MGB 301
#1 Peer Evaluation Form
D.Siaw-Asamoah’13
PEER EVALUATION FORM*
Your name __Faye Nguyen_____
Class Section __M/W 2:30 to 3:50_____________Team/Group # __2___
Using the scale below, circle ONE number for each person on your team/group
(excluding yourself) to indicate his or her overall contribution to the team.
9 = consistently went above and beyond—supported teammates, carried more than
his /her fair share of the load, always well-prepared, very cooperative.
8 = consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, usually well-prepared and
cooperative
7 = usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and
cooperative
6 = Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative
5 = Sometimes did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative
4 = Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
3 = Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
2 = consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared
1 = practically no participation
0 = No participation at all
List Team Member (last name first)
Circle ONE number for each person
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Jonathan Braun
0
8
9
Qiaolei Ci
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Jaison Mekkattil
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Carrie Schooping
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
John Scott Sommavilla
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Reason for less than satisfactory (0-3)/ Extraordinary (8-9) rating:
Carrie and John Scott usually take the leads in the group project. John Scott, tend to be fast and he always
come up with ideas in second and Carrie is in charge of typing and sending it out to the professor.
Due by September, 23rd @ 11:59pm
* Adapted from R. M. Felder, 2004 (updated to use)