MGB 301 DSA #2 Peer Evaluation Form PEER EVALUATION FORM* Your name ____Ayodeji Fagbenle Class Section _8am Team/Group # 5 Using the scale below, circle ONE number for each person on your team/group (excluding yourself) to indicate his or her overall contribution to the team. 9 = consistently went above and beyond—supported teammates, carried more than his /her fair share of the load, always well-prepared, very cooperative. 8 = consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, usually well-prepared and cooperative 7 = usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and cooperative 6 = Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative 5 = Sometimes did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative 4 = Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared 3 = Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared 2 = consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared 1 = practically no participation 0 = No participation at all List Team Member (last name first) Elaine Lambsen 0 Circle ONE number for each person 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jamarl Eiland 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Angelo Liccardo 0 1 2 3 4 5 Ya ting Lee 0 1 2 3 4 Kristen 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 8 9 7 8 9 6 7 8 9 5 6 7 8 9 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 5 6 7 8 9 Reason for less than satisfactory (0-3)/ Extraordinary (8-9) rating: Part 2: Taking into account the following criteria: interaction with peers, engagement & involvement in the group project, please allocate a notional amount from $50,000 bonus pool to reflect each team member’s relative performance. There should be a differential among members amounting to the total but please do not give yourself a bonus 1. Elaine Lambsen-75000 2. Jamarl Eiland-10,000 3. Angelo Liccardo-7500 4. Ya ting Lee-13,000 5. Kristen-12,000 * Partly adapted from R. M. Felder, 2004 (updated to use) due by by 11:59pm on Friday, May 6th