TIGERS IN THE TURF: POTENTIAL IMPACT OF TIGER BEETLES IN MANAGED TURF Kris Braman University of Georgia GENERALIST PREDATORS GEOCORIDAE Geocoris uliginosus (Say) Geocoris punctipes (Say) CARABIDAE Harpalus pennsylvanicus De Geer Calosoma sayi Dejean GENERALIST PREDATORS CARABIDAE Megacephala carolina carolina L. Lycosa sp. Walckenaer FORMICIDAE Solenopsis invicta Buren Objectives Document abundance as influenced by ground cover including turf type Determine potential impact on common turf pests Fall armyworm Twolined spittlebug Japanese beetle Methods 6 grasses (Sea Isle-1, 561-79, Cavalier, Palisades ,TifSport, TifEagle) RCB design with 6 reps Plots 25 m2 Materials and Methods Field samples Pitfall samples collected weekly for 16 weeks ; 6 May- 29 Aug Split plot design with grass genotype as whole plots Dates as the split plot for repeated measures analysis Means separated using LSD Orthogonal contrasts to identify influence of turf genera on arthropod community structure Turf genotype affects arthropod abundance (pitfall samples) Turf Genotype Sea Isle 1 561-79 Cavalier Palisades TifSport TifEagle Carabidae 2.1 bc 1.9 c 1.9 c 1.6 c 2.6 b 3.4 a Cicindellidae 0.7 b 1.8 a 0.2 b 0.1 b 0.3 b 1.8 a Orthogonal contrasts, pitfall samples Contrast Carab. Staph. Cicind. Araneae B vs Z *** NS *** NS P vs B *** NS NS NS P vs Z NS NS *** NS Tiger beetles Most numerous in 561-79 paspalum and ‘TifEagle’ bermudagrass Arthropod predator occurrence and performance…. Braman et al. 2003. Environ. Entomol. 32: 907-914 Influence of commercially available wildflower mixes on beneficial arthropod abundance and predation in turfgrass Braman et al. 2002. Environ. Entomol. 564-572 Mean number of tiger beetles in flower mixes, wheat straw mulch or in grasses with flower or mulch borders Contrast Year 1 Year 2 Smith Mix Border Patrol Mulch Bermuda- SM .31 .26 .59 .14 .32 .27 1.36 .09 Bermuda-BP Bermuda-Mulch Zoysia-SM .12 .14 .07 .08 .07 .02 Zoysia-BP Zoysia-Mulch P= .09 .12 0.002 .09 .22 0.0001 Experimental arena Mean number of prey killed/24h Functional response of M. carolina carolina on P. bicincta and S. frugiperda in single-prey system 10 8 6 4 2 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 Prey density S. frugiperda P. bicincta 15 Comparison of the total prey consumed by M. carolina carolina during 24 h. 1.0 Proportion of prey killed in 24 h 0.9 0.8 Prey alone Both prey together a b ab 0.7 0.6 c 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 P. bicincta S. frugiperda Total prey type available per arena Nachappa et al. J. Econ Entomol. In review White grubs Consumption of Japanese beetle eggs or 1st instars during 24 h (petri dish trials) M. carolina Number eaten 6 5 a a H. pennsylvanicus a 4 3 b 2 1 0 JB Eggs JB 1st instars Consumption of Japanese beetle eggs in soil (1-day) H. pennsylvanicus M. carolina H. pennsylvanicus a 35 Proportion eaten Number eaten M. carolina 90 80 30 a 25 70 b 60 a 20 b 15 5 40 b a 10 50 30 20 b 10 0 0 10 20 30 Prey density 40 Consumption of Japanese beetle eggs/larvae in soil (1-week) H. pennsylvanicus M. carolina H. pennsylvanicus 45 120 a 40 100 b 35 a 30 25 60 b 15 a b 80 a b 20 10 Proportion eaten Number eaten M. carolina 40 20 5 0 0 10 20 30 Prey density 40 Consumption of Japanese beetle eggs/larvae in soil (3-week) H. pennsylvanicus M. carolina H. pennsylvanicus 45 a a 40 Proportion eaten Number eaten M. carolina 120 100 a 35 30 25 a b 20 15 10 80 b 60 40 a b 20 5 0 0 10 20 30 Prey density 40 Conclusions The tiger beetle M. carolina occurs in turf and landscape beds in synchrony with common pests M. carolina’s abundance was influenced by turfgrass type and surrounding “habitat” The common turfgrass pests S. frugiperda, P. bicincta, and P. japonica were suitable prey for M. carolina in laboratory studies Conclusions In laboratory evaluations, M. carolina exhibited a Type II functional response to P. bicincta and S. frugiperda Greater numbers of S. frugiperda than P. bicincta were captured by adult M. carolina when only one type of prey was present In a “two-prey” system this difference was even more apparent; S. frugiperda was more frequently killed Conclusions In petri dish trials, M. carolina and H. pennsylvanicus consumed similar numbers of P. japonica eggs M. carolina consumed more first instar P. japonica larvae than H. pennsylvanicus in petri dish assays however…. Conclusions When M. carolina and H. pennsylvanicus adults were confined with different densities of P. japonica (initially as eggs) for three weeks in soil, H. pennsylvanicus consumed a greater proportion of prey at all densities on day 2 and 1 week. Numbers consumed by week 3 were similar at the highest density, but still lower for M. carolina at lower densities Implications and Research Needs M. carolina is a prominent predator in turf that .. Demonstrated potential to suppress three common turfgrass pests in laboratory trials Laboratory evaluations in simplistic systems are insufficient to define comparative predatory potential Field assessment of predator impact is required