Senior Assignment Fund Rubric

advertisement
Senior Assignment Fund Rubric
Please rate each quality indicator on a scale of 1 to 5, using values between scale integers to add sensitivity to the
index (higher scores represent higher quality). Please note that different quality indicators are weighted differently
in calculating the total score. Do not round the total score.
average
poor
5
4
3
2
Goals/Outcomes and Significance of the
Project
 Does the description of the project
offer a clear statement of goals or
outcomes?
 Is there a compelling argument for
the project?
 Would the plan clearly be accessible
to all students?
 Would funding the project clearly
result in long term improvement,
modification, or innovative
refinement of the Senior
Assignment?
 (35% of the total score)
Plan of Work
 Is the current Senior Assignment
clearly described?
 Is the plan reasonable and the
timeline realistic?
 Are faculty responsibilities clearly
delineated?
 Are specific descriptions of
anticipated outcomes provided?
 (25% of the total score)
Evaluation
 Is a clear method of assessing and
reporting the proposal’s impact
provided?
 Are project assessment measures
clearly related to goals/outcomes?
 (30% of the total score)
Points x 35 % =
Budget
 Does the line-item budget justify
each item?
 Is the budget clear, accurate and
complete?
 Does the budget follow the specified
information in the call for the
proposal?
 (10% of the total score)
Points x 10 % =
Total Score
Points x 25 % =
Points x 30 % =
Rationale
unacceptable
very good
Score
excellent
Quality Indicator
1
Download