Example of past group assignment PowerPoint slides

advertisement
Drinking Habits of Freshmen
17.871 Group Project
Question
When freshmen live off campus, do
they drink more than when they live
on campus?
Why is this important?

Influence University policy/government
laws & regulations

Impacts student life on college campuses

At MIT: all freshmen must live on campus!
Alternate Explanations

Past experience: High School & Parent’s
Drinking Habits

Living Environment: Substance freehousing, single sex housing, roommates
Background
Henry Wechsler: Principal Researcher, Harvard
School of Public Health
College Alcohol Studies (CAS) every 3-4
years
 1993 study prompted examination of
heavy-episodic “binge” drinking.
 90s: alcohol abuse classified #1 public
health problem facing college students by
Surgeon General and CDC

Statistics

1 in 3 college students use of alcohol
qualified for formal diagnosis of alcohol
abuse

Continued attempts in 1990sLittle
change

Efforts aimed at educational aspects; no
environmental changes (thought to be
major cause of alcohol issues)
Method: Data

Random sample

Relevant variablesSTATA datasets to
analyze

Recoded and dummy variables created for
comparison across datasets
Method: Answering the Question

Variables “on” and “off” for freshmen place
of residence

Measure for total drinks consumed in a 30day period: (total drinks= drinking
occasions x drinks per occasion)

Compared percentage of on-campus
freshmen who drank to the percentage of
total alcohol those on-campus freshmen
drank
Survey Questions

How many occasions in the last 30 days
have you had a drink?

How many drinks, on average, did you
drink each time?

Combining the questions (problematic)
The data we have: total_drinks
histogram
On Campus
Mean= ~43
SD= ~68
Off Campus
Mean= ~34
SD= ~72
Occasions
Mean (occasions/past 30 days):
7.29
6.41
On Campus
Off Campus
Mean (average drinks/occasion):
4.95
4.30
Number of drinks
Occasions
Mean (occasions/past 30 days):
7.09
7.07
Alcohol allowed in student’s housing
No alcohol allowed
Mean (average drinks/occasion):
4.75
4.94
Number of drinks
Occasions
Mean (occasions/past 30 days):
6.67
9.45
Non-Greek
Greek
Mean (average drinks/occasion):
4.68
5.47
Number of drinks
Method: Rival Explanations

For Greek membership & alcohol-free housing,
we repeated the same analysis procedure:
Generated binary dataset for (X, not X);
X=possible explanatory variable
Created table of (X, not X) total drinks
consumed in the past 30 days
Compared percentage of respondents who were
X with percentage of total alcohol drunk by
respondents who were X
Who consumes the alcohol?
Percent
respondents
Percent total
drinks
On
77.40
80.83
Off
22.60
19.17
Alcohol-free
70.29
69.37
Alcohol allowed
29.71
30.63
Non-Greek
85.10
78.69
Greek
14.90
21.31
Difference
- 3.43
- 0.92
- 6.40
Total alcohol consumed by the students surveyed in 30 days previous to
survey:
3951 respondents drank 163,058 drinks (average 41 drinks/person)
*Note: Among those who drank/answered both questions
Results…
As far as we can tell, when freshmen live
on campus, they are no less thirsty than
those who live off campus.
 This is true when we look at number of
times they drink…
 And number of drinks they have on each
occasion.

But…

There may be unavoidable shortcomings,
either in our methodology, or in the data.
•Do we look at total drinks?
•Or do we look at measures of drunkenness?
• We chose to attempt to quantify the number.
• This assumes an even distribution of sex…
• And a normal distribution of weights.
I said hey…what’s going on?



Perhaps people who
drank in high school
drink more in
college.
Engineering
students may drink
more because of
chronic depression.
Students at easy
schools drink more.

Data for high
school drinking
was lost…
Data for majors
was not taken
across all
surveys…
 Schools were not
identified.

So why should schools care?



Measures to force
freshmen to live on
campus may not be as
productive…
Providing substance free
housing may be a
waste…
Because the most
significant finding we had
was…
Further thought and research…

We have identified several distinct
categories of drinkers which may be of
interest to college policymakers.

Greek/Non-Greek histogram

A measure of what constitutes harmful
behavior needs to be determined.
 Is
binge drinking frequently the problem?
 Is binge drinking infrequently the problem?
 Are Greek organizations really to blame?
Questions?
Occasions
Non-Greek
Greek
Number of drinks
Download