SI 1: Ideology Measures
Australian Attitude Ideology Scale
1990
Australian Attitude Ideology Scale
2008
Death Penalty
Birth Control
Nuclear Power Plants
War in Afghanistan
Casual sex
Evolution
X-rated Movies
War on Terror
Privatization
Sabbath Observe
Aboriginal Intervention
Women in Combat
Medicare
Multiculturalism
Aboriginal Land Rights
Work Choices
Stiffer Jail Terms
Chastity
Defence Spending
Unions
Fluoridation
Diplomacy
Patriotism
Royalty
Education Spending
Euthanasia
Women Judges
Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide
Nuclear Power
Strict Rules
Evolution
Working Mums
Test Tube Babies
Foreign Trained Doctors
Bible Truth
Apartheid
Free Trade
Gay rights
Asian Immigration
Gay Marriage
Inborn Conscience
Church Authority
Global Warming is an Issue
Gov Welfare
Disarmament
Iraq War
Divine Law
Censorship
Labor Party
Socialism
White Lies
Legalise Marijuana
White Superiority
CANING
Legalised Abortion
Herbal Remedies
Teenage Dole
Liberal National Coalition
Charity Work
Private Schools
Living Together, not married
Suicide
Chiropractors
Medicare
Conservationists
Defense Spending
Medicare Subsidized Abortion
Licensing Laws
Surrogate Mums
Military Spending
Divorce
Modern Art
Reclaimed Water
Foreign Ownership
Abortion
Stem Cell Research
Nuclear Power
Condom Machines
Stricter Immigration
Legal Prostitution
Unions
Sample Size (MZ/DZ Pairs)
1666/1683
96/155
MZ/DZ co-twin correlations
.38/.19
.61/.32
Subjects who answered at least 80% of the political attitudes questions which comprise the ideological measures
were included in the analyses. Factor analysis of these items on this population has shown that a uni-dimensional
model fits the data, but up to 4 correlated sub-factors were also extracted (Verhulst, Hatemi and Martin 2010).
The Wilson-Patterson attitude Index presents subjects with a stimulus phrase such as ‘‘Abortion’’ and elicits an
‘‘agree,’’ ‘‘disagree”, or ‘‘uncertain’’ response which is then summarized to measure overall degrees of liberalismconservatism or ideology. . As a result, it takes on slightly different definitions in different contexts.
Co-twin Correlations
MZ
Australia 2008 Authoritarian Attitudes/Beliefs
0.271
DZ
0.116
A. Down deep. Australians share the same values and preferences
B. Australians are amazing diverse in their values and preferences
A. Facts get in the way of truth
B. Carefully looking at all kinds of evidence is the only way to truth
A. The world would work better if each country were left to take care of its own people
B. We are citizens of the world and should care for all people equal no matter where they live
A. Every assertion made by our highest political and military leaders should be challenged
B. We need to unite behind our leaders to show the rest of the world we are strong
A. Society works better if people adhere to a simple. unbending moral code
B. Situations vary and inflexible moral codes can cause serious problems
A. The best leaders take clear positions and never budge from their resolve
B. The best leaders are willing to change their minds and to admit to even embarrassing mistakes
A. Society works better if all people are left to accomplish things on their own
B. Society works better if the well-to-do are required to help the downtrodden
A. Swift and severe punishment for criminals is the best
B. Punishment should be tailored to the specific circumstances of the crime and traits of the criminal
A. Society works better if people are given the benefit of the doubt
B. Society works better if we assume that people will behave bad if given the chance
A. Without a firm moral code the social fabric would immediately break down
B. With time and teaching. people can learn to behave in a generous fashion
Sample Size (Pairs)
Respondents were asked: for each pair which is closest to your beliefs: A or B?
96
155
Co-twin Correlations
MZ
Australian 2008 Economic equity
0.378
DZ
0.12
A. Incomes should be made more equal
B. We need larger income differences as incentives for individual effort
Sample Size (Pairs)
96
155
Respondents were asked: how would you place your views on this scale (1 to 10). Score of 1 means you
completely agree with statement A, 10 you completely agree with statement B, and if you view falls somewhere
between please choose a number between A(1) and B(10).
3
Co-twin Correlations
MZ
Denmark 2009 Attitude Ideology Scale
DZ
0.671
0.519
435
633
high incomes do not pay enough taxes
Income inequalities are still too large
Harsher punishment for violent crimes
We should protect our national customs
Reduce Crime through prevention/counseling
Environmental policies should not hurt business
Homosexuals should have the same rights
Taxes on gas should be increased
More political referendum
Religious extremists right to organize public meetings
Porn should be accepted by society
equal rights for women should be accepted by society
Gay marriage should be accepted by society
Stem cell research should be accepted by society
Torture Terrorist suspects should be accepted by society
Warrantless searches should be accepted by society
Sample Size (pairs)
4
Co-twin Correlations
MZ
Denmark 2009 Individualism-Collectivism Attitudes
DZ
0.537
0.372
435
633
Individuals or the State should take more responsibility
People who are unemployed should have to take any job
Competition is healthy/harmful
The state should give more freedom/take more control to firms
We have gone too far in terms of welfare reforms
Sample Size (pairs)
5
Co-twin Correlations
MZ
Denmark 2009 Equality-Freedom Ideology
DZ
0.461
0.276
435
633
Which of these two statements comes closest to your own
opinion?
A says: I find that both freedom and equality are important.
But if I were to choose one or the other,
I would consider personal freedom more important, that is,
everyone can live in freedom and develop without hindrance
B says: Certainly both freedom and equality are important.
But if I were to choose one or the other, I would consider
equality more important, that is, that nobody is
underprivileged and that social class differences are not so
strong.
Sample Size (pairs)
6
Co-twin Correlations
MZ
US 1988 Attitude Ideology Scale
DZ
0.427
0.217
Sample Size (Pairs)
2107
2429
US 1988 Values Scale
0.383
0.146
1007
714
Death Penalty
Immigration
Astrology
Capitalism
X-rated
Segregation
Modern Art
Moral Majority
Womens Lib
Pacifism
Foreign Aid
Censorship
Federal housing
Nuclear Power
Democrats
Living together
Military Drill
Republicans
Draft
Divorce
Abortion
School Prayer
Property Tax
Unions
Gay rights
Socialism
Liberals
Busing
Be Happy
Self-control
Obey parents
Be Neat and Clean
Be dependable
Defend one's self
Be considerate
Be ambitious
Face problems calmly
Keep in good health
Obey law
Sample Size (Pairs)
7
Co-twin Correlations
MZ
US 1990-2 HHO Follow-up Attitude Ideology
Scale
Abortion
Family Values
Affirm Action
Fed Housing
Animal Rights
Foreign Aid
Arms Reduction
Fundamentalists
Astrology
Gay Rights
Bible Study
Gun Control
Busing
Immigration
Capitalism
Legalize Pot
Censorship
Liberals
Death penalty
Life after Death
Democrats
Living together
Divorce
Longer Prison
Draft
Mercy Killing
Drug Testing
Military Drill
Extramarital Sex
Miracles
Moral Majority
Unions
Nuclear Power
Welfare
Pacifism
White Supremacy
Private Schools
Women’s Lib
Property Tax
X-rated 1990
Republicans
Segregation
Right to life
Smokers Rights
School Prayer
Socialism
School Religious Education
Tax Reform
School Sex Ed
TV Evangelists
Sample Size (Pairs)
8
DZ
0.396
0.156
836
778
Co-twin Correlations
MZ
US 2008 Attitude Ideology Scale
Iraq War
School prayer
Increase welfare spending
Pacifism
Protect gun rights
Socialism
Increase military spending
Pornography
Allow warrantless searches
Stop illegal immigration
Globalization
Women's equality
Strict pollution control
Death penalty
Small government
Premarital sex
School standards
Gay marriage
Foreign aid
Abortion rights
Lower taxes
Evolution
Stem cell research
Patriotism
Abstinence only sex education
Biblical truth
Allow torture of terrorism suspects
Sample Size (Pairs)
US 2008 7 point Liberal-Conservative Ideology
Generally speaking, which of these best describes your
political views?
DZ
0.627
0.365
338
227
0.408
0.188
348
231
0.585
0.327
275
183
Extremely Liberal-Extremely Conservative
Sample Size (Pairs)
US 2008 Right Wing Authoritarianism
Our country needs a powerful leader, in order to destroy the
radical and immoral currents prevailing in society
Facts show that we have to be harder against crime and
sexual immorality, in order to uphold law and order.
It would be best if newspapers were censored so that people
would not be able to get hold of destructive and
Our forefathers ought to be honored more for the way they
have built our society, at the same time we ought
Our country needs free thinkers, who will have the courage to
stand up against traditional ways
It is better to accept bad literature than to censor it. General
Question: ]
People ought to put less attention to the Bible and religion,
instead they ought to develop their own moral
The old-fashioned ways and ;old-fashioned values ; still show
the best way to live.
God's laws about abortion, pornography and marriage must
be strictly followed before it is too late, violate
There are many radical, immoral people trying to ruin things;
the society ought to stop them.
The society needs to show openness towards people thinking
differently, rather than a strong leader, the world
Many good people challenge the state, criticize the church
and ignore the normal way of living."
If the society so wants, it is the duty of every true citizen to
help eliminate the evil that poisons our co
The situation in the society of today would be improved if
troublemaker were treated with reason and humanity
Our society would be better off if we showed tolerance and
understanding for untraditional values.
Sample Size (Pairs)
9
US 2008 Economic Egalitarianism
One of the biggest problems in this country is that
we don't give everyone an equal chance
We have gone too far in pushing equality in
this country.
If wealth were more equal in this country we
would have many fewer problems
Incomes should be more equal because
every family's needs for food, housing, and
so on
0.4
0.154
347
229
This country would be better off if we worried less
about how equal people are.
Sample Size (Pairs)
10
SWEDEN 2010
Co-twin Correlations
Left-right self-placement (1-10)
Sample size (MZ/DZ pairs)
In politics you sometimes talk about left and right. Where would you place yourself on a 1-10 scale where
1 stands for left and 10 stands for right?
Liberalism-conservatism attitudes Index (1-5, 34 items)
Sample size (MZ/DZ pairs)
Items included in the liberalism-conservatism index; items coded 1-5 (very good to very bad proposal)
Decrease the public sector
Decrease defense expenses (reversed)
Decrease welfare benefits
Decrease taxes
Keep property taxes (reversed)
Sell public companies to private buyers
Decrease income inequality in society (reversed)
Have more private companies in health care
Decrease the influence of financial markets on politics (reversed)
Keep the maximum fee for daycare (reversed)
Have more private schools
Introduce grades earlier in school
Increase the economic support to rural areas (reversed)
Introduce 6-hour working day for all employees (reversed)
Forbid all kinds of pornography (reversed)
Limit the right to free abortion
Introduce much harder punishments for criminals
Strengthen animal rights (reversed)
Sweden should in the long run carry through a nuclear phase-out (reversed)
Stop motoring in the inner city (reversed)
Invest more to prevent environmental damages (reversed)
Decrease carbon dioxide emissions (reversed)
Increase labor immigration to Sweden (reversed)
Introduce a language test to become a Swedish citizen
Decrease foreign aid
Accept fewer refugees in Sweden
Increase the economic support to immigrants so that they can preserve their own culture (reversed)
Remit debt to developing countries (reversed)
Give private companies more freedom
Sweden should leave the EU (reversed)
Sweden should introduce the EURO
Sweden should become members in NATO
Sweden should work for increased free trade all over the world
Sweden should actively support the US war on terrorism
11
MZ
0.469
1093
DZ
0.401
1188
0.550
1121
0.356
1201
Hungary 2010
MZ
DZ
Left-Right
Many use the terms left and right to describe
political standing. This figure shows the degrees
between being one the left and being on the right.
On this figure how would you place your own
political standing
.752
.82
Liberal -Conservative
Many use the terms liberal and conservative to
describe political standing. This figure shows the
degrees between being liberal and being
conservative. On this figure how would you place
your own political standing?
0.758
0.547
46
19
Sample Size (Pairs)
12
SI 2. Results of Variance Components Modeling
Male Parameter Estimates
US 2008
Political Attitude Ideology (27 item)
- ACE equate males and females
Right Wing Authoritarianism
- ACE equate males and females
7 point Left-right Ideology
- ACE equate males and females
Individualism- collectivism
- ACE equate males and females
Female Parameter Estimates
a2
c2
e2
a2
c2
e2
-2LL
.44 (.04-.65)
.12 (.00-.46)
.45 (.35-.58)
.61 (.34-.74)
.07 (.00-.31)
.32 (.26-.39)
3514.475
.54 (.31-.68)
.09 (.00-.29)
.37 (.32-.43)
.54 (.31-.68)
.09 (.00-.29)
.37 (.32-.43)
3521.546
.36 (.02-.71)
.27 (.00-.56)
.36 (27-.48)
.56 (.21-.54)
0 (.00-.30)
.44 (.36-.55)
3184.622
.51 (.24-.65)
.08 (.00-0.32)
.41 (35-.49)
.51 (.24-.65)
.08 (.00 -0.32)
.41 (35-.49)
3190.159
.47 (.13-.58)
.0 (.00-.28)
.53 (.42-.66)
.53 (.25-.61)
.0 (.00-.23)
.47 (.39-.57)
3628.556
.51 (.43-.58)
.0 (.00-.17)
.49 (.42-.57)
.51 (.43-.58)
.0 (.00-.17)
.49 (.42-.57)
3630.002
.45 (.12-.57)
.0 (.00-.00)
.55 (.43-.68)
.35 (.07-.45)
.0 (.00-.00)
.66 (.55-.76)
3652.443
.39 (.21-.47)
.0 (.00-.00)
.61 (.53-.70)
.39 (.21-.47)
.0 (.00-.00)
.61 (.53-.70)
3657.274
Notes: 95% confidence intervals in parentheses
∆X2
∆df
AIC
p-value
928.475
7.071
3
929.546
0.07
880.622
5.537
3
1.446
3
880.959
0.14
1028.556
1024.002
0.69
1056.443
4.831
3
1055.274
0.18
Male Parameter Estimates
a2
c2
e2
a2
c2
e2
-2LL
.59 (.41-.68)
.02 (.00-.14)
.39 (.28-.54)
.40 (.33-.45)
.23 (.06-.34)
.37 (.29-.59)
27965.45
.47 (.39-.55)
.09(.00-.26)
.44 (.29-.57)
.47 (.39-.55)
.09(.00-.26)
.44 (.29-.57)
27971.364
.39 (.23-.54)
.00 (.00-.03)
.61 (.49-.71)
.36 (.25-.51)
.00 (.00-.08)
.64 (.43-.77)
12063.1
.37 (.28-.42)
.00 (.00-.06)
.63 (.58-.67)
.37 (.28-.42)
.00 (.00-.06)
.63 (.58-.67)
12063.325
US 1988
Political Attitude Ideology (28 item)
- ACE equate males and females
Life Values
- ACE equate males and females
Female Parameter Estimates
Male Parameter Estimates
US HHO 1990-1992 FOLLOW UP
Political Attitude Ideology (50-item)
- ACE equate males and females
∆X2
∆df
AIC
p-value
7563.45
5.914
3
0.12
3415.1
0.225
3
3409.325
0.97
Female Parameter Estimates
a2
c2
e2
a2
c2
e2
-2LL
0.21 (.05-.45)
0.12 (.00-.29)
0.67 (.60-.74)
.41 (.24-.47)
.01 (.00-.17)
.58 (.53-.63)
16346.674
.33 (.17-.44)
0.05 (.00-.17)
0.67 (.56-.70)
.33 (.17-.44)
0.05 (.00-.17)
0.67 (.56-.70)
16348.608
14
∆X2
∆df
AIC
p-value
11832.674
1.934
3
11828.608
0.59
Male Parameter Estimates
a2
c2
e2
a2
c2
e2
.47 (.05-.63)
.00 (.00-.50)
.53 (.37-.74)
.42 (.01-.66)
.00 (.00-.38)
.58 (.34-.95)
-246.718
.46 (.09-.60)
.00 (.00-.27)
.54 (.40-.72)
.46 (.09-.60)
.00 (.00-.27)
.54 (.40-.72)
-245.563
0.28 (.01-.48)
.00 (.00-.36)
.72 (.52-.96)
.23 (.00-.50)
.00 (.00-.33)
.77 (.50-.97)
1616.026
0.27 (.01-.42)
.00 (.00-.25)
.73 (.57-.92)
0.27 (.01-.42)
.00 (.00-.25)
.73 (.57-.92)
1616.941
.46 (.03-.62)
.00 (.00-.34)
.53 (.38-.75)
.12 (.00-.40)
.00 (.00-.21)
.88(.60-.92)
2779.285
.34 (.04-.48)
.00 (.00-.21)
.67 (.52-.83)
.33 (.04-.48)
.00 (.00-.21)
.66 (.52-.83)
2783.306
Australia 2008
Political Attitude Ideology (29 item)
- ACE equate males and females
Authoritarian Values Ideology
- ACE equate males and females
Female Parameter Estimates
Individualism- collectivism
- ACE equate males and females
Male Parameter Estimates
- ACE equate males and females
c2
e2
a2
c2
e2
-2LL
.33 (.27-.39)
.29 (.18-.35)
.38 (.31-.46)
.27 (.20-.34)
.41 (.31-.47)
.31 (.27-.46)
23726.443
.31 (.26-.37)
.32 (.24-.41)
.37 (.32-.50)
.31 (.26-.37)
.32 (.24-.41)
.37 (.32-.50)
23728.144
Male Parameter Estimates
Australia 1980
Political Attitude Ideology (50-item)
- ACE equate males and females
AIC
∆df
p-value
-1356.718
1.155
3
0.915
3
-1361.563
0.76
506.026
500.941
0.82
1669.285
4.021
3
1667.306
0.25
Female Parameter Estimates
a2
Australia 1990
Political Attitude Ideology ACE (50 item)
∆X2
-2LL
∆X2
∆df
1.701
3
AIC
p-value
6774.443
6773.144
0.64
Female Parameter Estimates
a2
c2
e2
a2
c2
e2
-2LL
.27 (.08-.41)
.08 (.00-.08)
.66 (.60-.73)
.30 (.15-.32)
.08 (.00-.22)
.62 (.57-.66)
54052.852
.30 (.15-.40)
.07 (.00-.18)
.63 (.60-.67)
.30 (.15-.40)
.07 (.00-.18)
.63 (.60-.67)
54058.223
15
∆X2
∆df
AIC
p-value
38884.852
5.371
3
38884.223
0.15
Male Parameter Estimates
Denmark 2009
Classic Freedom-Equality Ideology
- ACE equate males and females
Individualism- collectivism
- ACE equate males and females
Political Attitude Ideology (15 item)
- ACE equate males and females
Female Parameter Estimates
a2
c2
e2
a2
c2
e2
.48 (.12-.59)
.00 (.00-.29)
.52 (.41-.65)
.28 (.00-.52)
.16 (.00-.39)
.56 (.47-.66)
5617.215
.37 (.14-.53)
.09 (.00-.27)
.54 (.47-.62)
.37 (.14-.53)
.09 (.00-.27)
.54 (.47-.62)
5618.258
.40 (.06-.61)
.14 (.00-.41)
.46 (.38-.58)
.25 (.02-.49)
.22 (.00-.38)
.52 (.44-.59)
10701.997
.31 (.19-.46)
.19 (.07-.28)
.49 (.43-.56)
.31 (.19-.46)
.19 (.07-.28)
.49 (.43-.56)
10705.099
.43 (.17-.71)
.25 (.00-.47)
.32 (.26-.41)
.22 (.04-.41)
.46 (.29-.61)
.31 (.26-.38)
5493.454
.31 (.17-.47)
.38 (.23-.49)
.31 (.28-.36)
.31 (.17-.47)
.38 (.23-.49)
.31 (.28-.36)
5516.349
16
-2LL
∆X2
∆df
AIC
p-value
1519.215
1.043
3
1514.258
0.79
6453.997
3.102
3
6451.099
0.38
1297.454
22.895
3
1314.349
<.001
ACE Parameter Estimates
Hungary 2011
a2
c2
e2
Liberal-Conservative self-placement
.39 (.19-.47)
.34 (.29-.82)
.27 (.16-.49)
Left-Right Self-Placement
.00 (.00-.54)
.78 (.65-.87)
.23 (.13-.340)
- samples are too small for model fitting
17
Male Parameter Estimates
Female Parameter Estimates
Sweden 2010
a2
c2
e2
a2
c2
e2
-2LL
Left-right self-placement
.05 (.00-.24)
.40 (.25-.49)
.55 (.48-.61)
.23 (.07-.39)
.26 (.13-.39)
.51 (.46-.57)
21088.809
- ACE equate males and females
.15 (.03-.28)
.32 (.22-.42)
.53 (.48-.57)
.15 (.03-.28)
.32 (.22-.42)
.53 (.48-.57)
21091.027
Liberalism-conservatism index
.37 (.19-.56)
.17 (.01-.32)
.46 (.40-.52)
.45 (.29-.57)
.08 (.00-.21)
.48 (.43-.53)
4434.278
- ACE equate males and females
.41 (.29-.53)
.12 (.01-.22)
.47 (.43-.51)
.41 (.29-.53)
.12 (.01-.22)
.47 (.43-.51)
4443.053
18
ΔX2
Δdf
2.218
3
AIC
p-value
11780.809
11777.027
0.53
-4963.722
8.774
3
-4960.947
0.03
SI 3. SNPs with a p-value better than 5 x 10-06
Australia 2008
CHR
SNP
AL1
AL2
FREQ1
6
rs9295794
A
G
0.088
0.437
0.079
3.52E-08
6
rs9393945
C
G
0.912
-0.437
0.079
3.55E-08
6
rs6930288
A
T
0.912
-0.436
0.079
3.56E-08
6
rs9391759
A
G
0.912
-0.437
0.079
3.63E-08
6
rs9295791
A
G
0.91
-0.434
0.079
3.86E-08
6
rs4713201
C
T
0.132
0.379
0.069
4.15E-08
6
rs7766902
G
T
0.909
-0.422
0.077
4.43E-08
6
rs9393944
A
G
0.091
0.429
0.079
4.53E-08
3
rs9813052
A
C
0.013
2.024
0.382
1.17E-07
3
rs4425256
G
T
0.988
-2.019
0.384
1.42E-07
6
rs9368591
C
T
0.901
-0.393
0.075
1.59E-07
6
rs9348819
C
T
0.901
-0.389
0.075
1.84E-07
6
rs4713199
A
G
0.901
-0.389
0.075
1.85E-07
6
rs9380106
A
T
0.901
-0.389
0.075
1.87E-07
6
rs10946966
A
G
0.097
0.393
0.076
2.02E-07
6
rs4713197
A
C
0.9
-0.387
0.075
2.04E-07
6
rs4713195
A
T
0.1
0.387
0.075
2.05E-07
6
rs9380103
A
G
0.9
-0.386
0.075
2.21E-07
6
rs4713191
C
T
0.099
0.384
0.075
3.19E-07
6
rs17399888
A
C
0.901
-0.38
0.075
3.43E-07
6
rs968723
A
T
0.918
-0.415
0.082
3.54E-07
2
rs12477520
C
T
0.986
-1.388
0.276
4.91E-07
9
rs10961913
A
G
0.217
-0.269
0.054
5.42E-07
2
rs6543023
C
T
0.981
-1.276
0.255
5.62E-07
9
rs10961909
C
G
0.785
0.266
0.054
6.83E-07
9
rs7031497
C
G
0.215
-0.266
0.054
7.21E-07
6
rs9348826
C
G
0.09
0.375
0.076
7.71E-07
9
rs1412255
C
T
0.214
-0.264
0.054
8.37E-07
9
rs10810355
C
T
0.786
0.263
0.054
8.49E-07
6
rs9380098
A
G
0.069
0.446
0.092
1.17E-06
6
rs9257171
A
G
0.075
0.404
0.084
1.50E-06
6
rs9257696
C
T
0.093
0.362
0.075
1.50E-06
6
rs9378186
A
G
0.093
0.361
0.075
1.54E-06
6
rs9380100
C
T
0.915
-0.381
0.079
1.64E-06
6
rs4947256
A
C
0.085
0.38
0.079
1.69E-06
6
rs9295793
A
C
0.137
0.323
0.068
2.05E-06
6
rs7746064
C
G
0.089
0.377
0.079
2.10E-06
6
rs9393954
A
T
0.093
0.352
0.075
2.50E-06
6
rs6456865
A
G
0.101
0.358
0.076
2.57E-06
19
EFFECT
SE
PVALUE
9
rs1888838
A
G
0.784
0.25
0.053
2.71E-06
1
rs665282
A
G
0.788
0.266
0.057
2.79E-06
1
rs1755583
C
T
0.212
-0.266
0.057
2.81E-06
1
rs651042
C
T
0.212
-0.266
0.057
2.82E-06
5
rs12520079
A
C
0.324
0.224
0.048
3.17E-06
6
rs7763661
A
G
0.086
0.37
0.08
3.23E-06
6
rs743848
G
T
0.914
-0.37
0.08
3.25E-06
1
rs12734496
A
G
0.093
0.481
0.103
3.34E-06
6
rs7763390
A
C
0.852
-0.29
0.062
3.48E-06
6
rs16894237
C
T
0.916
-0.36
0.078
3.58E-06
6
rs2211495
A
G
0.084
0.36
0.078
3.61E-06
6
rs6904278
A
G
0.916
-0.371
0.08
3.62E-06
6
rs763007
A
C
0.916
-0.371
0.08
3.63E-06
6
rs16894234
C
G
0.084
0.359
0.078
3.63E-06
6
rs6928948
A
C
0.084
0.369
0.08
3.78E-06
16
rs7192554
A
G
0.009
1.668
0.361
3.82E-06
6
rs1056032
C
T
0.916
-0.369
0.08
3.87E-06
6
rs4713209
A
T
0.907
-0.343
0.074
3.92E-06
6
rs1954407
G
T
0.084
0.356
0.077
3.96E-06
6
rs1419094
G
T
0.916
-0.356
0.077
3.97E-06
6
rs9357078
C
T
0.907
-0.342
0.074
4.19E-06
6
rs9295782
A
G
0.083
0.367
0.08
4.31E-06
6
rs9380119
A
G
0.907
-0.341
0.074
4.34E-06
6
rs9348827
G
T
0.907
-0.341
0.074
4.45E-06
5
rs10061148
A
G
0.679
-0.22
0.048
4.45E-06
5
rs1477306
C
T
0.679
-0.22
0.048
4.46E-06
6
rs2071788
C
T
0.918
-0.367
0.08
4.49E-06
12
rs2240868
C
T
0.011
1.056
0.23
4.59E-06
6
rs2032502
C
T
0.917
-0.366
0.08
4.61E-06
5
rs17070145
C
T
0.679
-0.219
0.048
4.62E-06
5
rs9313411
C
T
0.679
-0.219
0.048
4.66E-06
12
rs7295376
C
G
0.011
1.063
0.232
4.67E-06
6
rs3763338
A
G
0.083
0.366
0.08
4.70E-06
6
rs9357080
A
G
0.907
-0.34
0.074
4.72E-06
5
rs10462974
A
G
0.679
-0.219
0.048
4.84E-06
6
rs7762289
A
C
0.906
-0.351
0.077
5.16E-06
6
rs7761745
C
T
0.906
-0.351
0.077
5.16E-06
6
rs4713210
C
T
0.907
-0.339
0.074
5.20E-06
4
rs1479007
A
G
0.109
-0.329
0.072
5.58E-06
4
rs11942391
A
G
0.109
-0.328
0.072
5.76E-06
4
rs6554339
C
T
0.891
0.328
0.073
5.98E-06
12
rs7132503
A
G
0.011
1.154
0.255
6.02E-06
16
rs9925564
A
G
0.991
-1.591
0.352
6.13E-06
20
6
rs9257797
A
G
0.111
0.314
0.07
6.23E-06
6
rs9257799
C
T
0.111
0.314
0.07
6.24E-06
1
rs12757973
C
T
0.953
-0.664
0.147
6.35E-06
5
rs10866628
A
T
0.68
-0.217
0.048
7.04E-06
6
rs16894184
C
T
0.087
0.358
0.08
7.44E-06
6
rs16894189
C
T
0.912
-0.358
0.08
7.44E-06
7
rs17171045
C
G
0.189
-0.286
0.064
7.81E-06
2
rs7567981
C
T
0.009
1.426
0.319
7.89E-06
1
rs12142474
A
G
0.933
-0.397
0.089
7.96E-06
6
rs9391791
A
C
0.906
-0.332
0.074
8.10E-06
6
rs9380120
C
T
0.094
0.332
0.074
8.21E-06
5
rs13188278
A
C
0.035
0.517
0.116
8.87E-06
6
rs6905729
A
T
0.155
0.277
0.062
8.96E-06
6
rs6903771
C
T
0.844
-0.275
0.062
9.69E-06
21
Australia 1990
CHR
SNP
AL1
AL2
FREQ1
EFFECT
5
rs2036023
A
C
0.571
-0.098
6
rs17630640
A
G
0.871
5
rs7704021
A
C
0.388
6
rs9398764
A
G
5
rs6555264
C
5
rs6555263
5
rs6894281
5
SE
PVALUE
0.02
1.09E-06
0.143
0.03
1.38E-06
0.098
0.021
2.28E-06
0.662
0.101
0.022
5.22E-06
G
0.961
0.352
0.078
6.59E-06
G
T
0.04
-0.352
0.078
6.61E-06
A
G
0.04
-0.351
0.078
6.67E-06
rs10036225
C
G
0.04
-0.345
0.077
6.72E-06
5
rs7712941
C
T
0.04
-0.345
0.077
6.72E-06
6
rs4709741
A
C
0.107
-0.223
0.05
6.77E-06
5
rs7718797
G
T
0.608
-0.093
0.021
7.11E-06
5
rs7705226
C
T
0.393
0.093
0.021
7.23E-06
5
rs6887436
C
T
0.393
0.093
0.021
7.28E-06
5
rs10036180
C
T
0.042
-0.332
0.074
7.34E-06
5
rs6882308
A
G
0.042
-0.327
0.073
7.66E-06
5
rs6555262
C
T
0.957
0.315
0.071
8.36E-06
5
rs6868320
A
G
0.603
-0.092
0.021
8.37E-06
5
rs6555261
C
T
0.957
0.313
0.07
8.53E-06
5
rs6555260
C
G
0.956
0.312
0.07
8.70E-06
21
rs2832114
C
T
0.698
0.101
0.023
9.06E-06
2
rs7589373
A
G
0.906
0.149
0.034
9.17E-06
5
rs6555259
A
G
0.044
-0.304
0.069
9.29E-06
11
rs480081
A
C
0.244
-0.103
0.023
9.30E-06
rs10079205
C
G
0.044
-0.304
0.069
9.38E-06
5
22
Sweden 2010
CHR
SNP
AL1
AL2
FREQ1
5
rs13174333
G
C
0.51
9
rs16910029
G
C
5
rs6594417
T
C
9
rs7867754
T
9
rs13286734
9
9
EFFECT
SE
PVALUE
0.305
0.062
7.35E-07
0.055
0.498
0.105
2.16E-06
0.487
-0.293
0.062
2.27E-06
G
0.072
0.494
0.105
2.43E-06
T
C
0.056
0.496
0.105
2.46E-06
rs9942876
T
C
0.911
-0.49
0.104
2.46E-06
rs13292040
T
C
0.055
0.494
0.105
2.79E-06
9
rs877755
T
C
0.907
-0.481
0.103
2.87E-06
9
rs10733404
C
A
0.939
-0.489
0.105
2.91E-06
9
rs4978031
T
C
0.053
0.492
0.105
3.05E-06
9
rs7870311
G
A
0.066
0.49
0.105
3.18E-06
9
rs12345614
T
G
0.107
0.481
0.104
3.44E-06
9
rs10867781
T
C
0.663
-0.292
0.063
3.44E-06
9
rs2383605
T
A
0.055
0.491
0.107
4.49E-06
5
rs2925093
C
A
0.527
0.278
0.061
5.28E-06
14
rs4020126
T
C
0.24
0.334
0.074
5.88E-06
18
rs4432340
G
A
0.864
0.403
0.089
5.98E-06
4
rs16839310
T
C
0.836
-0.47
0.105
6.90E-06
14
rs7141888
T
C
0.78
0.329
0.074
8.18E-06
14
rs8011567
T
C
0.185
0.387
0.087
8.64E-06
9
rs1537292
T
C
0.882
-0.451
0.102
9.08E-06
5
rs4957851
C
A
0.641
0.276
0.062
9.41E-06
9
rs13291149
T
A
0.944
-0.451
0.102
9.51E-06
18
rs16945953
T
G
0.143
-0.43
0.097
9.83E-06
14
rs2287653
T
C
0.225
0.326
0.074
9.85E-06
5
rs10076394
G
C
0.928
0.499
0.113
9.91E-06
23
Meta-Analysis
CHR
SNP
AL1
AL2
EFFECT
6
rs9398764
a
g
0.0958
0.0195
8.62E-07
7
rs500454
t
g
0.4937
0.1071
4.04E-06
3
rs16824957
a
c
-0.157
0.0349
6.90E-06
4
rs1494950
a
g
-0.3081
0.0695
9.27E-06
5
rs6555263
t
g
0.3285
0.071
3.68E-06
5
rs6555264
c
g
0.3285
0.071
3.68E-06
5
rs10036180
t
c
0.3111
0.0673
3.84E-06
5
rs6894281
a
g
-0.3277
0.071
3.88E-06
5
rs6882308
a
g
-0.3065
0.0664
5
rs6555261
t
c
-0.2207
0.0589
3.95E-06
4.02E-06
5
rs10036225
c
g
-0.3221
0.07
4.17E-06
5
rs7712941
t
c
0.3221
0.07
4.17E-06
5
rs6555260
c
g
0.2931
0.0637
4.20E-06
5
rs6555254
a
g
-0.2798
0.0611
4.64E-06
5
rs6555262
t
c
-0.2957
0.0646
5
rs6555259
a
g
-0.2156
0.058
4.73E-06
5.21E-06
5
rs10043296
c
g
0.2778
0.061
5.26E-06
5
rs10079205
c
g
-0.2855
0.0627
5.29E-06
5
rs4702522
a
g
-0.2678
0.0592
6.05E-06
17
rs12602795
t
c
-0.0945
0.0214
9.65E-06
24
SE
PVALUE