Adventures in Thermochemistry James S. Chickos* Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Missouri-St. Louis Louis MO 63121 E-mail: jsc@umsl.edu 11 Clydesdales from the Budweiser Brewery St. Louis MO Applications of the The Correlation-Gas Chromatographic Method Objectives: To go where no one else has gone 1. Evaluation of the vaporization enthalpies of large molecules 2. Application of Correlation-Gas Chromatography to a Tautomeric Mixture - Acetylacetone 3. The Vaporization Enthalpies of Drugs and Related Substances 4. Evaluation of the Vaporization Enthalpies and Vapor Pressures of Plasticizers 5. Identifying unusual interactions in heterocyclic systems Diazines and Triazines Structural Chemistry 2009, 20, 49-58 A Comparison of calculated vaporization enthalpies and normal boiling temperatures with literature values s-triazine 50.0±0.3 lgHm (298.15 K)/kJ.mol-1 = (0.9410.07) slngHm(358 K) - (13.10.59), (r2 = 0.9765) a Literature boiling temperatures from SciFinder Scholar A Examination of the Vaporization Enthalpies and Vapor Pressures of Pyrazine, Pyrimidine, Pyridazine and 1,3,5-Triazine. Lipkind D., Chickos J. S. Structural Chemistry 2009, 20, 49-58 N Unknowns N N N N N Standards CH3 CH3 N N N N Top, from left to right : phthalazine, benzo[c]cinnoline, quinazoline, quinoxaline. Standards: phenazine, 2,6-dimethylquinoline, acridine, 4,7-phenanthroline, 7,8benzoquinoline, Lipkind, D.; Chickos, J. S. Study of the Anomalous Thermochemical Behavior of 1,2-Diazines by Correlation-Gas Chromatography J. Chem. Eng. Data 2010, 55, 698-707 Since all of the compounds studied are crystalline solids, the following equations were used to adjust sublimation and fusion enthalpies to T = 298.15 K and evaluate the vaporization enthalpy Sublimation: crgHm(298.15 K)/(kJ·mol-1)=crgHm(Tm)+[0.75+0.15Cp(cr)/(J·mol-1·K-1)][Tm/K-298.15 K]/1000 Fusion: crlHm(298.15 K)/(kJ·mol-1)=crlHm(Tfus)+[(0.15Cp(cr)-0.26 Cp(l))/(J·mol-1·K-1)-9.83)][Tfus/K-298.15]/1000 Vaporization: lgHm(298.15 K) = crgHm(298.15 K) - crlHm(298.15 K) where Cp(cr), Cp(l) refer to the heat capacity of the crystal and liquid, respectively Acree, Jr.; W.; Chickos, J. S. Phase Transition Enthalpy Measurements of Organic and Organometallic Compounds. Sublimation, Vaporization and Fusion Enthalpies From 1880 to 2009, J. Phys. Chem. Ref Data 2010, 39, 1-942. A summary of the vaporization enthalpies for diazines at T = 298 K Vap. Enth. Calc, kJmol-1 : 58.71.4 Vap. Enth. Lit, kJmol-1 : 56.52.0 -1 Difference, kJmol : -2.22.4 Tb/K this work/lit: 503.5/496.2 59.61.4 61.11.1 1.51.8 511.2/516.2 67.31.6 711.9 3.72.5 440/462 46.42.0 53.50.4 7.12.0 427/481 N Vap. Enth. Calc, kJmol-1 : Vap. Enth. Lit, kJmol-1 : Difference, kJmol-1 : Tb/K this work/lit: 81.90.8 89.22.3 7.32.4 638.3/633 76.70.7 78.82.2 2.12.3 606.9/na 79.7±1.3 78.4±2.0 -1.02.4 Difference in the strength of intermolecular interactions between 1,2diazines and their isomeric counterparts is approximately 6-7 kJmol-1 Lipkind, D.; Chickos, J. S. Study of the Anomalous Thermochemical Behavior of 1,2-Diazines by Correlation-Gas Chromatography J. Chem. Eng. Data 2010, 55, 698-707 A good correlation is found between the enthalpy of transfer and the literature values for the 1,2-diazines, Why do the 1,2-diazines behave differently from the 1,3- or 1,4-diazines? Does the stereochemisty or the size of the ring influence the magnitude of the interaction? N N N N N N Rediscovering the Wheel. Thermochemical Analysis of Energetics of the Aromatic Diazines Verevkin, S. P.; Emel’yanenko, V. N.; Notario, R.; Roux, M.V.; Chickos, J.S.; Liebman, J. F. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 3454. N N N N N 2 1 N 5 N N 3 4 N N N N N N 6 N N N N N CH3 Unknowns N N N N N CH2CH3 N N CH2 N N N N Ph Standards N N CH3 N N N N CH3 N CH3 N CH3 CH3 N N Unknowns: N N N N 2 1 N N 3 4 N N N N N N 6 5 N N 7 N 8 N N 11 12 N 10 N 9 N N 13 14 N N Standards Set 2 Standards Set 1 N N N N N 17 16 15 N 18 N N N N N N 19 20 21 Vaporization Enthalpies as a Function of Standards Used gl Hm(298 K) /kJmol-1 H N N N 1 N N 3 Standards Set 1 Transpiration Correlation gas chromatography N 2-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine (1) 55.20.10 54.62.3 0.62.3 1,5-diazabicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-ene (3) 61.90.21 61.12.4 0.82.4 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine (2) 68.40.9a 61.32.5 7.12.7 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (4) 70.70.15 67.82.6 2.92.6 imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (6) 67.40.2 60.52.6 6.92.6 triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine (5) 74.2±3.8b 63.72.7 10.54.7 2 N N N N 5 N N Standards Set 2 N 4 N imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (6) 67.40.23 67.14.6 0.34.6 triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine (5) 74.2±3.8b 70.74.5 3.55.9 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)pyridine (2) 68.40.9a 69.63.8 1.23.9 6 All the compounds whose vaporization enthalpy is in red are planar in the solid state; all are reproduced using various pyridazines and imidazole derivatives as standards The Vaporization Enthalpies of 2- and 4-(N,N-Dimethylamino)pyridine, 1,5-Diazabicyclo[4.3.0]non-5-ene, 1,8Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene, Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine and 1,2,4-Triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine by Correlation –Gas Chromatography, Lipkind, D.; Rath, N.; Chickos, J.S. Pozdeev, V. A.; Verevkin, S. J. Phys. Chem. 2010, 55, 1628-35. gl Hm(298 K) (kJmol-1) Lit CGC Table A Refa gl Hm(298 K) (kJmol-1) (D)b B benzene C5H5N pyridine 40.2±0.1 40.0±2.3 1,25 0.2±2.3 2.19 B C 5 H7 N N-methylpyrrole 40.6±0.8 40.3±2.5 3,26 0.3±2.6 1.96 B C5H11N N-methylpyrrolidine 34.2±0.7 36.6±2.4 3,27 -2.4±2.5 1.1 B C 6 H7 N 3-methylpyridine 44.5±0.2 44.5±2.0 1,14 0 ±2.0 2.4 B C7H10N2 2-N,N-dimethylamino-pyridine 55.2±0.1 54.6±2.3 tw 0.6±2.3 1.92 B C8H6N2 quinoxaline 56.5±2.0 58.7±1.9 2,30 -2.2±2.8 0.51 B C8H11N 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine 51.0±1.0 50.4±2.9 1,19 -0.6±3.0 2.26 C C 9 H7 N quinoline 59.3±0.2 59.5±1.3 7,18 -0.2±1.3 2.24 B C 9 H7 N isoquinoline 60.3±0.12 60.1±1.3 7,18 -0.2±1.3 2.53 B C10H8N2 2-2-bipyridyl 67.02.3 63.5±3.2 7 3.5±3.9 0.69 B C10H9N 2-methylquinoline 62.6±0.1 62.8±1.3 7,17 -0.2±1.3 2.07 B C12H10N2 trans azobenzene 74.7±1.6 74.90.7 3,28 -0.2±1.7 0B C13H9N phenanthridine 80.14 79.35.5 7,29 0.8±5.5 2.39 B C13H9N acridine 78.63 78.2±1.3 7,29 0.4±1.3 2.29 B Table B C4H4N2 pyridazine 53.50.4 46.52.2 1,4 7.02.2 4.1 B C4H6N2 N-methylimidazole 55.6±0.6 48.83.5 3,5,6 6.83.6 3.7d B C4H6N2 N-methylpyrazole 48.0±1.3 42.8±0.2 41.6±2.9 twe,6 6.4±3.2 2.29 B C7H10N2 4-N,N-dimethylaminopyridine 68.40.9 61.32.5 tw 7.1±2.7 4.33 B C9H8N2 N-phenylpyrazole 70.2±3.4 63.52.9 3,25 6.7±4.5 2.0 B C9H8N2 N-phenylimidazole 84.6±3.7 67.72.1 3,25 16.9±4.3 3.5 B C12H8N2 benzo[c]cinnoline 89.22.3 81.91.1 2,28 7.32.5 4.1 B Summary Polarity seems to play a role Extensive conjugation seems to be an important property All compounds exhibiting enhanced intermolecular interactions are planar The crystal structure of 1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine suggests the N presence of π- π stacking in the solid state N N N 5 Since most of the compounds exhibiting stronger intermolecular interactions examined so far (pyridazines, imidazoles) seem to correlate with each other, this suggests a common interaction responsible for the enhanced intermolecular interactions observed; the origin of this interaction has yet to be identified. separation between stacks = 3.24 Å Graduate Students Patamaporn Umnahanant Dmitry Lipkind Visiting Graduate Students Manuel Temprado, Instituto de Química Física “Rocasolano”, Madrid 28006, Spain Visiting Faculty and Collaborators Maria Victoria Roux, On leave from the Instituto de Química Física “Rocasolano”, Madrid 28006, Spain Sergey Verevkin, University of Rostock, Rostock Germany Chatchawat Plienrasri ott Hasty Dmitry lipkind Patamaporn Umnahanant T F Sergey Verevkin Does ring size play a role? All compounds used as standards were six-membered ring heterocycles. N lgHm(298 K) (kJmol-1) lgHm(298 K) (kJmol-1) [Lit] 1-methylpyrrolidine 36.62.4 34.2±0.7 1-methylpyrrole 40.32.5 40.6±0.8 4-methylpyrimidine 43.82.6 44.2 47.62.7 47.0 N N 2,5-dimethylpyrazine N 2,4,6-trimethylpyridine 51.42.8 51.5 quinoline 59.23.0 59.31 N N 1-methylindole 61.13.1 62.2±1.6