PLEASE SILENCE ALL CELL PHONES! THANK YOU! Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh’s

advertisement
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh’s
Clinical Services Building
Pittsburgh, PA
PLEASE
PLEASE
SILENCE ALL CELL PHONES!
SILENCE ALL CELL PHONES!
THANK YOU!
THANK YOU!
Final Thesis Presentation
Gloria Brashear
Construction Management Option
Advisor: Professor Horman
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
- 900,000 SF hospital
- 6th floor atrium and rooftop garden
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling for General Contractors
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
- vibrant use of colors on the interior and exterior
- family, healing, sustainability, and state-of-the-art
technology
- 40% of the total construction is renovations to a previously
existing hospital.
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
Video Courtesy of Astorino
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling for General Contractors
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Owner:
University of Pittsburgh
Owner Rep:
Oxford Development Co.
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling for General Contractors
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Construction Manager:
Dick Corp.
Architect & Engineer:
Astorino
General Contractor:
Barton Malow – P.J. Dick, A Joint Venture
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
2006
PROJECT SCHEDULE
BMPJD Notice of Award
0 days
Award Packages
Steel Erection
Coordination Drawings
Interior Demolition (Old Building)
Plumbing
Major Material Deliveries
37 days
166 days
179 days
25 days
251 days
136 days
Telecommunications Construction
Risers
Mechanical
Electrical
Exterior Studs and Sheathing
Roofing
Vendor Selection
556 days
134 days
194 days
229 days
126 days
250 days
234 days
Elevators
Windows
Doors
Punchlist
Helipad
475 days
147 days
208 days
373 days
57 days
Full Enclosure
0 days
Owner Deliver Medical Equipment
0 days
Installation
Testing
Commission
36 days
9 days
15 days
Substantial Completion
0 days
Project Completion
0 days
2007
2008
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
PROJECT SCHEDULE
- Very complex schedule by floor and quad
- Telecommunications contractor and Steel contractor picked
prior to General Contractor
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
- Trades work through the building in a spiral effect
Research 2: Virtual Modeling for General Contractors
Breadth 1: Mechanical
- Overlap of trades due to continual work flow
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
- Start Date: 12/22/05
- Projected Completion Date: 12/22/08
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
2006
BMPJD Notice of Award
0 days
Award Packages
Steel Erection
Coordination Drawings
Interior Demolition (Old Building)
Plumbing
Major Material Deliveries
37 days
166 days
179 days
25 days
251 days
136 days
Telecommunications Construction
Risers
Mechanical
Electrical
Exterior Studs and Sheathing
Roofing
Vendor Selection
556 days
134 days
194 days
229 days
126 days
250 days
234 days
Elevators
Windows
Doors
Punchlist
Helipad
Full Enclosure
Owner Deliver Medical Equipment
475 days
147 days
208 days
373 days
57 days
0 days
0 days
Installation
Testing
Commission
36 days
9 days
15 days
Substantial Completion
Project Completion
0 days
0 days
2007
2008
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
"The frog does not drink up the pond in
which it lives."
- Chinese Proverb
<http://www.gardendigest.com/conserve.htm>
- Green building popularity increasing, public has a vested
interest
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
- Clinical Services Building designed to meet the LEED™ New
Construction v2.1.
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
- Save 90¢ /sq. ft. annually
Breadth 2: Structural
- Energy and other costs earn back investment in 2 – 2 ½ yrs.
Acknowledgements
- Certification process now 100% online
Comments & Questions
- Availability of online sample submission forms
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
- Research of LEED™
- Pittsburgh General Contractor Survey
- LEED™ Submittals in Specifications
- LEED™ Submittal form
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
1. Familiarity of Contractors: 8-9
2. Familiarity of Subcontractors: 4-5, MEP higher
3. Helpfulness and Familiarity of Architects: 6-7, large firms
higher
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
4. Number of Green and LEED™ Projects Worked On: 3-4
5. Most Difficult Credits: FSC chain of custody, harvest location,
HVAC, commissioning, and materials/resources
6. Most Difficult Aspects of LEED™: drywall recycling, education
of the masses, inclusion in the bidding process, structure or
defined steps
7. Client's Eagerness to Implement LEED™: poor perception of
cost, do not know all it entails
8. LEED in Construction Documents: need better definition
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
- Research of LEED™
- Pittsburgh General Contractor Survey
- LEED™ Submittals in Specifications
- LEED™ Submittal form
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Addendum to Specifications Section 05310:
1.02 SUBMITTALS
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Add: " F. LEED™ Submittal form for each specific material.
1. MR 3.1: List of proposed materials salvaged, reused, or refurbished
a. Identify material cost.
2. MR 4.1 and 4.2: List of proposed materials with recycled content.
a. Indicate cost, post-consumer recycled content, and postindustrial recycled content for each product having recycled
content.
3. MR 5.1 and 5.2: List of proposed regionally manufactured
materials and regionally extracted, harvested, or recovered
materials.
a. Identify each regionally manufactured material, its source,
and cost.
b. Identify each regionally extracted, harvested or recovered
material, its source, and cost. "
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
- Research of LEED™
- Pittsburgh General Contractor Survey
- LEED™ Submittals in Specifications
- LEED™ Submittal form
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
- Research of LEED™
- Pittsburgh General Contractor Survey
- LEED™ Submittals in Specifications
- LEED™ Submittal form
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
"“If a picture contains one thousand words... A
model contains one thousand pictures”
- Edward McCracken (former CEO – SGI)
<http://www.cdi-grp.net/Home_Page.html>
- 25 yr. old idea in the making
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
- Automobile and airline manufacturing industries adopted
virtual modeling successfully
Breadth 1: Mechanical
- Acceptance, compatibility, and perhaps contractual reliability
and responsibility essential for success
Breadth 2: Structural
- Compatibility of software
Acknowledgements
- Owners do not understand investment and commitment
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Comments & Questions
- Industry-wide standards in the works with National Institute of
Building Sciences.
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
- Research of Virtual Modeling
- Interview with MIS Project Leader with P.J. Dick, Inc.
- Software Review
- Research of BIM Consultants
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Project Model Type Man Hours Completed By
Office
3D
545
In House
Research
5D
480
Out Sourced
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
- Research of Virtual Modeling
- Modeling not used on Clinical Services Building
- Decide what general contractor wants with model
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
- Quality and reliability of the work product outweigh the
additional cost of out sourcing
- Interview with MIS Project Leader with P.J. Dick, Inc.
- Software Review
- Research of BIM Consultants
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Vico vs. Autodesk
Constructor vs. Revit Architecture
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
- Research of Virtual Modeling
- Interview with MIS Project Leader with P.J. Dick, Inc.
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
- Software Review
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
- Research of BIM Consultants
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Vico vs. Autodesk
Constructor vs. Revit Architecture
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
- Research of Virtual Modeling
- Interview with MIS Project Leader with P.J. Dick, Inc.
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
- Software Review
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
- Research of BIM Consultants
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Vico vs. Autodesk
Constructor vs. Revit Architecture
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
- Research of Virtual Modeling
- Interview with MIS Project Leader with P.J. Dick, Inc.
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
- Software Review
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
- Research of BIM Consultants
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
BIM Consultants
Project Overview
- Combine multiple fields of work
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
- Devote proper time required
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
- Reduce cost and coordination issues
Breadth 1: Mechanical
- Improve construction inefficiencies
Breadth 2: Structural
- Improve schedule and trade coordination
Acknowledgements
- Benefits outweigh cost
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
- Research of Virtual Modeling
- Interview with MIS Project Leader with P.J. Dick, Inc.
- Software Review
- Research of BIM Consultants
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Background:
- Existing hood system outdated
- Manufacturer out of business
Project Overview
- Owner wants to salvage existing equipment
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Problem:
- Existing system and proposed system noncompatible
- Initial cost increase with change in scope of work
- Schedule delays increasing
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Proposal:
- Fully functioning kitchen hood system
- New hood and ductwork
Model "CG3-BDL" Water Wash Ventilator
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
Proposed Revision to Scope of Work:
Existing Scope of Work:
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
18,500 CFM @ 0.08 friction per 100 ft of duct = 60x24
Material
Exhaust: Low Roof Exhaust: 5th Floor
Project Overview
Duct Insulation
$15,617.56
$9,543.46
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Ducts
$76,020.14
$43,832.09
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Louver
$840.00
$840.00
Fan
$2,650.00
$2,650.00
Exhaust Hood
$61,425.00
$61,425.00
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
DAYS:
TOTAL:
L = 0.09 √Q (√DF - U/400)
<ASHRAE 62.1, Exhaust Ventilation>
Attempts to reduce size failed
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Minimum separation distance between building and exhaust is 1/2 of L.:
52
32
$156,552.70
$118,290.55
Q= exhaust air volume, 250 cfm per million BTU/h (per Appendix F3)
DF = dilution factor, 15 (per Table F.2)
U= 0
L = 43.8 ft.
1/2L = 21.9 ft. OK!
SAVINGS on material: $38,262.15
SAVINGS on schedule: 20 days
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Background:
- Topping showing visible fatigue between col. line
K-P and 1-5
- Form deck corrosion
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
Problem:
- Mechanical and electrical penetrations causing
corrosion
- All penetrations should be seen as potential hazards
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Proposal:
- Ensure longevity of aesthetics and structural
integrity
- New form deck
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
UF2X form deck
24 GA, 5” slab, @ 7’ spans
4x4 – W2.9 x 2.9 mesh
United Steel Deck, Inc.
Form Deck & Slab for Typical Bay
Infill Beams @ 7' O.C.
Needed: 5" thick slab, 2" deck, 3" lightweight concrete
Loading:
Live Loads:
Lab/Ward: 80psf <per Specifications>
Dead Loads:
Deck: 3 psf <per USD Design Manual>
Concrete: 115 pcf x 3 in slab = 28.75psf <per USD Design Manual>
Superimposed: 15 psf
W = 1.4 (3psf + 28.75psf + 15 psf) + 1.7 (80psf)
W = 201.45 psf
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
United Steel Deck:
concrete slabs on UF2X form deck, 24 GA, 5” slab, @ 7’ spans
4x4 – W2.9 x 2.9 mesh,
Uniform Total Load = 212 psf
201.45psf < 212psf - OK!
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Material
Edge Forms
Impact
$6,213.00
WWF
$483,968.00
Concrete
$108,098.77
Placing Concrete $28,498.77
Project Overview
Finishing
$62,406.40
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Form Decking
$187,856.00
Breadth 1: Mechanical
DAYS:
TOTAL:
32 days/floor
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
$877,040.93
Proposed cost compared with
life cycle
- Original built in 1968
- Less than 37 years later
showed signs of fatigue
-Additional MEP
penetrations increase
need
- Structural integrity and
future aesthetics
guaranteed
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Conclusion:
Research 1: LEED Process: Change in submittals would close the
information gap between subcontractors and architects
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
Research 2: Virtual Modeling: Outsourcing most beneficial option, if inhouse use of Vico software proves most user-friendly
Breadth 1: Mechanical: Re-routing ductwork reduces cost by $38,262.15
and saves 20 days
Breadth 2: Structural: Structural improvements increase building life cycle
which outweighs cost of construction adding 32 days to the schedule for each
floor
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
I would like to thank the following companies for their assistance with
my senior thesis:
- Astorino Architect & Engineers
- Barton Malow – P.J. Dick, A Joint Venture
- Brashear Construction Consulting, Inc.
- Jendoco Construction Corporation
- Mascaro Construction Company, LP
- Massaro Corporation
- Oxford Development Company
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
I would also like to thank the following people for their support and
guidance throughout my time at Penn State:
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
- Family and friends (the ones at home in Pittsburgh, and the ones that are here
making State College my second home)
- Fellow AE students
- Penn State AE Faculty and Staff
Gloria S. Brashear
Construction Management Option
Department of Architectural Engineering
The Pennsylvania State University
Project Overview
Research 1: LEED Documentation Process for General Contractors
Research 2: Virtual Modeling
Breadth 1: Mechanical
Breadth 2: Structural
Acknowledgements
Comments & Questions
Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh Clinical Services Building
Download