Massachusetts Department of
Elementary and Secondary Education
75 Pleasant Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-4096
Telephone: (781) 338-3700
TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
June 22, 2012
Dr. Melinda Boone
Worcester Public Schools
20 Irving Street
Worcester, MA 01609
Re: Mid-cycle Report
Dear Superintendent Boone:
Enclosed is the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education's Mid-cycle Report based
on the onsite visit conducted in your district in April 2012. During the Mid-Cycle Review the
Department monitored selected special education criteria to determine your district’s compliance
with special education laws and regulations. The review consisted of information gathered from
one or more of the following activities: interviews, review of student records, examination of
documentation, and classroom observation(s).
The Department determined that one or more of the criteria monitored in your district was
“Partially Implemented” or “Not Implemented.” In all instances where noncompliance was
found, the Department has prescribed corrective action for the district. This corrective action
must be implemented as soon as possible, but in no case later than a year from the date of this
report. You will find these requirements for corrective action included in the enclosed report,
along with requirements for submitting progress reports using the enclosed form.
Please provide the Department with your written assurance that all of the required corrective
action will be implemented by your district within the timelines specified in the report. You
must submit your statement of assurance to Darlene Lynch, Director, Program Quality Assurance
Services, by July 9, 2012.
1
Your staff's cooperation throughout this Mid-cycle Review is appreciated. If you have questions
about this letter or the enclosed report, please do not hesitate to contact Nathan Lemmon at 781338-3720.
Sincerely,
Mid-cycle Review Chairperson
Program Quality Assurance Services
Darlene A. Lynch, Director
Program Quality Assurance Services
cc:
Mitchell D. Chester, Ed.D., Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education
Elisabeth Ahern, Supervisor, Program Quality Assurance Services
Joseph M. Petty, Mayor Worcester and School Committee Chairperson
Midge Wetzel, Local Program Review Coordinator
Encs: Mid-cycle Report
Mid-cycle Progress Report Form
2
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
MID-CYCLE REPORT
Worcester Public Schools
Dates of the Mid-cycle Review Onsite: April 8-10, 2012
Date of this Report: June 22, 2012
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REPORT IS IN TWO SECTIONS.
Required Special Education Criteria Monitored in this Mid-cycle Review
Current special education criteria available by scrolling down to the special education instrument at
http://www.doe.mass.edu/pqa/review/cpr/default.html
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented


SE 7
Transfer of
parental rights
and student
participation
and consent at
age of
majority
Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Student
Record
Review
Documents
Staff
Interviews
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
The district has appropriate
procedures for the transfer of
parental rights at the student’s age
of majority. One year prior to the
student reaching age 18, the district
informs the student and the
parent/guardian of the rights that
will transfer from the
parent/guardian to the student upon
the student’s 18th birthday.
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 1 of 18
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
PI
Method(s) of
Investigation
Student
Record
Review
Staff
Interviews
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
The review of student records
indicated that regular education
teachers were not in attendance at
the IEP Team meeting when it was
necessary for regular education
participation, with no indication of
having been excused through the
procedures described by regulation.
SE 8
IEP Team
composition
and attendance
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for Implementation
Conduct a district-wide analysis of
student records of IEP meetings held
between January and April of 2012
to determine why regular education
teachers, when required, do not
participate in the IEP Team meeting
and why the district is not
consistently following the
requirement to formally document
the excusal of attendance for regular
education teachers. The district must
seek the written consent of the parent
to an excusal. The district must also
require each teacher to provide
written input to the Team with regard
to the development of the IEP if the
parent agrees to the excusal.
Based on the results of the analysis,
provide the district’s determination
of the root cause(s) of the noncompliance, the steps the district
proposes to correct the root causes(s)
and a timeline for the
implementation of those corrections.
The district must conduct an internal
review of a sample of student records
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 2 of 18
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
Please submit a
narrative
description of
the results of
the analysis
conducted, the
district’s
corrective
actions and the
associated
timelines by
October 31,
2012.
Submit the
results of the
review of
student
records.
Indicate the
number of
student records
reviewed, the
number of
student records
in compliance,
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for Implementation
from all school levels of IEP Team
meetings conducted after all
corrective actions have been
implemented for evidence of the
participation of regular education
teachers or evidence that appropriate
excusal procedures were followed,
including documentation in the
student record.
*Please note that when conducting
internal monitoring the district must
maintain the following
documentation and make it
available to the Department upon
request: a) List of student names
and grade level for the record
review; b) Date of the review; c)
Name of person(s) who conducted
the review, their roles(s), and their
signature(s).
SE 18A
IEP

Student
Record
IEP plans address the skills and
proficiencies needed to avoid and
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 3 of 18
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
for all records
not in
compliance
with this
criterion,
determine the
root cause(s) of
the
noncompliance
and provide the
district’s plan
to remedy the
noncompliance.
This progress
report is due
January 31,
2013.
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

development
and content
Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Review
Staff
Interviews
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
respond to bullying, harassment, or
teasing when the IEP Team
evaluation indicated that a
student’s disability affects social
skills development or when the
student’s disability makes him or
her vulnerable to bullying,
harassment or teasing.
The IEP Team considers and
specifically addresses the skills and
proficiencies needed to avoid and
respond to bullying for students
identified with a disability on the
autism spectrum.

Student
Record
Review
SE 25
Parental
consent
Staff
Interviews
The district has a policy and
follows a procedure to ensure that
if parent revocation of consent for
the continuation of special
education services occurs, the
district acts promptly to provide
written notice (and a copy of
procedural safeguards) to the
parent of the district’s proposal to
discontinue services.
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 4 of 18
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
Additional Special Education Criteria Monitored in this Mid-cycle Review
Current special education criteria available by scrolling down to the special education instrument at
http://www.doe.mass.edu/pqa/review/cpr/default.html
Criterion
SE 2
Required and
Optional
Assessments
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
PI
Student
Record
Review
Staff
Interviews
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
The student record
review indicated
that there were
several IEP plans
that did not
document the
completion of
Educational
Assessments Part A
and B and
subsequently could
not use the
information as part
of IEP development
as required.
For those students whose records
were identified by the
Department as not containing
documentation of Education
Assessments Part A and B on the
Student Record Issues
Worksheet, the district must
complete the missing evaluations
and conduct an IEP Team
meeting to review the
assessments and determine if the
district’s proposal for services
will change.
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 5 of 18
Conduct an analysis of a sample
of student records from all levels
where a re-evaluation was
conducted between January 2012
to April 2012 to determine why
the district is not completing the
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
For the students
identified by the
Department, please
provide copies of
the completed
Educational
Assessments A and
B, along with the
IEP Team Meeting
notice and N1
notice that would
accompany all new
proposals for
service.
Submit a narrative
description of the
results of the
analysis conducted,
the district’s
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
required Educational
Assessments Part A and B.
Based on the results of the
analysis, provide the district’s
determination of the root
cause(s) of the noncompliance,
the steps the district proposes to
take to correct the root causes
and a timeline for the
implementation of those
corrections.
The district must conduct an
internal review of student
records after all other corrective
actions have been implemented.
The record review should
examine records across all
school levels for re-evaluations
that occurred subsequent to the
district’s implementation of its
corrective actions to ensure that
each record contains completed
Educational Status A and
Educational Status B
assessments.
* Please note when conducting
internal monitoring that the
district must maintain the
following documentation and
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 6 of 18
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
corrective actions
and the associated
timelines by
October 31, 2012.
Submit the results
of the review of
student records.
Indicate the number
of student records
reviewed, the
number of student
records in
compliance, for all
records not in
compliance with
this criterion,
determine the root
cause(s) of the
noncompliance and
provide the district’s
plan to remedy the
non-compliance.
This progress report
is due January 31,
2013.
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
make it available to the
Department upon request: a)
List of the student names and
grade levels for the records
reviewed; b) Date of the review;
c) Name of person(s) who
conducted the review, their
role(s), and signature(s).
SE 4
Reports of
Assessment
Results
PI
Student
Record
Review
Staff
Interviews
Student record
review and
interviews revealed
that summaries of
assessments did not
consistently contain
recommendations
for meeting the
student’s needs.
Conduct an analysis of a cross
section of initial evaluations and
re-evaluations conducted
between January 2012 and
April 2012, to determine why
assessment summaries do not
consistently define in detail and
in educationally relevant and
common terms, the student’s
needs, offering explicit means of
meeting those needs. Based on
the results of the analysis,
provide the district’s
determination of the root
cause(s) of the noncompliance,
the steps the district proposes to
take to correct the root causes
and a timeline for the
implementation of those
corrections.
The district must conduct an
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 7 of 18
Please submit a
narrative description
of the results of the
analysis conducted,
the district’s
corrective actions
and the associated
timelines by
October 31, 2012.
Submit a report of
the results of the
internal record
review. Include the
number of student
records reviewed;
the number of
records in
compliance; for
records not in
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
internal review of student
records after all other corrective
actions have been implemented.
The district should select a
sample of student records across
school levels and examine initial
evaluations and re-evaluations
completed subsequent to the
implementation of corrective
actions to ensure that
assessments summaries are
included and contain
recommendations for meeting
the student’s needs.
*Please note when conducting
internal monitoring that district
must maintain the following
documentation and make it
available to the Department
upon request: a) List of the
student names and grade level
for the records reviewed; b)
Date of the review; c) Name of
person(s) who conducted the
review, their role(s), and
signature(s).
SE 14
Review and

Student
Record
The district follows
regulatory
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 8 of 18
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
compliance,
determine the root
cause(s); and the
specific action(s)
taken by the district
to remedy the noncompliance.
This progress report
is due by January
31, 2013.
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Revision of IEPs
Method(s) of
Investigation
Review
Staff
Interviews
SE 18A
IEP Development
and Content
PI
Student
Record
Review
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
Please see SE 2.
Please See SE 2.
Please See SE 2.
Student records
indicated that at all
levels: elementary,
middle and high
school, the district
does not
consistently and
immediately
provide the parent
with two (2) copies
of the proposed IEP
and proposed
Develop appropriate procedures
to ensure that following the
development of the IEP, the
school district provides the
parent with two copies of the
proposed IEP and proposed
placement, along with the
required notice in the time frame
required under the Department’s
guidance. The guidance can be
found on the Department’s
website at:
Provide a copy of
the revised
procedures.
procedures with
respect to holding
IEP annual review
meetings on or
before the
anniversary date of
the IEP and when
appropriate,
developing
amendments to an
IEP.
Staff
Interviews
SE 18B
Determination of
Placement;
Provision of IEP to
Parents
PI
Student
Record
Review
Staff
Interviews
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 9 of 18
Provide evidence of
the training for IEP
Chairpersons.
Include the names
of the trainer, the
names, roles and
signatures of the
participants, the
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
placement along
with the required
notice following the
development of the
IEP.
http://www.doe.mass.edu/news/n
ews.aspx?id=3182
agenda and copies
of materials used.
Please provide training to all IEP
Chairpersons on the requirement
to implement the appropriate
procedures for providing the
parent with two copies of the
proposed IEP and placement,
along with the required notice.
These progress
reports are due by
October 31, 2012.
Develop an internal oversight
and tracking system with
periodic review by designated
person(s) to ensure that the
parent is provided with two
copies of the proposed IEP and
proposed placement along with
the required notice immediately
following the development of the
IEP.
Select a sample of student
records from a cross-section of
schools and grade levels to
review for evidence of the
provision of two copies of the
proposed IEP and proposed
placement, along with the
required notice immediately
following the IEP Team meeting.
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 10 of 18
Please provide a
description of the
internal oversight
and tracking system
and identify the
person(s)
responsible for the
oversight, including
the date of the
system’s
implementation by
January 31, 2013.
Submit the results
of the review of
student records.
Indicate the number
of student records
reviewed, the
number of student
records in
compliance, for all
records not in
compliance with
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
The sample should be taken from
those IEP Team meetings that
occurred after all corrective
actions have been implemented.
*Please note when conducting
internal monitoring the charter
school must maintain the
following documentation and
make it available to the
Department upon request:
(a) List of student names
and grade levels for the records
reviewed;
(b) Date of the review;
(c) Name of person(s) who
conducted the review, with their
role(s) and signature(s).
SE 20
Least Restrictive
Program Selected

Student
Record
Review
Staff
Interviews
The student record
review indicated
that if consideration
of a more restrictive
placement is
recommended, IEP
Teams state why
the removal is
considered critical
to the student’s
program.
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 11 of 18
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
this criterion,
determine the root
cause(s) of the
noncompliance and
provide the district’s
plan to remedy the
non-compliance.
This progress report
is due January 31,
2013.
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
SE 22
IEP
Implementation and
Availability

Student
Record
Review
Staff
Interviews
The student record
review and staff
interviews indicated
that the district
tracks the removal
of students from
special education
classes who are
referred to the
Safety Center for
disciplinary
purposes and counts
these removals as a
suspension. See
also SE 46.
SE 29
Communications
are in English and
the Primary
Language of the
Home
PI
A review of student
records indicated
that when the
primary language of
the parent is other
than English, the
district does not
always provide
written
communication in
both English and
their primary
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 12 of 18
Please obtain translations and
submit evidence that the district
translated the most recent IEP
notice and IEP for the families of
the students identified in the
Student Record Issues
Worksheet.
Please provide the IEP Team
chairpersons with training on the
procedures to secure translations.
Please provide
copies of the
translated notice of
the district’s
proposal and the
IEP for those
families identified
by the Department.
Please provide
evidence of the staff
training including
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
language.
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
Please track in the district’s data
management system whether
parents require written
communications in a language
other than English. It should be
noted that one method of
collecting this information is
through the administration of the
district’s Home Language
Survey. Please be sure to identify
the personnel responsible for the
data tracking and translation
protocols.
The district must conduct a
student record review. Please
select a sample of student
records across school levels with
IEP activities conducted
subsequent to the district’s
implementation of all corrective
actions to verify that families
who require translations received
translated IEP notices and
documents.
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 13 of 18
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
the agenda and
signed attendance
sheet with the name
and role of staff.
Please identify the
personnel
responsible for the
data tracking and
obtaining
translations.
This progress report
is due October 31,
2012.
Submit the results
of the review of
student records.
Indicate the number
of student records
reviewed, the
number of student
records in
compliance, for all
records not in
compliance with
this criterion,
determine the root
cause(s) of the
noncompliance and
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
provide the district’s
plan to remedy the
non-compliance.
This progress report
is due January 30,
2013.
SE 37
Procedures for
Approved and
Unapproved Outof-District
Placements

Student
Record
Review
Staff
Interviews
Student records and
staff interviews
indicated that
monitoring plans
for students with
out-of-district
placements were
included in the
student records.
Progress reports
were included and
contracts included a
statement indicating
that the out-ofdistrict placement
shall allow the
placing school
district and/or the
Department of
Education to
conduct announced
and unannounced
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 14 of 18
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
site visits and to
review all
documents relating
to the provision of
special education
services to
Massachusetts
students provided at
public expense.
SE 46
Suspension
Procedures for
Students with
Disabilities

Student
Record
Review
Staff
Interviews
Staff interviews and
the student record
review indicated
that schools in the
district consider a
pattern of removal,
such as placement
in the Safety
Center, as a change
in placement or as a
removal that is
counted in the ten
consecutive or
cumulative days
that requires a
manifestation
determination.
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 15 of 18
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
SE 48
Equal Opportunity
to Participate in All
Nonacademic,
Extracurricular and
Ancillary Programs

Student
Record
Review
Staff
Interviews
Student records and
staff interviews
indicated that all
students receiving
special education
that are also limited
English proficient
have an equal
opportunity to
receive English as a
Second Language
( ESL) services or
have access to a
program that is
consistent with the
requirements of
Chapter 71A that is
available to nondisabled students.
SE 55
Facilities
PI
On-site
Observation
Onsite observations
indicated that the
district has made
substantial progress
towards full
compliance under
this criterion since
the last Coordinated
Program Review.
The special
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 16 of 18
The district must develop a plan
that demonstrates an acceptable
solution to this on-going issue.
The school must find space at the
school for the related services of
Occupational Therapy and
Physical Therapy.
The Department will conduct an
Please submit a
description of the
district’s action(s) to
achieve compliance
at the City View
Elementary School.
This progress report
is due by October
31, 2012.
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
education
classrooms at South
High School,
Worcester East
Middle School,
Norback
Elementary School,
Burncoat Middle
School,
Quinsigamond
Elementary School
and Chandler
Elementary School
are no longer
clustered together
and the placement
of special education
classrooms ensures
that students are
included into the
life of these
schools.
onsite verification visit after the
review of the district’s corrective
action.
There is adequate
space for
psychological
services at the
Nelson Place
Elementary School.
Students are no
longer overloaded
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 17 of 18
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion Partially
Implemented (PI) or
Not Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of
Determination
about Criterion
in substantially
separate classes at
the Burncoat High
School.
However, the City
View Elementary
School observation
indicated that OT
and PT are
conducted in the
corridor/hallways of
the ground floor
level.
Worcester Public Schools Mid-cycle Report
June 22, 2012
Page 18 of 18
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(b) Required Corrective
Action and
Timelines for
Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due Date(s)
and Required
Elements
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
MID-CYCLE REVIEW
School District: Worcester Public Schools
M I D – CY C L E P R O G R E S S R E P O R T
Date Prepared: ____________________________________
Prepared by: __________________________________________________________________
(name and title)
Criterion: _______________________
Topic: ________________________________________________________________________
For each criterion for which you prepare a progress report, please



make a copy of this cover page,
fill in the information requested above, and
attach a complete description of the corrective action taken and any accompanying documentation.
(Description of corrective action for each criterion and any accompanying documentation should include all of the
“Progress Report Required Elements” for that criterion in the Mid-cycle Report.)
Send the whole set of completed progress reports to:
Darlene Lynch, Director
Program Quality Assurance Services
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
75 Pleasant Street
Malden, MA 02148-4906
Mid-cycle Report & Cover Letter with Mid-cycle PR Form 2011