Example assessment & marking criteria Assessment type: Subject: Subject learning outcomes: Assessment task: Value& length: Task description: Critical reflection INF530 Concepts and Practices for a Digital Age This subject sets the foundations of connected learning within new information environments created by the social and technological changes of the digital age. By focussing on connectivity, communication, collaboration and convergence, the subject addresses the challenges, opportunities and emerging possibilities for learning and teaching in information-rich participatory environments. Trends in knowledge construction, participation and social networks will be explored, including information futures and digital convergence. The subject introduces education informatics and the scholarship of digital teaching, and models connected learning through group discourse and collaborative inquiry in digital environments, including the reflective and participatory experiences employed throughout the course. be able to understand the evolution of the web that has led to information and knowledge sharing; cloud computing; digital repositories and digital connectedness; be able to identify and critique how current and emerging trends in the creation, circulation and communication of information and knowledge build connected learning; be able to discuss the connections between transliteracy, information fluency and digital proficiency; be able to demonstrate an understanding of how mobile and 'geo-social' relationships of learners, homes, communities, non-formal learning spaces, regions and the globalised economy influence learning; be able to explore and respond creatively to the principles of connected learning as teacher and learner, including collaboratively guiding, constructing and assessing the work of peers; be able to demonstrate an understanding of the importance and impact of connected learning as drivers to re-imagine learning in schools for a networked world; and be able to examine education informatics from the disciplines of education, information science and information technology. 8b. Critical reflection 10%, 600 words TASK Provide a critical synthesis of your reflection on how your views, knowledge and understanding of the work of an education professional in digital environments has changed and/or developed. Rationale: This should include examples captured from your compulsory blog tasks, other personal reflections posted on your blog, and from participatory experiences within the subject. Study of concepts and practices in a digital world has required engagement with multimodal environments, along with information, knowledge and scholarly engagement within the digital information ecology of 21st century learning. The digital essay provides an authentic task to extend and present academic enquiry using digital networked media. This authentic reflection activity is designed to further develop a student's engagement with information processing and thinking skills and to synthesise ideas as a result of their engagement with the subject content. The final reflection is an opportunity to complete the learning cycle of investigation of the concepts and practices in a digital age from a personal professional perspective. The assignment is designed to assess all the learning objectives in the subject, with an emphasis on 5, 6 and 7. Students will be allocated a rating High Distinction to Pass/Fail as to how well you have addressed each criteria for: Investigate a range of ideas and issues Demonstrate reflection and reflexivity Form, present and support own opinions Marking criteria & standards of performance Developed by Judy O’Connell Criteria Student investigates a range of ideas and issues Student applies and integrates critical analysis Student is able to form, present and support own opinions Reflective component in keystone and all following subjects (blog post) HD D C P Blog entry demonstrates a Blog entry shows an Blog entry shows awareness Blog entry shows awareness strong professional position emergent professional of key issues as discussed in of some of the key issues about key issues as dialogue about key issues as weekly forums, blog posts and central course concepts discussed in weekly forums, discussed weekly forums, and subject learning as discussed in weekly blog posts and subject blog posts and subject materials, and provides forums, blog posts and learning materials. learning materials. evidence of being able to subject learning materials, highlight appropriate facets of however, emphasis is the issues being discussed. disproportionate and somewhat descriptive. Strong evidence of Evidence of independent Some evidence of Little evidence of independent investigation. investigation, and original independent investigation, independent investigation, Original questioning and questioning and analysis. original questioning and original questioning and analysis. Independently takes Independently takes and analysis. Takes and analysis. Attempts to take and understands multiple understands multiple understands multiple and understand multiple perspectives and through perspectives and through perspectives and through perspectives. these can provide an these can provide an these can provide a critical insightful and/or exhaustive insightful critical discussion of discussion of the issues at critical discussion of the the issues at hand. hand. issues at hand. Incorporates own opinion and Incorporates own opinion into Incorporates own opinion into Some attempt to Incorporate original ideas into discussion, discussion, with foundation in discussion, linked to theory own opinion into discussion, explicitly shaped by a strong theory and examples, with or examples. however, opinion may not be foundation in theory and some incorporation of ideas grounded in theory or examples, and to promote to promote further thinking. examples. Little or no further thinking. attempt to incorporate original ideas. FL Blog entry is descriptive and shows little or no awareness of key issues discussed. No evidence of independent investigation. Original questioning and analysis. No attempt to take and understand multiple perspectives. No attempt to Incorporate own opinion into discussion, or opinion is not be grounded in theory or examples.