MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW Charter School or District: Silver Lake Regional School District Corrective Action Plan Forms Program Area: Special Education Prepared by: David Kenney, Administrator of Special Education CAP Form will expand to as many lines as necessary. Before completing and emailing to pqacap@doe.mass.edu, please see separate Instructions for Completing Corrective Action Plans. All corrective action must be fully implemented and all noncompliance corrected as soon as possible and no later than one year from the issuance of the Coordinated Program Review Final Report to the school or district. Mandatory One-Year Compliance Date: August 30, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Rating: Partially Implemented Criterion & Topic: SE 3 Special requirements for determination of specific learning disability Department CPR Finding: A review of students’ records indicates that the district does not consistently use the Specific Learning Disability-Eligibility Process/Forms that require Team members to provide a written determination as to whether or not the student has a specific learning disability. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The district will train special education professional staff on the requirement to consistently use the Specific Learning Disability-Eligibility Process/Forms requiring TEAM members to provide a written determination as to whether or not the student has a specific learning disability. This training will occur during building-based special education staff meetings in September, 2010. The district will then monitor implementation throughout the year as paperwork is submitted from the buildings to the Special Education Office for filing in the student record. Additionally, the district will randomly select several records of students in February, 2011 to more formally review in order to determine compliance. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Administrator of Special Corrective Action Activity: September, 2010 Education for training; February 2011 for random selection of student records for review Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Meeting/training agendas and sign-in sheets; Review of records indicating that staff are consistently using the SLD-Eligibility Process forms requiring TEAM members to provide a written determination as to whether or not the student has a specific learning disability. 1 Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Special Education Office clerical staff will monitor all paperwork as it arrives for inclusion in the student files for compliance and will be directed to alert administration if forms are missing or are incomplete. Additionally, district administrators will randomly select student records in February for review. Logs will be kept to document monitoring. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: SE 3 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Department Order of Corrective Action: Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, submit evidence of training for special education staff on the requirement to consistently sign the written determination for the specific learning disability eligibility process. Include the dates of the training, the agenda, training materials used, and the signed attendance sheets including staff role and building. By March 25, 2011, submit a report of the district’s internal review of records in which a student suspected of having a specific learning disability was evaluated after the training. Include the following: 1. The number of student records reviewed; 2. The number of student records in compliance; 3. For all records not in compliance with this criterion, determine the root cause(s) of the noncompliance; and 4. The district’s plan to remedy the non-compliance. Please note that when conducting internal monitoring the district must maintain the following documentation and make it available to the Department upon request: a) List of student names and grade levels for the record review; b) Date of the review; c) Name of person(s) who conducted the review, their role(s), and their signature(s). Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 and March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: SE 7 Transfer of parental rights Rating: Partially Implemented at age of majority and student participation and consent at the age of majority Department CPR Finding: A review of student records indicates that the district does not consistently inform the student one year prior to the student reaching 18 years of age of his or her right at age 18 to make all decisions in relation to special education programs and services. 2 Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The district will train special education professional staff on the requirement to consistently inform the student one year prior to the student reaching 18 years of age of his or her right at age 18 to make all decisions in relation to special education programs and services. Training will include review of the use of district age of majority documentation forms. This training will occur during high school special education staff meetings in September, 2010. The district will then monitor implementation throughout the year as paperwork is submitted from the buildings to the Special Education Office for filing in the student record. Additionally, the district will randomly select several records of students in February, 2011 to more formally review in order to determine compliance. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Administrator of Special Corrective Action Activity: September, 2010 Education for training; February 2011 for random selection of student records for review Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Meeting/training agendas and sign-in sheets; Review of records indicating completed documentation that indicates that students were informed one year prior to reaching age 18 of their right at age 18 to make all decisions in relation to special education programs and services. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Special Education Office clerical staff will monitor all paperwork as it arrives for inclusion in the student files for compliance and will be directed to alert administration if forms are missing or are incomplete. Additionally, district administrators will randomly select student records in February for review. Logs will be kept to document monitoring. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: SE 7 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Department Order of Corrective Action: Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, submit evidence of training for special education staff on the requirement to consistently inform the student one year prior to the student reaching 18 years of age of his or her right at age 18 to make all decisions in relation to special education programs and services. Include the dates of the training, the agenda, training materials used, and the signed attendance sheets including staff role and building. By March 25, 2011, submit a report of the district’s internal review of records in which students were informed one year prior to reaching age 18 of their right at age 18 to make all decisions in relation to special education programs and services after the training. Include the following: 1. The number of student records reviewed; 2. The number of student records in compliance; 3. For all records not in compliance with this criterion, determine the root cause(s) of the noncompliance; and 4. The district’s plan to remedy the non-compliance. Please note that when conducting internal monitoring the district must maintain the following documentation and make it available to the Department upon request: a) List of student names and grade levels for the record review; b) Date of the review; c) Name of person(s) who conducted the review, their role(s), and their signature(s). Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 and March 25, 2011 3 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: SE 8 IEP Team composition and Rating: Partially Implemented attendance Department CPR Finding: A review of student records indicates that a representative of the school district who has the authority to commit the resources of the district (and who may act as the chairperson) is not consistently present at IEP Team meetings. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The district will train staff on the requirement to consistently ensure that a representative of the school district who has the authority to commit the resources of the district and may act as chairperson be present at TEAM meetings. This training will occur during building-based special education staff meetings in September, 2010. The district will then monitor implementation throughout the year as paperwork is submitted from the buildings to the Special Education Office for filing in the student record. Additionally, the district will randomly select several records of students in February, 2011 to more formally review in order to determine compliance. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Administrator of Special Corrective Action Activity: September, 2010 Education and building Principals for training; February 2011 for random selection of student records for review Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Meeting/training agendas and sign-in sheets; Review of records indicating that a representative of the school district who has the authority to commit the resources of the district is present at TEAM meetings. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Special Education Office clerical staff will monitor all paperwork as it arrives for inclusion in the student files for compliance and will be directed to alert administration if forms are missing or are incomplete. Additionally, district administrators will randomly select student records in February for review. Logs will be kept to document monitoring. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: SE 8 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: The district’s internal monitoring procedures do not specifically indicate how it will ensure that a representative of the school district, who has the authority to commit the resources of the district, is consistently present at Team meetings. Department Order of Corrective Action: Develop internal monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements of this criterion. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, submit evidence of training for special education staff on ensuring that the representative/chairperson of the school district who has the authority to commit the resources of the district is present at IEP Team meetings. Include the dates of the training, the agenda, training materials used, and the signed attendance sheets including staff role and building. By January 21, 2011, submit the district’s internal monitoring procedures for ensuring that a representative of the school district who has the authority to commit the resources of the district is consistently present at Team meetings. 4 By March 25, 2011, submit a report of the district’s internal review of records in which a Team meeting was held after the training. Include the following: 1. The number of student records reviewed; 2. The number of student records in compliance; 3. For all records not in compliance with this criterion, determine the root cause(s) of the noncompliance; and 4. The district’s plan to remedy the non-compliance. Please note that when conducting internal monitoring the district must maintain the following documentation and make it available to the Department upon request: a) List of student names and grade levels for the record review; b) Date of the review; c) Name of person(s) who conducted the review, their role(s), and their signature(s). Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 and March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Rating: Partially Implemented Criterion & Topic: SE 12 Frequency of reevaluation Department CPR Finding: A review of student records indicates that re-evaluations are not always conducted every three years as required. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The district will train special education professional staff on the requirement to consistently conduct re-evaluations on time every three years as required. This training will occur during building-based special education staff meetings in September, 2010. The district will then monitor implementation throughout the year as paperwork is submitted from the buildings to the Special Education Office for filing in the student record. Additionally, the district will randomly select several records of students in February, 2011 to more formally review in order to determine compliance. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Administrator of Special Corrective Action Activity: September, 2010 Education for training; February 2011 for random selection of student records for review Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Meeting/training agendas and sign-in sheets; Review of records indicating re-evaluations were conducted on time every three years. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Special Education Office clerical staff will monitor all paperwork as it arrives for inclusion in the student files for compliance and will be directed to alert administration if forms are missing or are incomplete. Additionally, district administrators will randomly select student records in February for review. Logs will be kept to document monitoring. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: SE 12 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: The district’s internal monitoring procedures do not specifically indicate how it will ensure that re-evaluations are conducted every three years as required. 5 Department Order of Corrective Action: Develop internal monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with the requirements of this criterion. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, submit evidence of training for special education staff on the requirement to consistently conduct re-evaluations every three years. Include the dates of the training, the agenda, training materials used, and the signed attendance sheets including staff role and building. By January 21, 2011, submit the district’s internal monitoring procedures for ensuring that reevaluations are consistently conducted every three years as required. By March 25, 2011, submit a report of the district’s internal review of records in which re-evaluations were conducted since the training. Include the following: 1. The number of student records reviewed; 2. The number of student records in compliance; 3. For all records not in compliance with this criterion, determine the root cause(s) of the noncompliance; and 4. The district’s plan to remedy the non-compliance. Please note that when conducting internal monitoring the district must maintain the following documentation and make it available to the Department upon request: a) List of student names and grade levels for the record review; b) Date of the review; c) Name of person(s) who conducted the review, their role(s), and their signature(s). Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 and March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: SE 13 Progress Reports and Rating: Partially Implemented Content Department CPR Finding: A review of student records indicates that the district does not consistently inform parents of the student’s progress towards reaching the goals set in the IEP at least as often as parents are informed of the progress of non-disabled students. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The district will train special education professional staff on the requirement to consistently inform parents of the student’s progress towards reaching the goals set in the IEP at least as often as parents are informed of the progress of nondisabled students. This training will occur during building-based special education staff meetings in September, 2010. The district will then monitor implementation throughout the year as paperwork is submitted from the buildings to the Special Education Office for filing in the student record. Additionally, the district will randomly select several records of students in February, 2011 to more formally review in order to determine compliance. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Administrator of Special Corrective Action Activity: September, 2010 Education for training; February 2011 for random selection of student records for review Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Meeting/training agendas and sign-in sheets; Review of records indicating that staff are consistently writing progress reports and submitting them to parents at the same frequency as parents of non-disabled students are informed of progress. 6 Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Special Education Office clerical staff will monitor all paperwork as it arrives for inclusion in the student files for compliance and will be directed to alert administration if forms are missing or are incomplete. Additionally, district administrators will randomly select student records in February for review. Logs will be kept to document monitoring. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: SE 13 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Department Order of Corrective Action: Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, submit evidence of staff training on the requirement to consistently inform parents of the student’s progress towards reaching the goals set in the IEP at least as often as parents are informed of the progress of non-disabled students. Include the dates of the training, the agenda, training materials used, and the signed attendance sheets that include staff role and building. By March 25, 2011, submit a report of the district’s internal review of records in which progress reports were completed after the training. Include the following information: 1. The number of student records reviewed; 2. The number of student records in compliance; 3. For all records not in compliance with this criterion, determine the root cause(s) of the noncompliance; and 4. The district’s plan to remedy the non-compliance. Please note that when conducting internal monitoring the district must maintain the following documentation and make it available to the Department upon request: a) List of student names and grade levels for the record review; b) Date of the review; c) Name of person(s) who conducted the review, their role(s), and their signature(s). Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 and March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: SE 24 Notice to parent regarding Rating: Partially Implemented proposal or refusal to initiate or change the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of the child or the provision of FAPE Department CPR Finding: A review of student records indicates that the Notice of Proposed School District Action (N1) form is not consistently provided to parents with the following required elements: o A description of the action proposed or refused by the agency; o An explanation of why the agency proposed or refused to take the action; o A description of any other options that the agency considered and the reasons why those options were rejected; o A description of each evaluation procedure, test, record, or report the agency used as a basis for the proposed or refused action; and A description of any other factors that were relevant to the agency’s proposal or refusal. 7 Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The district will train special education professional staff on the requirement to consistently provide parents with a Notice of Proposed School District Action (N1) containing all required elements. This training will occur during building-based special education staff meetings in September, 2010. The district will then monitor implementation throughout the year as paperwork is submitted from the buildings to the Special Education Office for filing in the student record. Additionally, the district will randomly select several records of students in February, 2011 to more formally review in order to determine compliance. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Administrator of Special Corrective Action Activity: September, 2010 Education for training; February 2011 for random selection of student records for review Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Meeting/training agendas and sign-in sheets; Review of records indicating that staff are consistently providing parents with a Notice of Proposed School District Action containing all required elements. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Special Education Office clerical staff will monitor all paperwork as it arrives for inclusion in the student files for compliance and will be directed to alert administration if forms are missing or are incomplete. Additionally, district administrators will randomly select student records in February for review. Logs will be kept to document monitoring. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: SE 24 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Department Order of Corrective Action: Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, submit evidence of training for special education staff on the content requirements to be included in the narrative description of the school district proposal (N1). Include the dates of the training, the agenda, training materials used, and the signed attendance sheets that include staff role and building. By March 25, 2011, submit a report of the district’s internal review of random samples of N1 forms completed after the training. Include the following information: 1. The number of student records reviewed and the buildings they are from; 2. The number of proposals found to be in compliance; 3. For all records not in compliance with this criterion, determine the root cause(s) of the noncompliance; and 4. The district’s plan to remedy the non-compliance. Please note that when conducting internal monitoring the district must maintain the following documentation and make it available to the Department upon request: a) List of student names and grade levels for the record review; b) Date of the review; c) Name of person(s) who conducted the review, their role(s), and their signature(s). Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 and March 25, 2011 8 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Rating: Partially Implemented Criterion & Topic: SE 41 Age span requirements Department CPR Finding: Documentation and interviews indicate that the age span of the special education students in the Life Skills classroom at the high school exceeds 48 months and the district did not submit a written request to the Department for approval to serve a wider age range for the 2009-2010 school year. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The district no longer needs an age span waiver. The age span of all students enrolled in the Life Skills classroom (as well as all other special needs classrooms) is now less than 48 months. Additionally, staff will be trained during department meetings in September regarding the age span requirements. Training will include reviewing the need for the district to seek a waiver approval should it be projected that the age span of students in a special needs class will exceed 48 months. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Administrator of Special Corrective Action Activity: Completed Education/Building Principal Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Current class roster; Meeting/training agendas and sign in sheets. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Review of class rosters by Special Education Office/Administration during periodically throughout the year, including August/September and again in December/January. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: SE 41 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Department Order of Corrective Action: Required Elements of Progress Report(s): On January 21, 2011, submit evidence of training for special education staff on the age span requirements and procedures for requesting a waiver approval from the Department if the age span exceeds 48 months. Include the dates of the training, the agenda, training materials used, and the signed attendance sheets that include staff role and building. Also submit the class roster(s) of the high school’s Life Skills class with the initials of the students and their dates of birth. Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 9 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW Charter School or District: Silver Lake Regional School District Corrective Action Plan Forms Program Area: Civil Rights Prepared by: Joy Blackwood, Assistant Superintendent CAP Form will expand to as many lines as necessary. Before completing and emailing to pqacap@doe.mass.edu, please see separate Instructions for Completing Corrective Action Plans. All corrective action must be fully implemented and all noncompliance corrected as soon as possible and no later than one year from the issuance of the Coordinated Program Review Final Report to the school or district. Mandatory One-Year Compliance Date: August 30, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CR 16 Notice to students 16 or Rating: Partially Implemented over leaving school without a high school diploma, certificate of attainment, or certificate of completion Department CPR Finding: Documentation and interviews indicate that the district does not send annual written notice to former students who have not yet earned their competency determination and who have not transferred to another school to inform them of the availability of publicly funded posthigh school academic support programs and to encourage them to participate in those programs. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: Letters are mailed out annually to all students who have not yet earned their competency determination. The students are invited to any and all retests offered in the fall or spring. Students are also invited to our academic support programs funded through 625 and/or 632 grants. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Assistant Superintendent/ Corrective Action Activity: 9/1/2010 Director of Guidance Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Copies of all letters are kept and cross referenced to any student who has not earned a CD and have not transferred to another school. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Lists are maintained of all students who have not earned a CD and not transferred to another school. These lists are used to send out invitations to attend any retests of MCAS offered in the spring or fall. The students are also invited to attend our academic support programs funded through the 625 and/or 632 grants. 10 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CR 16 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Department Order of Corrective Action: Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, submit a copy of the letter sent to former students who have not yet earned their competency determination and who have not transferred to another school. Also submit the list of students, by initials, to whom this letter was sent. Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CR 24 Curriculum review Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: Staff interviews indicate that the district does not ensure that individual teachers review all educational materials for simplistic and demeaning generalizations, lacking intellectual merit, on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin and sexual orientation and provide balance and context for any such stereotypes depicted in such materials. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: As part of the opening day agenda for the 2010-2011 school year all professional staff members were instructed to review all curriculum materials used in the classroom throughout the year for any simplistic and demeaning generalizations, lacking intellectual merit, on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin and sexual orientation and provide balance and context for any such stereotypes depicted in such materials. All professional staff signed off on attending the presentation and it has also been added to the faculty handbook which also has a sign off receipt. Materials will be monitored during teacher observations and classroom walk-throughs by administrators. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Assistant Superintendent and Corrective Action Activity: September 1, Principals/Assistant Principals 2010 for training; January 2011 and ongoing for monitoring Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Opening Day agendas and attendance sign off sheets as well as faculty handbook read sign off sheets Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Training on curriculum review will be part of the opening day agendas each year going forward as well as a permanent part of the faculty handbooks. Additionally, materials will be monitored during teacher observations and classroom walk-throughs by administrators. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CR 24 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Department Order of Corrective Action: 11 Disapproved Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, submit evidence of training for staff on curriculum review procedures. Include the dates of the training, the agenda, training materials used (including procedures on curriculum review and any forms to be used), and the signed attendance sheets that include staff role and building. Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 12 MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW Charter School or District: Silver Lake Regional School District Corrective Action Plan Forms Program Area: English Learner Education Prepared by: Joy Blackwood, Assistant Superintendent CAP Form will expand to as many lines as necessary. Before completing and emailing to pqacap@doe.mass.edu, please see separate Instructions for Completing Corrective Action Plans. All corrective action must be fully implemented and all noncompliance corrected as soon as possible and no later than one year from the issuance of the Coordinated Program Review Final Report to the school or district. Mandatory One-Year Compliance Date: August 30, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: ELE 5 Program Placement and Rating: Partially Implemented Structure Department CPR Finding: Sheltered English immersion (SEI) is a program model for limited English proficient (LEP) students composed of two parts—English as a second language (ESL) and sheltered content instruction. ESL is explicit, direct instruction about the English language, delivered to LEP students only and designed to promote the English language development of LEP students. Sheltered content instruction is an approach for teaching content to LEP students in strategic ways that make the subject matter concepts comprehensible while promoting the LEP students’ English language development. Although there is an ESL curriculum in place, there is no specific curriculum map provided or other documentation to indicate that the district has aligned its’ ESL curriculum with the Massachusetts English Language Proficiency Benchmarks and Outcomes (ELPBO). The district does not provide ESL instruction in amounts that are in accordance with the Commissioner’s Memorandum of June 2004. In addition, according to district documents, instruction is provided by teachers who have not completed any of the four Categories of professional development. While documentation submitted by the school district clearly indicates goals for training 1-3 teachers for the 2010-2011 school year, the Department is concerned that the proposed number of teachers is not sufficient to cover the content and curriculum of sheltered content classrooms. 13 Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The ELPBO standards of Speaking, Listening, Writing and Reading will be cross-referenced with the ESL curriculum. The ESL tutor will use the content based ESL Curriculum map for each of our ELL students. The student profiles will connect to student learning outcomes and will reflect “big picture” student goals. The student learning outcomes from the scope and sequence tool include Listening, Reading, Speaking, and Writing. There will be planned assessments/and student work products which will measure the student attainment of learning goals. These will be included in our ELL student folders. As a low incident district training will continue in each of the four categories for at least one teacher in each grade level. So far for the 2010-2011 school year in Silver Lake there are 5 classroom teachers signed up for Category 1 training in October at the North River Collaborative, there are 4 teachers signed up for Category II at the North River Collaborative in November, there is 1 teacher signed up for the Category III training offered in district by our QMT in September, and 2 teachers signed up for Category IV at the North River Collaborative in January. This will provide at least one classroom teacher in each grade level with category trainings. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Joy Blackwood, Assistant Corrective Action Activity: June 2011 Superintendent Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Use of the content based ESL curriculum map which will be included in the ELL student folders and additionally trained staff in the four categories. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Students folders will be reviewed annually and should include the content-based curriculum map. ELL students will be placed in a classroom with a teacher who is in process of completing all four category trainings and has completed at least one of the category trainings. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: ELE 5 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: The district’s proposed corrective action does not specifically address the following findings: The lack of alignment of the district’s ESL curriculum with the ELPBO. ESL/ELD instruction is not being provided consistent with ESE recommendations. There is no monitoring procedure to ensure that students are placed appropriately with trained staff. There is no indication that any evidence of completion of the corrective action will be submitted to ESE. Department Order of Corrective Action: Provide evidence that ESL/ELD instruction is being provided to all LEP students at all schools by a certified ESL teacher. Specifically, provide the following: Teacher schedules indicating assignments. Names of teachers delivering ESL/ELD. A list of all LEP students in the district, their MEPA proficiency levels, the numbers of hours of ESL/ELD instruction that they receive, and the name of the ESL/ELD teacher. Five sample schedules from each school in the district supporting the hours of ESL/ELD instruction that are evidenced on the aforementioned list. To the extent the documentation above does not demonstrate that LEP students receive sufficient hours of ESL/ELD instruction, provide a detailed plan that ensures that the district addresses this and is 14 providing sufficient ESL/ELD to all LEP students before September 1, 2011. In order to monitor levels of ESL/ELD instruction, assign an individual (either one individual districtwide or one individual at each school) to review the schedules of all LEP students in the district on a quarterly basis for the following: Sufficient levels of ESL/ELD instruction, consistent with Department guidance; Delivery of all ESL/ELD by appropriately licensed staff; and Placement in classrooms of teachers who have received training in sheltering content, and levels of training of each teacher. Provide the name(s) of the individual(s) and the means by which s/he or they will monitor the delivery of ESL/ELD and sheltered content to all LEP students. Provide a timeframe for developing an ESL curriculum fully aligned with the Massachusetts ELPBO. This curriculum should be developed by a certified ESL teacher/s, not only by an ESL tutor. Provide evidence of SEI professional development training for the 2010-2011 school year, including the following: Specific training dates. Signed attendance sheets. Provide the above by January 21, 2011. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): Provide status updates on the following by January 21, 2011: 1) Progress toward aligning the K-12 ESL curriculum with the ELPBO. 2) Evidence of SEI professional development training for the 2010-2011 school year, including the following: Specific training dates. Signed attendance sheets. Also provide the following by January 21, 2011: 1) Copies of the LEP students’ schedules, including ESL. Indicate, as to each student, the student’s grade level, and identified level of proficiency. 2) A list of the general/special education classroom teachers with whom LEP students have been placed, including the initials of LEP students placed with them. 3) Evidence of the first quarterly monitoring of student schedules, as ordered above. By March 25, 2011, provide the following: 1) The K-12 ESL curriculum completely aligned with the ELPBO. 2) Evidence of SEI professional development training for the 2010-2011 school year, including the following: Specific training dates. Signed attendance sheets. 3) Evidence of the most recent quarterly monitoring of student schedules, as ordered above. Provide a description of actions taken to remedy any non-compliance. Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 and March 25, 2011 15 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: ELE 11 Equal Access to Academic Rating: Partially Implemented Programs and Services Department CPR Finding: A review of student records and documentation indicate that not all academic courses offer English language support to LEP students. As not all teachers have been trained in sheltered English immersion, the district does not ensure that ELE students are taught to the same academic standards and curriculum as all students, and are provided with the same opportunities to master such standards. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: As a low incident district training will continue in each of the four categories for at least one teacher in each grade level. So far for the 2010-2011 school year in Silver Lake there are 5 classroom teachers signed up for Category 1 training in October at the North River Collaborative, there are 4 teachers signed up for Category II at the North River Collaborative in November, there is 1 teacher signed up for the Category III training offered in district by our QMT in September, and 2 teachers signed up for Category IV at the North River Collaborative in January. This will provide at least one classroom teacher in each grade level with category trainings. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Joy Blackwood, Assistant Corrective Action Activity: June 2011 Superintendent Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: A teacher in each grade level will attend Category trainings Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Teachers will submit certificates upon completion of the category trainings. These will be maintained in their personnel file. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: ELE 11 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: See ELE 5 Department Order of Corrective Action: See ELE 5 Required Elements of Progress Report(s): See ELE 5 Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 and March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: ELE 14 Licensure Requirements Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: It is evident through the documentation that the district is not clear on the requirements of a district-wide Literacy and Fluency Policy. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: A Literacy and Fluency policy has been adopted and is being sent to the Office of Language Acquisition and Achievement by the superintendent. 16 Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Joy Blackwood, Assistant Corrective Action Activity: 10/1/2010 Superintendent Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Submission of the Literacy and Fluency policy to the Office of Language Acquisition and achievement Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: A signed copy of the policy will be mailed each school year after careful review of any new hires. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: ELE 14 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: The literacy and fluency policy has not been received yet. Department Order of Corrective Action: Submit literacy and fluency policy as soon as possible. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): Provide status updates on the following by January 21, 2011: 1) Submission of Literacy and Fluency Policy. Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: ELE 15 Professional Development Rating: Partially Implemented Requirements Department CPR Finding: According to district documents, LEP students are receiving content instruction by teachers who have not completed any of the four Categories of professional development. While documentation submitted by the school district clearly indicates goals for training 1-3 teachers for the 2010-2011 school year, the Department is concerned that the proposed number of teachers is not sufficient to cover the content and curriculum of sheltered content classrooms. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: As a low incident district training will continue in each of the four categories for at least one teacher in each grade level. So far for the 2010-2011 school year in Silver Lake there are 5 classroom teachers signed up for Category 1 training in October at the North River Collaborative, there are 4 teachers signed up for Category II at the North River Collaborative in November, there is 1 teacher signed up for the Category III training offered in district by our QMT in September, and 2 teachers signed up for Category IV at the North River Collaborative in January. This will provide at least one classroom teacher in each grade level with category trainings. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Joy Blackwood, Assistant Corrective Action Activity: June 2011 Superintendent Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: A teacher in each grade level will attend Category trainings Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Teachers will submit certificates upon completion of the category trainings. These will be maintained in their personnel file. 17 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: ELE 15 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: See ELE 5 Department Order of Corrective Action: See ELE 5 Required Elements of Progress Report(s): See ELE 5 Progress Report Due Date(s): January 21, 2011 and March 25, 2011 18 Disapproved MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW Charter School or District: Silver Lake Regional Corrective Action Plan Forms Program Area: Career/Vocational Technical Education Prepared by: Elliott J. Glass CAP Form will expand to as many lines as necessary. Before completing and emailing to pqacap@doe.mass.edu, please see separate Instructions for Completing Corrective Action Plans. All corrective action must be fully implemented and all noncompliance corrected as soon as possible and no later than one year from the issuance of the Coordinated Program Review Final Report to the school or district. Mandatory One-Year Compliance Date: August 30, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 6 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: The admissions policy approved by the Department needs to be updated in order to align with current district admissions procedures. District staff were scheduled to meet with the Office for Career/Vocational Technical Education Admissions Coordinator in late March to review planned updates to the admissions policy. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: District staff met with Lisa Sandler and Maura Russell from the DESE on 3/23/2010. The current admissions policy and district forms were reviewed and suggestions for changes were documented. A district committee this fall will work with the suggestions to rewrite the admissions policy and update the necessary forms and rubrics. The proposed changes will be submitted both to the DESE and District School Committee for approval. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Director of Career & Technical Corrective Action Activity: January 2011 Education Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence will include the workgroup’s final product (admission policy), as well as minutes from meetings of committee used to develop product. 19 Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: The new admissions policy development will be monitored by the Director of Career and Technical Education. A monthly meeting will be scheduled to construct language and forms, with group review of revised changes and rubrics. Progress will be communicated monthly to the Principal and Superintendent of schools through regularly scheduled administration meetings. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 6 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Not applicable. Department Order of Corrective Action: Not applicable. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, the district will submit its revised admission policy. Progress Report 1 Due Date: January 21, 2011 Progress Report 2 Due Date: (if required) March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 9 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: Membership on the General and Program Advisory Committees is not race/linguistic or disability inclusive, and there is no plan (formal recruitment process) to make them inclusive. The Metal Fabrication and Joining Technologies and Carpentry Program Advisory Committees are not gender inclusive and there is no formal recruitment process to make them inclusive. In addition, the following Program Advisory Committees lack required membership: Carpentry (college); Culinary Arts (college, organized labor); Horticulture (organized labor); Metal Fabrication and Joining Technologies (college). Note that school districts may meet the organized labor representation on their school’s Program Advisory Committees by including organized labor representation on the General Advisory Committee in lieu of each Program Advisory Committee. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The district will develop an Advisory Recruitment Plan to work towards more inclusive Program Advisory Committee’s. The plan will address outreach goals, target audience for each Ch. 74 program working towards membership goals, planned events, and an overview of the efforts to be implemented. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Director of Career & Technical Corrective Action Activity: March 2011 Education Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence will include the final product (advisory recruitment plan), as well as monthly meeting minutes used to develop the plan. 20 Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Monitoring will be the responsibility of the Director of Career and Technical Education. A review of previous membership years and records will be conducted to determine specific needs for each program, as well as general trends in the district. Monthly meetings will be scheduled and representation from the general advisory committee will be included in plan development. The Director of Career and Technical Education will utilize the state Vocational Director Group for assistance from schools who have achieved success with such recruitment plans. Progress on the development of the recruitment plan will be communicated to school administrators at a weekly scheduled administrator meeting. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 9 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Not applicable. Department Order of Corrective Action: Not applicable. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, the district will report on progress towards the development of a recruitment plan and provide minutes from meetings held to date to develop the plan. By March 25, 2011, the district will provide the completed recruitment plan and minutes from the working committee. Progress Report 1 Due Date: January 21, 2011 Progress Report 2 Due Date: March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 10 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: While career plans are developed with students, they are not developed with the involvement of parents/guardians. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: A letter will be generated by the guidance department that will be mailed to parents, explaining the student career plan, and inviting them to attend a meeting with their guidance counselor and student. Reviewing each student’s career plan and goals, as well as planning course selection for the following year will take place annually through an individual meeting. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Implementation: Director of Guidance Expected Date of Completion for Each Corrective Action Activity: April 2011 Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence of completion will include the parent letter that will be mailed home, as well as the parent meeting schedule maintained in the guidance office. 21 Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: The Director of Guidance will develop a letter to parents, approved by the Principal. The Director of Guidance will develop a time frame for the mailing and scheduling of appointments and provide the guidance staff with deadlines for implementation. The Director of Guidance through weekly staff meetings will monitor the scheduling of parent meetings through the guidance office for the purpose of career planning. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 10 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Not applicable. Department Order of Corrective Action: Not applicable. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, the district will provide documentation of the letter sent to parents describing the career planning process, including the intent to have individual meetings with guidance counselors, students and their parents. Progress Report 1 Due Date: January 21, 2011 Progress Report 2 Due Date: (if required) March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 17 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: Some articulation agreements are unsigned and others are not updated annually. The district does not have any articulations with registered apprenticeship programs. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The District will review and revamp its process for updating articulation agreements. Communication between technical teachers and the guidance staff will be formalized to expedite the sharing and collecting of course syllabus, updated curriculum, and other required documents sent to colleges to update articulation agreements. A spreadsheet will be developed to organize articulation agreements, with deadlines for submission, and college representative contacts. The district will utilize advisory committee members in both the Carpentry (New England Carpenters Union) and Metal Fabrication and Welding (Local 17) programs that are active with apprenticeship programs to formalize articulation agreements. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Implementation: Director of Guidance & Director of Career and Technical Education 22 Expected Date of Completion for Each Corrective Action Activity: May 2011 Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence will include an updated spreadsheet organizing the District’s articulation agreements and submission deadlines. Evidence will include signed and updated articulation agreements to include a registered apprenticeship program. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: In October 2010, the Director of Guidance and Director of Career and Technical Education will meet and review the status of current articulation agreements. Guidance staff will be delegated the primary responsibility of collecting local curriculum and necessary documents and communicating with colleges. The guidance staff will submit a monthly report to the Director of Career and Technical Education. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 17 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Not applicable. Department Order of Corrective Action: Not applicable. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, the district will submit the updated spreadsheet organizing the district’s articulation agreements including dates of renewal. By March 25, 2011, the district will submit evidence of progress towards establishing articulation agreements with registered apprenticeship programs. Progress Report 1 Due Date: January 21, 2011 Progress Report 2 Due Date: March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 20 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: There are no written guidelines for off-campus construction and maintenance projects to assure that only those students who have demonstrated those academic, technical and employability competencies associated with at least one and one half years of full time study in the project area (Carpentry and Horticulture) are allowed to participate in such projects. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: Written guidelines will be developed based on MGL CH. 74 603 CMR 4.06 Unpaid Off-Campus Construction and Maintenance Projects. The new district guidelines will meet the one and one half years of full time study requirement. The projects accepted during the 2010 – 2011 school year will meet the new policy for carpentry and horticulture program students. The policy will be put in writing for the CTE Department and communicated to the school committee. Course syllabus will reflect the changes. 23 Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Director of Career and Corrective Action Activity: November 2010 Technical Education Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence will include the new written guidelines communicated to district staff in a formal memorandum. Course syllabus for carpentry and horticulture will also reflect the change. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: The written guidelines will be developed and monitored by the Director of Career and Technical Education as the director approves and signs off on all projects off campus. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 20 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Not applicable. Department Order of Corrective Action: Not applicable. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, the district will submit the memorandum to staff describing the new guidelines. Progress Report 1 Due Date: January 21, 2011 Progress Report 2 Due Date: (if required) March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 27 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: A supervisor does not hold a Vocational Technical Supervisor/Director license and the district does not have a waiver from the Department Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The current supervisor has received a Vocational Principal/Assistant Principal 9 – 14 License. The district superintendent has written a letter to the Commissioner of Education requesting a waiver on the Vocational Technical Supervisor/Director license. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Implementation: Superintendent of Schools Expected Date of Completion for Each Corrective Action Activity: June 2011 Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence will be in the form of a letter approving the current arrangement from the DESE. 24 Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: The Superintendent of Schools is in communication with the State Vocational Director and Commissioner of Education. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 27 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Not applicable. Department Order of Corrective Action: Not applicable. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, the district will report on progress made. Progress Report 1 Due Date: January 21, 2011 Progress Report 2 Due Date: (if required) March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 31 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: A safety expert from the Massachusetts Department of Labor - Division of Occupational Safety (DOS) inspected the career/vocational technical program facilities and shop equipment. This inspection was part of the Coordinated Program Review conducted by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. The Office for Career/Vocational Technical Education will send the Safety Survey Report on the inspection to Superintendent Tuffy. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: Corrective action began immediately following receipt of the first safety response from the DOS. The district safety officer, as well as the three other OSHA certified instructors on the district staff, following each response from the DESE to continue development and implementation of correcting action items. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Director of Career and Corrective Action Activity: April 2011 Technical Education Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence will be in the approval of each item within the safety survey report response template, exchanged with Dave Edmonds of the DESE every thirty days. 25 Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Bi-Monthly safety meetings in the CTE Department, led by the Director of Career and Technical Education will insure internal monitoring of all action items from within the report. Follow-up of action taken to correct action items in report is the responsibility of the Director of Career and Technical Education, assisted by the schools’ safety officer (OSHA Certified Instructor). CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 31 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Not applicable. Department Order of Corrective Action: Not applicable. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, the district will report on progress towards completing safety action items. By March 25, 2011, the district will report on the completion of any remaining safety action items. Progress Report 1 Due Date: January 21, 2011 Progress Report 2 Due Date: March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 32 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: See CVTE 31. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: Corrective action began immediately following receipt of the first safety response from the DOS. The district safety officer, as well as the three other OSHA certified instructors on the district staff, following each response from the DESE to continue development and implementation of correcting action items. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Director of Career and Corrective Action Activity: April 2011 Technical Education Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence will be in the approval of each item within the safety survey report response template, exchanged with Dave Edmonds of the DESE every thirty days. 26 Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Bi-Monthly safety meetings in the CTE Department, led by the Director of Career and Technical Education will insure internal monitoring of all action items from within the report. Follow-up of action taken to correct action items in report is the responsibility of the Director of Career and Technical Education, assisted by the schools’ safety officer (OSHA Certified Instructor). CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 32 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Department Order of Corrective Action: Required Elements of Progress Report(s): See CVTE 31 Progress Report Due Date(s): See CVTE 31 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 33 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: Reviewers found that the district’s performance was as follows: For the Class of 2007 (the most recent data available at the time of report writing), the district did not meet the required 70% performance level for positive placement under Chapter 74 in the following Chapter 74approved vocational technical education programs: Culinary Arts (50%). For Perkins Performance Year Two (2008-2009), the district did not meet at least 90% of the performance level for the populations with 16 or more students for the following core indictors: 6S1 – CVTE Nontraditional Participation Core Indicator (required = 9.0%): Students with disabilities – actual = 7.55% Economically Disadvantaged – actual = 5.26% Tech Prep – actual = 6.73% 27 Narrative Description of Corrective Action: A committee consisting of the Director of Career and Technical Education, guidance staff, culinary staff, and an advisory representative, will meet to discuss raising the positive placement percentage in Culinary Arts and develop an Improvement Plan. Corrective action in regards to the CVTE Nontraditional participation core indicator will include utilization of department professional development time for nontraditional support items. The district nontraditional support team will review nontraditional inclusiveness in promotional materials and presentations. A new recruitment video was completed last year to highlight nontraditional student career choices and the new group of 9th grade exploratory students entering for fall 2010 admissions, has a higher percentage of potential nontraditional gender students given the 5 program choices at Silver Lake. Action steps will be developed for each special populations group that did not meet the required 9%. New involvement with SEEL will also be encouraged of nontraditional leaders when scheduling permits. The guidance staff will meet with students in the mentioned special population groups at the beginning in the first month of this school year to outline available services to them to include: counseling services, on-line networking and research opportunities through the career center, and support group meeting times both during and after school. The district will utilize technology software such as Career Cruising and Navience to give this population of students the chance to explore and match individually their interests and skills with career paths. The guidance staff will develop career plans with each student to be reviewed annually. The district will remain active with its Tech Prep consortium through Masassoit Community College and communicate programs to our students specifically targeting nontraditional students by gender. The district will offer a balance of field trips to local apprenticeship programs, employers, and post secondary education opportunities each year. For this population of students, the district will seek out presenters who are nontraditional for their gender in their career. The Nontraditional by Gender Support Group will meet with successful men/women who are nontraditional professionals in their field of employment. Support through the school PTO is in place to assist students who are economically disadvantaged. Counseling support for this population is proactive with students meeting quarterly with a guidance counselor and assigned school mentor. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Director of Career and Corrective Action Activity: June 2011 Technical Education Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence will include the product (improvement plan), supporting the goal of raising graduate followup results over the next two years that demonstrate a higher percentage of positive placement for Culinary Arts students. Evidence in the area of the Nontraditional participation numbers will ultimately be in raising the percentages currently below 9% over the next two years. Additional evidence will be in the form of meeting minutes from CTE Department professional development, as well as the nontraditional support team. 28 Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Internal monitoring will be the responsibility of the Director of Career and Technical Education and will include goal setting for the staff members included in this corrective action plan. Department meeting time, as well as professional development time will be dedicated to improving supports for nontraditional students. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 33 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Not applicable. Department Order of Corrective Action: Not applicable. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, the district will submit the plan to increase positive placement for students in the Culinary Arts program. The district will also provide evidence of activities to support students entering and remaining in programs nontraditional for their gender, e.g. field trips, support groups, mentoring, and professional development for staff. Progress Report 1 Due Date: January 21, 2011 Progress Report 2 Due Date: (if required) March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 34 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: The district did not develop an improvement plan to address the Chapter 74 positive placement rate in Culinary Arts. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: A committee consisting of the Director of Career and Technical Education, guidance staff, culinary staff, and an advisory representative, will meet to discuss raising the positive placement percentage in Culinary Arts and develop an Improvement Plan. The group will look at student services, co-op opportunities, and program advisory committee recommendations, as well as reviewing the culinary arts program in general. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Director of Career & Technical Corrective Action Activity: May 2011 Education Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence of the corrective action will include a written document (improvement plan). In addition any meeting minutes would be documented as well as advisory committee meeting notes. 29 Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: Monitoring will be the responsibility of the Director of Career and Technical Education. An October meeting date with the program advisory committee has been set. Thereafter, monthly meetings will be scheduled to maintain progress on the development of the improvement plan. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 34 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Not applicable. Department Order of Corrective Action: Not applicable. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, the district will submit the plan to increase positive placement for students in the Culinary Arts program. The district will also provide minutes of the program advisory committee. Progress Report 1 Due Date: January 21, 2011 Progress Report 2 Due Date: (if required) March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 36 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: Telephone logs kept as back-up documentation for the Career/Vocational Technical Education Graduate Follow-up Survey lack sufficient detail. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: Training will be scheduled with the staff member in October, who will be responsible for phone calls to graduates for the follow-up survey. A form will be developed by the Director of Career and Technical Education to log responses in necessary detail. The form will be modeled after the sample provided in the DESE Advisory Committee Guide. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Director of Career and Corrective Action Activity: November 2010 Technical Education Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence will be in the resulting log document, which will contain the necessary level of detail. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: The Director of Career and Technical Education will conduct the training and ask for all phone calls to be made from the CTE Office. The Director will directly check the log each day phone calls are being made for accuracy and detail. 30 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 36 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Not applicable. Department Order of Corrective Action: Not applicable. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, the district will provide documentation of the new follow-up survey log. By March 25, 2011, the district will provide samples of completed logs with student names redacted. Progress Report 1 Due Date: January 21, 2011 Progress Report 2 Due Date: March 25, 2011 COORDINATED PROGRAM REVIEW CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (To be completed by school district/charter school) Criterion & Topic: CVTE 37 Rating: Partially Implemented Department CPR Finding: Expenditures for supplies in the Fiscal Year 2009 Perkins Allocation Grant exceed the approved budget by more than ten percent. A summary of the actual expenditures by line item for the grant does not match the line item breakdown submitted by the district on the Final Financial Report. Narrative Description of Corrective Action: The Director of Career and Technical Education will work with the Business Manager to devise a more formal process for tracking Perkins allocations and expenditures. The Business Manager’s Office will provide the CTE Office monthly with an expenditure report. The newly organized process will document and formalize both actual and encumbered expenses. Title/Role of Person(s) Responsible for Expected Date of Completion for Each Implementation: Director of Career and Corrective Action Activity: January 2011 Technical Education & Business Manager Evidence of Completion of the Corrective Action: Evidence will include the monthly expenditure reports generated in the business office. Evidence will also include a balanced budget that does not have any budget lines exceeding more than 10% of the budged allotment. Description of Internal Monitoring Procedures: The CTE Office staff will maintain financial spreadsheets and perform monthly check and balances with the actual Perkins grant allocations and budget. This process will be overseen by the CTE Director. The Superintendent will review the budgeted grant expenditures with the business manager monthly. 31 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN APPROVAL SECTION (To be completed by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) Criterion: CVTE 37 Status of Corrective Action: Approved Partially Approved Disapproved Basis for Partial Approval or Disapproval: Not applicable. Department Order of Corrective Action: Not applicable. Required Elements of Progress Report(s): By January 21, 2011, the district will provide documentation of the monthly expenditure reports generated by the district business office and the spreadsheets used by the CTE office. Progress Report 1 Due Date: January 21, 2011 Progress Report 2 Due Date: (if required) March 25, 2011 32