USCG Ballast Water Update Richard A. Everett Environmental Standards Division (CG-5224) US Coast Guard December 5, 2007 CG Ballast Water Initiatives • Development of a national BW Discharge Standard • BW treatment system approval protocols • STEP • International Developments Why issue a BWD Standard? Ballast Water Exchange issues: -Safety and voyage constraints -Effectiveness is variable Benchmark to approve BWM systems: -Easier to compare to than BWE Should increase the level of BWM conducted by vessels Legislative Authority to issue a BWD standard • National Invasive Species Act of 1996 (NISA): • • Establishes our authority to approve BW treatment systems Establishes our ability to implement a BWD standard • • BWE clearly viewed as an initial step Secretary (USCG) given discretion to promulgate additional regulations as necessary Current Rulemaking Project The BWD Standard regulation would: • Set a concentration-based standard (# of organisms/volume of ballast water) • Be used to approve BWT technologies • Be environmentally protective, scientifically sound, and enforceable BWD Standard Rulemaking (cont’d) • Specifically, the BWD Standard should address the full range of organisms including: -Microbes (pathogens) -All life stages (adults, juveniles, larvae, resting stages) -Those that reproduce asexually Components of the Regulatory Project • Regulatory Analysis – Cost/benefit • Environmental Analyses • Drafting the Regulatory Text – Notice of Proposed Rule-making (NPRM) In progress – Final Rule Regulatory Assessment (Cost-Benefit Analysis) • Executive Order 12866 -Assess cost and benefits • Regulatory Flexibility Act -Economic impacts to small businesses • Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act -Assistance to small businesses Regulatory Assessment • Addresses potential costs and benefits of implementing a BWD standard • Addresses costs and benefits of alternatives analyzed in the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DPEIS) • This analysis is completed and is part of the DPEIS Environmental Analyses • Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DPEIS) • ESA Consultation • CZMA Consistency Determination Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (DPEIS) • Required under: the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) • DPEIS consists of: -Purpose and Need -Range of Alternatives Different Standards -Affected Environment -Environmental Consequences DPEIS Approach • Expert Panel Workshop: -Comprised of NEPA Experts and Biologists from the 5 cooperating agencies -Finish the DPEIS analysis and obtain interagency team agreement -Took place in May 2007 in Charleston, SC. DPEIS Status • Incorporated interagency comments in Summer 2007 • DPEIS is in CG clearance • Anticipate publishing DPEIS in Winter 2007 and hold 3 Public Meetings to solicit comments (WC, GL, DC) • Incorporate comments into the NPRM and publish soon thereafter, with additional Public Meetings Approving BWT Technologies • Must meet the BWD Standard • Must ALSO meet Engineering and Operational Requirements (46 CFR) - Approval of Equipment and Materials - Approval of Electrical Equipment - Approval of Engineering Equipment - Approval of Piping Equipment Approving BWM Systems • Type Approval of systems – Rigorous land-based testing – Shipboard qualification • Consistent with existing USCG procedures and BWM Convention • Requires development of standard test protocols – Efficacy in killing/removing wide range of organisms (bacteria – fish) – Under wide range of water quality conditions (blue water – turbid industrial estuaries – freshwater lakes) – Under wide range of operating conditions (temp, humidity, sea state) EPA Environmental Technology Verification Program Performance Verification of Ballast Water Treatment Technologies United States Coast Guard NSF International 6/28/2016 slides for sweden.ppt Coastal Resource and Environmental Management 16 ETV Tech Panel Mechanical Engineers Naval Architects Marine Engineer Ocean Engineers Physical Oceanographer Microbiologist ETV Program Control Marine & Biologists Automation Engineer Independent Instrumentation Engineers Consultants Research and Development Ballast Water Treatment Test Facility at NRL Key West Test facility operational • EPA ETV Protocols largely validated • – Some Improvements Req’d – Severn-Trent system used in validation – Test Report in Review STEP Shipboard Technology Evaluation Program • • • Intended to facilitate development of effective BW treatment options Available to all vessels, foreign and domestic, subject to USCG regulations (33 CFR 151 Subparts C & D) Currently reviewing 4 applications – Significant delays in CG ability to process first 3 applications. – Environmental Assessments (EAs) will be released soon for first 3 applications. • Currently assessing options to streamline and expand program – 3rd party review of applications and preparation of EAs? Applicant expense Applicant schedule – Multiple vessels per application? Increased complexity for EAs… Distribution of test effort among vessels… Ballast Water Management Convention of 2004 Key provisions for U.S.: • Phase out of BW Exchange • BW discharge standard – More protective than BWE, but not as stringent as many in U.S. want – Challenges to technology: meet the standard wide availability on the desired schedule • Parties may implement more stringent measures • Parties may test discharges to confirm compliance with the discharge standard Ballast Water Management Convention • Entry into force: 12 months after ratification by 30 member states representing 35% of the world’s merchant shipping tonnage To date: Ratified by 10 states representing 3.42% of shipping tonnage Guidelines supporting the Convention • Status – 14 of 15 sets of guidelines adopted – 1 remaining Guideline to be developed further at BLG 12 (Feb 08) Sampling (G2) Divergence of Opinion – Some Administrations and ship owners Specify details of sample acquisition, analysis, and interpretation Average of samples to be below standard – U.S. – How to get a sample Analysis and interpretation left to Administration No averaging required Ballast Water Treatment System Approvals IMO Active Substance approvals under G9 • Paraclean Ocean System, proposed by Germany; • Electro Clean System, proposed by the Republic of Korea; • Special Pipe Ballast Water Management System combined with ozone treatment, proposed by Japan; • EctoSys. electrochemical System, proposed by Sweden; • NK Ballast Water Treatment System, proposed by the Republic of Korea; and • PureBallast System, proposed by Norway and Sweden, which was also given Final Approval. – Type approval pends successful shipboard tests Administration Type approvals under G8 • NEI – VOS deoxygenation system by Liberia Recent and Upcoming Meetings • Assembly (November 19-30, 2007) – Major BW decision • Resolution - Ships subject to Reg B-3.3 constructed in 2009 not required to meet Regulation D-2 until 2nd annual survey,, but no later than 31 December, 2011. Due to lack of “available” treatment systems; build contracts already in place. BLG 12 (February 4 - 8, 2007) – Sampling Guideline (G2) – Alignment of G8 and G9 – G9 (Approval of BWT systems using AS) • Human Exposure Scenario Criteria to evaluate systems using same substance (me too) GESAMP Methodology Procedure for assessing “same level of protection” when evaluating “other methods of BW management” under Regulation B-3.7 MEPC 57 (March 31 – April 4) – Review Group – availability of BWT technology – Applications for approval under G9 (7+) – Outcome of BLG 12 Biofouling at IMO • Biofouling management proposed as a new work item for MEPC • Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom proposal • MEPC 56 agreed to proposal in July 2007. • First phase will be a scoping effort to determine the best approach for IMO to take – New convention – Amend an existing convention Ballast Water Antifouling – Guidelines Next Steps • Publish and implement the BWD Standard Regulation to include BWTS test protocols and BWTS approval process • Continue and refine STEP • Continue to engage actively at IMO – Refine guidelines – Address biofouling – Exchange information on testing and approvals of technologies • Update existing BWM Reporting and Recordkeeping Regulations and NOBOB requirements • Develop improved methods and technologies for assessing compliance with BWD Standard Further information on the U.S. Coast Guard’s ANS Program can be found at: http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-m/mso/estandards.htm