The Massachusetts Department of
Elementary and Secondary Education
75 Pleasant Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-4096
Telephone: (781) 338-3700
TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370
July 16, 2013
Steven Moore, Interim Superintendent
Randolph Public Schools
70 Memorial Parkway
Randolph, MA 02368
Re: Mid-cycle Report
Dear Interim Superintendent Moore:
Enclosed is the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education's Mid-cycle Report based
on the onsite visit conducted in your district in March 2013. During the Mid-Cycle Review the
Department monitored selected special education criteria to determine your district’s compliance
with special education laws and regulations. The review consisted of information gathered from
one or more of the following activities: interviews, review of student records, examination of
documentation, and classroom observation(s).
The Department determined that one or more of the criteria monitored in your district was
“Partially Implemented” or “Not Implemented.” In all instances where noncompliance was
found, the Department has prescribed corrective action for the district. This corrective action
must be implemented as soon as possible, but in no case later than a year from the date of this
report. You will find these requirements for corrective action included in the enclosed report,
along with requirements for submitting progress reports using the enclosed form.
Please provide the Department with your written assurance that all of the required corrective
action will be implemented by your district within the timelines specified in the report. You
must submit your statement of assurance to Darlene Lynch, Director, Program Quality Assurance
Services, by August 2, 2013.
1
Your staff's cooperation throughout this Mid-cycle Review is appreciated. If you have questions
about this letter or the enclosed report, please do not hesitate to contact Deborah Conover at 781338-3736.
Sincerely,
Deborah Conover, Mid-cycle Review Chairperson
Program Quality Assurance Services
Darlene A. Lynch, Director
Program Quality Assurance Services
cc:
Mitchell D. Chester, Ed.D., Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education
Vani Rastogi-Kelly, Supervisor, Program Quality Assurance Services
Andrew Azer, School Committee Chairperson
Maria Lopes, Local Program Review Coordinator
Encs: Mid-cycle Report
Mid-cycle Progress Report Form
2
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
MID-CYCLE REPORT
Randolph Public Schools
Date of the Mid-cycle Review Onsite: March 28, 2013
Date of this Report: July 16, 2013
PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REPORT IS IN TWO SECTIONS.
Required Special Education Criteria Monitored in this Mid-cycle Review
Current special education criteria available by scrolling down to the special education instrument at
http://www.doe.mass.edu/pqa/review/cpr/default.html
Criterion
SE 7
Transfer of
parental
rights and
student
participation
and consent
at age of
majority
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
PI
Method(s) of
Investigation
Student
Records
Interviews
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
One year prior to the
student turning 18 years of
age, the district does not
consistently inform the
student and parent/guardian
of the rights that will
transfer from the
parent/guardian to the
student upon the student’s
18th birthday. The
notification provided to
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
For those students whose records were
identified by the Department, provide
notice to the student and parent/guardian
of the transfer of parental rights. Ensure
that the notification states that all rights
accorded to parents/guardians under
special education law will transfer to the
student once he or she turns 18 years of
age.
For those student
records identified
by the
Department,
submit a copy of
the notification
provided to the
student and
parent/guardian.
Develop procedures for informing the
Provide a copy of
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 1 of 15
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
both the student and
parent/guardian should
indicate that all the rights
provided to the parent under
special education law will
transfer to the 18-year-old
student.
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
student and parent/guardian of the transfer
of parental rights requirements one year
prior to the student reaching the age of 18.
Train all high school IEP Team
chairpersons on the procedures.
Develop an internal oversight and tracking
system to ensure the implementation of
the age of majority procedures. The
tracking system should include
supervisory oversight and periodic
reviews by the Director of Special
Education to ensure ongoing compliance.
Develop a report of the results of an
internal review of records for students
who turned 17 years of age, after
implementation of all of the district’s
corrective actions, for evidence of
compliance with provision of notification
one year prior to the student reaching the
age of majority.
*Please note that when conducting
internal monitoring the district must
maintain the following documentation
and make it available to the
Department upon request: a) List of
student names and grade levels for the
record review; b) Date of the review;
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 2 of 15
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
the procedures
and evidence of
Team chairperson
training at the
high school.
Submit the
agenda and
signed attendance
sheet with the
name and role of
staff.
Submit a
description of the
internal oversight
and tracking
system with
periodic reviews,
along with the
name and role of
the designated
person.
Submit the above
information by
October 25,
2013.
Submit the results
of a review of
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
c) Name of person(s) who conducted the
review with their roles(s) and
signature(s).
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
records and
include:

SE 8
IEP Team
composition
PI
Student
Records
Not all required Team
members are consistently
present at the IEP Team
meeting, including the
Review the Team meeting composition
from a sample of IEP Teams that have
convened between March and June of the
2012-2013 school year, where not all
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 3 of 15
Number of
records
reviewed;
 Number in
compliance;
 Results of the
root cause
analysis of
any records
not in
compliance;
and
 The specific
corrective
actions taken
to remedy the
noncompliance.
Submit the above
information by
January 24,
2014.
Submit the results
of the root cause
analysis with
specific proposals
Criterion
and
attendance
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Interviews
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
student’s general education
teacher (if the student is
involved in a general
education program) and the
parent. When a member of
the Team does not attend
the IEP Team meeting, the
district is not following
appropriate procedures to
excuse the Team member
that include:
 The district and the
parent agreeing, in
writing, that the
attendance of the Team
member is not
necessary because the
member’s area of the
curriculum or related
services is not being
modified or discussed;
or
 The district and the
parent agreeing, in
writing, to excuse a
required Team
member’s participation
and the excused
member provides
written input into the
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
required members of the Team were in
attendance. Select representation from
across elementary, middle and high school
levels and analyze the information to
establish the root cause(s) for the noncompliance. Based on this root cause
analysis, indicate the specific corrective
actions that will be taken to remedy the
non-compliance.
for remedying the
non-compliance
and proposed
timelines for
corrective actions.
Submit this
information by
October 25,
2013.
Select a sample of student records from a
cross-section of schools and levels in
which Team meetings were held since
implementation of all of the district’s
corrective actions. Develop a report of the
results of an internal review for evidence
of compliance with IEP Team
composition and attendance, excusal
procedures, and documentation of efforts
for parent participation.
Submit the results
of the second
review of records
and include the
following:
 Number of
records
reviewed;
 Number of
records in
compliance;
 Results of the
root cause
analysis of
any records
not in
compliance;
 Specific
corrective
actions taken
*Please note when conducting internal
monitoring the district must maintain
the following documentation and make
it available to the Department upon
request: a) List of student names and
grade levels for the records reviewed;
b) Date of the review; c) Name of
person(s) who conducted the review,
with their role(s) and signature(s).
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 4 of 15
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
development of the IEP
to the parent and IEP
Team prior to the
meeting.
by the district
to remedy any
noncompliance.
Submit the above
information by
January 24,
2014.
When the parents are unable
to attend the IEP Team
meeting, the district does
not consistently document
that it has used alternative
means, such as video
conference or a conference
call, to ensure parent
participation.
SE 18A
IEP
development
and content
Student
Records
PI
Interviews
Students are invited to
attend IEP Team meetings
when a purpose of the
meeting is to discuss
transition services, or if
otherwise appropriate.
For students identified with
a disability on the autism
spectrum and for those
students whose disability
affects social skills
development or whose
disability makes them
vulnerable to bullying,
harassment, or teasing, the
For those students whose records were
identified by the Department, the district
must reconvene the IEP Teams to consider
and address the skills and proficiencies
needed to avoid and respond to bullying,
harassment or teasing. Please see
Technical Assistance Advisory SPED
2011-2: Bullying Prevention and
Intervention for assistance and guidance
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 5 of 15
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
For those student
records identified
by the
Department,
submit a copy of
the IEP and the
Special Education
Team Meeting
Attendance Sheet
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
IEP Team is not
consistently considering and
addressing the skills and
proficiencies needed to
avoid and respond to
bullying, harassment, or
teasing.
Age specific considerations
are being appropriately
addressed in the Present
Levels of Educational
Performance B (PLEP B)
section of the IEP for
students age 16-22.
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
on meeting this requirement:
http://www.doe.mass.edu/sped/advisories/
11_2ta.html
Provide the IEP Team chairpersons with
training on the requirements for
addressing bullying prevention and
intervention in the IEP.
Develop an internal oversight and tracking
system to ensure that IEP Teams consider
and address the skills and proficiencies
needed to avoid and respond to bullying,
harassment and teasing. The tracking
system should include supervisory
oversight and periodic reviews by the
Director of Special Education to ensure
ongoing compliance.
Develop a report of the results of an
internal review of records to ensure that
IEP Teams, that have convened after all
corrective actions have been implemented,
are addressing the skills and proficiencies
needed to avoid and respond to bullying,
harassment or teasing in the IEP.
*Please note when conducting internal
monitoring the district must maintain
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 6 of 15
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
(N3A) to indicate
that the IEP
Teams have
reconvened.
Submit evidence
of the IEP Team
chairperson
training and
include the
agenda, materials
and signed
attendance sheet
with the name and
role of staff.
Submit a
description of the
internal oversight
and tracking
system with
periodic reviews,
along with the
name and role of
the designated
person.
Submit the
information
indicated above
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
the following documentation and make
it available to the Department upon
request: a) List of student names and
grade levels for the records reviewed;
b) Date of the review; c) Name of
person(s) who conducted the review,
with their role(s) and signature(s).
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 7 of 15
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
by October 25,
2013.
Submit the results
of the review of
records and
include the
following:
 Number of
records
reviewed;
 Number of
records in
compliance;
 For any
records not in
compliance,
determine the
root cause;
and
 Specific
corrective
actions taken
to remedy the
noncompliance.
Please submit the
above information
by January 24,
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination
about Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action and
Timelines for Implementation
(b) Progress
Report Due
Date(s) and
Required
Elements
2014.
Student
Records
Interviews

SE 25
Parental
consent
When a parent revokes
consent, in writing, to
special education services,
the district provides written
notice to the parent of its
proposal to discontinue
services based on the
written revocation of
consent as well as
information on how the
parent can obtain a copy of
his/her rights to procedural
safeguards. The district
provides notice within a
reasonable time before it
intends to discontinue
services. Staff members are
aware that they may not use
mediation or request a due
process hearing to obtain
agreement or a ruling for
continuation of services.
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 8 of 15
Additional Special Education Criteria Monitored in this Mid-cycle Review
Current special education criteria available by scrolling down to the special education instrument at
http://www.doe.mass.edu/pqa/review/cpr/default.html
Criterion
SE 4
Reports of
assessment
results
SE 6
Determination
of transition
services
SE 9
Timeline for
determination
of eligibility
and provision
of
documentation
to parent
SE 13
Progress
Reports and
content
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation

Student
Records

Student
Records
Interviews
Student
Records

Interviews
PI
Student
Records
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
Assessment reports define in
detail and in educationally
relevant and common terms the
student’s needs, offering means
for meeting those needs.
IEP Teams discuss the student’s
transition needs starting at age 14
and document this discussion on
the Transition Planning Form.
The district conducts evaluations
within 30 school working days of
receiving consent to an initial
evaluation or a re-evaluation and
holds an IEP Team meeting and
provides either a proposed IEP
and placement or a finding of no
eligibility to the parent within 45
school working days of receipt of
consent.
Review of student records from
across grade levels indicates that
progress reports are not
consistently maintained in the
records; therefore, there is no
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action
and Timelines for
Implementation
Provide training to special
education staff responsible for
completing progress reports on
writing reports that address the
student's progress towards the
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 9 of 15
(b) Progress Report
Due Date(s) and
Required
Elements
Submit the training
information, including
the agenda and signin sheet.
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action
and Timelines for
Implementation
indication that progress reports
are sent to parents at least as
often as parents are informed of
the progress of non-disabled
students. Progress reports that
were reviewed in the records do
not consistently include written
information on the student's
progress towards reaching the
annual goals set forth in the IEP.
annual IEP goals, issuing reports
at least as often as parents are
informed of the progress of nondisabled students and
maintaining reports in the student
records.
Develop an internal oversight
and tracking system for ensuring
that progress reports are issued
consistently, maintained in the
student record and contain
information on the student's
progress towards the annual IEP
goals. The oversight and tracking
system should include periodic
reviews by the Director of
Special Education to ensure
ongoing compliance.
Develop a report of the results of
an internal review of student
records, in which progress
reports were written subsequent
to implementation of all
corrective actions, to ensure
appropriate completion and
inclusion in the student record.
Please note when conducting
internal monitoring, the
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 10 of 15
(b) Progress Report
Due Date(s) and
Required
Elements
Submit a description
of the internal
oversight and tracking
system with periodic
reviews, along with
the name and role of
the designated person.
Submit the
information indicated
above by October 25,
2013.
Submit the results of
the review of student
records and include
the following:
 Number of
records reviewed;
 Number of
records in
compliance;
 For any records
not in
compliance,
determine the root
cause; and
 Specific
corrective actions
taken to remedy
Criterion
SE 14
Review and
revision of
IEPs
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
PI
Method(s) of
Investigation
Student
Records
Interviews
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
Team meetings are not
consistently held on or before the
anniversary date of the IEP to
consider the student’s progress
and to review, revise, or develop
a new IEP or to refer the student
for a re-evaluation, as
appropriate.
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action
and Timelines for
Implementation
district must maintain the
following documentation and
make it available to the
Department upon request:
a) List of the student names
and grade levels for the records
reviewed; b) Date of the
review; c) Name of person(s)
who conducted the review,
their role(s), and signature(s).
Review a sample of student
records from all levels in which
the IEP Team convened between
March and June of the 20122013 school year and the Team
meeting was not held prior to the
anniversary date of the IEP.
Analyze the information to
establish the root cause(s) for the
non-compliance. Based on this
root cause analysis, indicate the
specific corrective actions that
will be taken to remedy the noncompliance.
Develop a report of the results of
an internal review of records
from all levels, in which an IEP
Team convened subsequent to
implementation of the district’s
corrective actions, for evidence
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 11 of 15
(b) Progress Report
Due Date(s) and
Required
Elements
the noncompliance.
Submit the above
information by
January 24, 2014.
Submit a description
of the root cause
analysis with the
results, as well as
specific proposal(s)
for remedying the
non-compliance and
associated timelines.
Submit this
information by
October 25, 2013.
Submit the results of a
second review of
student records and
include the following:
 Number of
records reviewed;
 Number of
records in
compliance;
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action
and Timelines for
Implementation
of compliance with annual
review and revision of the IEP.
SE 20
Least
restrictive
program
selected
PI
Student
Records
Interviews
The Non-Participation
Justification statement does not
consistently state why the
removal of a special education
student from the general
education classroom is
considered critical to the
student’s program. The IEP also
does not indicate the basis of the
Team’s conclusion that education
of the student in a less restrictive
environment, with the use of
supplementary aids and services,
could not be achieved
satisfactorily.
*Please note when conducting
internal monitoring the district
must maintain the following
documentation and make it
available to the Department
upon request a) List of student
names and grade levels for the
records reviewed; b) Date of
the review; c) Name of
person(s) who conducted the
review, their role(s) and
signature(s).
Review a sample of student
records across all levels in which
an IEP was written between
March and June of the 20122013 school year and analyze the
information to establish the root
cause(s) for the non-compliance.
Based on this root cause analysis,
indicate the specific corrective
actions that will be taken to
remedy the non-compliance.
Develop a report of the results of
an internal review of records
from across all grade levels, in
which IEPs have been written
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 12 of 15
(b) Progress Report
Due Date(s) and
Required
Elements

For any records
not in
compliance,
determine the root
cause; and
 Specific
corrective actions
taken to remedy
any noncompliance.
Submit the report by
January 24, 2014.
Submit the
description of the root
cause analysis with
the results, as well as
specific proposal(s)
for remedying the
non-compliance and
associated timelines.
Submit this
information by
October 25, 2013.
Submit the results of
the second review of
student records and
include the following:
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action
and Timelines for
Implementation
since implementation of all of the
district’s corrective actions, for
evidence of compliance with
ensuring appropriate completion
of the Non-Participation
Justification statements.
Please note when conducting
internal monitoring the district
must maintain the following
documentation and make it
available to the Department
upon request: a) List of the
student names and grade levels
for the records reviewed;
b) Date of the review; c) Name
of person(s) who conducted the
review, their role(s), and
signature(s).
SE 26
Parent
participation in
meetings
SE 29
Communications are in
English and
primary
language of
home
PI
Student
Records
(b) Progress Report
Due Date(s) and
Required
Elements

Number of
records reviewed;
 Number of
records in
compliance;
 For any records
not in
compliance,
determine the root
cause; and
 Specific
corrective actions
taken to remedy
the noncompliance.
Submit the above
information by
January 24, 2014.
See SE 8.
Interviews
PI
Student
Records
Interviews
While the district has procedures
and forms for providing oral and
written translations, the review of
student records indicated that
translated IEPs, progress reports,
and notices are not being
maintained in the student record.
For those students whose records
were identified by the
Department, provide evidence of
translated documents, including
the most recent IEP, progress
reports and Notice of Proposed
School District Action (N1).
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 13 of 15
For those student
records identified by
the Department,
submit a copy of the
translated IEP,
progress reports and
N1 form.
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action
and Timelines for
Implementation
Review a sample of student
records between March and June
of the 2012-2013 school year in
which the primary language of
the home is other than English
and the IEP Team convened and
progress reports were issued.
Analyze the information to
determine the root cause(s) of the
non-compliance. Based on this
root cause analysis, indicate the
specific corrective actions the
district will take to remedy the
non-compliance.
Develop a report of the results of
an internal review of records,
after all corrective actions have
been implemented, for ensuring
translated special education
documentation is included in the
student record for parents
requiring communications in a
language other than English.
*Please note when conducting
internal monitoring the district
must maintain the following
documentation and make it
available to the Department
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 14 of 15
(b) Progress Report
Due Date(s) and
Required
Elements
Submit the results of
the root cause
analysis with specific
proposals for
remedying the noncompliance and
associated timelines.
Submit the above
information by
October 25, 2013.
Submit the results of
the review of student
records and include
the following:
 Number of
records reviewed;
 Number of
records in
compliance;
 For any records
not in
compliance,
determine the root
cause; and
 Specific
corrective actions
taken to remedy
Criterion
Criterion
Implemented

Criterion
Partially
Implemented
(PI) or Not
Implemented
(NI)
Method(s) of
Investigation
Basis of Determination about
Criterion
If Partially Implemented or Not
Implemented:
(a) Required Corrective Action
and Timelines for
Implementation
upon request a) List of student
names and grade levels for the
records reviewed; b) Date of
the review; c) Name of
person(s) who conducted the
review, their role(s) and
signature(s).
SE 48
Equal
opportunity to
participate in
all programs
SE 55
Special
education
facilities &
classrooms

Document
Review
Interviews

Observation
All students receiving special
education have an equal
opportunity to participate in
remedial services, specifically
through Title I, which may be
available as part of the general
education program.
An onsite visit to the Lyons
Elementary School indicated that
the time out areas are located
within the special education
classrooms, allowing for
confidentiality.
Randolph Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Mid-cycle Report
July 16, 2013
Page 15 of 15
(b) Progress Report
Due Date(s) and
Required
Elements
the noncompliance.
Submit the above
information by
January 24, 2014.
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
MID-CYCLE REVIEW
School District: Randolph Public Schools
M I D – CY C L E P R O G R E S S R E P O R T
Date Prepared: ____________________________________
Prepared by: __________________________________________________________________
(name and title)
Criterion: _______________________
Topic: ________________________________________________________________________
For each criterion for which you prepare a progress report, please



make a copy of this cover page,
fill in the information requested above, and
attach a complete description of the corrective action taken and any accompanying documentation.
(Description of corrective action for each criterion and any accompanying documentation should include all of the
“Progress Report Required Elements” for that criterion in the Mid-cycle Report.)
Send the whole set of completed progress reports to:
Darlene Lynch, Director
Program Quality Assurance Services
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
75 Pleasant Street
Malden, MA 02148-4906