DETECTION OF PATHOGENS (DIAGNOSTIC BACTERIOLOGY & VIROLOGY) Assist Prof. Dr Syed Yousaf Kazmi OBJECTIVES • Explain the basic concept of diagnostic microbiology including classical bacteriology and newer techniques • Identify the available diagnostic methods DETECTION OF BACTERIAL INFECTIONS For diagnosis of various bacterial infections 1. Microscopy & morphology 2. Staining 3. Cultural characteristics 4. Metabolism 5. Resistance 6. Bio chemical properties MORPHOLOGY • WET FILM EXAM – Direct unstained exam of specimen – Rapid presumptive identification e.g. Vibrio cholerae shooting star motility – Suitability of specimen e.g. Sputum vs saliva MICROSCOPY • STAINED SPECIMEN EXAM – Gram Stain-Most bacteria – ZN Stain-AFB – Albert Stainmetachromatic granules of C diphtheriae – Geimsa Stain-Chlamydia Gram Stain Albert Stain GRAM STAIN • Most widely used stain • Color, Shape, Arrangement, spores and capsules • Intracellular e.g. Neisseria • Less sensitive-105 org/ml for detection • Differentiation from normal flora • Probable identification Neisseria meningitidis in CSF Streptococcus pneumoniae IMMUNOFLUORESCENT ANTIBODY (IF) STAINING • • • • • More specific than other More cumbersome More time consuming Expertise required Quality control is important to minimize nonspecific IF staining • Bordetella pertussis or Legionella pneumophila CULTURE OF SPECIMEN • Culture of bacteria- Gold standard for identification • Usually 24-48 hrs • 72 hrs for slow growers • Up to 6 weeks for M tuberculosis • Routine media include Blood Agar, Chocolate agar & Mc conkeys Agar • Enriched medium, Differential medium CULTURE OF SPECIMEN • Blood Agar-detects hemolysis • Other characters e.g. color, shape and texture of bacterial colony • Rate of growth • Pigment production e.g. Pseudomonas, Serratia spp. • Satellitism e.g. Strep pneumoniae and Staph aureus, swarming of Proteus • Allows org to be tested for antimicrobial sensitivity Β- hemolysis Proteus swarming METABOLISM • Growth requirements – Aerobic & Anaerobic – Micro-aerophilic, Carboxyphilic etc. – Growth factor requirements e.g. Haemophilus influenzae factor X, V FERMENTATION AND BIOCHEMICAL TESTS Sugar fermentation test Indole test Methyl red test Voges prousker test Citrate test Catalase test Oxidase test Urease test Nitrate test OXIDASE TEST FERMENTATION AND BIOCHEMICAL TESTS API 10S RESISTANCE TO ANTIMICROBIALSANTIBIOGRAM • Sensitivity profile of org • Helps in identification • Genetic resistance or sensitivity OTHER TESTS • Bacteriophage Test – Mostly for epidemiological testing – Not routinely done – Reference laboratories only • Animal pathogenicity tests – Limited value – Few bacterial infections – Reference laboratories only SEROLOGY BASED TESTS Agglutination Tests – Latex Agglutination Test e.g. group A streptococcal pharyngitis, Cryptococcus antigen detection in CSF – Co-agglutination Test-useful in bacterial identification in cultures Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) Western Blot Assay Molecular Diagnosis – Nucleic acid probe – PCR RAPID BACTERIAL IDENTIFICATION TESTS • Rapid Serology based tests • Rapid presumptive identification • Helps in management • Strep A throat test, Clostridium difficile rapid toxin detection test VIRAL DIAGNOSTIC TESTS 1. Direct Examination 2. Indirect Examination (Virus Isolation) 3. Serology DIRECT TESTS 1.Electron Microscopy Morphology of virus particles immune electron microscopy 2. Light Microscopy Histological appearance of inclusion bodies e.g. Negri bodies in rabies 3. Viral Genome Detection Hybridization With Specific Nucleic Acid Probes Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) INDIRECT TESTS 1. Cell Culture Cytopathic effect (CPE) Haemabsorption Immunofluorescence 2. Animals pathogenicity Disease or death ELECTRON MICROSCOPY Viruses may be detected in the following specimens. Faeces Astrovirus, Rotavirus, Vesicle Fluid HSV VZV Skin scrapings Papillomavirus Rotavirus Astroviruses Cell Cultures Growing virus may produce 1. Cytopathic Effect (CPE) - such as the ballooning of cells or syncytia formation, may be specific or non-specific. 2. Haemadsorption - cells acquire the ability to stick to mammalian red blood cells. Cytopathic Effect (1) Cytopathic effect of enterovirus 71 and HSV in cell culture: note the ballooning of cells. (Virology Laboratory, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Linda Stannard, University of Cape Town) Cytopathic Effect (2) Syncytium formation in cell culture caused by Resp. Syncytial Virus (top), and measles virus (bottom). (courtesy of Linda Stannard, University of Cape Town, S.A.) Problems with cell culture • Long period (up to 4 weeks) required for result. • Often very poor sensitivity, sensitivity depends on a large extent on the condition of the specimen. • Susceptible to bacterial contamination. • Susceptible to toxic substances which may be present in the specimen. • Many viruses will not grow in cell culture e.g. Hepatitis B, Diarrhoeal viruses, parvovirus, papillomavirus. SEROLOGY Classical Techniques Newer Techniques • Complement fixation test • Haemagglutination test • Immunofourescence tech • ELISA • Western Blot TYPICAL SEROLOGICAL PROFILE AFTER ACUTE INFECTION Note that during reinfection, IgM may be absent or present at a low level transiently COMPLEMENT FIXATION TEST Complement Fixation Test in Microtiter Plate. Rows 1 and 2 exhibit complement fixation obtained with acute and convalescent phase serum specimens, respectively. (2-fold serum dilutions were used) ELISA for HIV antibody Microplate ELISA for HIV antibody: colored wells indicate reactivity WESTERN BLOT HIV-1 Western Blot • • • • • Lane1: Positive Control Lane 2: Negative Control Sample A: Negative Sample B: Indeterminate Sample C: Positive USEFULNESS OF SEROLOGICAL RESULTS • Rapid • Coincide with clinical conditions • Cheap • No contamination effect PROBLEMS WITH SEROLOGY • Mild infections e.g. HSV genitalis may not produce a detectable humoral immune response. • False positive results-cross-reactivity between related viruses e.g. HSV and VZV • Atypical antibodies in SLE etc-false positivity • Immunocompromised response. -↓humoral immune MOLECULAR METHODS • Methods based on the detection of viral genome • Still small role compared to conventional methods. • Dot-blot, Southern blot are examples of classical techniques • PCR, LCR etc newer techniques Schematic of PCR Each cycle doubles the copy number of the target