Managing Water Quality in Growing Media David Wm. Reed Department of Horticultural Sciences Texas A&M University Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Irrigation Water Quality Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Irrigation Water Quality Chemical Properties pH alkalinity EC SAR Individual Soluble Salts Water Treatment Methods Growing Medium EC and pH Saturated Paste 1:2 Dilution Pour Through 5.5-6.5 5.5-6.5 pH All Plants 5.5-6.5 EC dS/m Young Plants 1-2 0.5-0.9 Established Plants 2-3 0.8-1.2 3-5 (from Lang 1996) Irrigation Water Alkalinity Limits Minimum Maximum ppm Plugs and/or seedlings 38 Small pots/shallow flats 38 4" to 5" pots/deep flats 38 6” pots/long term crops 63 meq/l 0.75 0.75 0.75 1.25 ppm meq/l 66 1.3 86 1.7 106 2.1 131 2.6 (from Bailey 1996) Irrigation Water Critical Limits Minimum Maximum pH 5.5 7.0 EC (dS/m) 0.2 0.8 ppm Alkalinity 40 160 Ca 25 75 Mg 10 30 S 0 40 Na 0 20 Cl 0 20 Fe 0 1 Zn 0 0.5 B 0 0.1 Cu 0 0.1 Mo 0 0.1 F 0 0.1 (from Biernbaum 1994) Plant Nutrient Requirements Supplied by Irrigation Water Nutrient S Minimum ppm To Supply Plant Requirements 20-30 ppm Ca 40 ppm Mg 20 ppm B 0.3 ppm Sulfur Supplied by Irrigation Water 20-30 ppm supplies most plant’s requirement(from Reddy 1996) Irrigation Water Quality Water Treatment Methods Water Purification Methods Reverse Osmosis Water Softener Alkalinity (carbonates) X Total Salts X Sodium X Chloride X Iron X Boron X Fluoride X Manganese X X Copper X X Calcium X X Sulfate X Acid Injection Aeration/ Oxidation Activated Carbon/Al X X X X X X X (from Reed 1996) Reverse Osmosis Unit Reverse Osmosis Water Purification To Decrease Salts Pretreatments: 1) Polymer injection 2) Depth Filter 3) Charcoal Filter 4) Ion Exchange Purification System: Reverse Osmosis to coagulate due to high SDI to remove coagulated particles to remove municipal chlorine to remove residual polymer using polyamide membranes (pH resistant, chlorine sensitive) Production Capacity Purified Water 5,760 gallons per day Blended Water (40/60) 14,400 gallons per day Blend to EC of 0.75 dS/m (approx. 500 ppm) (from Reed 1996) Reverse Osmosis Water Purification To Decrease Salts Costs Lease and Service $900 per month Water (1.09/1,000) $700 per month Electricity $200 per month Total $1800 per month Purified Water Cost 1 cent per gallon Blended Water Costs 0.4 cents per gallon Production Space Irrigated 80,000 to 135,000 square foot of 6-inch production space (at 12-20 oz/6”pot/day at 0.9 sq. ft. space/6”pot) Purified Water Used For Salt sensitive foliage plants and mist propagation (from Reed 1996) Acid Injection 80% Neutralization to Approx. pH 5.8 Acid Fluid ounce of acid per 1,000 of water, for each meq of alkalinity Nitric (67%) Phosphoric (75%) Sulfuric (35%) 6.78 8.30 11.00 ppm per oz. per 1,000 gal water 1.64 N 2.88 P 1.14 S (from Bailey 1996) Fertilizer Program Soluble Liquid Feed Granular Incorporation Controlled Release Incorporation Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media EC of Soluble Fertilizers & Water Quality (from Peterson 1996) Fertility & Salt Stratification in the Root Zone Subirrigation – New Guinea Impatiens ‘Barbados’ (from Kent & Reed 1996) Irrigation Method Top-Watering vs. Subirrigation Vertical Stratification of Salts Evaporation from Surface Leaching Fraction Factors That Impact Water Quality in Growing Media Vertical Stratification of Soluble Salts Salt Stratification in the Root Zone with Different Irrigation Methods (from Molitor, 1990, Warncke & Krauskopf 1983) Evaporation from Surface Causes Vertical Stratification of Salts Effect of Evaporation on Salt Stratification Poinsettia ‘Gutbier V-14 Glory’ (from Argo and Biernbaum 1995 Warncke & Krauskopf 1983) Effect of Evaporation on Salt Stratification Poinsettia ‘Gutbier V-14 Glory’ (from Argo and Biernbaum 1995 Warncke & Krauskopf 1983) Vertical Stratification of Soluble Salts and Root Distribution Salt Stratification & Root Distribution Spathiphyllum in subirrigation (from Kent & Reed, unpubl; Warncke & Krauskopf 1983) Track EC to Monitor Soluble Salt Accumulation Over Fertilization Minimum Fertility Level Caution: DO NOT sample the top layer Graphical Tracking: EC Crop: ______________________ Leaching Fraction and Soluble Salt Accumulation Leaching in Top-Watering Vs. Subirrigation Leaching Fraction in Top-Watering Low LF LF ~ 0.3-0.4 High LF LF @ ECw / (5(ECe(desired)-ECw)) Effect of Leaching Fraction on Medium EC Poinsettia ‘V-14 Glory’ 0 LF 6 0.15 LF 5 EC 4 dS/m 3 sat. 2 ext. 0.35 LF 0.55 LF 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Week (from Yelanich and Biernbaum 1993, Warncke & Krauskopf 1983) Top Layer Salts and Wilting Upon Irrigation Especially Critical in Subirrigation (from Todd & Reed 1998) Leaching & Salt Removal From Media New Guinea Impatiens ‘Blazon’ in Subirrigation 20 15 10 EC dS/m 5 0 1 2 3 4 Times Leached 5 6 0 2 4 6 8 10 14 18 mM CaCl2 + NaCl (from Todd & Reed 1998) Determination of Soluble Salt Toxicity Limits “Shoot Gun” Approach Plant Response to 24 Texas Water Sources 1.1 0.9 0.3 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.4 1.2 (from Kent & Reed unpubl) Growth Versus EC with 24 Water Sources Vinca ‘Apricot Delight’ Grown in Subirrigation (from Kent & Reed unpubl) Growth Versus EC with 24 Water Sources Vinca ‘Apricot Delight’ Grown in Subirrigation (from Kent & Reed unpubl) Growth Versus EC with 24 Water Sources Vinca ‘Apricot Delight’ Grown in Subirrigation (from Kent & Reed unpubl) Growth Versus Na + Cl with 24 Water Sources Vinca ‘Apricot Delight’ Grown in Subirrigation (from Kent & Reed unpubl) Determination of Soluble Salt Toxicity Limits Studies on Individual Salts (cation + anion combinations) Toxicity Limits to Sodium Bicarbonate Rose 0 mM 2.5 mM 7.5 mM Chrysanthemum 0 mM 5 mM 10 mM 2.5 mM 7.5 mM 10 mM 5 mM (from Valdez, PhD) Predicted NaHCO3 Toxicity Limit as a Function of Chlorosis Rose SPAD Index decrease Mum Vinca Hibiscus ‘Mango Breeze’ Hibiscus ‘Bimini Breeze’ Predicted mM NaHCO3 10% 0.8 3.2 6.0 2.1 4.2 20% 1.7 4.8 7.4 4.2 8.5 30% 2.8 6.1 8.4 6.3 12.7 40% 4.2 7.2 9.3 8.4 16.8 (from Valdez, PhD) Determination of Soluble Salt Toxicity Limits Studies on Individual Salts (cation + anion combinations) Problem With This Approach Do not know if the effect is due to the cation or the anion Determination of Soluble Salt Toxicity Limits Separation of Anion and Cation Effects Using Mixture Experiments Mixture Experiment Design X 1:0:0 Pure blends Tertiary blends Centroid 2/3:1/6:1/6 Binary blends ½:½:0 1/3:1/3:1/3 1/6:2/3:1/6 ½:0:½ 1/6:1/6:2/3 Z 0:0:1 Y 0:1:0 0:½:½ Shoot Dry Mass (g) Mixture-Amount Experiments to Separate the Na+ and HCO3- Effect in Sodium Bicarbonate Na+ tox./K+ def.=-19% 0 mM HCO3 HCO3- effect=-15% 7.5 mM HCO3 (from Valdez, PhD) Binary Mixture Experiments to Separate the Na+ and HCO3- Effect in Sodium Bicarbonate Shoot Dry Mass (g) 2.5 mM total binary mixture 6.0 0 0 HCO 3 5.0 0 4.0 0 2.5 HCO33.0 0 2.0 0 1.0 0 + Na 0.00 0.25 + K 1.00 0.75 Na+=-19% HCO3-=-19% 0.50 0.50 0.75 0.25 1.00 0.00 Proportion of K+ and Na+ (from Valdez, PhD) Mixture-Amount Experiments To Separate Chloride, Bicarbonate and Sulfate Effects (from Kent & Reed unpubl) Separation of Chloride, Bicarbonate and Sulfate Effects with Mixture-Amount Experiments Vinca ‘Pacifica Red’ in Subirrigation Cation = Na HCO3 SO4 Cation = Na Cl 30 meq/l HCO3 SO4 Cation = Na Cl 45 meq/l HCO3 SO4 Cl 60 meq/l (from Kent & Reed unpubl) Mixture-Amount Experiments To Separate Chloride, Bicarbonate and Sulfate Effects Vinca ‘Pacifica Red’ in Subirrigation Cation = Na HCO3 SO4 Cation = Na Cl 30 meq/l (1,700 to 2,500 ppm) HCO3 SO4 Cation = Na Cl 45 meq/l (2,300 to 3,400 ppm) HCO3 SO4 Cl 60 meq/l (2,800 to 4,400 ppm) (from Kent & Reed unpubl) Thanks EC of Soluble Fertilizers & Water Quality 4 EC dS/m 3 20-20-20 15-10-30 2 1 0 0 100 200 300 Soluble Fertilizer ppm N 400 Separation of Sodium and Bicarbonate Effect Using Mixture Experiments 5.5 4.5 g shoot 3.5 mass Na+ tox./K+ def.=-19% 2.5 HCO3- effect=-15% Rb+7.5mM K+ 0 mM Na+7.5mM Na+ 0 mM Rb+ 0 mM (from Valdez, Ph.D. dissertation) K+ 7.5mM Leaching & Salt Removal From Media New Guinea Impatiens ‘Illusion’ in Subirrigation 20 15 10 EC dS/m 5 0 1 2 3 4 Times Leached 5 6 0 2 4 18 10 14 6 8 mM CaCl2 + NaCl (from Todd & Reed 1998)