Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition M F
advertisement
Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Washington, DC MICHAEL FUNK Construction Management Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Presentation Outline Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Analysis 3 – Foundation Excavation Conclusions Q&A Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Project Overview Total Cost: Project Overview $ 45 Million Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Size: Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Duration: Analysis 3 – Foundation Conclusions Q&A 410,000 Sq. Ft. 2 Stories 30 Months Original: March 2005 – September 2007 Building Function: High School Facilities: Classrooms, Computer Lab, Gymnasium, Stage and Dressing Rooms, Dance Studio, Weight and Aerobics Rooms, Arts / Crafts, Music Room Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Project Overview Construction: Project Overview School must remain in session throughout the project duration Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide During school: Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Summer: Analysis 3 – Foundation Conclusions Q&A 50 to 60 workers 150 workers Project Site: Fairly Open Construction Site Given 60 parking spaces Trash sorted by concrete/CMU and steel despite there being no recycling requirements Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Project Overview Traditional Delivery Method Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Analysis 3 – Foundation Conclusions Q&A Michael Funk Construction Management Project Team: Owner: City of Fairfax School Board Program Manager: BeeryRio Architecture & Interiors General Contractor: Grunley Construction Company Architects/ Engineers: Strickler Associates, Ehlert/Bryan, Adtek Engineers AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition PROJECT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART FAIRFAX HIGH SCHOOL STAFFING PLAN City of Fairfax School Board GRUNLEY SUPPORT TEAM Accounting & Human Resources Estimating Procurement Information Technologies Corporate Scheduling Corporate Safety Corporate Quality Assurance LEED Certification Field Operations & Training Off-Site Organization CHIP SCOTT PROJECT EXECUTIVE GREG MCHUGH BERNARD SCHULZE PROJECT MANAGER GENERAL SUPERINTENDENT SCHEDULER COST ENGINEER SAFETY DIRECTOR ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENTS COORDINATORS FOREMEN ASSISTANT PMS TRADESMEN Self-Performed Work Subcontractors’ Home and Field Organizations Michael Funk Construction Management On-Site Organization AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Analysis 1 – LEED Guide Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition LEED Guide Problem Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout • • • ‘Going green’ trend continues to increase LEED points can be hard to obtain Focus gets lost on the project Existing Research • Setting early “green” goals is critical Analysis 3 – Foundation Conclusions Q&A Goal • • Michael Funk Construction Management Identify LEED® points that are attainable based on project type Develop a guide that can be distributed to project team to aid in obtaining these points AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition LEED Guide Research Steps: • • Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide • • Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Analysis 3 – Foundation • • Literature review to become more familiar with LEED® Identify and interview different owners on different LEED® Rated projects Surveyed owners and project managers Develop an outline for a guide that will benefit owners and project managers from the start of a project Developed a spreadsheet format for each LEED ® point Had several project managers test out the guide, obtained Conclusions Q&A Michael Funk Construction Management feedback, and developed a final version AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition LEED Guide Excel Spreadsheet: Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Analysis 3 – Foundation Specification Section Description Responsible Party Material Cost Location Comments Submission Deadline Conclusions Q&A Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition LEED Guide Spec Section LEED LOG 08110 05310 10605 04065 07210 07620 07900 08800 07814 07900 0990 09900 09900 10270 07210 07900 09100 09250 09280 09510 09770 Description Standard Steel Doors and Frames Steel Deck and Plate Hardware Cloth Stone Mortar Building Insulation Product Data - STONE Sheet Metal Flashing and Trim - Stonework Joint Sealants - Stone Control Joints Glass and Glazing Transom Glass Interior Intumescent Fireproofing Joint Sealants - Partition Opening Perimeter Joints Temporary Cafeteria Paint Temporary Cafeteria Epoxy Paint Paint Access Flooring Building Insulation Product Data - DRYWALL Joint Sealants - Partition Perimeter and Control Joints Drywall Metal Support Assemblies, Metal Support Assemblies Gypsum Board Temporary Cafeteria, Whole Project Plaster Restoration Acoustical Ceilings, Fasteners Glass Fiber-Reinforced Wall Panels Resp Party Material Cost Location Comments Due By AG Mauro AIW AIW Atlantic Sent: Sent: Sent: Sent: 6/29/05 6/29/05 6/29/05 6/29/05 Received: Received: Received: Received: 7/8/2005 7/8/2005 7/8/2005 7/8/2005 Atlantic Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005 Atlantic Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005 Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005 Received: 6/29/05 - Atlantic Glass Manufacturer: Oldcastle Glass - Telford, PA Wood from existing/salvaged transoms AV Smoot Sent: 6/29/05 Ballard Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005 Ballard Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/8/2005 Ballard Sent: 6/29/05 Received: Ballard Ballard Bettinger-West Sent: 6/29/05 Sent: 6/29/05 Sent: 6/29/05 Received: Received: Received: 7/8/2005 7/8/2005 7/8/2005 Coakley 8000.00 Inwood, WV Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 - Coakley n/a n/a Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 - Coakley 120000.00 Baltimore, MD Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 - Coakley Coakley Baltimore, MD Baltimore, MD Cloquet, MN Stony Point, NY Sent: 6/29/05 Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 Received: 7/11/05 - Coakley 54000.00 141000.00 5000.00 18000.00 Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 - Coakley n/a n/a Sent: 6/29/05 Received: 7/11/05 - Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Phasing Functionality of the school caused for a unique schedule Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Four Phases and Fourteen Areas Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Phase 1 Nine areas covered 54% of the $1.2 million contingency used Heavily front-end loaded Analysis 3 – Foundation Conclusions Q&A Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Phasing Initial Layout: Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Analysis 3 – Foundation Conclusions Q&A Michael Funk Construction Management Phase 1 – 9 Areas Phase 2 – 6 Areas Area A Area B Area D Area E Area I Area J Area L Area M Area N Area A Area C Area D Area G Area I Area E Phase 3 – 4 Areas Phase 4 – 2 Areas Area F Area I Area K Area J Area H Academy Work AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Phasing Re-Designed Layout: Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Analysis 3 – Foundation Conclusions Q&A Michael Funk Construction Management Phase 1 – 4 Areas Phase 2 – 4 Areas Area A Area B Area M Area N Area C Area D Area E Area H Phase 3 – 3 Areas Phase 4 – 4 Areas Area F Area G Area I Area J Area K Area L Academy Work AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Phasing New layout provides a more balanced schedule Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Phase 3 is lighter to allow for make-up time if any previous Phases get behind Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Analysis 3 – Foundation Places the work in a nice flow based on what work is being done and the school remaining open Conclusions Q&A Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Analysis 3 – Foundation Placement Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Foundation Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Bulk Excavation (current) versus Trench Excavation Goal: Reduce labor costs, schedule, and the amount of material used Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Analysis 3 – Foundation Trench excavation eliminates the need for forming and reduces the amount of material removed and the amount of fill Conclusions Q&A Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Foundation Table 1 - Cost Difference Summary Trench Bulk Item Excavation Excavation Difference Material (BCY) 483.545 1310.465 826.92 Material (LCY) 531.9 1441.51 909.61 Total Costs $13,946.96 $60,158.80 $46,211.84 Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Foundation Table 3 - Schedule / Excavator Demand Impact Item Equipment Labor (hrs/BCY) Total BCY Trench Excavation 1 C.Y. Hydraulic Backhoe 0.04 483.55 Bulk Excavation 1 C.Y. Hydraulic Backhoe 0.027 1310.47 Difference: Total hrs 19.34 35.38 Total Days 2.4 4.4 16.04 2 *Assume 8 hour work day ** Productivity rates taken from R.S. Means 2006 Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Foundation Outcome Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide • • Increased safety measures must be taken Trench Method Saves – $46,211 • • Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Analysis 3 – Foundation Conclusions Q&A – – 2 days off schedule 826 BCY reduction in spoils • • Michael Funk Construction Management Reduced spoils Removal of formwork labor and materials Reduced by roughly 77% Reduced site disturbance AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Conclusions Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Conclusions Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Analysis 3 – Foundation Conclusions Q&A Michael Funk Construction Management LEED® Guide Developed spreadsheet design to aid in obtaining various points Phasing Layout Adjusted the existing phasing to ease the schedule Foundation Placement Trench foundation placement method is a feasible alternative • Reduces quantities of spoils and associated costs AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Conclusions Project Overview Acknowledgements: Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Penn State Architectural Engineering Faculty Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Grunley Construction Company Analysis 3 – Foundation Conclusions Q&A All of the LEED® Rated project personnel Fellow AE students and LP friends Most importantly: Mom, Dad, and Molly Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University Fairfax High School Renovation and Addition Questions/Suggestions? Project Overview Analysis 1 – LEED® Guide Analysis 2 – Phasing Layout Analysis 3 – Foundation Conclusions Q&A Michael Funk Construction Management AE Senior Thesis 2007 Pennsylvania State University
