Dr. Merle P. Martin
MIS Department
CSU Sacramento
Ski Resort Planning
What is a DSS?
Unstructured Problems
DSS Components
DSS Examples
Group DSS
Ski Area Planning
Ski area designs require
same input
same decision model
Each resort offers :
different types of trails
to different skill levels
Long-range objective: maximize profits for given terrain & market mix
Ski Area Planning
Optimum design concentrates on balancing downhill / uphill capacities
System of trails cannot easily be changed once carved
Summer activities complicate design
Industry is capital intensive
Ski Resort Planning
Primary Objective
Downhill Capacity
(Trails)
Production Capacity
=
Uphill Capacity
(Lifts)
Market Demand
Ski Area Planning
Terrain Capacity Analysis:
Examine physical attributes of mountain
Create initial set of trails
Determine mountain's downhill capacity (i.e., trail system)
Ski Area Planning
Terrain Capacity Analysis:
Examine physical attributes of the mountain
Create initial set of trails
Determine mountain's downhill capacity (i.e., trail system)
Market Analysis:
Match trail system to market mix
Topography Map (Terrain)
Expert and advanced trails
Steep slope
Gentle slope
Lifts
Novice & beginner trail
Physical Design
Physical terrain and constraints
Slope of mountain sides
Physical obstacles
(e.g., cliffs, boulders, creeks, etc.)
Aesthetics (i.e., forest scenery)
Designer selects initial layout
Initial set of trails
Physical Design
Downhill capacity of skiers calculated
Number of skiers per acre
(judgmental)
Type of skier (i.e., skill level)
Regional density
Market Analysis
Objective: match trail system to market demands
Seven skier skill levels:
Beginner
Novice
Low intermediate
Intermediate
High intermediate
Advance
Expert
Market Mix:
Percentage from each category
Decision Support System
Calculates trail capacity
Matches skill levels to trail via slope grades
Takes into account skier density per acre by skill level
Calculates market mix of skier skill levels
Provides expected numbers from a given market mix distribution
Decision Support System
Balances trail system to market mix
Changes input parameters:
Trail attributes
Density levels
Market mix distribution
Examines uphill capacity
Terrain Capacity Analysis
Slope Inventory
S v u r l L p h g % /
N 1 0 1 n d n d
0 1
0 1 n d
0 4 1
0 4 1
0 4 1
Market Display:
Design for 3837 Skiers
L m
I m h d
N k l G r
9 2
8 1
6 1
3 1 4
6 2
8 1
9 1
Market percent estimated by the planner
Computed by the DSS
Skill Balance
L m
I m h d
A k n
4 0 3
9 0
7 0
3 0 1
4 0 7
6 0 2
7 0
7 0
Sprague / Carlson:
“Computer-based system that helps the decision maker confront ill-structured problems through direct interaction with data and analysis models.”
Aid decision maker
not replace ( ES )
Decision maker remains in control
Not always best decision
Change / flexibility
Quick response
Large amounts of data
Different data sources
Tailored to decision maker:
judgment
knowledge
intuition
style
personal traits
Graphically oriented
Optimize / heuristics
“What if”(sensitivity) analysis
Goal-seeking analysis
Unstructured problems
Data Base
Decision
Maker
DSS
Software
Graphical
Interface
Model
Base
Models
• Financial
• Statistical analysis
• Graphical
• Project mgmt
Financial
Statistical Analysis
Graphical
Project Management
Management Science
Operations research
Cash Flow
e.g., discounted payback
Internal ROI
Portfolio Analysis
stock market
advertising
Spreadsheets
Descriptive (summary)
Trend projection
Hypothesis testing
Regression analysis
Inventory
Queuing (Line)
Network
Search
American Airlines
Price / rate selection
Frito-Lay
Advertising / promotion selection
Juniper Lumber
Production scheduling
Kmart
Price evaluation
Southern Railway
Train dispatching and forecasting
Texas Oil & Gas
Potential drilling sites
Does your firm use DSS?
How?
How could your firm use a DSS?
What problems do you see with DSS?
) interactive computer-based system facilitating solution of unstructured problems by a set of decision makers working together as a group.
Database
Model Base
GDSS
Processor
Groupware
Dialogue
Manager
User
Brainstorming tools
Idea organization
Prioritization / voting
Electronic questionnaires
pre-meeting
Group Dictionary
Stakeholder identification
Projection Screen
Facilitator
Console &
Network
Server
Projector
Workstations
Efficiency of group meetings
Quality of decisions reached
alternatives examined
participation / contribution
those who would otherwise be silent
decision outcomes
Leverage (way meetings run)
e.g., human parallel processing
Anonymity
provides sense of equality
encourages participation by all
reduces:
problems with “group think” dominance by strong personalities
heightens conflict / impoliteness
Facility Design
lighting and layout
Multiple public screens
Knowledge bases / databases
Network speed
Fixed versus customized tools
Software design
ease of use
Group size / composition
individual satisfaction increases with group size
Satisfaction
participants not blocked out of group
same place
Face-to-Face
Meetings
(electronic copyboards)
Teams in
Place
(team room tools) different places
Cross-Distance
Meetings
(audio/video conferencing) same time
Ongoing
Coordination
(voice mail, e-mail) different times
GDSS is based on the assumption that anonymity is desired. How important is anonymity in groups?
at work?
in class?
in distance-learning?
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
What is a DSS?
DSS Components
DSS Examples
Group DSS