Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete
Association for Community Development  Association du Développement Communautaire
1011 Budapest, Corvin tér 8.  1251 Budapest, Pf. 42  E-mail: kofe@kkapcsolat.hu
Telefon: (36-1) 201 57 28, Fax: (36-1) 225-60-13, www.kka.hu
Budapest, 29 August 2008
EACEA – Unit P7 Citizenship
Support to projects initiated by civil society
Avenue du Bourget, 1 (BOUR 00/13)
B-1140 Brussels - Belgium
Email : eacea-p7-civilsociety@ec.europa.eu
Final Report
Name of the beneficiary: Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete, Corvin tér 8. HU-1011 Budapest
(HACD Hungarian Association for Community Development)
Decision number: 2007 – 1530/001 - 001
Project number: CSP 2007 / 152
Duration of project:
- N° of months: 10
- Start date: 01/09/2007
End date: 30/06/2008
1. Executive summary
The ’European Dialogue – Longlasting Networking for European Integration through Encouraging Citizens’
Participation’ transnational project has been implemented successfully, and it has greatly contributed to the
development and future co-operation of the two Community Organizing and Development networks in Europe:
the CEE CN Central-Eastern European Citizens Network and the CEBSD Combined European Bureau for
Social Development.
The project that was initiated and implemented by the HACD Hungarian Association for Community
Development, member in both networks, and its partner organizations, the CEE CN and the CEBSD, has
reached the range of organizations and people previously planned. Through its 2 national and 3 transnational
workshops it has enhanced the interest towards the European integration. The project launched the European
Dialogue Booklet, organised an opening ceremony and a press conference with the participation of the
representatives of foreign embassies active in Hungary and the media, on the Europe Boat on the River Danube,
in Budapest. The organisers have evaluated the work that was done by the representatives of participating
organisations.
The ED workshop was held with the participation of representatives from 23 organisations from 17
countries (15 from European member countries, 1 EFTA-country Norway and 1 non-European country,
Georgia), coordinators from the two networks and 10 Hungarian community activists.
The results of the European Dialogue have been published on HACD’s journal, Parola 2008. Vol. 2 and
its website www.kka.hu (see European Dialogue), and sent to the participating organisations, asking them to
publish and disseminate them in their own countries and among the related international organisations and
networks they are active in.
The project throughout its planning, implementation, evaluation and follow-up entirely kept to the basic
principle of community development, the principle of participation and complete stakeholder ownership. The
HACD and its partners, CEBSD and CEE CN, undertook the roles of initiator and professional support.
Both networks are in a process of structural change, which influences strategy, membership, policy
issues, as well as the activities. It seems the ED project came in the right time, as this cooperation can be a focus
in the development processes in the close future.
Strongly emphasized issues:
 There was respect for each other but gaps in knowledge and understanding.
1
Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete
Association for Community Development  Association du Développement Communautaire
1011 Budapest, Corvin tér 8.  1251 Budapest, Pf. 42  E-mail: kofe@kkapcsolat.hu
Telefon: (36-1) 201 57 28, Fax: (36-1) 225-60-13, www.kka.hu
 Differences in culture, experience and terminology were identified.
 We need to be in the forefront of actions, but we also have to balance this with long term process.
 It is important to keep an eye to be both professional and movement oriented.
Some proposals for future co-operation:
1. Match-up the CPW Citizens’ Participation Week and EWLD European Week of Local Democracy
2. Possible joint leadership meetings between CEBSD and CEECN.
3. Use, refresh, review the Budapest Declaration lobby.
4. Capture best practice where this has already been done.
5. Surveys analysing the levels of citizen’s participation in decision-making processes.
6. Common training issues, especially within the Training and Learning CD European project.
7. The policy implications of the experience and practice especially the issue of intercultural dialogue,
involvement of youth. Embedding the experience practices in the structure, creating culture, not only projects!
8. European Future Forum: it would retain a commitment to European Dialogue and hold a conference between
two bodies every 4 years to look at what has happened and what is projected into the future.
The project has enhanced the strengthening of the co-operation networks, their reputation and
willingness to co-operate. As a result of the project, several resolutions, co-operation agreements have been
established, and joint project planning has been launched among the co-operating partners and the participants.
Contact:
CEE CN
Anna Karailieva
anna@ceecn.net
www.ceecn.net
CEBSD
Kirsten Paaby
kirsten.paaby@idebanken.no
www.cebsd.org
2
HACD
Ilona Vercseg
vercseg@kka.hu
www.kka.hu
Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete
Association for Community Development  Association du Développement Communautaire
1011 Budapest, Corvin tér 8.  1251 Budapest, Pf. 42  E-mail: kofe@kkapcsolat.hu
Telefon: (36-1) 201 57 28, Fax: (36-1) 225-60-13, www.kka.hu
2. Final report of the project
European Dialogue
9-10 May 2008
Kunszentmiklós-Kunbábony, Hungary
Main Patron: Kinga Göncz
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Further Co-operating Organizations:
Civil College Foundation, Civil Radio, Hungarian Institute for Culture and Art
Sponsors:
Co-financed by the European Union within the programme "Europe for
Citizens" 2007 – 2013.
3
National Civil Fund
Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete
Association for Community Development  Association du Développement Communautaire
1011 Budapest, Corvin tér 8.  1251 Budapest, Pf. 42  E-mail: kofe@kkapcsolat.hu
Telefon: (36-1) 201 57 28, Fax: (36-1) 225-60-13, www.kka.hu
WHO
The HACD Hungarian Association for Community Development is a registered (registration number 356),
nationwide organisation, founded in 1989. The objective of HACD is the development of the capacity of
citizens to initiate and act in the community. This goal is designed to be achieved through increasing
participation of citizens in their own and in their common affairs, through improving the community-related
conditions for local action and through building-up the local institutions of democracy. HACD joined CEBSD
in 1991, the CEE CN in 2002. see www.kka.hu
The CEBSD Combined European Bureau for Social Development, a network of organisations in Europe
which promotes Community Development, was set up on 3.7.90 and has been registered as a non-profit
organisation in the Netherlands since 29.5.96. Members supports exchanges, networking and policy work
through projects, seminars, working groups and conferences. CEBSD has succeeded in developing and
strengthening links between organisations and associations working on shared values and principles of
Community Development within Europe. See www.cebsd.org
The CEE CN Central and Eastern European Citizens Network was registered in January 2005 in Slovakia
but organized its activities under the assistance of the Center for Community Organizing in Slovakia from 2000.
The mission is to promote citizen participation in CEE and provide opportunities for grassroots initiatives to
learn and exchange experiences and ideas. Activities: joint activities of grassroots initiatives; exchanges; annual
training for citizen activists; conference every two years; development and maintenance of an active web site.
See www.ceecn.net
Participating Organizations
BELGIUM
Samenlevingsopbouw Vlaanderen vzw, Brussel
BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA
CCI Centers for Civic Initiatives, Banja Luka
BULGARIA
C.E.G.A. Creating Effective Grassroots Alternatives, Sofia
CZECH REPUBLIC
 CCO Center for Community Organizing, Prerov
 Agora Central Europe, Society for Democracy and Culture, Prague
DENMARK
KSS Kristeligt Studenter-Settlement, København
FRANCE
IR DSU Inter-Réseaux Développement Social Urbain
GEORGIA
International Association „Civitas Georgica”, Tbilisi
GERMANY
PBW, Paritaetisches Bildungswerk Bundesverband, Frankfurt a. M.
HUNGARY
HACD Hungarian Association for Community Development, Budapest
NETHERLANDS
MOVISIE, kennis en advies voor maatschappelijke ontwikkeling, Utrecht
4
Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete
Association for Community Development  Association du Développement Communautaire
1011 Budapest, Corvin tér 8.  1251 Budapest, Pf. 42  E-mail: kofe@kkapcsolat.hu
Telefon: (36-1) 201 57 28, Fax: (36-1) 225-60-13, www.kka.hu
NORWAY
Stiftelsen Idébanken, Oslo
ROMANIA
 RACD Romanian Association for Community Development, Vrancea
 Community Foundation, Sibiu
 Pro Democracy Association Brasov Branch, Brasov
 Association for Community Partnership, Brasov
 Associatia CRONO, Craiova
SLOVAK REPUBLIC
 CCO Center for Community Organizing, Banska Bystrica
 VOKA Rural Organization for Community Activities, Banska Bystrica
SLOVENIA
CNVOS Centre for Information Service, Cooperation and Development of NGOs,
Ljubljana
SPAIN
FDC Fundacio Desenvolupament Comunitari, Barcelona
SWEDEN
CESAM Stiftelsen Centrum för Samhällsarbete och Mobilisering, Örebro
UNITED KINGDOM
Community Development Foundation, London
Note: Georgian and Norwegian organisations are not eligible in this project, thus they were supported by
other resources.
WHAT
The organisers of the ’European Dialogue – Longlasting Networking for European Integration through
Encouraging Citizens’ Participation’ transnational project have successfully implemented 3 transnational and 2
national workshops in Hungary, launched the European Dialogue Booklet (Newsletter), organised an opening
ceremony and a press conference with the participation of the representatives of foreign embassies active in
Hungary and the media, on the Europe Boat on the River Danube, in Budapest. Furthermore, the organisers
have summarised and evaluated the work that was done by the representatives of participating organisations.
The results of the European Dialogue have been published on HACD’s website www.kka.hu and sent to the
participating organisations, asking them to publish and disseminate them in their own countries and among the
related international organisations and networks they are active in.
The European Dialogue project undertook to organise the first network meeting of two European community
organizing and development networks, the CEE CN Central-Eastern European Citizens Network and the
CEBSD Combined European Bureau for Social Development, with the participation of representatives from 23
organisations from 17 countries (15 from European member countries, 1 EFTA-country Norway and 1 nonEuropean country, Georgia), coordinators from the two networks and 10 Hungarian community activists, so that
these two civil society development networks contributed to the development of citizenship in the European
Union.
The project had been initiated by HACD (applicant) which is a member in both networks.
The project successfully organised the following events:
5
Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete
Association for Community Development  Association du Développement Communautaire
1011 Budapest, Corvin tér 8.  1251 Budapest, Pf. 42  E-mail: kofe@kkapcsolat.hu
Telefon: (36-1) 201 57 28, Fax: (36-1) 225-60-13, www.kka.hu
1. Preparatory, coordination workshop – national: 03/09/2007 – 04/09/2007, Budapest, Hungary
2. Planning Workshop – transnational: 16/11/2007 – 17/11/2007, Budapest, Hungary
3. European Dialogue on the Day of Europe – transnational:
08/05/2008 Budapest – registration, opening ceremony and press conference. Main Patron: Kinga
Göncz, Hungarian Minister of Foreign Affairs (her welcome is enclosed!)
09/05/2008 - 10/05/2008, Kunszentmiklós, Hungary
Day of Europe and the following day: European Dialogue
4. Coordination workshop - national. Evaluation and preparation for the follow-up 1: 23/05/2008 –
24/05/2008, Budapest, Hungary
5. Follow-up – transnational workshop. Evaluation and preparation for the follow-up 2: 06/06/2008 –
07/06/2008, Budapest, Hungary
Call for participation, Application form, ED-info form, lists of participants, programmes for each event,
notes and evaluation sheet are enclosed!
WHY
The aim of the project was to help the members of the two European community development networks, which
have been working independently, but for the same goal - the development of civil society and participative
democracy -, to get to know each other, to learn from each other, to reinforce each other’s efforts, to jointly seek
the European dimension of their work while they inspire each other to seek potential ways of cooperation.
The basis for future cooperation between the two networks can be the agreeing of their aims and the integration
of these into one pan-European aim: the promotion of active European citizenship, the joint promotion of
participation and democracy at the European level, the strengthening of the European sense of identity, the
definition of possible ways and future projects to achieve this, creating closer and more regular cooperation
between the two networks.
WHERE
The project was implemented in Hungary, by the Hungarian Association for Community Development and its
partner organisations, in Budapest, at the venue of the HACD and on the Europe Boat on the River Danube, and
in Kunszentmiklós-Kunbábony, in the residential community centre of the Civil College Foundation, Hungary.
HOW
The project throughout its planning, implementation, evaluation and follow-up entirely kept to the basic
principle of community development, the principle of participation and complete stakeholder ownership. The
HACD and its partners, CEBSD and CEE CN, undertook the roles of initiator and professional support. This
means that the project did not operate along pre-defined patterns, but provided a thoroughly thought through
and operational framework to facilitate the creative cooperation of project participants.
At the 2 transnational and the two HACD workshops the project participants applied the usual cooperation,
planning and evaluation techniques, with additional discussions, work in groups on a rotation basis. The ED
transnational workshop was implemented in partnership cooperation, in the framework of the Café Dialogue
method (see the detailed description of the project at the enclosed booklet of the project!) Cross-fertilization –
mutual learning, information exchange and international cooperation prevailed during the implementation of the
project.
6
Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete
Association for Community Development  Association du Développement Communautaire
1011 Budapest, Corvin tér 8.  1251 Budapest, Pf. 42  E-mail: kofe@kkapcsolat.hu
Telefon: (36-1) 201 57 28, Fax: (36-1) 225-60-13, www.kka.hu
3.Target group(s)
Direct target groups
In the European Dialogue workshop 17 countries (15 from EU-member countries, 1 EFTA-country Norway and
1 non-European country, Georgia) and 23 organisations were represented, among which:
- CEE CN was present with 13 participants (including a Georgian representative), representing 7
countries and 13 organisations + the coordinator of the network, Anna Karailieva (Slovakia). A
total of 13 persons were supported by this project.
- CEBSD was present with 10 participants (including a Norwegian representative), representing 10
countries and 10 organisations + the coordinator of the network, Margo Gorman (Ireland). A
total of 9 persons were supported by this project.
- 10 Hungarian professionals and volunteers.
Problem: lack of travel costs (CEE CN) which many participants just could not afford, but in the end there was
still a good turn-out.
Indirect target groups
It has been noted several times by the participants that their members have shown a high level of interest
towards working on the European level in the future. Hence, the estimated number of the indirect target groups
was correct (15000 European citizens: organisational members and project activists + we can count with
approx. 1000 persons in the new activities indentified by this project).
Participants proved to be committed towards the EU, its institutions and values, and they were ready to bring
them closer to the local people.
4. Impact
The ’European Dialogue’ transnational project has been implemented successfully, and it has greatly
contributed to the development and future co-operation of the two Community Organizing and Development
networks in Europe: the CEE CN Central-Eastern European Citizens Network and the CEBSD Combined
European Bureau for Social Development.
The European Dialogue workshop helped a lot to give some perspective about the future cooperation. There
was also considerable caution and a sense that while it was a good step, we need to do a lot more together to get
to know each other better.
Both networks are in a process of structural change, which influences strategy, membership, policy issues, as
well as the activities. It is difficult to project the concrete changes and their effects at the moment, but it seems
the ED project came in the right time, as this cooperation can be a focus in the development processes in the
close future. Project or issue orientation seems to be a preferred way of working from both sides, which is also a
possibility to build short or longer term co-operations around certain topics.
High expectations at the beginning but we also have to relate those to our capacities and what we are able to do.
Some of the issues are very big and some even utopian but we also have smaller steps that are more realistic.
We should bear this in mind for the follow-up. Small and simple is beautiful.
HACD has analysed evaluation results from individual participation. Most of the participants (around 90%, 3031 persons) has been very satisfied or satisfied with the transnational elements of the meeting (contribution,
sharing roles and responsibilities, information, understanding objectives, aims - 91 %), with the organisation
and structure of the meeting (contribution, sufficient clarity, content, range and balance of activities, mixture of
activities, adequate information prior to the meeting, materials were relevant, meeting ran to time - 87 %), the
overall experience (venue, accommodation, special requirements, social programme, catering, other resources 88 %).
Participants have rated certain statements on a 4-point scale:
7
Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete
Association for Community Development  Association du Développement Communautaire
1011 Budapest, Corvin tér 8.  1251 Budapest, Pf. 42  E-mail: kofe@kkapcsolat.hu
Telefon: (36-1) 201 57 28, Fax: (36-1) 225-60-13, www.kka.hu
General overview:
- “there was a well balanced selection of information given” ( 78 % rated 4; 12 % rated 3),
- “the usefulness of the outcomes from individual session, e.g. learning value, possibility of
transfer of approaches” (78 % rated 4; 13 % rated 3),
- “the given time to build co-operation was appropriate (85 % rated 3),
- “the meeting provided adequate networking opportunities” (82 % rated 4; 4 % rated 3),
- “the number of participants during sessions was comfortable” (91% rated 4).
Discussion groups:
- “the content of discussions was appropriate and informative” (85 % rated 4; 7 % rated 3),
- “the outcomes from discussions were useful and valuable” (78% rated 4; 12 % rated 3),
- “the presenters and facilitators spoke credibly on the topic” (82 % rated 4; 8 % rated 3)
- “the time for questions and discussion was adequate” (82 % rated 3; 8 % rated 4)
Most of the participants thought, that the event hosted a forum for discussion of the core elements of a common
framework for future co-operation of the CEE CN and CEBSD.
In the 10 % (3-4 persons) there were negative comments. Most frequently was the comment that there was not
enough time to get to know each other better and too many people who have no clear overview of both CEBSD
and CEECN. Some people said that there was not enough self-introduction or enough information about the
country. We would have needed more time for that. The booklet was good as it gave this information. Some
questioned results of group work.
The last session of the ED workshop, the Speed Dialogue, provided the opportunity for feedback from groups,
for some points for evaluation.
Strongly emphasized issues:
 There was respect for each other but gaps in knowledge and understanding.
 Differences in culture, experience and terminology were identified. We need to specify what we do now
and that we have a clear commitment and desire in closing the gaps between the two networks.
 The two networks want to do concrete things together one first project could be an exploration of how
we measure these differences. How to make differences and commonalities as strength and not always
as problem?
 The anxiety level was too high as there were some key people who would have made a significant
difference to sharing the responsibility. It created a problem. We really missed some of their experience
and we have to find a way how to get them on board with the process and follow-up.
 We need to be in the forefront of actions such as Citizens Participation Week, but we also have to
balance this with long term process. We should keep an eye on this – how do we have longer term
learning from each other and yet still have action?
 From the organizational aspect, it is important to keep an eye to be both professional and movement
oriented, while we are developing networks and wide scale future cooperation
Results of the groupwork for future steps
1. Match-up the CPW Citizens’ Participation Week and EWLD European Week of Local
Democracy
First step: Follow-up Possibility of linking the “People and Politics” meeting in Hungary during CPW
with CEECN network to build links. The goal is to extend the Citizens’ Participation week to the West.
8
Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete
Association for Community Development  Association du Développement Communautaire
1011 Budapest, Corvin tér 8.  1251 Budapest, Pf. 42  E-mail: kofe@kkapcsolat.hu
Telefon: (36-1) 201 57 28, Fax: (36-1) 225-60-13, www.kka.hu
This needs a longer and shorter-term perspective. The People in Politics meeting in September in
Kunbábony is a starting point. Politicians could be invited. Should the Council of Europe be invited to
this too? The role of HACD as a team in organizing this event should be considered.
2. Possible joint leadership meetings between CEBSD and CEECN. Once a year to have a joint
meeting.
3. Possibility of an International Seminar which is in partnership with ALDA and held in Slovakia and
this provides an opportunity to work together on the theme: the role of local authorities and civil society
in the promotion of EU development policies in the new member states. Our proposal is that we focus
on the Budapest Declaration and participatory budgets within this theme. Funding for up to 60 people.
4. Use, refresh, review the Budapest Declaration lobby. Link the declaration to TLCD Training and
Learning for Community Development project practice and other practice that arose from it. Explore
how to theme it.
5. Capture best practice where this has already been done. Visit and See: how to visualize best practice
better and how to make best practice more visible?
Write it down – share and learn
Brochure
Electronic news sheet
Notes: Now People in Politics Grundtvig-project are collecting case studies and methods on issue of
communication and co-operation between citizens and politicians. ARCD have also experience drawn
from European projects on good practice. Link CEECN Best practice database, case studies CEBSD
good practice. Refer to Budapest Declaration and proposal for European Ideas Bank.
6. Surveys analysing the levels of citizen’s participation in decision-making processes – CEE and WE.
7. Common training issues, especially within the Training and Learning CD European project.
8. The policy implications of the experience and practice especially the issue of intercultural dialogue,
involvement of youth. Embedding the experience practices in the structure, creating culture, not only
projects.
9. European Future Forum: Create space for discussion of community development and participation
possibility: European Future Forum would retain a commitment to European Dialogue and hold a
conference between two bodies every 4 years to look at what has happened and what is projected into
the future. What is changing with the perception of the different realities. What is happening in WE and
CEE? What is happening in structures, in civil society? What are the trends?
10. The life stories methodology as a concrete follow-up for example in the next meeting between CEBSD
and CEECN to
deepen understanding of the two realities,
learning the method.
9
Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete
Association for Community Development  Association du Développement Communautaire
1011 Budapest, Corvin tér 8.  1251 Budapest, Pf. 42  E-mail: kofe@kkapcsolat.hu
Telefon: (36-1) 201 57 28, Fax: (36-1) 225-60-13, www.kka.hu
Common Priorities
11.. CPW
22.. Joint leadership meeting and International Seminar ALDA
33.. Budapest Declaration
44.. Best Practice
Kirsten Paaby will take feedback on priorities to CEBSD and Chuck Hirt will take priorities to CEECN.
Both networks, the CEE CN and the CEBSD are working on with the results of the project, with the following
immediate priorities:
11.. The European Social Forum will take place on 18th September to 21st September. CEBSD has
suggested a joint workshop of CEBSD and CEECN during the European Social Forum.
22.. The Citizens’ Participation Week will coincide with a meeting of the People in Politics group to get
them closer from 26th to 28th September to Hungary. Some people will come to the closing seminar of
CPW from CEECN.
33.. The work on the Training and Learning for Community Development project which will continue
in the Laboratory in the autumn. The Budapest Declaration and the points that are linked to training
and learning should be included in the discussion at the Laboratory and to the Consortium in Palermo
in November 2008 and to the Dissemination Seminar in Sofia in April 2009.
44.. October 21st 2008 is deadline for Best Practice.
55.. Autumn 2009 the proposed ALDA conference in Slovakia is an opportunity for both bodies to work
together again.
We should find ways to explore follow-up at this conference e.g. do more work on the Budapest
Declaration and to explore ideas for European Future Forum. Policy and lobbying implications of
Budapest Declaration and embedding it in mainstream structures.
This is the plan for the coming 1,5 years, but it is obvious from the follow-up that the ambitions go even further:
“creating culture, not only projects” through those ways that are described in 4. Impact. It has been confirmed
that the relationship between CEE CN and CEBSD is a long-term and strategic one. Implementation depends on
many factors: European, national and organisational ones, the development of democracy, civil society,
European values, CD professional development, and, of course, the existence of proper and available funds.
The participating organisations and representatives are very committed to all the above, and if it is up to them,
the process will go on in the long term, from now up to 6-7 years.
As it has already been mentioned, both CEE CN and CEBSD are in a process of structural change, which
influences strategy, membership, policy issues, as well as the activities. Both networks will include the results
and priorities of this project to its strategic, medium and short-term goals. European Dialogue Seminar helped
give some perspective
10
Közösségfejlesztők Egyesülete
Association for Community Development  Association du Développement Communautaire
1011 Budapest, Corvin tér 8.  1251 Budapest, Pf. 42  E-mail: kofe@kkapcsolat.hu
Telefon: (36-1) 201 57 28, Fax: (36-1) 225-60-13, www.kka.hu
5. Visibility and Valorisation
The dissemination/publication of the project information was already started during the implementation phase
of the project, and is still in progress. HACD has published a type of Newsletter – booklet – for the ED Seminar
and distributed it to the participants and media and embassy representatives (enclosed). All the documents and
the results of the European Dialogue have been published on HACD’s website (www.kka.hu European
Dialogue), and sent to the participating organisations, asking them to publish and disseminate them in their own
countries, through their own communication channels, as well as among the related international organisations
and networks they are active in. The professional journal of HACD, the Parola, will report on the European
Dialogue Workshop in its coming issue, 2008/Vol. 2. (enclosed)
The project has enhanced the strengthening of the co-operation networks, their reputation and willingness to cooperate. As a result of the project, several resolutions, co-operation agreements have been established, and joint
project planning has been launched among the co-operating partners and the participants.
6. Partner(s)
Both the CEE CN and the CEBSD, the partners, have been duly represented at all the transnational events of the
European Dialogue project: at the Planning and Follow-up meeting and of course, at the European Dialogue
Workshop itself, where they have fulfilled the tasks defined by the project and more closely, by the Planning
Workshop: group leading, presentations, making notes, summaries, etc. The co-operation has been particularly
enjoyable and fruitful.
Contact:
CEE CN
Anna Karailieva
anna@ceecn.net
www.ceecn.net
CEBSD
Kirsten Paaby
kirsten.paaby@idebanken.no
www.cebsd.org
Thanks for all of those who have made this possible.
Ilona Vercseg
Project Manager
11
HACD
Ilona Vercseg
vercseg@kka.hu
www.kka.hu