Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 75 Pleasant Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-4096 Telephone: (781) 338-3700 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370 January 3, 2013 Julie Hackett, Superintendent Taunton Public Schools 215 Harris Street Taunton, MA 02780 Re: Mid-cycle Report Dear Superintendent Hackett: Enclosed is the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education's Mid-cycle Report based on the onsite visit conducted in your district in November 2012. During the Mid-Cycle Review the Department monitored selected special education criteria to determine your district’s compliance with special education laws and regulations. The review consisted of information gathered from one or more of the following activities: interviews, review of student records, examination of documentation, and classroom observation(s). The Department determined that one or more of the criteria monitored in your district was “Partially Implemented” or “Not Implemented.” In all instances where noncompliance was found, the Department has prescribed corrective action for the district. This corrective action must be implemented as soon as possible, but in no case later than a year from the date of this report. You will find these requirements for corrective action included in the enclosed report, along with requirements for submitting progress reports using the enclosed form. Please provide the Department with your written assurance that all of the required corrective action will be implemented by your district within the timelines specified in the report. You must submit your statement of assurance to Darlene Lynch, Director, Program Quality Assurance Services, by January 21, 2013. 1 Your staff's cooperation throughout this Mid-cycle Review is appreciated. If you have questions about this letter or the enclosed report, please do not hesitate to contact Vani Rastogi-Kelly at 781-338-3728. Sincerely, Nancy Hicks Alger, Mid-cycle Review Chairperson Program Quality Assurance Services Darlene A. Lynch, Director Program Quality Assurance Services cc: Mitchell D. Chester, Ed.D., Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Vani Rastogi-Kelly, Supervisor, Program Quality Assurance Services Joseph Martin, School Committee Chairperson Sheilah Reardon, Local Program Review Coordinator Encs: Mid-cycle Report Mid-cycle Progress Report Form 2 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION MID-CYCLE REPORT Taunton Public Schools Date of the Mid-cycle Review Onsite: November 19, 2012 Date of this Report: January 3, 2013 PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REPORT IS IN TWO SECTIONS. Required Special Education Criteria Monitored in this Mid-cycle Review Current special education criteria available by scrolling down to the special education instrument at http://www.doe.mass.edu/pqa/review/cpr/default.html Criterion SE 7 Transfer of parental rights and student participation and consent at age of majority Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation Student Records Interviews Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation One year prior to the student reaching age 18, the district informs the student and parent/guardian of the rights that will transfer from the parent/guardian to the student upon the student’s 18th birthday. Notice is provided to both the student and the Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 1 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements Criterion Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation parent/guardian and explicitly states that all rights accorded to parents under special education law will transfer to the 18 year old student. SE 8 IEP Team composition and attendance Student Records Interviews Upon reaching the age of majority, students are signing their IEPs. All required members of the Team are present at IEP Team meetings. Members of the Team attend IEP Team meetings unless: The district and the parent agree, in writing, that the attendance of the Team member is not necessary because the member’s area of the curriculum or related services is not being modified or discussed; or Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 2 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements Criterion Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation Student Records Interviews SE 18A IEP development and content The district and parent agree, in writing, to excuse a required Team member’s participation and the excused member provides written input into the development of the IEP to the parent and IEP Team prior to the meeting. IEP Teams consider and specifically address the skills and proficiencies needed to avoid and respond to bullying, harassment, or teasing when a student is identified with a disability that affects social skills development, when the disability makes him or her vulnerable to bullying, harassment, or teasing, or when the student is identified with a disability on the autism spectrum. Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 3 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements Criterion Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation Basis of Determination about Criterion Student Records If the parent revokes his or her consent to the student’s special education services in writing, the district acts promptly to provide written notice to the parent of the district’s proposal to discontinue services based on the revocation of consent, as well as information on how the parent can obtain a copy of the procedural safeguards. The notice is provided a reasonable time before the district intends to discontinue services. Interviews SE 25 Parental consent If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation The Pole Elementary School uses the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education/ Evaluation Consent Form N1A, as required. Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 4 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements Additional Special Education Criteria Monitored in this Mid-cycle Review Current special education criteria available by scrolling down to the special education instrument at http://www.doe.mass.edu/pqa/review/cpr/default.html Criterion SE 3 Special requirements for determination of a specific learning disability Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation PI Student records Interviews Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation Record review indicates that when a student suspected of having a specific learning disability is evaluated, the Team does not always create a written determination as to whether or not he or she has a specific learning disability, which is signed by all members of the Team. If there is disagreement as to the determination, one or more Team members do not document their disagreement. Review the student records in which an evaluation was conducted this past school year and there was a finding of a specific learning disability. Analyze the written determinations to establish the root cause(s) of the noncompliance. Based on this root cause analysis, indicate the specific corrective actions taken to remedy the non-compliance. Develop an internal oversight and tracking system to ensure that when a student suspected of having a specific learning disability is evaluated, the Team: Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 5 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements Submit the results of the root cause analysis with specific proposals for remedying the noncompliance and associated timelines. Submit a description of the internal oversight and tracking system and identify the person(s) responsible for the oversight. Criterion Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation 1. Creates a written determination as to whether or not the student has a specific learning disability, which is signed by all members of the Team; or 2. If there is disagreement as to the determination, one or more Team members document their disagreement. The tracking system should include supervisory oversight and periodic reviews to ensure compliance. Develop a report of the results of an internal review of records of students suspected of having a specific learning disability and who have been evaluated since Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 6 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements Submit this information by March 22, 2013. Submit a report of the results of an internal review of student records and include the following: 1) Number of records reviewed; 2) Number of records in compliance; 3) Results of the root cause analysis of any records in noncompliance; and Criterion Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation implementation of all of the district's corrective actions for evidence of compliance with the special requirements. *Please note that when monitoring, the district must maintain the following documentation and make it available to the Department upon request: a) List of student names and grade levels for the record review; b) Date of the review; c) Name of persons who conducted the review, their roles and their signatures. SE 4 Reports of assessment results Student Records Reports of assessment results define in detail and in educationally relevant and common terms, the student’s needs, offering explicit means of meeting those needs. Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 7 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements 4) Specific actions taken by the district to remedy any noncompliance. Submit this report by June 3, 2013. Criterion SE 9 Timeline for determination of eligibility and provision of documentation to parent SE 13 Progress Reports and content SE 18B Determination of placement; provision of IEP to parent Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation Student Records Student Records Student Records Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation Evaluations are completed within 30 school working days and the Team meeting is held within 45 school working days after receipt of the parent’s written consent to evaluate. Progress reports for students at Taunton High School address all IEP goals and for students at Taunton High School and in out-of-district settings, progress reports are issued as often as parents are informed of the progress of non-disabled students. The placement page of the IEP is signed by the parent. Parents receive a copy of the IEP within two weeks following the Team meeting Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 8 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements Criterion SE 20 Least restrictive program selected Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation Document Review Interviews Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation and parents sign a statement indicating that they have received a copy of the service delivery grid and a statement of the major goal areas associated with these services at the meeting. Documentation indicates that offerings of inclusion classes have increased over the past two years at Taunton High School and interviews indicate that there is a commitment to expand inclusive class offerings at Taunton High School in the next school year. At Taunton High School, students with disabilities receive special education services in general education English and mathematics classes (among other subject Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 9 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements Criterion Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation areas), as indicated on the IEPs. SE 24 Notice to parent regarding proposal or refusal to initiate or change the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the child or the provision of FAPE SE 26 Parent participation Student Records Student Records Professional development has been provided in inclusive teaching methods. The Notice of Proposed School District Action (N1) meets all of the content requirements of federal law, as all questions on page two of the form are consistently addressed. Student records contain copies of the Team Meeting Invitation (N3) notices that Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 10 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements Criterion Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation in meetings SE 32 Parent advisory council for special education SE 37 Procedures for approved and unapproved out-of-district placements Document Review Interviews Student Records Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation are sent to parents prior to Team meetings. The special education parent advisory council (PAC) has opportunities to advise the district on matters that pertain to the education and safety of students with disabilities. The PAC meets with school officials to participate in the planning, development and evaluation of the school district’s special education programs. Monitoring plans are included in the records of students in out-of-district placements and there is documentation of actual monitoring. Interviews Contracts with private day and residential programs were in the student records and meet the content requirements of Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 11 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements Criterion SE 54 Professional development Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation Document Review Interviews Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation 603 CMR 28.06(3)(f)(1-5). Contracts consistently include a statement that the out-ofdistrict placement would allow the district and/or the Department to conduct announced and unannounced site visits and the contracts contain a statement assuring that the out-of district placement does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sexual orientation, or national origin, and that it does not discriminate against qualified persons with disabilities. Staff have received training in: Analyzing and accommodating diverse learning styles of all students in order to achieve an objective Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 12 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements Criterion Criterion Implemented Criterion Partially Implemented (PI) or Not Implemented (NI) Method(s) of Investigation Basis of Determination about Criterion If Partially Implemented or Not Implemented: (a) Required Corrective Action and Timelines for Implementation of inclusion in the regular classroom of students with diverse learning styles; and Methods of collaboration among teachers, paraprofessionals and teacher assistants to accommodate diverse learning styles of all students in the regular classroom. Taunton Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report January 3, 2013 Page 13 of 13 (b) Progress Report Due Date(s) and Required Elements MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION MID-CYCLE REVIEW School District: Taunton Public Schools M I D – CY C L E P R O G R E S S R E P O R T Date Prepared: ____________________________________ Prepared by: __________________________________________________________________ (name and title) Criterion: _______________________ Topic: ________________________________________________________________________ For each criterion for which you prepare a progress report, please make a copy of this cover page, fill in the information requested above, and attach a complete description of the corrective action taken and any accompanying documentation. (Description of corrective action for each criterion and any accompanying documentation should include all of the “Progress Report Required Elements” for that criterion in the Mid-cycle Report.) Send the whole set of completed progress reports to: Darlene Lynch, Director Program Quality Assurance Services Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 75 Pleasant Street Malden, MA 02148-4906