Department of Communities Evidence Based Practice for

advertisement

Department of Communities

safe, valued and empowered communities

Evidence Based Practice for

Community Services in

Queensland

5 September 2006

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

Presentation Overview

• Department of Communities evidence based practice framework (Rick Williams)

• Demonstration of COMSIS tools (Greg Pole)

• Use of COMSIS within framework (Rick Williams)

• Key implications (Rick Williams)

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

Evidence Based Practice Framework

• Provide the department with key concepts and building blocks to ensure allocation of all departmental resources

(funded and direct service) to priority need

• Able to be progressively implemented:

– Phase 1 = growth and one-off funding e.g. PEI growth funding and

SAAP V funding

– Phase 2 = all other program areas e.g. system reform

– Phase 3 = all of the department’s resources and services including direct service delivery

INDICATIVE NEED

- defined by analysis of objective indicators incl.

SEIFA maps, surveys of clients, comparison with state measures and benchmark data (if avail)

GAP ANALYSIS: Is there a service or set of services to meet this potential need?

SERVICE SUPPLYdefined by analysis of quantitative and qualitative data

NEEDS BASED APPROACH TO PLANNING ANALYSES MEASURES OF NEED AND EXISTING SERVICE

SUPPLY IN LIGHT OF KEY PRIORITIES (local, regional, departmental and State Government) IN ORDER TO

MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT WHAT IS PRIORITY NEED AND WHAT CHANGES TO A SERVICE SYSTEM

ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THAT NEED

No service development required

SERVICE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CONTINUUM

Quality improvement

Scope expansion

Realignment Increased access through integration of services

Reform New service

COMMUNITY CAPACITY to provide a service or set of services

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

EVIDENCE BASE

• Evidence for policy and service development is both quantitative and qualitative data including:

– Demographic and socio-economic data (ABS Census, Labour

Force, etc);

– surveys of clients’ perspectives (need as well as regarding the performance of the Department’s services);

– other service related data (inputs, outputs and outcomes);

– research and evaluation data;

– other key stakeholder views; and

– departmental staff’s analysis of services and service systems.

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

KEY STEPS

Six key steps in the needs based planning and resource allocation process:

1. Develop Regional and State Profiles

2. Needs identification (quantitative and qualitative)

3. Service prioritisation against needs

4. Mapping need and services

5. Notional regional allocation of funding

6. Finalisation of service investment plans .

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

COMSIS

• Communities Statistical Information System - purpose built and maintained by OESR for the department

• A key tool and platform to progress, across the state, a core set of common standards and information for identifying disadvantage, need and risk

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

OUTPUT USING COMSIS V1.0

• Sentinel indicators (greatest prognostic/predictive power)

• At-a-glance combined information at program level on

– location,

– comparative disadvantage,

– relative need and

– risk (proxy - proportion of target population)

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

Statistical local area

Locality A - Central

Locality A - Other

Locality B

Locality C

Locality D

Locality E

Locality F

Locality G

Locality H

Locality I

Locality J

Locality K

Locality L

972.1

1,024.2

949.9

972.6

1,037.4

934.1

947.1

966.6

935.0

881.2

931.8

893.8

979.6

1

2

4

2

4

2

1

1

1

1

3

1

1

SEIFA

Index value

Overall quintile position

Housing

Stress

Score

Substantiat ed Notice

Child

Protection

(Rate)

24.92

25.55

17.56

20.22

22.28

23.46

27.47

26.99

20.51

21.84

18.88

20.18

22.68

0.43

0.88

0.86

0.83

0.39

1.13

1.26

1.34

0.8

2.94

3.14

2.16

0.99

Number of people aged

0-9 years

(target group)

Population

All Persons

(Number)

% of SLA population in target group

DNR score

SEIFA x

SNCP x

Target

Pop

2718

1241

467

1775

4668

1608

1554

1431

2997

2747

2,226

3104

2012

9279

9411

3312

13045

17253

16615

15,823

17044

7073

6343

8044

10849

17236

29.29%

13.19%

14.10%

13.61%

27.06%

16.53%

14.07%

18.21%

28.45%

25.35%

19.32%

13.19%

17.39%

122.44

118.85

115.19

109.84

109.47

428.33

411.59

351.58

275.87

267.58

230.54

170.84

130.07

Rank

(Based on

Combin ed

Score)

6

7

8

4

5

9

10

11

12

13

1

2

3

Output

Statewide

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

Assessing Service Levels

The number of child protection staff in Cairns

Region is twice the number of child protection staff in Townsville Region.

Why is it so?

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

REALITY CHECK

Statistical data

REGIONAL FOCUS GROUPS

• Output highlighted potential areas of need for enhanced prevention and early intervention services (PEI).

• Identification of existing funded ‘PEI’ services in these areas

• Identification of total regional investment in PEI

Sharing information and value-adding through regional knowledge

• Regional Focus Group held in all 10 regions

• Purpose – to verify & contextualise data, & to identify priority needs and discuss the best ways that these needs may be met.

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

REGIONAL FOCUS GROUPS

• Focus groups lasted 3 – 4 hours. Discussion audio-recorded, and summary provided to region

• Focussed on prompt questions

– Detailed identification of areas of need,

– Best practice response,

– Capacity and effectiveness of current services,

– Priority areas for improved service capacity/effectiveness

• Focus Group review of the output data supported and extended the initial identification and ranking of high need-high risk populationslocations for priority service development.

• Identified the need for inclusion of service data

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

OUTPUT USING COMSIS V2.0

• Sentinel Indicators

• At-a-glance combined information at program level on

– location,

– comparative disadvantage,

– relative need and

– risk (proxy - proportion of target population)

+ services (locality, type, activity)

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

COMSIS V2.0

Matches Population, Location, Need and

Service Information

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

Matching Need and Service

Preschool Catchments

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

Matching Need and Service

Community Profiles

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

KEY IMPLICATIONS

• Allows us to identify and rank high need-high risk populations-locations across the State using standard information

• Provides common basis for policy, planning, budget and service development

• Initial results are quantitative confirmation of qualitative research results.

Department of Communities safe, valued and empowered communities

What’s Next?

• Incorporate all service data - COMSIS V2.0

• Incorporate protective factors (e.g. social capital, volunteering) - COMSIS V3.0

• Incorporate forecasting and modelling tools -

COMSIS V3.0

• Incorporate outcomes focus into evidence platform (match budget-expenditure-activity-outputsoutcomes)

– EBM V2.0

Download