Productivity Rewards and Pay Illusions with Benefit Cost Increases Sylvester J. Schieber, Ph.D. 11th Annual RRC Conference Issues for Retirement Security 10 August 2009 Washington, DC Overview Background – – – 1 Health reform looks likely Likely to present certain employment related costs Already concerns that wages aren’t growing properly The Compensation Puzzle in the Picture Intermediate Term Outlook on Benefit Costs Future Productivity Rewards under Alternative Health and Entitlement Reform Scenarios Conclusions Rich Environment for Policy Change 2 Health Reform President Obama is pushing hard Five Congressional Committees moving forward Current Congressional recess: building backbone or causing gastric distress? Russell Long and the theory of government finance Who pays for health reform? – – 3 President Obama says he will not sign a bill that creates a large increase in the deficit Many calls for employer mandates, taxes on benefits and curtailing public plan costs with prospects of cost shifts to employer-sponsored plans Concerns with Recent Compensation Outcomes 4 Stagnation in Income Growth in Middle Classes in Early Part of the Decade 5 Concerns mounting that compensation for lower and middle-earners not commensurate with productivity contributions Evidence is cited of flat earnings levels and higher unemployment in the middle of the earnings spectrum over last economic cycle The Composition of Compensation In 1995, total compensation paid to workers in the United States was $19.40 per hour on average – – – 6 82 percent was cash wages, salaries or bonuses 12 percent was paid in the form of retirement or health benefits 6 percent was paid in as social insurance contributions to government Growth in Hourly Productivity and Compensation Elements 1995-2007 Value of productivity and compensation elements set to 100 in 1995 150.0 125.0 Wage Pen/Health 100.0 ER Soc Ins Productivity 75.0 1995 7 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 Source: Derived from unpublished data from the Office of the Actuary, Social Security Administration. Wages, and benefit costs were converted into constant dollars using the GDP deflator. Compound Annual Growth Rates in InflationAdjusted Hourly Compensation for Full-Time FullYear Workers Pay levels are in deciles 8 Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide tabulations of the Current Population Survey, various years. Compound Annual Growth Rates in InflationAdjusted Hourly Pay for Full-Time Full-Year Workers Pay levels are in deciles 9 Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide tabulations of the Current Population Survey, various years. Compound Annual Growth Rates in InflationAdjusted Social Insurance Contributions for FullTime Workers 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 1980-1990 1990-2000 2.0% 2000-2007 1.0% 0.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pay levels are in deciles 10 Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide tabulations of the Current Population Survey, various years. Compound Annual Growth Rates in InflationAdjusted Retirement Benefits for Full-Time Workers Pay levels are in deciles 11 Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide tabulations of the Current Population Survey, various years. Compound Annual Growth Rates in InflationAdjusted Health Benefits for Full-Time Workers Pay levels are in deciles 12 Source: Watson Wyatt Worldwide tabulations of the Current Population Survey, various years. Share of Compensation Gains Provided as Benefits for Selected Periods Earnings decile 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 1980-1990 1990-2000 2000-2007 100.0% 100.0% 87.0% 52.7% 61.8% 41.7% 46.9% 35.5% 29.0% 20.8% 29.5% 22.2% 24.2% 20.5% 17.2% 18.3% 12.1% 9.5% 7.8% 6.9% 29.1% 44.6% 48.9% 59.6% 53.6% 54.5% 50.2% 49.7% 43.8% 78.0% Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009. Share of Compensation Gains Provided as Benefits for Selected Periods Earnings decile 14 1980-1990 1990-2000 2000-2007 3 87.0% 24.2% 48.9% 5 61.8% 17.2% 53.6% 8 35.5% 9.5% 49.7% Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009. Intermediate Term Outlook on Benefit Costs 15 Social Security and Medicare HI Income and Costs as a Percentage of Covered Payroll Percent of covered earnings 16 Source: Office of the Actuary, Social Security Administration. Average Funded Status and Contributions to DB Plans for 2000 to 2006 and projected for 2007 to 2010 Contributions (billions $) Percent funded 140 120 120 100 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 2000 17 2002 2004 2006 2008* 2010* Source: “The Future of DB Plan Funding Under PPA, The Recovery Act and Relief Proposals,” Watson Wyatt Insider, January 2009. Note: (*) projected Employer Contributions to DC Plans in Millions of Dollars from 1990 through 2007 $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 1980 18 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 Source: U.S. Department of Labor, EBSA, “Private Pension Plan Bulletin Historical Tables and Graphs,” February 2009. Whither Goes Health Care Costs under Health Care Reform? Highly inflationary cost environment possibly augmented with expanded demand Where are the cost savings coming from? – – – The Medicare experience – – – 19 Productivity improvements in the delivery sector Added contributions for those not now covered Reengineering of the health delivery sector Expected inflation to moderate Expected demand to be flat … and then there’s more… Actual Wage Growth, Expected and Actual Hospital Cost Growth under HI Annual rates shown against base of 100 in 1966 20 Sources: Average wages were taken from the Average Wage Index series developed by the Office of the Actuary, Social Security Administration; average daily hospital charges and reimbursement rates were taken from the Social Security Bulletin Annual Statistical Supplement, 1976, p. 178, Social Security Bulletin Annual Statistical Supplement, 1981, p. 209 and Social Security Bulletin Annual Statistical Supplement, 1993, p. 311. Actual and Estimated Hospital Utilization Rates per Aged Enrollee Under the Medicare HI Program for Selected Years Hospitalization days per enrollee 21 Source: See Nyce and Schieber, p. 39. Completing the Trifecta: Unexpected Inflation, Unanticipated Utilization… and then Expanded Coverage 22 Anyone receiving a DI benefit for 24 consecutive months was given coverage Anyone with end-stage renal disease who had been on dialysis for three months was covered By 1984, these two groups comprised 18 percent of the caseload Future Productivity Rewards under Alternative Scenarios 23 Baseline Assumptions 24 Productivity increases 1.7 percent per year Retirement plan costs stay high until 2012 and then grow at rate of growth in wages Health costs grow at rate of growth in compensation plus 1.5 percent per year down from 3.2 percent from 2000-2007 Baseline Projections of Annual Wage Growth Rates across Earnings Deciles for Selected Periods 25 Income Deciles 2007 to 2015 2015 to 2030 2007 to 2030 All 0.88% 1.10% 1.02% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0.99% 0.94% 0.89% 0.85% 0.84% 0.84% 0.84% 0.84% 0.86% 0.91% 1.01% 1.01% 1.00% 1.00% 1.02% 1.05% 1.07% 1.09% 1.12% 1.17% 1.00% 0.98% 0.96% 0.95% 0.96% 0.97% 0.99% 1.00% 1.03% 1.08% Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009. Scenarios 26 Baseline assumptions: health costs grow at rate of growth in compensation plus 1.5 percent per year Scenario 1: Assume that workers not covered by health insurance are mandated to be covered Annual Compound Average Wage Growth until 2015 Health inflation Expanded All rate above coverage workers wage growth Third decile Median decile Eighth decile Baseline 1.5% No 0.89% 0.89% 0.84% 0.84% Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 0.63% 0.15% 0.59% 0.76% Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009. 27 Annual Compound Average Wage Growth from 2015 through 2030 Health inflation Expanded All rate above coverage workers wage growth 28 Third decile Median decile Eighth decile Baseline 1.5% No 1.10% 1.00% 1.02% 1.09% Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 1.06% 0.88% 0.98% 1.08% Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009. Scenarios 29 Baseline assumptions: health costs grow at rate of growth in wages plus 1.5 percent per year Scenario 1: Assume that workers not covered by health insurance are mandated to be covered Scenario 2: Coverage is expanded and recent health inflation rates persist Annual Compound Average Wage Growth until 2015 Health inflation Expanded All rate above coverage workers wage growth 30 Third decile Median decile Eighth decile Baseline 1.5% No 0.89% 0.89% 0.84% 0.84% Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 0.63% 0.15% 0.59% 0.76% Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.42% -0.25% 0.29% 0.55% Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009. Annual Compound Average Wage Growth from 2015 through 2030 Health inflation Expanded All rate above coverage workers wage growth 31 Third decile Median decile Eighth decile Baseline 1.5% No 1.10% 1.00% 1.02% 1.09% Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 1.06% 0.88% 0.98% 1.08% Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.68% 0.11% 0.43% 0.71% Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009. Scenarios 32 Baseline assumptions: health costs grow at rate of growth in compensation plus 1.5 percent per year Scenario 1: Assume that workers not covered by health insurance are mandated to be covered Scenario 2: Coverage is expanded and recent health inflation rates persist Scenario 3: Coverage is expanded and health inflation rate increases to compensation growth rate plus 6 percent per year Annual Compound Average Wage Growth until 2015 Health inflation Expanded All rate above coverage workers wage growth 33 Third decile Median decile Eighth decile Baseline 1.5% No 0.89% 0.89% 0.84% 0.84% Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 0.63% 0.15% 0.59% 0.76% Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.42% -0.25% 0.29% 0.55% Scenario 3 6.0% Yes -0.16% -1.24% -0.48% -0.01% Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009. Annual Compound Average Wage Growth from 2015 through 2030 Health inflation Expanded All rate above coverage workers wage growth 34 Third decile Median decile Eighth decile Baseline 1.5% No 1.10% 1.00% 1.02% 1.09% Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 1.06% 0.88% 0.98% 1.08% Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.68% 0.11% 0.43% 0.71% Scenario 3 6.0% Yes -0.96% -3.68% -2.03% -0.86% Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009. Scenarios 35 Baseline assumptions: health costs grow at rate of growth in compensation plus 1.5 percent per year Scenario 1: Assume that workers not covered by health insurance are mandated to be covered Scenario 2: Coverage is expanded and recent health inflation rates persist Scenario 3: Coverage is expanded and health inflation rate increases to compensation growth rate plus 6 percent per year Scenario 4: Coverage is expanded and recent health rates persist and Social Security and HI reform is heavily tilted toward payroll tax increases Annual Compound Average Wage Growth until 2015 Health inflation Expanded All rate above coverage workers wage growth 36 Third decile Median decile Eighth decile Baseline 1.5% No 0.89% 0.89% 0.84% 0.84% Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 0.63% 0.15% 0.59% 0.76% Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.42% -0.25% 0.29% 0.55% Scenario 3 6.0% Yes -0.16% -1.24% -0.48% -0.01% Scenario 4 3.2% Yes 0.27% -0.42% 0.12% 0.39% Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009. Annual Compound Average Wage Growth from 2015 through 2030 Health inflation Expanded All rate above coverage workers wage growth 37 Third decile Median decile Eighth decile Baseline 1.5% No 1.10% 1.00% 1.02% 1.09% Scenario 1 1.5% Yes 1.06% 0.88% 0.98% 1.08% Scenario 2 3.2% Yes 0.68% 0.11% 0.43% 0.71% Scenario 3 6.0% Yes -0.96% -3.68% -2.03% -0.86% Scenario 4 3.2% yes 0.43% -0.21% 0.15% 0.45% Source: Steven A. Nyce and Sylvester J. Schieber, “Productivity Rewards, Pay Illusions Caused by Retirement and Health Benefit Cost Increases,” Watson Wyatt, August 2009. Getting the Horse in Front of the Cart 38 Advisory Board Project Meeting with Dr. John Wennberg on the Dartmouth Atlas Projec t – – – 39 Effective care – evidence based care anyone with need should routinely receive Preference sensitive care – cases where alternative routines with varying risks are appropriate and patient should be involved in “informed choice” decision on treatment path Supply-sensitive care Advisory Board Project Meeting with Dr. John Wennberg on the Dartmouth Atlas Projec t – – – 40 Effective care – evidence based care anyone with need should routinely receive Preference sensitive care – cases where alternative routines with varying risks are appropriate and patient should be involved in “informed choice” decision on treatment path Supply-sensitive care – see the article in the June 1, 2009 New Yorker comparing treatment patterns in McAllen and El Paso, Texas under Medicare Advisory Board Project Meeting with Dr. John Wennberg on the Dartmouth Atlas Projec t – – – 41 Effective care – 12 percent of Medicare services Preference sensitive care – 25 percent Supply-sensitive care – 63 percent Advisory Board Project Meeting with Dr. John Wennberg on the Dartmouth Atlas Projec t – – – Dr. Brent James, Health Care Delivery Institute at the Intermountain Health Care System in Utah – 42 Effective care Preference sensitive care Supply-sensitive care – Developing evidence to support the delivery of effective care A case study Analysis of Complications Associated with Induced Labor Deliveries of Babies Complication rates associated with timing – – – 43 6.66 percent of babies ended up in ICU at 37 weeks 3.36 percent at 38 weeks 2.47 percent at 39 weeks Notified doctors, empowered nurses to change procedures Percentage of Live Births by Elective Induction at Less than 39 Weeks Gestation at Intermountain Health Care System 44 C-section rates dropped from roughly one-third to 12 percent on first births and 20 percent overall. C-Section Births in South Florida Costs – – Rates – 45 C-sections cost between $11,000 and $30,000 per live birth Normal deliveries cost between $5,000 and $16,000 John Dorschner, “More S. Florida babies born by an appointment,” The Miami Herald (May 10, 2009, Early Edition), Health and Medicine Section, Page 1. The 2008 C-Section Rates in Miami Miami-Dade County 46 Total C-sections births Percentage c-sections Kendall Regional Hialeah South Miami Baptist Mercy Mount Sinai North Shore Palmetto General Homstead Jackson Memorial Jackson North 1,534 871 2,483 2,221 803 944 847 959 758 2,786 626 2,180 1,657 4,145 4,416 1,384 1,944 2,016 2,005 1,522 5,524 1,704 70.4% 52.6% 59.9% 50.3% 58.0% 48.6% 42.0% 47.8% 49.8% 50.4% 36.7% Total 15,336 29,969 51.2% Atul Gawande on McAllen and El Paso Medicare Treatment Patterns, 2001-2005 Critically ill patients received nearly 50 percent more specialists visits in McAllen Were 2/3rds more likely to see 10 or more specialists in a six month period Received – – – – 20 percent more echocardiography tests 200 percent more nerve conduction studies 550 percent more urine flow studies One-fifth to two-thirds more 47 Gallbladder operations Knee replacements Breast biopsies Bladder scopes Atul Gawande on McAllen and El Paso Medicare Treatment Patterns, 2001-2005 Received – Two to three times as many 48 Pacemakers Implantable defibrillators Cardiac bypass operations Carotid endarterectomies Coronary-artery stents The cost in McAllen was $15,000 per enrollee versus $7,500 in El Paso There was no discernable difference in the outcomes in the two cities Dr. Brent James of Intermountain Health System “If health reform is just about expanding health insurance coverage without addressing the delivery issues in the current health care system, it will simply be pouring gasoline on an open flame.” 49 Conclusions 50 Conclusion 51 A 1 percentage point increase in health benefits costs today costs 2.25 times the amount of cash wages that it did in 1980 If we could cut health inflation back to 1990s levels, we would likely see 1990s wage growth rates If we do not throttle back health inflation, median workers can expect long-run wage growth only about 40 percent of that in the 1990s If health reform ramps up inflation, we could see wage losses over most of the earnings spectrum Entitlement reform is a further risk and complication in assuring workers’ prosperity in the future Outlook for the Future 52 If health inflation persists at recent rates, cash wages likely will not grow at rates that persisted during the 1990s even if health reform fails Health care reform is a crucial consideration for the future prosperity of U.S. workers We need to be careful about getting the cart (expanded coverage) in front of the horse (workers’ ability to pay and improve their living standards The prospects for workers improving their standards of living and their ability to save for retirement hinge on the outcome in the current health care reform deliberations Questions and Answers ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 53 ? Productivity Rewards and Pay Illusions with Benefit Cost Increases Sylvester J. Schieber, Ph.D. 11th Annual RRC Conference Issues for Retirement Security 10 August 2009 Washington, DC