23403 version 1 Page 1 of 5 Demonstrate knowledge of the psychology of learning used in the training of quarantine detector dogs Level 4 Credits 6 Purpose People credited with this unit standard are able to demonstrate knowledge of: factors which affect learning in dogs; classifications of learning for dogs; associative learning theories and their application in training a quarantine detector dog; reinforcement in the learning process of a dog; the use of punishment as a means of decreasing unwanted behaviour; extinction as a consequence of operant or classical conditioning; and motivation in dogs and its relevance to the selection and training of a quarantine detector dog. Subfield Biosecurity Domain Border Quarantine Status Registered Status date 18 December 2006 Date version published 18 December 2006 Planned review date 31 December 2011 Entry information Open. Accreditation Evaluation of documentation and visit by NZQA and industry. Standard setting body (SSB) Competenz Accreditation and Moderation Action Plan (AMAP) reference 0173 This AMAP can be accessed at http://www.nzqa.govt.nz/framework/search/index.do. Special notes 1 The training manual refers to the MAF Quarantine Detector Dog Programme Training Manual, produced by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Quarantine Service (MAFQS). The manual is a restricted document available only to staff of MAFQS warranted or authorised under the Biosecurity Act 1993. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016 23403 version 1 Page 2 of 5 2 Risk goods are defined in the Biosecurity Act 1993 as ’any organism, organic material, or other thing, or substance, that, (by reason of its nature, origin, or other relevant factors) it is reasonable to suspect constitutes, harbours, or contains an organism that may cause unwanted harm to natural and physical resources or human health in New Zealand; or interfere with the diagnosis, management, or treatment, in New Zealand of pests or unwanted organisms.’ 3 Legislation applying to this unit standard includes the Biosecurity Act 1993, Diplomatic Privileges and Immunities Act 1968, Trade in Endangered Species Act 1989, Conservation Act 1987, Animal Welfare Act 1999, Dog Control Act 1996, and their subsequent amendments. Elements and performance criteria Element 1 Demonstrate knowledge of factors which affect learning in dogs. Performance criteria 1.1 The reasons why dogs learn are described in accordance with the training manual. 1.2 Factors which affect a dog’s learning are described in accordance with the training manual. Range 1.3 age and developmental periods, differing methods of learning, conditioning, reinforcement, punishment. The developmental periods in the life of a dog are described in accordance with the training manual. Range neonatal, transitional, socialisation, juvenile, mature, geriatric. Element 2 Demonstrate knowledge of classifications of learning for dogs. Performance criteria 2.1 The classification of learning for dogs is described in accordance with the training manual. Range 2.2 associative, trial and error, observational, habituation, learning set, shaping. insight, latent, Types of associative learning are described in accordance with the training manual. Range classical, operant. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016 23403 version 1 Page 3 of 5 2.3 Types of learning processes affecting dog behaviour are described in accordance with the training manual. Range trial and error, insight, observational, latent, habituation, learning set, shaping. Element 3 Demonstrate knowledge of associative learning theories and their application in training a quarantine detector dog. Performance criteria 3.1 Classical conditioning is described in accordance with the training manual. Range 3.2 unconditioned stimulus, unconditioned response, conditioned stimulus, conditioned response. Operant conditioning is described in accordance with the training manual. Range stimulus, response, reinforcement. 3.3 Habituation is described in accordance with the training manual. 3.4 Shaping is described in accordance with the training manual. Element 4 Demonstrate knowledge of reinforcement in the learning process of a dog. Performance criteria 4.1 Types of reinforcement are explained in accordance with the training manual. Range primary, secondary, positive, negative. 4.2 Reinforcement of learning is explained in terms of the distinction between positive and negative reinforcers, in accordance with the training manual. 4.3 Schedules of reinforcement and their effect are explained in accordance with the training manual. Range 4.4 interval, ratio, fixed, variable. Rules of effective reinforcement are explained in accordance with the training manual. Range immediate, consistent, varied, application of schedules. desirable, repetition, correct New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016 23403 version 1 Page 4 of 5 Element 5 Demonstrate knowledge of the use of punishment as a means of decreasing unwanted behaviour. Performance criteria 5.1 The use of punishment is explained in terms of the distinction between positive and negative types of punishment in accordance with the training manual. 5.2 Rules of decreasing unwanted behaviour by the use of punishment are explained in accordance with the training manual. 5.3 Problems arising from the wrong application of punishment as a behaviour modifier are described in accordance with the training manual. Range desensitivity, redirected behaviour, reduced motivation, learned helplessness. Element 6 Demonstrate knowledge of extinction as a consequence of operant or classical conditioning. Performance criteria 6.1 The consequences of non-reinforcement of desired behaviour are explained in accordance with the training manual. 6.2 The effect of non-reinforcement of undesired behaviour is explained in accordance with the training manual. 6.3 Spontaneous recovery is explained in terms of the relinking of the stimulusresponse reinforcement chain. Element 7 Demonstrate knowledge of motivation in dogs and its relevance to the selection and training of a quarantine detector dog. Performance criteria 7.1 The causes of variation in the relationship between stimulus and response are described in accordance with the training manual. 7.2 Types of motivation are described in terms of their effect on the stimulusresponse relationship, in accordance with the training manual. Range general, specific. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016 23403 version 1 Page 5 of 5 7.3 Measures of motivation are described in accordance with the training manual. Range 7.4 latency to respond, number of responses in unit time, strength of overcoming aversive stimuli, intensity of responses to standard stimuli. The relevance of measuring motivation in potential quarantine detector dogs is described in terms of the selection of suitable dogs for training in the detection of quarantine risk goods, is described in accordance with the training manual. Please note Providers must be accredited by the Qualifications Authority, or an inter-institutional body with delegated authority for quality assurance, before they can report credits from assessment against unit standards or deliver courses of study leading to that assessment. Industry Training Organisations must be accredited by the Qualifications Authority before they can register credits from assessment against unit standards. Accredited providers and Industry Training Organisations assessing against unit standards must engage with the moderation system that applies to those standards. Accreditation requirements and an outline of the moderation system that applies to this standard are outlined in the Accreditation and Moderation Action Plan (AMAP). The AMAP also includes useful information about special requirements for organisations wishing to develop education and training programmes, such as minimum qualifications for tutors and assessors, and special resource requirements. Comments on this unit standard Please contact the Competenz at info@competenz.org.nz if you wish to suggest changes to the content of this unit standard. New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2016