Page |1
TWU Academic Institutional Improvement 2013-14 Report - AIIR: Findings and Use of Results
Deadline: November 3, 2014
Component Name:
Degree/Academic Program:
Component Director/Chair:
Dean:
Degree Program Campus(es): Denton Dallas Houston
If online degree, indicate type: Fully Hybrid Completion (Fully) Completion (Hybrid)
Date Submitted:
Table 1 – SLOs, Assessment Measures, 2013-14 Summary Data, and Target Indicators Table
List the academic degree program student learning outcomes, name only of assessment measures, and target indicators (criterion for success, realistic program goal
percentage, and stretch program goal percentage – refer to current AIIAP). List all SLOs even though you may not have assessed each SLO during 2013-14. In the
Summary Data column, report the percentage of students assessed during 2013-14 (Fall 2013, Spring 2014, Summer 2014) that achieved the set criterion for
success for each SLO assessed, and report the total number of students assessed per measure (N = __). [Disaggregated category/sub-category data for assessments, if
applicable, can be reported in Table 2.]
Student Learning Outcome
(SLO)
SLO 1:
SLO 2:
SLO 3:
Assessment Measures
(2 per SLO)
2013-14
Summary Data
Target Indicators
Criterion for
Realistic
Stretch
Success
Program Goal Program Goal
1.
(N = )
%
%
%
2.
(N = )
%
%
%
1.
(N = )
%
%
%
2.
(N = )
%
%
%
1.
(N = )
%
%
%
2.
(N = )
%
%
%
Page |2
Table 2 – Disaggregated Assessment Category/Sub-Category Data Table
Use this table, when appropriate, to report additional category/sub-category data (disaggregated data) for applicable assessments reported in Table 1. Table 2 only
applies to program assessments for which category/sub-category data are available to report.
SLO/Assessment
1.1
1.2
2.1
2.2
Assessment Categories/Sub-Categories
Outcome 1/Assessment 1 – [Insert name of assessment here]
A. [List category here]
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Outcome 1/Assessment 2 – [Insert name of assessment here]
A. [List category here]
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Outcome 2/Assessment 1 – [Insert name of assessment here]
A. [List category here]
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Outcome 2/Assessment 2 – [Insert name of assessment here]
A. [List category here]
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
2013-2014
Categorical Data
Realistic Program
Goal/Target
[if applicable]
Page |3
SLO/Assessment
3.1
3.2
Assessment Categories/Sub-Categories
Outcome 3/Assessment 1 – [Insert name of assessment here]
A. [List category here]
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Outcome 3/Assessment 2 – [Insert name of assessment here]
A. [List category here]
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
2013-2014
Categorical Data
Realistic Program
Goal/Target
[if applicable]
Page |4
Table 3 – Analysis & Interpretation of Results
Provide a detailed analysis and interpretation of student performance data for each student learning outcome assessed during the 2013-14 reporting period using Tables 1
and 2 results/findings. Also, use the TWU Summary Analyses & Actions for Improvement – Trend Analysis of AIIRs table (separate document) to reflect trend analysis
(where appropriate).
Student Learning Outcome
SLO 1 -
SLO 2 -
SLO 3 -
Analysis & Interpretation
Page |5
Table 4 - Next Steps – Actions for Improvement
Using the data analysis and interpretation provided in Table 3, describe in detail one targeted action that will be implemented to improve student learning for each SLO
assessed during the 2013-14 reporting period. Use the Improvement Code Table below to “code” the type of action that will be taken.
Student Learning Outcomes
(List each SLO statement)
Actions for Improvement
Improvement
Codes
SLO 1 SLO 2 SLO 3 *Recommend no more than 1 action for improvement per SLO so that changes in performance data may be more likely attributed to the action taken.
Code
Curr-C
Action
Curricular Change
Ped-C
Pedagogical Change
CR
C-Pre
Course Revision
Change in Course Prerequisite(s)
SS
Student Support
RP
RA
D/T
Revised Process
Revised Assessment
Development/Training
ESS
Equipment, Supplies, Space
Crit-C
Fac-C
SLO-C
Accr-C
OTH
Criteria Change
Faculty Change
SLO Change
Accreditation Change
Other Change
Description
Curricular change to degree program (adding a course or other requirement, changed course sequence, etc.)
Revised instructional methodology of delivering course material (less lecture, more student engagement; integrated technology; more
formative assessment & feedback, etc.)
Revised existing course(s), added or modified assignments or projects, modified content of course, changed textbooks; etc.)
Adding or deleting course prerequisites; enforcing prerequisites
Improving tutoring services, self-study materials, developing specialized support by library or writing center staff, improved advising to
ensure students follow established course sequencing, faculty mentoring, etc.
Changed entrance/admission requirements, hired new faculty, changed environment, other process revisions, etc.
Modified assessment tools, changed data analyses strategy, etc.
Providing faculty or TA development or further training workshops
Change in instructional equipment, supplies, and/or space (new/updated computers or software, improvements or expansions of labs or
studios, expanded space or equipment for student projects
Increased or modified set criteria for success or standards change/implementation
Additional or change in roles or responsibilities of faculty
Revisions or changes to SLOs
Revisions due to disciplinary accreditation standards, etc.
Changes made that are not reflected in any of the above categories
[2013-14_ Acad_Instit_Improve_Report_Template_TSenne_06-25-14_TSenne]