Fall 2016
Collaborative Inquiry Grant Program
Technical Proposal Application
Due by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, April 22, 2016
Student Instructions. Students applying for a Collaborative Inquiry grant in a technical field must fill out
sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 below according to the Guidelines that appear on the Collaborative Inquiry website.
Enter your answers to the questions in the text box below each question. Once this form is complete,
you must save it as a Word document and submit it as an attachment to an e-mail directed to Kristin Walters
at kswalters@stthomas.edu. If you do not receive an email confirming receipt of your proposal within 72
hours, please contact Katie Hubly at the same e-mail address. Your application will not be considered if it
is sent after the due date and time posted above.
Faculty Mentor Instructions. Faculty agreeing to mentor a student must submit a letter of support by the
same date and time as listed above.
Student Applicant:
Student UST ID#:
Student E-Mail:
Campus Mail#
Student Phone:
Student Mailing Address
Undergraduate Major(s)
Expected Semester/Year of Graduation
Title of Proposed
Project
Faculty Mentor Name
Faculty Mentor Phone
Faculty Mentor E-Mail
Department /Program
Campus
Mail#
An Overview of Your Application:
Please note that a complete proposal consists of the following components and will be assigned
up to 450 points by reviewers on the Undergraduate Research Board:
Part 1: Press Summary (150 points)
In this section, you will be asked to briefly explain your proposed research to a nonspecialist. Reviewers of your application will measure the extent to which you are able to
articulate your research to someone outside of your field. Answer all of the questions as
completely as possible, write clearly and concisely, and avoid disciplinary jargon.
Part 2: Project Narrative (300 points – 150 points possible from each of two reviewers)
This component of your proposal consists of six major sections. Make certain that you
address all of the sub-questions that appear in each. In this area of your proposal, you
will be evaluated on the scientific merit, anticipated impact, and potential for
dissemination of your proposed project. Any necessary disciplinary jargon is allowed
here, but be sure to include a glossary of terms.
Part 3: Project Timeline
You must include a Timeline of your proposed project as per the Guidelines published on the
Grants and Research Office website. Applications missing a Timeline will not be reviewed.
Part 4: Additional Appendices
Additional appendices may include at your discretion:
Glossary of Terms
Supporting Figures
Special Expenses Budget
Treatment of Human and Animal Subjects
External Letters of Support (when appropriate)
Part 5: Transcript of College Grades (Official or un-official)
Part 6: Mentor Letter of Support (Electronic or Hard Copy)
This component of your application must be written and submitted by your project mentor.
Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 must be submitted as a single Word Document by the deadline posted above. For
Part 5, you must contact the Registrar’s Office, get a transcript of your college grades (need not be an
official transcript), and send those to the Grants and Research Office (Mailing address: AQU 319). For
Part 6, the Mentor Letter of Support must be sent separately (to AQU 319) by your mentor. All six parts
must be received at the Grants and Research Office (AQU 326) by the posted deadline.
Enter your answers to the questions in the text box below each question: any
other format of application will be automatically discarded!
Part 1 - PRESS SUMMARY (limit: 400 words – application will be discarded if word
count is violated)
150 possible points
Describe your proposed research project using language that a non-specialist will be able to understand.
You will be evaluated here exclusively on your ability to provide a comprehensive and clear description of
your proposed project that someone outside of your field can understand. Avoid disciplinary jargon!
Please see the guidelines for proper faculty mentor roles in helping prepare this, and other all pieces of the
application.
Enter your answers to the questions in the text box below each question: any
other format of application will be automatically discarded!
Be sure to address all of the following questions:
a. What question(s) are you trying to address?
b. How is your project important to your field and the broader community?
c. How will you address the question(s) that you pose above in question (a.)? What will
your methodology be?
d. What would you predict will be the outcomes of your research? What are the possible
alternate outcomes? How will you interpret the results?
e. How will you disseminate the results of your research? If applicable, please describe
how your research is part of a broader project designed for publication and/or
presentation at a major academic meeting.
f.
What do you think will be the impact of your research on your academic and intellectual
development? How will conducting this research contribute to your longer-term
academic and professional goals?
PART 2 - PROJECT NARRATIVE (limit: 1,200 words – application will be discarded if
word count is violated)
150 possible points from each of two reviewers
Enter your answers to the questions in the text box below each question: any
other format of application will be automatically discarded!
1. Research Question (10 points)
What question(s) are you planning to address in your research?
2. Background and Literature Review (40 points)
What is the background of your project? Why is your project important to your discipline and to the
general community? What have scholars written about your project/question(s) in the past? Who are the
most important researchers relating to your project? How does your project fit in with the existing
literature?
3. Research Design and Methodology (40 points)
How will you address the question(s) that you pose? What methodologies will you employ? How do you
plan to analyze your results?
4. Results and Interpretation (40 points)
What would you predict will be the outcomes of your research and what are some possible alternate
outcomes? How will you interpret the results?
5. Anticipated Impact (10 points)
What do you think will be the impact of your research on your discipline, the general community, and your
own intellectual development?
6. Dissemination Plan (10 points)
How will you share the results of your research? What specific conferences might you attend? What
audiences do you hope to reach?
Part 3 - PROJECT TIMELINE (Required)
Part 4 - ADDITIONAL APPENDICES (See Guidelines)
Please briefly answer the following questions (0 points):
1. How did you hear about the Collaborative Inquiry Grant Program? (Faculty, Peers,
Brochures, Website, Orientation, Electronic Media, etc. Include all that apply).
2. What is your favorite part of being a (fill in your major/s) major at UST?
May we publish your answer in our annual publication featuring undergraduate
research?
Yes
No
A photographer will be taking photos during the “Inquiry at UST” event. May we publish
your picture in our website and in our research book?
Yes
No