MGB 301
DSA
#2 Peer Evaluation Form
PEER EVALUATION FORM*
Your name ____Ayodeji Fagbenle
Class Section _8am Team/Group # 5
Using the scale below, circle ONE number for each person on your team/group (excluding
yourself) to indicate his or her overall contribution to the team.
9 = consistently went above and beyond—supported teammates, carried more than
his /her fair share of the load, always well-prepared, very cooperative.
8 = consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, usually well-prepared and
cooperative
7 = usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and
cooperative
6 = Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative
5 = Sometimes did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative
4 = Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
3 = Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
2 = consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
1 = practically no participation
0 = No participation at all
List Team Member (last name first)
Elaine Lambsen
0
Circle ONE number for each person
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jamarl Eiland
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Angelo Liccardo
0
1
2
3
4
5
Ya ting Lee
0
1
2
3
4
Kristen
0
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
8
9
7
8
9
6
7
8
9
5
6
7
8
9
4
5
6
7
8
9
4
5
6
7
8
9
Reason for less than satisfactory (0-3)/ Extraordinary (8-9) rating:
Part 2:
Taking into account the following criteria: interaction with peers, engagement & involvement in the group
project, please allocate a notional amount from $50,000 bonus pool to reflect each team member’s
relative performance. There should be a differential among members amounting to the total but please do
not give yourself a bonus
1. Elaine Lambsen-75000
2. Jamarl Eiland-10,000
3. Angelo Liccardo-7500
4. Ya ting Lee-13,000
5. Kristen-12,000
* Partly adapted from R. M. Felder, 2004 (updated to use) due by by 11:59pm on Friday, May 6th