1 Cellular Visualization of Macrophage Pyroptosis 2 and IL1 Release in a Viral Hemorrhagic 3 Infection in Zebrafish Larvae 4 Mónica Varela1, Alejandro Romero1, Sonia Dios1, Michiel van der Vaart2, Antonio 5 Figueras1, Annemarie H. Meijer2, Beatriz Novoa1# 6 1 Marine Research Institute, CSIC, Vigo, Spain, 2 Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The 7 Netherlands 8 9 10 Corresponding Author: beatriznovoa@iim.csic.es 11 Running Tittle: Macrophage Pyroptosis in Zebrafish Larvae 12 Keywords: Hemorrhagic Virus, Zebrafish, Macrophages, Pyroptosis, IL1 Release, Antiviral Response, 13 RNA Virus, Inflammatory Response, SVCV 14 Abstract word count: 284 15 Text word count: 5097 16 1 17 ABSTRACT 18 Hemorrhagic viral diseases are distributed worldwide with important pathogens, 19 such as Dengue virus or Hantaviruses. The lack of adequate in vivo infection models has 20 limited the research on viral pathogenesis and the current understanding of the 21 underlying infection mechanisms. Although hemorrhages have been associated with the 22 infection of endothelial cells, other cellular types could be the main targets for 23 hemorrhagic viruses. Our objective was to take advantage of the use of zebrafish larvae 24 in the study of viral hemorrhagic diseases, focusing on the interaction between viruses 25 and host cells. Cellular processes, such as transendothelial migration of leukocytes, 26 viral-induced pyroptosis of macrophages and Il1 release, could be observed in 27 individual cells, providing a deeper knowledge of the immune mechanisms implicated 28 in the disease. Furthermore, the application of these techniques to other pathogens will 29 improve the current knowledge of host-pathogen interactions and increase the potential 30 for the discovery of new therapeutic targets. 31 32 IMPORTANCE 33 Pathogenic mechanisms of hemorrhagic viruses are diverse and most of the 34 research regarding interactions between viruses and host cells has been performed in 35 cell lines that might not be major targets during natural infections. Thus, viral 36 pathogenesis research has been limited because of the lack of adequate in vivo infection 37 models. The understanding of the relative pathogenic roles of the viral agent and the 38 host response to the infection is crucial. This will be facilitated by the establishment of 39 in vivo infection models using organisms as zebrafish, which allows the study of the 40 diseases in the context of complete individual. The use of this animal model with other 2 41 pathogens could improve the current knowledge on host-pathogen interactions and 42 increase the potential for the discovery of new therapeutic targets against diverse viral 43 diseases. 44 3 45 INTRODUCTION 46 Endothelial cells and leukocytes are at the front line of defense against 47 pathogens. Most infectious pathogens have some relationship with the endothelium, 48 although not all pathogens are true endothelial invading organisms (1). Infections can 49 produce large changes in endothelial cells function, particularly in relation to 50 inflammation. Inflammatory stimuli can activate endothelial cells, which secrete 51 cytokines and chemokines. Moreover, the importance of endothelial cells in the 52 regulation of leukocyte transmigration to the site of inflammation has given these cells a 53 major role in immunity (2). 54 Host-pathogen interactions are essential for the modulation of immunity (3). The 55 presence of a pathogen alters the immune balance prevailing in a host under normal 56 conditions causing the appearance of diseases, which lead to the death of the host if it is 57 not able to control the infection. Clear examples of these effects are evident in viral 58 hemorrhagic fevers, in which an understanding of the relative pathogenic roles of the 59 viral agent and the host response to the infection is crucial (4). Hemorrhagic 60 manifestations are characteristic of these fevers, which have historically been associated 61 with endothelium infections. Currently, many pathogens causing hemorrhagic diseases 62 do not infect endothelial cells as the primary target (1). Indeed, macrophages and 63 dendritic cells are targets for some hemorrhagic viruses, such as Ebola Virus (5) or 64 Dengue Virus (6, 7). 65 Most of the research regarding interactions between viruses and host cells has 66 been performed in cell lines that might not be major targets during natural infections 67 (8), making it difficult to characterize the behavior of pathogens in individuals and 68 reducing the likelihood of discovering an effective therapeutic target. The lack of a good 4 69 animal model in which the infection can be followed from the beginning and in the 70 context of the whole organism has contributed to these difficulties. Zebrafish (Danio 71 rerio) provide advantages, as these organisms exhibit rapid development, transparency 72 and a high homology between its genome and the human one (9). Furthermore, the 73 existence of mutant and transgenic fish lines and the potential use of reverse genetics 74 techniques, such as the injection of antisense morpholino oligonucleotides or synthetic 75 mRNA, make zebrafish a useful tool for the study of host-pathogen interactions. 76 No naturally occurring viral infections have been characterized for zebrafish 77 (10). Moreover, the experimental susceptibility of zebrafish to viral infections has been 78 demonstrated with other fish viruses (11-13) and also with mammalian viruses (14-16). 79 We used the rhabdovirus Spring Viraemia of Carp Virus (SVCV) as a viral 80 model to show the potential of the zebrafish in host-pathogen interaction studies. SVCV 81 predominantly affects cyprinid fish and causes important economical losses and 82 mortalities worldwide (17, 18). Affected fish exhibit destruction of tissues, such as 83 kidney or spleen, leading to hemorrhage and death. However, little is known about the 84 infection mechanism of this enveloped RNA virus. 85 Thus, the main objective of the present study was to improve the knowledge of 86 the pathology generated by SVCV, as an example of hemorrhagic virus, focusing on 87 interactions between the virus and host cells at early stages of the infection in zebrafish 88 larvae. Taking advantage of zebrafish transgenic lines, imaging techniques and, using 89 morpholino-induced cell depletion, viral-induced pyroptosis and IL1β release were 90 observed in macrophages at the single cell level. 91 5 92 MATERIALS AND METHODS 93 Ethics Statement. The protocols for fish care and the challenge experiments were 94 reviewed and approved by the CSIC National Committee on Bioethics under approval 95 number 07_09032012. Experiments were conducted in fish larvae before independently 96 feeding and therefore, before an ethical approval is required (EU directive 2010_63). 97 Fish. Homozygous embryos and larvae from wild-type zebrafish, transgenic line 98 Tg(Fli1a:eGFP)y1 that labels endothelial cells, transgenic line Tg(Mpx:GFP)i114 that 99 labels neutrophils, transgenic line Tg(Mpeg1:eGFP)gl22 that labels macrophages and 100 transgenic line Tg(Cd41:GFP)la2 that labels thrombocytes were obtained from our 101 experimental facility, where the zebrafish were cultured using established protocols (19, 102 20). The eggs were obtained according to protocols described in The Zebrafish Book 103 (19) and maintained at 28.5˚C in egg water (5 mM NaCl, 0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM 104 CaCl2, 0.33 mM MgSO4, and 0.00005% methylene blue), and 0.2 mM N- 105 phenylthiourea (PTU; Sigma) was used to prevent pigment formation from 1 days post- 106 fertilization (dpf). 107 Virus and Infection. The SVCV isolate 56/70 was propagated on epithelioma 108 papulosum cyprini (EPC) carp cells (ATCC CRL-2872) and titrated in 96-well plates. 109 The plates were incubated at 15°C for 7 days and examined for cytophathic effects each 110 day. After the observation of the cells under the microscope, the virus dilution causing 111 infection of 50% of the inoculated cell line (TCID50) was determined using the Reed- 112 Müench method (21). The fish larvae were infected through microinjection into the duct 113 of Cuvier as described in Benard et al. (22) at 2 or 3 dpf. SVCV was diluted to the 114 appropriate concentration in PBS with 0.1% phenol red (as a visible marker to the 115 injection of the solution into the embryo) just before the microinjection of 2 nl of viral 6 116 suspension per larvae. The infections were conducted at 23˚C. SVCV was heat-killed at 117 65ºC during 20 minutes. 118 Imaging. Images of the signs and videos of the blood flow were obtained using an 119 AZ100 microscope (Nikon) coupled to a DS-Fi1 digital camera (Nikon). Confocal 120 images of live or fixed larvae were captured using a TSC SPE confocal microscope 121 (Leica). The images were processed using the LAS-AF (Leica) and ImageJ software. 122 The 3D reconstructions and the volume clipping were performed using Image Surfer 123 (http://imagesurfer.cs.unc.edu/) and LAS-AF (Leica), respectively. 124 Immunohistochemistry. Whole-mount immunohistochemistry was performed as 125 previously described (23). The following primary antibodies and dilutions were used: L- 126 plastin (rabbit anti-zebrafish, 1:500, kindly provided by Dr. Paul Martin); Caspase a 127 (rabbit anti-zebrafish, 1:500; Anaspec); SVCV (mouse anti-SVCV, 1:500; BioX 128 Diagnostics) and Il1β (rabbit anti-zebrafish, 1:500, kindly provided by Dr. John 129 Hansen). The secondary antibodies used were Alexa 488 anti-rabbit, Alexa 546 anti- 130 rabbit or Alexa 635 anti-mouse (Life Technologies), all diluted 1:1000. 131 Real-Time PCR. Total RNA was isolated from snap-frozen larvae using the Maxwell® 132 16 LEV simply RNA Tissue kit (Promega) with the automated Maxwell® 16 133 Instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA synthesis using random 134 primers and qPCR were performed as previously described (24). 18S was used as a 135 housekeeping to normalize the expression values. Gene expression ratio was calculated 136 by dividing the normalized expression values of infected larvae by the normalized 137 expression values of the controls. Table S1 in supplemental material shows the 138 sequences of the primer pairs used. Two independent experiments, of 3 biological 139 replicates each, were performed. 7 140 Microangiography. Tetramethylrhodamine dextran (2x106 MW, Life Technologies) 141 was injected into the caudal vein of anesthetized zebrafish Tg(Fli1a-GFP) embryos at 142 24 hours post-infection (hpi). The images were acquired within 30 min after injection. 143 TUNEL assay. The TUNEL assay was performed using the In Situ Cell Death 144 Detection Kit, TMR red or POD (Roche) as previously described (25). 145 In vivo acridine orange staining. For acridine orange staining, larvae were incubated 146 for 2 hours in 10 µg/ml acridine orange solution followed by washing for 30 min. 147 Macrophages depletion with PU.1-MO. For the PU.1 knockdown, the morpholino 148 was injected into the yolk at the one-cell stage at 1 mM to block macrophages 149 development as previously described (26). Macrophage-depleted fish were infected at 2 150 dpf to ensure morpholino effectiveness until the end of the infection. 151 In vivo propidium iodide staining. For propidium iodide (PI) staining, larvae were 152 incubated for 2 hours in 10 µg/ml propidium iodide solution followed by washing for 30 153 min. 154 Statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were analyzed with a Log-rank 155 (Mantel Cox) test. The neutrophil count and qPCR data were analyzed using one-way 156 analysis of variance and Tukey’s test, and differences were considered significant at 157 p<0.05. The results are presented as the means ± standard error of mean (SEM). 158 8 159 RESULTS 160 Course of the SVCV infection in zebrafish larvae. Zebrafish larvae are susceptible to 161 SVCV through bath infection, but typically the results show high interindividual 162 variations (12, 27). Moreover, the long infection times required exclude the use of 163 temporal knockdown techniques, such as morpholino microinjection. As with caudal 164 vein injection (27), we found that SVCV injection into the duct of Cuvier was efficient, 165 thereby providing a reproducible route of infection with fast kinetics. We injected 2 nl 166 of a SVCV stock solution (3x106 TCID50/ml) per larva. Mortality began at 22-24 hpi, 167 consistently reaching nearly 100% between 48 and 50 hpi (Fig. 1A). There were no 168 differences in the development of the infection between the use of 2 or 3 dpf larvae 169 (data not shown). To assess viral transcription, the expression of the SVCV 170 nucleoprotein (N gene) was measured through quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 1B). The 171 samples were collected between 3 and 24 hpi (just prior to mortality). Efficient viral 172 transcription was observed from 6 hpi, with an important increment between 12 and 18 173 hpi. Moreover, we found that viral N gene transcription began quickly in the fish as 174 significant differences were found between heat-killed SVCV (HK-SVCV) and SVCV 175 infected fish (Fig. 1B). 176 With regard to macroscopic signs, the first ones were visible after 18 hours (Fig. 177 1C). A progressive decrease in the blood flow rate was observed, particularly in the tail 178 (See movie S1-S2 in supplemental material). The circulation in the tail was completely 179 stopped after 20-22 hpi, although it remained visible at the anterior part of the fish. The 180 circulation in the head lasted longer but also eventually stopped (See movie S3 in 181 supplemental material). At this point, blood was clearly visible inside the veins, with 182 exception of the hemorrhage areas (Fig. 1C). Hemorrhages appeared in the anterior part 9 183 of the larvae, mostly in areas with a huge amount of microvessels but, a great 184 heterogeneity was observed in the occurrence of these hemorrhages varying in terms of 185 location and time post-infection. The heartbeat was clearly less powerful over time until 186 it completely stopped, moment in which the larvae were considered dead. The observed 187 signs and times are consistent with those previously described for this virus using a 188 similar infection model (27). Consistency in the infection results reaffirms the idea that 189 SVCV and zebrafish larvae are an appropriate duo for an in-depth study of the innate 190 immune response against that intracellular pathogen. 191 SVCV does not affect the integrity of the endothelium. The loss of circulation in the 192 trunk and hemorrhages in larvae head were the most characteristic symptoms of 193 infection. Therefore, we characterized the effect of the virus in the vascular system of 194 the fish, as previously determined for another rhabdovirus, IHNV (13). Using the 195 transgenic line Tg(Fli1a-GFP) (28), which facilitates the visualization of the vascular 196 system, we clearly observed a loss of GFP fluorescence in infected fish at 24 hpi (Fig. 197 1D, E). This effect was particularly visible in the main veins of the head (Fig. 1D) and 198 in the tail (Figure 1E). In addition, we used this transgenic line in combination with a 199 whole-mount fluorescent immunohistochemistry for L-plastin (leukocyte-plastin) (29). 200 The anti-L-plastin antibody was a useful tool for the detection of macrophages and 201 neutrophils in the larvae. In addition to the loss of Fli1a-GFP fluorescence in the trunk, 202 a decrease in the number of L-plastin-positive cells in the area corresponding to the 203 caudal hematopoietic tissue was also observed at 24 hpi (Fig. 1E). Moreover, a shape 204 change in L-plastin-positive cells was clearly visible in infected fish. The morphology 205 of the cells in infected fish changed from thin and elongated (with prolonged 206 extensions) to rounded and lobulated (Fig. 1F). The morphological changes might be 10 207 associated with alterations in cell motility or the infection of the leukocytes themselves 208 (30, 31). 209 To confirm the integrity of the endothelium in the tail at 24 hpi, we injected 210 tetramethylrhodamine dextran into the caudal vein of the larvae. This fluorescent dye 211 remained inside the vessels, even when Fli1a-GFP fluorescence was absent (Fig. 2A). 212 Shadows in tetramethylrhodamine dextran fluorescence correspond with blood cells that 213 remain inside vessels even when circulation was stopped (Fig. 2A, 2B). Moreover, the 214 results of the TUNEL assay and the acridine orange staining revealed no DNA damage 215 neither necrosis, respectively, in the endothelial cells of infected fish (Fig. 2C), 216 suggesting that the cells were apparently healthy and the loss of fluorescence likely 217 reflected a transcriptional regulation of the Fli1a gene and not cell death. This was 218 verified by combining Fli1a-GFP fish with DIC microscopy (Fig. 2D). Further, 219 TUNEL-positive cells in the caudal hematopoietic tissue of infected larvae were 220 observed, and the localization of these cells was consistent with the position of L- 221 plastin-positive hematopoietic precursor cells in control fish (Fig. 2E). This observation 222 was not surprising as blood flow is essential for hematopoietic stem cell development 223 (32). In addition, several studies have shown the relationship between blood circulation 224 and Fli1, as Fli1-deficient mice exhibit impaired hematopoiesis (33). Indeed, previous 225 studies in mice described that both morphants and knockouts of Fli1 showed normal 226 vessel development, with impaired circulation and hemorrhaging (33, 34). This might 227 suggest that the simple transcriptional regulation of fli1a could be sufficient to cause the 228 symptoms observed in SVCV-infected larvae. 229 To determine the mechanism underlying fli1a mRNA transcription and to 230 associate it with the loss of blood flow in the larvae, we performed a time course during 11 231 SVCV infection. Based on the signs of their morphants and on their implication in the 232 maintenance of vessel integrity, we also selected the v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 233 oncogene homolog 1a (ets1a) and the vascular endothelial cadherin (ve-cad) genes for 234 qPCR analysis (Fig. 2F). Fli1a and Ets1a are both transcription factors involved in the 235 regulation of hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis (35). A statistically significant decrease 236 in the level of fli1a gene transcripts was observed from 12 hpi. Similar results were 237 observed for ets1a, as the time course profile for this transcription factor was identical 238 to that for fli1a. The interindividual variations in ve-cad, a key regulator of endothelial 239 intercellular junctions (36), made it difficult to observe a clear expression pattern, 240 particularly at the late stages of the infection. This effect might be associated with the 241 observed heterogeneity in the appearance of hemorrhages, in terms of time, area or 242 larvae. Notably, the downregulation of ve-cad at 9 hpi suggests an increase in the 243 permeability of the endothelium at that infection point. Interestingly, fli1a 244 downregulation clearly occurred before the onset of hemorrhages and the loss of 245 circulation, suggesting that hemorrhages were a consequence of this downregulation. 246 Zebrafish antiviral response to SVCV. To further study the mechanisms involved in 247 the defense against SVCV, we analyzed the expression of some important genes 248 associated with viral detection. Pattern recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors 249 (TLRs) and RIG-1-like receptors (RLRs), are membrane-bound and cytosolic sensors, 250 respectively (37). We observed a significant downregulation of tlr7, tlr22, tlr8a and 251 mda5 at 3 hpi (Fig. 3A). As occurred with Dengue virus (38) or Influenza (39), this 252 downmodulation could correspond to an immune evasion strategy. rig-1 was not 253 regulated during the first 24 hours of the infection. Regarding tlr3, we also saw a slight, 254 but significant, regulation at 12 hpi. 12 255 Pattern recognition receptors initiate antimicrobial defense mechanisms through several 256 conserved signaling pathways (40). The activation of interferon-regulatory factors 257 induces the production of several antiviral response-related genes. We observed that 258 SVCV elicited a response in all the analyzed genes (Fig. 3B). ifnphi1 and ifnphi2 259 showed different response profiles. ifnphi1 remained downregulated between 3 and 9 260 hpi, the time in which ifnphi2 was regulated. ifnphi1 was upregulated from 12 hpi, 261 similar to mx (a and b paralogues), which increased from 12 hours and reached a 262 maximum at 24 hours. rarres3 showed a biphasic response, with higher expression at 9 263 and 24 hpi. The recently characterized ifit gene family in zebrafish (41, 42) was also 264 present in the response, highlighting the response of ifit17a, which reached a 20-fold 265 change. 266 SVCV positive cells are not endothelial cells. To determine whether endothelial cells 267 were the primary targets of SVCV in this in vivo model of infection we performed an 268 immunohistochemistry using an antibody against SVCV (Fig. 4). Using Fli1a-GFP 269 infected larvae, SVCV was clearly visible in areas surrounding vessels (Fig. 4A). The 270 3D reconstruction and volume clipping of the Fli1a channel showed that the SVCV 271 positive cells were not endothelial cells (Fig. 4B, C, D). We observed crossing and 272 circulating SVCV-positive cells, suggesting that these cells might be leukocytes 273 interacting with the endothelium. 274 Our hypothesis was confirmed by performing L-plastin labelling (Fig. 5). L- 275 plastin positive cells were observed surrounding vessels and many of these cells co- 276 localized with SVCV. Again, the 3D reconstruction of the confocal images conferred 277 information about the cells and their position relative to the vessels (Fig. 5A). In 278 addition, we observed that SVCV-infected cells showed viral antigen positive signal 13 279 inside and on their surface (Fig. 5A). The signal detected on the cell surface might be 280 associated with viral assembly, antigen presentation by infected cells or both (6). We 281 observed cells labeled with only L-plastin (interacting or not with the endothelium), 282 double-positive cells (interacting or not with the endothelium) and cellular debris 283 positive for one or both markers. Large amounts of cellular debris were observed, 284 always with L-plastin-positive cells phagocytising SVCV-positive particles in the same 285 area (Fig. 5B). This cellular debris might play a role in the first line of defense against 286 SVCV, as observed with other pathogens (43). Furthermore, defective debris clearance 287 has been associated with persistent inflammatory diseases (44). 288 Cellular response to SVCV infection. The transendothelial migration of leukocytes 289 during inflammation has been well characterized (45). In the present study, the role of 290 leukocytes during infection was explored using the Mpx-GFP zebrafish transgenic line 291 combined with L-plastin immunohistochemistry (Fig. 6). Using this system, we were 292 able to differentiate between macrophages (L-plastin+, Mpx-) and neutrophils (L- 293 plastin+, Mpx+). After 24 hours of infection, practically all macrophages were 294 undetectable (Fig. 6A) and a statistically significant migration of neutrophils to the head 295 was observed (Fig. 6A, 6B, 6C). The loss of leukocytes in the caudal hematopoietic 296 region was also confirmed (Fig. 6B). Using markers for both cellular types, marco for 297 macrophages and mpx for neutrophils, we could check by qPCR the dynamics of that 298 leukocytes population (Fig. 6D). The analysis of marco gene expression suggested an 299 initial decrease in the macrophage population between 3 and 6 hpi and then, 300 macrophages remained stable until 18 hpi. Thereafter, the macrophage population 301 markedly reduced to nearly 0 at 24 hpi (Fig. 6D). Regarding neutrophils, mpx revealed 302 no differences in the number of cells, thus confirming the migration observed in 14 303 confocal images of these cells during the infection. Complementary experiments using 304 other transgenic lines possessing fluorescent macrophages (Mpeg-GFP), neutrophils 305 (Mpx-GFP) or thrombocytes (Cd41-GFP) showed that only macrophages were SVCV 306 positive at 18 hpi (data not shown). Moreover, given the importance of platelets and 307 coagulation system in hemorrhagic infections (46) we used the transgenic line with 308 fluorescent thrombocytes (fish equivalent to mammalian platelets) to detect a possible 309 thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy after SVCV infection. As no differences were found 310 in thrombocyte behavior or count between control and SVCV-infected larvae (data not 311 shown), we decided to focus our attention in macrophages. 312 To further confirm macrophage role as preferred target for this hemorrhagic 313 virus, at least during the first hours of the infection, we took advantage of the 314 morpholino-mediated gene knockdown technique. We injected the morpholino (MO) 315 PU.1 at a concentration of 1 mM to prevent the formation of macrophages in embryos 316 (47). A comparison of the normal fish and macrophage-depleted fish in these 317 experimental infections showed a delay in the mortality of morphants (Fig. 6E), 318 although eventually the mortality reached 100% in both groups. The duration of the MO 319 effect was analyzed at an equivalent time of 48 hpi in non-infected fish. Marco 320 expression was completely inhibited, as demonstrated using qPCR analysis (Fig. 6E). In 321 contrast, the population of neutrophils was not affected by the morpholino, as 322 demonstrated by the mpx gene expression after 48 hpi (Fig. 6E). The approximate 9- 323 hour delay in the mortality between both groups, suggested that macrophage presence is 324 crucial for SVCV pathogenesis during the first hours of infection. Therefore, we 325 analyzed the transcription levels of the SVCV N gene at 9 hpi (Fig. 6E). At this time, 326 fish without macrophages had lower viral transcription levels compared with normal 15 327 fish. Macrophage depletion delays the kinetics of viral transcription but is not enough to 328 prevent the death of morphant fish. This effect likely reflects the high virulence of the 329 infection. As an obligate intracellular pathogen, SVCV infects to survive and even if the 330 primary target is not present, the virus could still infect other cells. However, the 331 efficiency of infection is reduced in the first hours, resulting in a different timing of 332 mortality. This, plus the fact that the only SVCV-positive cells detected at 18 hpi are 333 macrophages, suggested that these cells could be the primary target of the virus. 334 SVCV elicits an inflammatory response that induces macrophages pyroptosis and 335 IL1β release. The fact that macrophages were primarily infected with SVCV prompted 336 us to examine the “disappearance” of these cells and determine whether pyroptosis is 337 involved. Pyroptosis might play a role in pathogen clearance, leading to inflammatory 338 pathology, which is detrimental to the host but positively affects the spread of the 339 pathogen (3). This programmed cell death depends on inflammasome activation and 340 consequent Caspase-1 action (48). In zebrafish, Caspa associates with ASC, an 341 inflammasome adaptor (49). Moreover, it has recently been demonstrated that this 342 caspase is able to cleave Il1 in zebrafish (50). Using qPCR, we characterized the 343 regulation of some important genes involved in the inflammatory response (Fig. 7A). 344 Three typical pro-inflammatory cytokines, il1, tnf and il6, were regulated during 345 infection. Il1 was the first responder, and a clear biphasic profile was observed. The 346 initial up-regulation of cytokine expression might be associated with the recognition of 347 SVCV by TLRs, followed by a second up-regulation of cytokine with a consequent 348 inflammatory response (51). This inflammatory response also triggered the response of 349 Tnf and Il6. Tnf was induced from 12 to 24 hpi. In addition, il6 showed a subtle 350 expression peak at 18 hpi. Strikingly, the response of this cytokine was delayed and 16 351 weak. Similar results were observed in the caspa time course. A complete inhibition of 352 asc was observed at 9 hpi, then, the expression of asc reached a maximum at 18 hpi 353 (Fig. 7A). 354 Immunohistochemistry against Caspa and SVCV showed that the macrophages 355 remaining at 20 hpi were positive for Caspa (Fig. 7B). These macrophages showed 356 interactions with infected cells (Fig. 7B). In addition, Mpeg1-positive and Caspa- 357 positive vesicles, presumably from macrophages, were observed in the same area near 358 SVCV-positive cells. Consistently with previus experiments, the 3D reconstruction 359 revealed that infected macrophages had external SVCV-positive signals (Fig. 7B). 360 Significant differences were found in Caspa levels between control and infected fish 361 (Fig 7C) showing the participation of that protein in the infection. 362 Il1 regulation is essential for a proper acute inflammatory response to an 363 infectious challenge. The implication of Caspa in Il1 secretion prompted us to 364 investigate the presence of that pro-inflammatory cytokine in infected larvae. An 365 antibody against zebrafish Il1 in combination with the Mpeg1-GFP transgenic line 366 allowed us the detection of this cytokine in macrophages (Fig. 7D). A 3D reconstruction 367 of the confocal images was generated to amplify the details, and two types of Il1- 368 positive macrophages were observed in SVCV-infected larvae. The first type was 369 SVCV-positive macrophages (Fig. 7E). The second type of macrophages localized near 370 zones with SVCV signal, was Il1 positive but was not positive for the virus (Fig. 7F). 371 The difference between these two macrophages types was the amount of Il1 detected. 372 Non-permissive macrophages in areas with SVCV-positive signal contained a higher 373 amount of Il1. Furthermore, the Mpeg1 signal was lost in favor of Il1 signal, which 374 could lead to the release of this cytokine. Il1 was detected in the macrophages of non17 375 infected fish, but the signal in these resting macrophages was clearly different that 376 observed in stimulated cells (Fig. 8A). Macrophages from infected fish showed a higher 377 amount of Il1 and what could be the release of this cytokine by microvesicle shedding 378 (Fig. 8B) or directly through the cell membrane (Fig. 8C) were observed. To assess the 379 membrane disruption produced during pyroptosis we used a cell membrane-impermeant 380 dye, PI. This dye was used in vivo and the uptake of PI by macrophages during SVCV 381 infection was confirmed (Fig. 8D). Furthermore, TUNEL assay showed IL1β releasing 382 cells dying during infection (Fig 8E). 383 18 384 DISCUSSION 385 In the present work we obtained images of the infection at the single cell level 386 using a zebrafish model, identifying macrophages as the preferred target of SVCV. We 387 were able to demonstrate for the first time that pyroptosis and Il1β release were 388 involved in the viral-induced cell dead in a whole organism. The direct observation of 389 such processes in individual cells provided a deeper knowledge of the inflammatory 390 mechanisms implicated in this viral disease. 391 Hemorrhagic viral diseases are globally observed with important pathogens, 392 such as Dengue Virus or Hantaviruses (52). Although hemorrhages have been 393 associated with the infection of endothelial cells (1), other cellular types could be the 394 main targets for viral infection (4). The lack of adequate in vivo infection models has 395 limited the research on viral pathogenesis. In SVCV-infected zebrafish larvae we 396 observed a loss of fluorescence of the endothelial marker Fli1a. However, this was not 397 due to infection of endothelial cells or cytopathic effects, and vascular integrity 398 remained intact, at least in the tail. The fact that haemorrhages always occur in the head 399 of the larva suggests the possibility that these occur as a result of damage or 400 permeability regulation in a particular kind of vessel, as it is known that the control of 401 the permeability may be different in different vessel types (53). The dysregulation of the 402 vascular endothelium, observed as a loss of Fli1a fluorescence, could reflect strong 403 immune activation during infection. In addition, the response induced in the rest of the 404 organism should also be considered. The downregulation of important transcription 405 factors, such as Fli1a and Ets1a, in endothelial cells shows the importance of a response 406 of the organism as a whole. It has been shown that the downregulation of Fli1 in 407 response to LPS is mediated through TLRs (54). Endothelial cells express different 19 408 receptors, such as Tlr3, Rig-1 and Mda5, among others. Based on this fact and the 409 qPCR results obtained in the present study, the activation of endothelial cells through 410 the Tlr3 might the cause of the loss of Fli1a expression, thereby inducing loss of 411 circulation, hemorrhages and inhibition in the development of hematopoietic precursors. 412 Recent studies have shown a relationship between Fli1 and glycosphingolipids 413 metabolism (55). Thus, we could consider Fli1a downregulation as a mechanism for 414 protection against viral infection in endothelial cells. Although, similar to other 415 hemorrhagic viral infections, we cannot rule out the possibility that endothelial cells 416 could be infected during the final stages of infection (4). However, this situation would 417 not be decisive for the pathogenesis of the disease. 418 Altogether, the qPCR results provide interesting data regarding the dynamics of 419 the response. The viral transcription began to emerge from 9 hpi, time in which we 420 observed the first increase in il1 transcription and the strong downregulation of asc. 421 With regard to the complete inhibition of asc transcription observed at 9 hpi, we cannot 422 rule out the involvement of the virus. Pathogens have developed diverse strategies to 423 block some of the components of the inflammasome (56). It has been shown that ASC 424 transcription is downregulated during the infection of keratinocytes with some types of 425 human papillomavirus (57). The host might also control this response (58); thus, it is 426 likely that, in this case, the host could control macrophage loss through the inhibition of 427 asc transcription. However, the potential blockade by the virus to favor viral spread 428 cannot be excluded. Furthermore, the accumulation of Caspa as an unprocessed protein 429 (pro-caspase) into the cells (59) would explain the weak transcriptional regulation 430 observed for this gene during the infection. 20 431 Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of the inflammasome in Il1 432 generation upon infection with RNA viruses (60) and showed that a biphasic response 433 might be associated with the two signals necessary for Il1 release from macrophages 434 (61). If we take into account of the results obtained also at protein level, the second 435 upregulation observed at 12 hpi might be related with inflammasome activation. 436 Inflammasome activation could be induced directly by the virus or cellular debris, but 437 further investigation is necessary to confirm the type or types of inflammasomes 438 implicated in this process. Moreover, as occurs with Influenza virus (62), and based in 439 the obtained qPCR results, we can not exclude the involvement of Tlr7 in 440 inflammasome activation and IL1β release. 441 The zebrafish model facilitated the capture of images showing Il1 release from 442 single macrophages during SVCV infection. The shedding of microvesicles containing 443 fully processed Il1 from the plasma membrane represents a major secretory pathway 444 for the rapid release of this cytokine (63). We observed vesicles presumably derived 445 from macrophages in areas with cellular debris or SVCV-positive cells. However, we 446 also observed the possible direct release of Il1 through the cellular membrane. Rarres3, 447 more commonly known as an antiviral protein, has recently been associated with 448 increased microtubule stability in cells (64), and cells with more stable microtubules 449 displayed increased pyroptosis (65). The fact that the expression profile of rarres3 450 overlaps with that of Il1 should be addressed in future studies. 451 The transcriptional regulation of some of the genes associated with pyroptosis 452 and the complete disappearance of macrophages before the onset of mortality, being 453 positive for Caspa and Il1β, suggested that pyroptosis is involved in SVCV infection. In 454 recent years, there have been many advances in research concerning this type of cell 21 455 death, particularly with regard to bacteria (66). In the case of viruses, our understanding 456 remains a step behind. It is known that some viruses cause pyroptosis of macrophages in 457 vitro, but so far, it is less clear whether this process occurs in vivo (67, 68). Using the 458 zebrafish model, we have provided the first description of viral-induced pyroptosis in 459 the context of a whole organism. The fact that a hemorrhagic viral infection was able to 460 induce macrophage pyroptosis in zebrafish, in the context of whole larvae, promotes the 461 use of this model organism for studying host-pathogen interactions. 462 Future studies will be particularly important for an in deep study of the role of 463 the endothelium, the inflammasome and pyroptosis in defense against the infection. 464 Indeed, without losing sight of the possible effects that the virus might have on the 465 regulation of the host response, the results obtained in the present study could be the 466 starting point to understand the antiviral immune response as a whole. Furthermore, the 467 application of these techniques and studies to other pathogens will improve the current 468 knowledge of host-pathogen interactions and increase the potential for the discovery of 469 new therapeutic targets. 470 22 471 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 472 This work was supported by the projects CSD2007-00002 “Aquagenomics” and 473 AGL2011-28921-C03 from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía e Innovación and 474 European structural funds (FEDER) / Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (CSIC08-1E- 475 102). Our laboratory is also funded by ITN 289209 “FISHFORPHARMA” (EU) and 476 project 201230E057 from the Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de Investigaciones 477 Científicas (CSIC). 478 The authors would like to thank Rubén Chamorro for technical assistance, 479 Professor Paul Martin (University of Bristol) for the provision of the L-plastin antibody 480 and Dr. John Hansen (Western Fisheries Research Center) for the provision of the Il1 481 antibody. Mónica Varela received predoctoral grants from the JAE Program (CSIC and 482 European structural Funds). 483 23 484 REFERENCES 485 1. Valbuena G, Walker DH. 2006. The endothelium as a target for infections. Annu. 486 Rev. Pathol. 1:171-198. 487 2. Muller WA. 2003. Leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions in leukocyte 488 transmigration and the inflammatory response. Trends. Immunol. 24:327-334. 489 3. Lupfer CR, Kanneganti TD. 2012. The role of inflammasome modulation in 490 virulence. Virulence 3:262-270. 491 4. Paessler S, Walker DH. 2013. Pathogenesis of the viral Hemorrhagic Fevers. Annu. 492 Rev. Pathol. 8:411-440. 493 5. Bray M, Geisbert TW. 2005. Ebola virus: the role of macrophages and dendritic 494 cells in the pathogenesis of Ebola hemorrhagic fever. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 495 37:1560–1566. 496 6. Halstead SB, O´Rourke EJ, Allison AC. 1977. Dengue viruses and mononuclear 497 phagocytes. II. Identity of blood and tissue leukocytes supporting in vitro infection. J. 498 Exp. Med. 146: 218-228. 499 7. Aye KS, Charngkaew K, Win N, Wai KZ, Moe K, Punyadee N, Thiemmeca S, 500 Suttitheptumrong A, Sukpanichnant S, Prida M, Halstead SB. 2014. Pathologic 501 highlights of dengue hemorrhagic fever in 13 autopsy cases from Myanmar. Hum. 502 Pathol. 45:1221-33 503 8. Mercer J, Greber UF. 2013. Virus interactions with endocytic pathways in 504 macrophages and dendritic cells. Trends Microbiol. 21:380-388. 24 505 9. Howe K, Clark MD, Torroja CF, Torrance J, Berthelot C, Muffato M, Collins 506 JE, Humphray S, McLaren K, Matthews L, McLaren S, Sealy I, Caccamo M, 507 Churcher C, Scott C, Barrett JC, Koch R, Rauch GJ, White S, Chow W, Kilian B, 508 Quintais LT, Guerra-Assunção JA, Zhou Y, Gu Y, Yen J, Vogel JH, Eyre T, 509 Redmond S, Banerjee R, Chi J, Fu B, Langley E, Maguire SF, Laird GK, Lloyd D, 510 Kenyon E, Donaldson S, Sehra H, Almeida-King J, Loveland J, Trevanion S, Jones 511 M, Quail M, Willey D, Hunt A, Burton J, Sims S, McLay K, Plumb B, Davis J, 512 Clee C, Oliver K, Clark R, Riddle C, Elliot D, Threadgold G, Harden G, Ware D, 513 Begum S, Mortimore B, Kerry G, Heath P, Phillimore B, Tracey A, Corby N, 514 Dunn M, Johnson C, Wood J, Clark S, Pelan S, Griffiths G, Smith M, Glithero R, 515 Howden P, Barker N, Lloyd C, Stevens C, Harley J, Holt K, Panagiotidis G, Lovell 516 J, Beasley H, Henderson C, Gordon D, Auger K, Wright D, Collins J, Raisen C, 517 Dyer L, Leung K, Robertson L, Ambridge K, Leongamornlert D, McGuire S, 518 Gilderthorp R, Griffiths C, Manthravadi D, Nichol S, Barker G, Whitehead S, Kay 519 M, Brown J, Murnane C, Gray E, Humphries M, Sycamore N, Barker D, 520 Saunders D, Wallis J, Babbage A, Hammond S, Mashreghi-Mohammadi M, Barr 521 L, Martin S, Wray P, Ellington A, Matthews N, Ellwood M, Woodmansey R, Clark 522 G, Cooper J, Tromans A, Grafham D, Skuce C, Pandian R, Andrews R, Harrison 523 E, Kimberley A, Garnett J, Fosker N, Hall R, Garner P, Kelly D, Bird C, Palmer S, 524 Gehring I, Berger A, Dooley CM, Ersan-Ürün Z, Eser C, Geiger H, Geisler M, 525 Karotki L, Kirn A, Konantz J, Konantz M, Oberländer M, Rudolph-Geiger S, 526 Teucke M, Lanz C, Raddatz G, Osoegawa K, Zhu B, Rapp A, Widaa S, Langford 527 C, Yang F, Schuster SC, Carter NP, Harrow J, Ning Z, Herrero J, Searle SM, 528 Enright A, Geisler R, Plasterk RH, Lee C, Westerfield M, de Jong PJ, Zon LI, 529 Postlethwait JH, Nüsslein-Volhard C, Hubbard TJ, Roest Crollius H, Rogers J, 25 530 Stemple DL. 2013. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the 531 human genome. Nature 496:498-503. 532 10. Crim MJ, Riley LK. 2012. Viral diseases in zebrafish: what is known and 533 unknown. ILAR J. 53:135-143. 534 11. Encinas P, Rodriguez-Milla MA, Novoa B, Estepa A, Figueras A, Coll, J. 2010. 535 Zebrafish fin immune responses during high mortality infections with viral 536 haemorrhagic septicemia rhabdovirus. A proteomic and transcriptomic approach. BMC 537 Genomics 11:518. 538 12. López-Muñoz A, Roca FJ, Sepulcre MP, Meseguer J, Mulero V. 2010. Zebrafish 539 larvae are unable to mount a protective antiviral response against waterborne infection 540 by spring viremia of carp virus. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 34:546–552. 541 13. Ludwig M, Palha N, Torhy C, Briolat V, Colucci-Guyon E, Brémont M, 542 Herbomel P, Boudinot P, Levraud, JP. 2011. Whole-body analysis of a viral 543 infection: vascular endothelium is a primary target of infectious hematopoietic necrosis 544 virus in zebrafish. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1001269. 545 14. Burgos JS, Ripoll-Gomez J, Alfaro JM, Sastre I, Valdivieso F. 2008. Zebrafish 546 as a new model for herpes simplex virus type 1 infection. Zebrafish 5:323-333. 547 15. Hubbard S, Darmani NA, Thrush GR, Dey D, Burnham L, Thompson JM, 548 Jones K, Tiwari V. 2010. Zebrafish-encoded 3-O-sulfotransferase-3 isoform mediates 549 herpes simplex virus type 1 entry and spread. Zebrafish 7:181-187. 550 16. Palha N, Guivel-Benhassine F, Briolat V, Lutfalla G, Sourisseau M, Ellett F, 551 Wang CH, Lieschke GJ, Herbomel P, Schwartz O, Levraud JP. 2013. Real-time 26 552 whole-body visualization of Chikungunya Virus infection and host interferon response 553 in zebrafish. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003619. 554 17. Ahne W, Bjorklund HV, Essbauer S, Fijan N, Kurath G, Winton JR. 2002. 555 Spring viraemia of carp (SVC). Dis. Aquat. Organ. 52:261–272. 556 18. Taylor NG, Peeler EJ, Denham KL, Crane CN, Thrush MA, Dixon PF, Stone 557 DM, Way K, Oidtman, BC. 2013. Spring viraemia of carp (SVC) in the UK: The road 558 to freedom. Prev. Vet. Med. 111:156-164. 559 19. Westerfield M. 2000. The zebrafish book. A guide for the laboratory use of 560 zebrafish (Danio rerio). Eugene: University of Oregon Press. 561 20. Nüsslein-Volhard C, Dahm R. 2002. Zebrafish: a practical approach. New York: 562 Oxford University Press. 303 pp. 563 21. Reed JL, Muench H. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent end point. 564 Am. J. Hyg. 27:493-497. 565 22. Benard EL, van der Sar AM, Ellett F, Lieschke GJ, Spaink HP, Meijer AH. 566 2012. Infection of zebrafish embryos with intracellular bacterial pathogens. J. Vis. Exp. 567 61:e3781. 568 23. Cui C, Benard EL, Kanwal Z, Stockhammer OW, van der Vaart M, 569 Zakrzewska A, Spaink HP, Meijer AH. 2011. Infectious disease modeling and innate 570 immune function in zebrafish embryos. Methods Cell Biol. 105:273-308. 571 24. Varela M, Dios S, Novoa B, Figueras A. 2012. Characterisation, expression and 572 ontogeny of interleukin-6 and its receptors in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Dev. Comp. 573 Immunol. 37:97-106. 27 574 25. Espín R, Roca FJ, Candel S, Sepulcre, MP, González-Rosa, JM. 2013. TNF 575 receptors regulate vascular homeostasis in zebrafish through a caspase-8, caspase-2 and 576 P53 apoptotic program that bypasses caspase-3. Dis. Model. Mech. 6:383-396. 577 26. Rhodes J, Hagen A, Hsu K, Deng M, Liu TX, Look AT, Kanki JP. 2005. 578 Interplay of pu.1 and gata1 determines myelo-erythroid progenitor cell fate in zebrafish. 579 Dev. Cell 8:97–108. 580 27. Levraud JP, Boudinot P, Colin I, Benmansour A, Peyrieras N, Herbomel P, 581 Lutfalla G. 2007. Identification of the zebrafish IFN receptor: implications for the 582 origin of the vertebrate IFN system. J. Immunol. 178:4385-4394. 583 28. Lawson ND, Weinstein BM. 2002. In vivo imaging of embryonic vascular 584 development using transgenic zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 248:307-318. 585 29. Mathias JR, Dodd ME, Walters KB, Yoo SK, Ranheim EA, Huttenlocher A. 586 2009. Characterization of zebrafish larval inflammatory macrophages. Dev. Comp. 587 Immunol. 33:1212-1217. 588 30. Herbomel P, Thisse B, Thisse C. 1999. Ontogeny and behaviour of early 589 macrophages in the zebrafish embryo. Development 126:3735-3745. 590 31. Brannon MK, Davis JM, Mathias JR, Hall CJ, Emerson JC, Crosier PS, 591 Huttenlocher A, Ramakrishnan L, and Moskowitz SM. 2009. Pseudomonas 592 aeruginosa Type III secretion system interacts with phagocytes to modulate systemic 593 infection of zebrafish embryos. Cell Microbiol. 11:755-768. 28 594 32. Wang L, Zhang P, We, Y, Gao Y, Patient R, Liu F. 2011. A blood flow– 595 dependent klf2a-NO signaling cascade is required for stabilization of hematopoietic 596 stem cell programming in zebrafish embryos. Blood 118:4102-4110. 597 33. Spyropoulos DD, Pharr PN, Lavenburg KR, Jackers P, Papas TS, Ogawa M, 598 Watson DK. 2000. Hemorrhage, impaired hematopoiesis, and lethality in mouse 599 embryos carrying a targeted disruption of the Fli1 transcription factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 600 20:5643–5652. 601 34. Pham VN, Lawson ND, Mugford JW, Dye L, Castranova D, Lo B, Weinstein, 602 BM. 2007. Combinatorial function of ETS transcription factors in the developing 603 vasculature. Dev. Biol. 303:772–783. 604 35. Sumanas S, Lin S. 2006. Ets1-Related Protein Is a Key Regulator of 605 Vasculogenesis in Zebrafish. PLoS Biol. 4:e10. 606 36. Vestweber D. 2008. VE-cadherin: the major endothelial adhesion molecule 607 controlling cellular junctions and blood vessel formation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. 608 Biol. 28:223-232. 609 37. Kawai T, Akira S. 2006. Innate immune recognition of viral infection. Nat. 610 immunol. 7:131-137. 611 38. Chang TH, Chen SR, Yu CY, Lin YS, Chen YS, Kubota T, Matsuoka M, Lin 612 YL. 2012. Dengue Virus Serotype 2 Blocks Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase and 613 Nuclear Factor-κB Activation to Downregulate Cytokine Production. PLoS One 614 7:e41635. 29 615 39. Keynan Y, Fowke KR, Ball TB, Meyers, AFA. 2011. Toll-Like Receptors 616 Dysregulation after Influenza Virus Infection: Insights into Pathogenesis of Subsequent 617 Bacterial Pneumonia. ISRN Pulmonology 2011:142518. 618 40. Broz P, Monack DM. 2013. Newly described pattern recognition receptors team up 619 against intracellular pathogens. Nat. Immunol. Rev. 13:551-565. 620 41. Liu Y, Zhang YB, Liu TK, Gui JF. 2013. Lineage-Specific Expansion of IFIT 621 Gene Family: An Insight into Coevolution with IFN Gene Family. PLoS One 8:e66859. 622 42. Varela M, Díaz-Rosales P, Pereiro P, Forn-Cuní G, Costa MM, Dios S, Romero 623 A, Figueras A, Novoa B. 2014. Interferon-induced genes of the expanded IFIT family 624 show conserved antiviral activities in non-mammalian species. PLoS One (in press). 625 43. Norling LV, Perretti M. 2013. Control of Myeloid Cell Trafficking in Resolution. 626 J. Innate. Immun. 5:367-376. 627 44. Nathan C, Ding A. 2010. Nonresolving Inflammation. Cell 140:871–882. 628 45. Muller WA. 2009. Mechanisms of Transendothelial Migration of Leukocytes. Circ. 629 Res. 105:223-230. 630 46. Zapata JC, Cox D, Salvato MS. 2014. The Role of Platelets in the Pathogenesis of 631 Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8:e2858. 632 47. He S, Lamers GE, Beenakker JW, Cui C, Ghotra VP, Danen EH, Meijer AH, 633 Spaink HP, Snaar-Jagalska BE. 2012. Neutrophil-mediated experimental metastasis is 634 enhanced by VEGFR inhibition in a zebrafish xenograft model. J. Pathol. 227:431–445. 635 48. Miao EA, Rajan JV, Aderem A. 2011. Caspase-1-induced Pyroptotic cell death. 636 Immunol. Rev. 243:206-214. 30 637 49. Masumoto J, Zhou W, Chen FF, Su F, Kuwada JY. 2003. Caspy, a Zebrafish 638 Caspase, Activated by ASC Oligomerization Is Required for Pharyngeal Arch 639 Development. J. Biol. Chem. 278:4268-4276. 640 50. Vojtech LN, Scharping N, Woodson JC, Hansen JD. 2012. Roles of 641 inflammatory caspases during processing of zebrafish interleukin-1β in Francisella 642 noatunensis infection. Infect. Immun. 80:2878-85. 643 51. Negash AA, Ramos HJ, Crochet N, Lau DT, Doehle B, Papic N, Delker DA, Jo 644 J, Bertoletti A, Hagedorn CH, Gale MJ. 2013. IL-1β Production through the NLRP3 645 Inflammasome by Hepatic Macrophages Links Hepatitis C Virus Infection with Liver 646 Inflammation and Disease. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003330. 647 52. Cox D, Salvato MS, Zapata JC. 2013. The role of platelets in viral hemorrhagic 648 fevers. J. Bioterr. Biodef. S12:2. 649 53. Dejana E, Orsenigo F. 2013. Endothelial adherens junctions at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 650 126:2545-2549. 651 54. Ho HH, Ivashkiv LB. 2010. Downregulation of friend leukemia virus integration 1 652 as a feedback mechanism that restrains lipopolysaccharide induction of matrix 653 metalloproteases and interleukin-10 in human macrophages. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 654 30:893-900. 655 55. Richard EM, Thiyagarajan T, Bunni MA, Basher F, Roddy PO, Siskind LJ, 656 Nietert PJ, Nowling TK. 2013. Reducing FLI1 Levels in the MRL/lpr Lupus Mouse 657 Model Impacts T Cell Function by Modulating Glycosphingolipid Metabolism. PLoS 658 One 8:e75175. 31 659 56. Taxman DJ, Huang MT, Ting JP. 2011. Inflammasome Inhibition as a Pathogenic 660 Stealth Mechanism. Cell Host Microbe 8:7-11. 661 57. Karim R, Meyers C, Backendorf C, Ludigs K, Offringa R, van Ommen GJ, 662 Melief CJ, van der Burg SH, Boer, JM. 2011. Human Papillomavirus Deregulates the 663 Response of a Cellular Network Comprising of Chemotactic and Proinflammatory 664 Genes. PLoS One 6:e17848. 665 58. Bedoya F, Sandler LL, Harton JA. 2007. Pyrin-only protein 2 modulates NF- 666 kappaB and disrupts ASC:CLR interactions. J. Immunol. 178:3837–3845. 667 59. Fernandes-Alnemri T, Wu J, Yu JW, Datta P, Miller B, Jankowski W, 668 Rosenberg S, Zhang J, Alnemri ES. 2007. The pyroptosome: a supramolecular 669 assembly of ASC dimers mediating inflammatory cell death via caspase-1 activation. 670 Cell Death Differ. 14:1590-1604. 671 60. Poeck H, Bscheider M, Gross O, Finger K, Roth S, Rebsamen M, 672 Hannesschläger N, Schlee M, Rothenfusser S, Barchet W, Kato H, Akira S, Inoue 673 S, Endres S, Peschel C, Hartmann G, Hornung V, Ruland J. 2010. Recognition of 674 RNA virus by RIG-I results in activation of CARD9 and inflammasome signaling for 675 interleukin 1 beta production. Nat. Immunol. 11:63-69. 676 61. Netea MG, Simon A, van de Veerdonk F, Kullberg BJ, van der Meer JW, 677 Joosten LA. 2010. IL-1β processing in host defense: beyond the inflammasomes. PLoS 678 Pathog. 6:e1000661. 679 62. Ichinohe T, Pang IK, Iwasaki A. 2010. Influenza virus activates inflammasomes 680 via its intracellular M2 ion channel. Nat. Immunol. 11:404-410. 32 681 63. Piccioli P, Rubartelli A. 2013. The secretion of IL-1 and options for release. 682 Semin. Immunol. 25:425-9. 683 64. Scharadin TM, Jiang H, Martin S, Eckert RL. 2012. TIG interaction at the 684 centrosome alters microtubule distribution and centrosome function. J. Cell. Sci. 685 125:2604-2614. 686 65. Salinas RE, Ogohara C, Thomas MI, Shukla KP, Miller SI, Ko DC. 2014. A 687 cellular genome-wide association study reveals human variation in microtubule stability 688 and a role in inflammatory cell death. Mol. Biol. Cell 25:76-86. 689 66. Richard EM, Thiyagarajan T, Bunni MA, Basher F, Roddy PO, Sarkar A, 690 Warren SE, Wewers MD, Aderem A. 2010. Caspase-1-induced pyroptosis is an 691 innate immune effector mechanism against intracellular bacteria. Nat. Immunol. 692 11:1136-1142. 693 67. Aachoui Y, Sagulenko V, Miao EA, Stacey KJ. 2013. Inflammasome-mediated 694 pyroptotic and apoptotic cell death, and defense against infection. Curr. Opin. 695 Microbiol. 16:319-326. 696 68. Tan TY, Chu JJ. 2013. Dengue virus-infected human monocytes trigger late 697 activation of caspase-1, which mediates pro-inflammatory IL-1β secretion and 698 pyroptosis. J. Gen. Virol. 94:1215-1220. 699 33 700 FIGURE LEGENDS 701 Figure 1. Infection course and loss of endothelium fluorescence in infected larvae 702 (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve after infection with 2 nl of a SVCV solution of 3x106 703 TCID50/ml (p<0.001). (B) Quantification of SVCV N gene transcripts as a measure of 704 the viral amount in the larvae over time. Heat-killed SVCV was injected in order to 705 separate immune response against the initial viral load. At 3 hpi significant differences 706 in the quantification of SVCV N gene transcripts were found between heat-killed SVCV 707 and SVCV infected larvae. The samples were obtained from infected larvae at different 708 times post-infection. Each sample (technical triplicates) was normalized to the 18S 709 gene. To avoid differences due to the larval development stage, the samples were 710 standardized with respect to an uninfected control of the same age. Three biological 711 replicates (of 10 larvae each) were used to calculate the means ± standard error of mean. 712 Significant differences between infected and non-infected larvae at the same time point 713 were displayed as *** (0.0001<p<0.001), ** (0.001<p<0.01) or * (0.01<p<0.05). qPCR 714 results are representative of 2 independent experiments. (C) The common macroscopic 715 symptoms observed at 24 hpi were hemorrhages and blood accumulation around the 716 eyes and head (arrows). See also Movie S1-S3 in supplemental material. (D). Zebrafish 717 larvae head confocal images (maximal projections from multiple z-stacks) of infected 3 718 dpf Tg(Fli1a-GFP) larvae immunostained with L-plastin antibody at 24 hpi (20x 719 magnification) showing the loss of GFP fluorescence in infected fish. (E) Confocal 720 images (maximal projections from multiple z-stacks) of infected 3 dpf Tg(Fli1a-GFP) 721 larvae immunostained with L-plastin antibody at 24 hpi (20x magnification) of vessels 722 in the yolk sac and trunk showing the loss of GFP fluorescence in infected fish. (F) 34 723 Higher magnification images are shown morphological changes in L-plastin-positive 724 cells in SVCV-infected fish. 725 Figure 2. Endothelium integrity is conserved 24 hours post-infection. (A) 726 Microangiography performed at 24 hpi injecting tetramethylrhodamine into the caudal 727 vein of 3 dpf infected and control larvae. Tetramethylrhodamine remained inside 728 vessels, even in infected fish without Fli1a-GFP fluorescence. Higher magnification 729 images are shown in the right panels. (B) DIC images showed the dorsal aorta 730 morphological integrity (arrows) in 24 hpi and control larvae. Note that blood cells were 731 visible inside dorsal aorta. (C) TUNEL assay and acridine orange staining were 732 performed in 24 hpi and control larvae to detect cells with DNA damage and necrotic 733 dead cells, respectively. Fli1a-GFP fluorescence is absent in infected fish, but TUNEL 734 positive cells were detected in the ventral part of the tail, which contains the caudal 735 hematopoietic tissue. No differences were found between control and SVCV-infected 736 larvae stained with acridine orange. (D) Fluorescent images of Fli1a-GFP of 3dpf 737 SVCV-infected and control larvae showing the loss of fluorescence in endothelial cells 738 after 22 hours of infection. Higher magnification images showed the intact morphology 739 of the dorsal aorta in infected larvae even when the fluorescence was lost (arrow head). 740 (E) The localization of L-plastin positive cells in caudal hematopoietic tissue is 741 consistent with that of TUNEL positive cells at 24 hours post-infection. TUNEL assay 742 was performed in 24 hours SVCV-infected and control larvae to detect cells with DNA 743 damage. L-plastin-positive cells are absent in infected fish, but TUNEL positive cells 744 are detected in the ventral part of the tail, which contains the caudal hematopoietic 745 tissue. (F) Expression qPCR measurements of vascular endothelium-related genes. The 746 samples were obtained from infected larvae at different times post-infection. Each 35 747 sample (technical triplicates) was normalized to the 18S gene. To avoid differences due 748 to the larval development stage, the samples were standardized with respect to an 749 uninfected control of the same age. Three biological replicates were used to calculate 750 the means ± standard error of mean. Significant differences between infected and non- 751 infected larvae at the same time point were displayed as *** (0.0001<p<0.001), ** 752 (0.001<p<0.01) or * (0.01<p<0.05). 753 Figure 3. Viral detection and antiviral response measure over time. (A) Expression 754 qPCR measurements of TLRs and RLRs associated with viral detection. (B) Expression 755 qPCR measurements of antiviral response-related genes. Samples were obtained from 756 infected larvae at different times post-infection. Each sample (technical triplicates) was 757 normalized to the 18S gene. To avoid differences due to the larval development stage, 758 the samples were standardized with respect to an uninfected control of the same age. 759 Three biological replicates were used to calculate the means ± standard error of mean. 760 Significant differences were displayed as *** (0.0001<p<0.001), ** (0.001<p<0.01) or 761 * (0.01<p<0.05). 762 Figure 4. SVCV positive cells are distinct from endothelial cells. (A) Confocal 763 images (maximal projections from multiple z-stacks) of 3 dpf infected Tg(Fli1a-GFP) 764 larvae immunostained with SVCV antibody at 20 hpi (60x magnification). (B) (C) (D) 765 3D reconstructions of the different zones shown in A. Sequential steps of volume 766 clipping of the Fli1a channel are shown from left to right. We classified SVCV-positive 767 cells as circulating- (white arrows) and interacting- (white head arrows) cells. The axis 768 numbers correspond to μm. 769 Figure 5. SVCV positive cells are L-plastin positive and Fli1a negative. (A) 770 Confocal images 3D reconstruction of different scenes observed during the infection of 36 771 3 dpf larvae. Double positive cells are observed around vessels, interacting or not with 772 the endothelium. (B) Confocal images (maximal projections from multiple z-stacks) of 773 infected Tg(Fli1a-GFP) larvae double-immunostained with SVCV and L-plastin 774 antibodies at 20 hpi (60x magnification). Panels on the right show 3D reconstructions of 775 the areas identified in the central panels. 776 Figure 6. Neutrophils and macrophages respond to SVCV. (A) Confocal images 777 (maximal projections from multiple z-stacks) of infected 3 dpf Tg(Mpx-GFP) larvae 778 immunostained with L-plastin antibody 24 hpi (20x magnification). Head showing the 779 loss of L-plastin-positive cells in infected fish. MPX-positive cells increase in the same 780 area as a consequence of the migratory wave from the yolk sac population. (B) View of 781 yolk sac and tail of infected and control larvae. A yolk sac neutrophil population was 782 observed in the control larvae. Macrophages are missing in infected larvae. (C) 783 Neutrophil count in the head of control and 24 hours SVCV-infected larvae (n=4). (D) 784 qPCR results of the dynamics of macrophages and neutrophils population during SVCV 785 infection. (E) PU.1 MO was used to block macrophages development. Macrophages- 786 depleted fish showed a delay in mortality of 9 hours after SVCV infection at 2 dpf 787 compared to controls. The results are representative of 3 independent experiments of 2 788 or 3 biological replicates each. qPCR of marco and mpx facilitated an assessment of the 789 efficiency of PU.1 MO at 48 hpi. Regarding SVCV N gene, the morphants showed less 790 viral transcription during first hours of infection, suggesting that macrophages are the 791 main target of SVCV during the first hours of infection. Significant differences were 792 displayed as *** (0.0001<p<0.001), ** (0.001<p<0.01) or * (0.01<p<0.05). 793 Figure 7.SVCV elicits an inflammatory response and also macrophages pyroptosis. 794 (A) Expression qPCR measurements of some important inflammatory response genes. 37 795 Three biological replicates were used to calculate the means ± standard error of mean. 796 Significant differences between infected and non-infected larvae at the same time point 797 were displayed as *** (0.0001<p<0.001), ** (0.001<p<0.01) or * (0.01<p<0.05). (B) 798 Confocal images (maximal projections from multiple z-stacks) of 3 dpf infected 799 Tg(Mpeg1-GFP) larvae immunostained with SVCV and Caspa antibodies at 22 hpi (60x 800 magnification). The last macrophages in the larvae were Caspa positive. Some of these 801 cells were infected (boxed area) and the other cells were interacting with a group of 802 infected cells (arrowhead). (The arrow shows potential macrophage pyroptosis, 803 observed as visible membrane vesicle shedding. The last panel shows a 3D 804 reconstruction of the infected macrophage in the boxed area, with a viral antigen 805 positive area on its surface (arrowhead). (C) Resting macrophages shown Caspa signal 806 inside the cell. The level of Caspa was significantly less in resting macrophages than 807 that in the macrophages of infected larvae. (D) Confocal images (maximal projections 808 from multiple z-stacks) of infected Tg(Mpeg1-GFP) larvae immunostained with SVCV 809 and Il1 antibodies at 20 hpi (60x magnification). Regarding the proportion of Il1 and 810 SVCV fluorescence observed, we distinguished two types of macrophages. (E) 3D 811 reconstruction of infected macrophages in the boxed area is displayed. Il1 signal is 812 visible inside cells, as the SVCV signal. SVCV antigens are also visible on the cell 813 surface. (F) 3D reconstruction of non-infected macrophages positive for Il1 in boxed is 814 displayed. Mpeg1 fluorescence is lost in favor of the Il1 signal. Cellular debris positive 815 for SVCV is visible around these macrophages. 816 Figure 8. Interleukin 1 release is induced by SVCV infection. (A) Resting 817 macrophages shown Il1 signal inside the cell. The level of il1 was significantly less 818 in resting macrophages than that in the macrophages of infected larvae. (B) The 38 819 macrophages in 3 dpf infected larvae showed shedding of Il1-positive vesicles. (C) 820 Il1 also could be released directly through membrane pores in the macrophages of 821 infected larvae. (D) In vivo PI staining of infected larvae showing macrophages PI 822 uptake through membrane pores. (E) 3D reconstruction of macrophages in an SVCV 823 infected larvae positive for IL1β and TUNEL are displayed. 39