Management & Administration Other items may be included as interns choose or wish to share. As you read for LIBS 6991 please identify the connection between standards and competencies that are reflected in your practical experience. Your final portfolio should be descriptive of how and why you made these connections. Joyner Library has provided a Web page with links to all the remote student tutorials. It would be a good idea to review this link http://personal.ecu.edu/geec/tutorials.htm The first tutorials are on finding library science databases, and basic/advanced searching in Library Literature. These may be especially useful as you pursue research. . Information about LIBS 6991 Course Artifact For this course you will complete and post an artifact and reflection statement in TaskStream as evidence of mastering skills for the course. The artifact for this course will be the summary including link to video from Component 3, the In-Service Project. Your document should be compiled into a single PDF before you post online. I will require and verify posting of the artifact and reflective statement to the student’s portfolio before awarding final grade for the course. Rev. 08-15