Longwood University College of Education and Human Services Communication Sciences and Disorders Program APHASIA and RIGHT HEMISPHERE DISORDERS CSDS 515; Fall 2011 Instructor: Dr. Michele L. Norman Class: Monday 6 - 8 pm Office: Hull 224 Telephone: 434-395-2341 Office Hours: Monday/Friday 11-2; Monday 3-5 Email: normanml@longwood.edu COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course is an introduction to specific acquired neurogenic language and communicative disorders. Students will become familiar with both theoretical and applied knowledge relating to aphasia and right hemisphere disorders well as evaluation and treatment for these disorders. 2 credits REQUIRED TEXT: Brookshire, R. H. (2007). Introduction to neurogenic communication disorders (7th ed.). St. Lois, MO: Mosby. Helm-Estabrooks, N, & Albert, M.L. (2004). Manual of Aphasia and Aphasia Therapy (2nd ed.). Austin, TX Pro-Ed, Inc. Chapey, R. (2008). Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia (5 th ed.). Lippincott, Wilkins and Williams. SUGGESTED SUPPLEMENTAL TEXT: Johnson, A. F., and Jacobson, B.H. (2007). Medical Speech-Language Pathology: A practitioner’s guide (2nd ed.). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. Additional readings as assigned. COURSE OBJECTIVES: The following conceptual framework competencies guide the planning and delivery of instruction in this course. Specific course objectives reflect this framework as they focus on the needs of the students for developing skills as professionals who will be knowledgeable, caring and ethical decision-makers. LONGWOOD CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK COMPETENCIES CFC 1 – Plan for Instruction CFC 2 – Implementation and Management of Instruction CFC 3 – Evaluation and Assessment CFC 4 – Knowledge of Subject CFC 5 – Behavior Management CFC 6 – Communication Skills CFC 7 – Professional Responsibilities CFC 8 – Technology CFC 9 – Diversity ASHA KASA Standards (applicable to this course) Standard III-C Demonstrate knowledge of the nature of speech, language, hearing, and communication disorders and differences and swallowing disorders, including their etiologies, characteristics, anatomical/physiological, acoustic, psychological, developmental, and linguistic and cultural correlates. Standard III-D: The applicant must possess knowledge of the principles and methods of prevention, assessment, and intervention for people with communication and swallowing disorders, including consideration of anatomical/physiological, psychological, developmental, and linguistic and cultural correlates of the disorders. Upon completion of this, course students should be able to: 1. 2. 3. 4. demonstrate an understanding of the epidemiology, etiology, neuropathophysiology and mechanisms of injury associated with Aphasia and RHD. (KASA III-C; CFC 4) demonstrate knowledge of the characteristics of cognitive communication disorders resulting from Aphasia and RHD (KASA III-D; CFC 4,9) demonstrate knowledge and application of the principles and procedures underlying diagnosis and treatment of clients with Aphasia and RHD (KASA III-D; CFC 1,2, 3,4,8,9) demonstrate understanding of the implications of psychosocial and socioemotional issues for clients and their families (KASA III-D; CFC 1,2,3,8) COURSE REQUIREMENTS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Participation - Students are expected to attend and participate in class. Attendance will be taken. Abstract- Review one empirical article of Aphasia or RHD Assessment review & demonstration – As a group, you will complete review of an assessment using the form provided. Individually, you will demonstrate administration and scoring of any assessment presented in the class. Reaction Paper – 1-2 page paper describing how the information you have learned from the assigned reading will impact your service delivery to a person with aphasia or RHD. Tests - There will be a midterm and final examination. Team Project and Presentation – Create and information package on the selected topic or disorder. Present the package to the class explaining the contents. GRADING SCALE Abstract 10 pts 180-185=A- 186-200=A Reaction Paper 10 pts 160-165=B- 166-172=B Assessment Review 10 pts 140-159=C Assessment Demo 10 pts < 140=F Team Project 15 pts Team Presentation 5 pts Midterm Exam 70 pts Final Exam 70 pts TOTAL 200 pts 176-179=B+ ASSIGNMENTS All written assignments are to be submitted in Blackboard before midnight of the date due. Reaction Paper (10 Points) You will complete a 1-2 page paper describing the information you have learned from reading the short story and how it will impact your service delivery. Abstract: (10 pts total) You are required to complete an abstract on an empirical article. The article selected must 1) be data based and 2) discuss a speech, language, communication, or swallowing impairment in relation to the topic area (Aphasia or RHD) as the focus of the problem. You must attach your abstract to a copy of the article. Use the abstract format provided in this syllabus. All abstracts must be typewritten, double-spaced using Times New Roman 12 point font with 1” margins on all sides. There is no page limitation. Follow the APA (6th ed.) guidelines. Assessment review and demonstration (20 points total) You are expected to participate in the review of an assessment using the form provided. This portion of the assignment is completed as a team and is worth 10 points. Each member of the group will receive the same grade. You are responsible for learning how to administer and score all assessments. You will also be required to administer (5 points) and score (5 points) a randomly assigned assessment to demonstrate your knowledge. Examinations: (140 pts total) The examination will include information presented in class, in assigned chapters, and in assigned additional readings. Each examination is with 50 points. The final examination will be comprehensive and may include multiple choice questions and cases. Team Project: (15 pts) Each team will develop an information package containing information specific to the topic assigned. The package should include, but is not limited to, the following: Descriptions, Definitions, and Explanations regarding the topic Brochures, pamphlets, and/or flyers Helpful communication hints or tips Listing of various types of resources available (local, regional, national, web) Rehabilitation/therapeutic services available Support group and/or counseling information The package should be user-friendly. Be creative in putting the contents of the package together. You may create items to be included, as well as use materials provided through other resources (if they are reliable). Include a list of ALL references in APA format (6th ed.). All participants in the group will receive the same grade. Team Presentation: (5 pts) As a team, you will present your project to the class. Your team will have 30 minutes to introduce your package and review its contents. All participants will receive the same grade. ACADEMIC EXPECTATIONS No more than nine Longwood non-degree graduate hours may be counted toward a degree, certificate or licensure program. Students are expected to apply to a Longwood graduate program prior to enrolling in classes. At the latest, all application materials should be received by the Graduate and Extended Studies Office before the completion of six hours. Disability Statement: The instructor is willing to meet reasonable accommodations for any student's documented disability. The student should bring supporting material to the instructor during the first week of class, including the accommodations needed, as outlined by the Learning Center at Longwood University. Honor Code: Students are expected to abide by the Longwood Honor Code, and all assignments and examinations must be pledged in order for a grade to be earned. The instructor will investigate any suspicion of an Honor Code infraction. Class Attendance: Attendance in all class meetings is expected. ALL absences should be discussed with the instructor prior to time of absence, if possible. In accordance with the Longwood Attendance Policy, the class grade may be lowered one letter grade if the student misses 10% of class meetings and a grade of "F" may be assigned if a student misses 25% of class meetings. If a student is absent on a quiz or test date, without prior discussion with the instructor, the grade will be zero. Policy on Late Work: All assignments are due to the instructor at the beginning of class on the assigned due date unless otherwise arranged or notified. Work submitted late will be accepted, however a penalty will be incurred. Five % of the total point value of the assignment will be lost for each calendar day beyond the required submission date. Additional Readings: TBA Class Schedule (This schedule may be revised during the semester if necessary) Week Date Topic Assignment Reading 1 8/22 Overview of stroke 2 8/29 Overview of Aphasia 3 9/5 No Class! 4 9/12 Evaluation 5 9/19 Evaluation and Intervention Assessment Review Due Brookshire CH 7, 9 Helm-Estabrooks CH 12-24; Chapey 4 and 6 6 9/26 Intervention strategies Abstract Due Chapey 1 and 7 7 10/3 8 10/10 No Class! 9 10/17 Overview of RHD Brookshire CH 10 Chapey 34 10 10/24 11 10/31 Evaluation and assessment Myers CH 8 (Reserve) 12 11/7 Intervention strategies Myers CH 9 (Reserve) 13 11/14 14 11/21 Special and diverse populations Assessment demonstration 15 11/28 Review for Final Examination Assessment demonstration 16 12/5 6:30-9 pm FINAL EXAM Brookshire CH 1, 2, 8 Reaction Paper Helm-Estabrooks CH 1, 2, 3, 4 Brookshire CH 3 and 5 Helm-Estabrooks CH 8, 10, 11; Chapey CH 2 MIDTERM EXAM Team Project and Presentation Due Chapey 5 and 9 Assessment Review Team Members Write APA format (6th ed.) of assessment reference for written report. 1. Standardization a. Total number b. Number of males/females c. Ages (ranges and/or groups) d. Diagnoses of participants e. Exclusionary criteria f. Inclusion of normal control group i. Group characteristics ii. Matching criteria 2. Assessment Materials 3. Areas Assessed a. Subtest names b. What does it assess 4. Testing Procedures a. Basic information b. Specialized instructions 5. Scoring Procedures a. Basic (basal; ceiling) b. Specialized c. Types of scores provided 6. Interpretation a. Severity Ratings b. Normative Comparisons 7. Critique Abstract Format Name Date Course name & number Abstract (double space) Article reference in APA style (6th ed.) using hanging indentation and single space. (double space) Purpose/Problem: This statement should include the researchers’ reasons or intents for conducting the study, research questions, and hypotheses as indicated in the article. Methods: This is a general statement about how the researchers conducted the study. Participants: Describe the population sample used in the study as thoroughly as possible (age, gender, race, education, condition, etc.). How many were included? Tell how they were recruited, what were the inclusionary and/or exclusionary criteria. Procedures: What did the researchers do? What steps were involved? Instructions? Give details. Materials: What did the researchers use? What assessments and instrumentation? Analysis: What research design was used? What were the independent and dependent variables? What statistical methods were used? What were the covariates? Results: What were the outcomes? What were the findings (without interpretation)? Conclusions: What was the author’s interpretation of the findings? Were the research questions answered? Were the hypotheses accepted or rejected? What were the reasons given for the outcomes? What implications are made based on the findings? What does the author propose as changes needed for future studies? What are the future directions implicated in the study? Critique: This section is the most important part of the abstract. This is your opportunity to tell me what you thought of the article. I want to know about the flaws (readability, poor design, lack of controlling for factors, inadequate sample size, lack of diversity, confounding variables, etc.), whether you agree with the author’s interpretations, suggestions for improving the study, and what do you think the implications are for speech-language pathologists. Your comments should be constructive and succinct. I want you to express your opinions, but have supporting facts for your claims. General Abstract Guidelines You do not need to provide text citations unless you are referencing a different article. You should avoid using quotations. Paraphrase the information. Only use quotes if repeating the exact words is necessary and relevant to your description of the study. Quoting the authors does not demonstrate your understanding of what you read; thereby defeating one of the main purposes for the assignment. You are graded on the factual information presented and your adherence to the format and guidelines, not your opinions. Team Project Grading Rubric Aphasia and RHD CSDS 615; Fall 2010 Dr. Michele L. Norman Team Authors: Information Package POINTS Table of Contents Descriptions, Definitions, & Explanations Communication hints .5 .5 Brochures, pamphlets, flyers, and/or various resources 1 Support group/counseling information References 1 Accuracy of Contents 5 User-friendliness 5 Presentation 5 TOTAL 20 1 1 SCORE COMMENTS