CPPC Meeting minutes
2/8/2016
Taken by Andrew Chandler
Committee Members present (by constituency group):
Faculty : Andrew Chandler, Suzanne Pugh, Erika Delacorte, Muriel Parenteau
Represented staff: Jeffrey Kelly, Joe Jah
Unrepresented staff: Rebeca Chavez
Administration: Marina Lam
Not present:
Represented Staff: James Rogers, Athena Steff
Guests:
Amy Jane Frater of tBP, Phil Newsom of tBP, Gary Moon of tBP
1. Meeting called to order at 2:18pm (quorum achieved)
2. Agenda adopted with amendments
3. Minutes from December 2015 not approved. Minutes not available from co-chair. Will revisit
this approval at next meeting on February 29
4. Public comment I: None
5. Reports:
a. tBP, architects for the Facilities Master Plan presented the overall process to the CPPC,
including a proposed schedule through completion and important aspects of the
process. It was stated that the administration wants the CPPC to be the main
participatory governance group to shepherd the FMP process.
b. The CPPC agreed to split their two hour meetings into two halves this semester: the first
half dedicated to regular CPPC business and the second half to being the FMP working
group. Given that, we will have working group meetings for the FMP on 2/29, 3/21,
4/11, 5/2 and 5/16, 3PM-4PM in MUB 357.
c. tBP agreed to schedule these working sessions and provide an agenda one week before
each meeting.
6. Old Business
a. PAEC updates by Madeline Mueller: New estimates are underway for the PAEC but no
word on when they will be finished. She understands that the new estimates do not
include any value engineering.
b. CDEV temporary relocation project: Marian Lam said that the Phase 1 (Site utility work)
is at DSA awaiting approval. June 15, 2016 is the new scheduled completion date
(changed from June 1). Parenteau asks how many parking spaces will be lost; Lam
estimates 30-40 but didn’t have the exact number. Committee members suggested that
they can be aware of the future changes. Marina Lam agreed that was a good idea.
7. New Business: Program Review Prioritization
a. Chandler updated the committee on the process and indicated that we need to
establish criteria for the priorities. Lam said she knew the state had priorities and that
we could look at that. Chandler will follow up with that. Also it was suggested that tBP
would likely have such a priority sheet that we could adopt and avoid having to invent
the wheel again.
8. Public comment II: Joe Jah asked about the smoking signs on campus that conflict with smoking
designated areas. He also asked about the un-usable wayfinding signage on campus. Lam agreed
to check into both.
9. Meeting adjourned at 4pm.