Notes for examiners – assessment of students in examinations and guidelines for continuous assessment for students who have difficulties with reading, spelling and / or writing. Exam Policy, Trinity College Dublin Please refer to ‘Notes for examiners – assessment of examinations for students who have difficulties with reading, spelling and / or writing’ http://www.tcd.ie/disability/docs/Examguidelines.doc Introduction Marking Guidelines inform the examiner that the student, due to the nature of his/her disability, may have a particular difficulty with reading, spelling, grammar and written expression, and provide a framework for marking the scripts of such students. Marking Guidelines apply to timed examinations only. If a core component of assessment is that of competence in spelling, grammar and written expression, it is not possible to disregard these elements (for example, languages, journalism). The purpose of this document is to raise awareness amongst examiners if they are having difficulty correcting an examination script of a student who has difficulties with reading, spelling and / or writing. This document does not ask examiners to compensate these students by giving them additional marks because they have a disability. It asks examiners to understand that, even with additional supports put in place in examinations, the student’s disabilities may prevent them from reaching their full potential. Students who have difficulties with reading, spelling and / or writing as a result of their disability, are at a disadvantage when assessment takes the form of written examinations under timed conditions. Under such conditions they are not able to use their normal technological aids, nor adopt the extensive drafting and redrafting strategies they would use for assignments. The purpose of the sticker is to draw such a disadvantage to the attention of examiners, and to refer them to these marking guidelines. Procedure for granting examination accommodations Students must register with the Disability Service and submit supporting documentation (medical evidence from a consultant). The Disability Service will conduct a Needs Assessment for each student requesting registration. Students with reading, spelling and / or writing difficulties may be entitled to an extra 10 minutes per hour in exams to read and understand questions in an examination paper, or to complete their responses. Some students may require the use of a human or electronic reader. Some students may require the use of word-processing facilities in addition to extra time, depending on speed and legibility of handwriting. Common errors associated with reading, spelling and / or writing difficulties Reading underdeveloped word development skills; comprehension and retention difficulties; slow reading rate and/or difficulty in modifying rate; word omission; difficulties with processing print, also known as ‘visual stress’ or ‘scotopic sensitivity syndrome’. Spelling underdeveloped visual memory for words; limited recall of spelling patterns; letter sequencing errors. omission or transposition of letters, syllables and words e.g. siad for said. using the wrong tense in writing though not when speaking confusing ‘homophones’ which/witch, two/to/too, here/hear etc. Students may have developed strategies for mastering new course-specific terminology. However, the fatigue or stress which often exists under examination conditions may result in poor written expression. Written Expression inability to copy accurately; inconsistent syntax, sentence formation and paragraph construction; incorrect use of punctuation; restricted vocabulary. greater difficulty expressing ideas in writing than talking construction of ideas and answers may not show a logical linguistic connection Some students have significant difficulty with handwriting skills and/or an apparent disregard for writing conventions, as a function of motor co-ordination difficulties. Handwriting poor legibility of handwriting and presentation writing may be extremely slow, disjointed and untidy mis-use of upper and lower case letters may print words or use a semi-cursive script difficulty taking down information from books or boards accurately note taking in lectures is often an area of difficulty Despite gaining entry to the higher education sector, students with mathematical difficulties may continue to have difficulty with setting out problems coherently and distinguishing between mathematical signs such as (-) and (+). Marking and feedback of examinations The following points regarding assessment of examinations for learners with reading, spelling and / or writing difficulties, are commonly used across the HE sector in both the UK and Ireland: read fast, looking for ideas, understanding and knowledge. ignore mistakes in punctuation, spelling or grammar - do not comment on these mistakes unless part of the assessment criteria. do not penalise poor handwriting. write legibly and use uncomplicated English. explain clearly any comments made. be sensitive towards individuals and their work as many students with specific learning difficulties will have experienced negative reactions throughout their educational lives. consider whether the purpose of the examination question is to assess competence in writing essay type answers. If this is not the case, bullet point answers may be acceptable. Marking and feedback of assignments What To Do Rationale Assess or discuss the level of correction that the learner will be able to use effectively. Students will be able to tell you what “works” for them. Read quickly to assess ideas, understanding & knowledge, ignoring grammar, spelling & punctuation errors, without making corrections or comments. Holistic thinking does not lend itself to the linear nature of words; reading quickly may enable the reader to access the holistic pattern of thought. Comment on where the learner has done well and explain why a particular aspect of the work is good, rather than/as well as being critical. Models of good practice and correct usage are easier to retain and replicate; some students find it difficult to “read between the lines”. Explain what is required and what went wrong; use clear explicit English avoiding innuendo, sarcasm and complex sentences; avoid using grammatical terms. The student will be unlikely to know how to correct an error without some guidance or explanation; they are often unfamiliar with grammatical terms/rules. Inform the learner if you are marking for ideas, understanding and knowledge and ignoring spelling, punctuation and grammar. Absence of lots of corrections (they are used to a lot!) may create a false impression of improvement and can be demoralising when reappraisal occurs. If you decide to mark for spelling, grammar and punctuation avoid marking every error - select and indicate about four types of error. Numerous corrections can be demoralising; simply correcting spelling and grammar will not lead to improvement - helping the learner identify types of error together with models of correct usage will help. Use one colour pen to comment on ideas, understanding and knowledge and a different colour for spelling, punctuation and grammar. Avoid using red pens. Anything which helps to differentiate functions of words is useful. Red often has negative associations from school days and can be demoralising. Use highlighter pens to indicate which areas of text “belong together” if you want to indicate where changes in structure or organisation are necessary. Anything which aids differentiation of text is helpful; colour is instantly recognisable and will give the learner an additional sense of control over the text. Further information on how to support students with specific learning difficulties effectively in third level education can be found on the TCD Disability web page at http://www.tcd.ie/disability/teaching-info/awareness-info/learning.php Guidelines for students and staff on the modification of examination and assessment arrangements for students with disabilities are available at https://www.tcd.ie/academicregistry/exams/assets/local/exams-for-disability-students.pdf