Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 350 Main Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148-5023 Telephone: (781) 338-3700 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370 April 24, 2007 Mary Ann A. Lanzo Superintendent Chatham Public Schools 425 Crowell Road Chatham, MA 02633 Re: Mid-cycle Coordinated Program Review Report Dear Superintendent Lanzo: Enclosed is the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education's Mid-cycle Coordinated Program Review Report (Mid-Cycle Report). This report contains findings based on onsite monitoring conducted to verify the implementation and effectiveness of corrective action approved or ordered by the Department to address findings of noncompliance included in the Chatham Public Schools Coordinated Program Review Report issued on April 7, 2004. The Midcycle Report also contains findings based on onsite monitoring of special education compliance criteria that have been created or substantially changed in response to IDEA 2004. Another component of the Department’s Mid-cycle Review is the review of your school district or charter school's self-assessment in the area of English learner education (ELE). (In the remainder of this letter, please read “district” as meaning “school district or charter school.”) The purpose of this review is to determine whether your district is implementing the significant changes in M.G.L. Chapter 71A, governing the education of limited English proficient students, that were adopted by voters by means of Question 2 in 2002. The Department has reviewed your district’s ELE self-assessment (documentation and any written analysis of compliance) and, based solely on that self-assessment, is providing you in this report with findings on your ELE program and the corresponding corrective action to be implemented. Your district is urged to request technical assistance in relation to any of these findings or this prescribed corrective action from me or from staff in the Department’s Office of Language Acquisition and Achievement at 781338-3534. ELE guidance documents are available on the Department’s website at http://www.doe.mass.edu/ell/ . While the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education found your district to have resolved certain noncompliance issues, others were partially corrected or not addressed at all, or the Department’s onsite team identified new issues of noncompliance, either noncompliance with special education criteria added or substantially changed in response to IDEA 2004, noncompliance with ELE criteria, or other new noncompliance. Where the district has failed to implement its approved Corrective Action Plan, the Department views these findings to be serious. 1 In all instances where noncompliance has been found, the Department has prescribed corrective action for the district that must be implemented without delay. You will find these requirements for corrective action included in the attached report, along with requirements for progress reporting. Please provide the Department with your written assurance that all of the Department's requirements for corrective action will be implemented by your district within the timelines specified. You must submit your statement of assurance to me by Thursday, May 17, 2007. Your staff's cooperation throughout this Mid-cycle Review is appreciated. Should you like clarification of any part of our report, please do not hesitate to contact me at 781-338-3726. Sincerely, Thomas Taylor, Mid-cycle Review Chairperson Program Quality Assurance Services Darlene A. Lynch, Director Program Quality Assurance Services c: David P. Driscoll, Commissioner of Education Michael Harry, Chairperson Chatham School Committee Roseanne Crowley, District Program Review Follow-up Coordinator Encl.: Mid-cycle Coordinated Program Review Report 2 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION MID-CYCLE COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT Chatham Public Schools ONSITE MONITORING OF IMPLEMENTATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND OF CERTAIN NEW REQUIREMENTS Date of Coordinated Program Review (CPR): January 21-26, 2004 Date of Coordinated Program Review Corrective Action Plan Approval: May 27, 2004 Dates of Corrective Action Plan Progress Reports: January 4, 2005, February 10, 14, 15: March 14, 2005 Dates of this Mid-cycle Review Onsite Visit: February 6 and 7, 2007 Date of this Report: April 24, 2007 PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS REPORT IS IN SEVERAL SECTIONS. Chatham Public School District Mid -Cycle Report April 24, 2007 Page 1 of 8 Criterion Number and Topic Criterion Implemented Method(s) of Verification Basis of Determination that Criterion was Implemented Record Review and Staff Interviews Transition goals are discussed beginning at age 15; a transition plan is developed that reflects the course of studies and the preference and interest of the student. Record Review and Staff Interviews IEP Team meetings are composed of a full complement of Team members as outlined in 34 CFR 300.321. SE 12 Frequency of re-evaluation Record Review and Staff Interviews Re-evaluations are conducted every three years. Re-evaluations are conducted when a student is considered to be no longer eligible for special education services, and re-evaluations are conduct when requested by a parent. SE 13 Progress Reports and content Record Review and Staff Interviews Progress reports are sent to parents as often as they are sent to parents of non-disabled students. Written information is presented that addresses progress toward the annual goals of the IEP, and a Criterion Partially Implemented or Not Implemented Special Education Criteria created or revised in response to IDEA-2004 SE 6 ##1 - 3 Determination of Transition Services SE 8 IEP Team composition and attendance Chatham Public School District Mid -Cycle Report April 24, 2007 Page 2 of 8 Basis of Determination that Criterion was Partially Implemented or Not Implemented Required Corrective Action, Timelines for Implementation, and Progress Reporting summary of his/her academic achievement is provided upon graduation or termination. SE 14 Review and revision of IEPs SE 25B Resolution of disputes SE 33 Involvement in the General Curriculum SE 39A Procedures for services to eligible private school students whose parents reside in the district (SE 39A does not apply to charter schools or vocational schools) Record Review and Staff Interviews Annual reviews are conducted within the anniversary date of the IEP, and amendments are made without a Team meeting upon the written request of the parent(s) and the parents are provided a revised copy of the IEP. Record/ Documentation Review and Staff Interviews The district has not had an IEP appeal for a number of years. However, all parents receive the Notice of Procedural Safeguards concerning their right to appeal to the Bureau of Special Education Appeals. Record / Documentation Review and Staff Interviews The general curriculum is based on the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks. The district has taken steps, and in many cases extra effort, to provide students (including those students with disabilities) an opportunity to participate in the general curriculum. Documentation Review and Staff Interviews The district has a policy and procedure in place to provide services to eligible private school students whose parents reside in the district. Chatham Public School District Mid -Cycle Report April 24, 2007 Page 3 of 8 SE 39B Procedures for services to eligible students in private schools in the district whose parents reside out of state Documentation Review and Staff Interviews The district has a policy and procedure in place to provide services to eligible private school students whose parents reside out of state. Record / Documentation Review and Staff Interviews The district has policies and procedures in place to address suspensions that exceed 10 consecutive school days for students with disabilities or a pattern of suspensions that may exceed 10 consecutive school days. The district has Functional Behavior Assessments and/or Manifestation Determinations as part of the procedure. Team meetings are held when behavior may necessitate a change in placement. (SE 39B does not apply to charter schools or vocational schools) SE 46 Procedures for suspension of students with disabilities more than 10 days Partial Partial Chatham Public School District Mid -Cycle Report April 24, 2007 Page 4 of 8 The district has not included in the student handbooks for the middle school and high school the policy and procedure for suspending students with disabilities. The district must submit to the Department by Friday, June 15, 2007 a copy of the middle school and high school handbooks that state the policy and procedure for suspending students with disabilities. Chatham Public Schools English Learner Education (ELE) Requirements Mid-Cycle Review Findings and Corrective Action Based on the Department’s Review Of Local Self-Assessments (Please refer to full text of 2006-2007 CPR requirements for ELE and related implementation guidance at http://www.doe.mass.edu/pqa/review/cpr/instrument/chapter71A.doc ) ELE Criterion Number and Topic ELE 1 Annual Assessment Criterion Determined to be Implemented Based on Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment Findings of Noncompliance Based on Department’s Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment (Criterion Determined to be Partially Implemented or Not Implemented) ELE 2 MCAS Participation ELE 3 Initial Identification ELE 4 Waiver Procedures Chatham Public School District Mid -Cycle Report April 24, 2007 Page 5 of 8 Required Corrective Action, Timelines for Implementation, and Progress Reporting ELE Criterion Number and Topic Criterion Determined to be Implemented Based on Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment ELE 5 Program Placement and Structure ELE 6 Program Exit and Readiness ELE 7 Parent Involvement ELE 8 Declining Entry to a Program ELE 9 Instructional Grouping ELE 10 Parental Notification Findings of Noncompliance Based on Department’s Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment (Criterion Determined to be Partially Implemented or Not Implemented) Required Corrective Action, Timelines for Implementation, and Progress Reporting The district did not provide English language development curriculum for the high school level. Also, the district did not provide schedules for ELE students at the high school level. The Department requests that the district provide by Friday, June 15, 2007: copies of all schedules for ELE students at the high school level, and a copy of the high school sheltered English immersion curriculum. The district did not provide the class roster for instructional groupings at the high school level. or the curriculum for each instructional group. The Department requests that the district provide by Friday, June 15, 2007: a copy of the class roster at the high school level, and copies of the instructional curriculum for each level. The district did not provide a sample notice in all home languages in order to inform parents upon student’s placement in an ELE program. The Department requests that the district provide by Friday, June 15, 2007: a copy of translated notices sent to parents to inform them upon student’s placement in an ELE program. Chatham Public School District Mid -Cycle Report April 24, 2007 Page 6 of 8 ELE Criterion Number and Topic ELE 11 Equal Access to Academic Programs and Services ELE 12 Equal Access to Nonacademic and Extracurricular Programs ELE 13 Follow-up Support ELE 14 Licensure Requirements Criterion Determined to be Implemented Based on Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment Findings of Noncompliance Based on Department’s Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment (Criterion Determined to be Partially Implemented or Not Implemented) Chatham Public School District Mid -Cycle Report April 24, 2007 Page 7 of 8 Required Corrective Action, Timelines for Implementation, and Progress Reporting ELE Criterion Number and Topic Criterion Determined to be Implemented Based on Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment ELE 15 Professional Development Requirements ELE 16 Equitable Facilities ELE 17 Program Evaluation Findings of Noncompliance Based on Department’s Review of Local ELE Self-Assessment (Criterion Determined to be Partially Implemented or Not Implemented) Chatham Public School District Mid -Cycle Report April 24, 2007 Page 8 of 8 Required Corrective Action, Timelines for Implementation, and Progress Reporting