MYC with poor survival in patients with gastric cancer

advertisement

Recurrent amplification of MYC and TNFRSF11B in 8q24 is associated with poor survival in patients with gastric cancer

Supplementary results:

Independent cohort validation of MYC and TNFRSF11B at 8q24

An independent validation cohort of 413 cases was used to validate the association between gains of MYC , TNFRSF11B , ESRP1 , MMP9 , and CSE1L and patient prognosis.

The general conditions of the patients in the training and validation cohorts are comparable. Patients with a gain of either MYC or TNFRSF11B presented a shorter median overall survival than those without gain ( MYC : median survival: 23.24 months vs. 42.77 months, P = 0.034; TNFRSF11B : median survival: 26.36 months vs. 30.06 months, P = 0.047, Supplementary Figures A and 1B), whereas there was no significant difference in survival between the patients with a gain of MMP9 , CSE1L , or ESRP1 and those without gain (data not shown).

Moreover, the GC patients with a high copy number gain (copy number > 4) of MYC or TNFRSF11B exhibited an even poorer overall survival than those with a copy number gain (2 < copy number ≤ 4) and those with no gain (

MYC : median survival: 12.26 months vs. 26.56 months vs. 42.77 months, P < 0.001; TNFRSF11B : median survival:

17.98 months vs. 26.66 months vs. 36.06 months, P = 0.015, Supplementary Figures C and D).

Association of 8q24 gain with survival and clinicopathological features

The survival-related genes MYC and TNFRSF11B are found within a wide range of amplified regions in 8q24, which spans approximately 20 million base pairs. We found that the patient group with gains of both MYC and TNFRSF11B was markedly

segregated from non-gain group. The co-gain group presented a significantly lower five-year survival rate than the non-gain group (median survival: 23.24 months vs.

45.14 months, P = 0.019, Supplementary Figure E). The statistical analysis showed that the co-gain of MYC and TNFRSF11B was strongly associated with the depth of wall invasion and TNM stage in both the training and validation cohorts (supplementary

Table 4).

Table 1S. Probe information.

Chromosome Symbol chr20 CSE1L chr8 chr8

DNA srand

+

TNFRSF11B -

ESRP1 +

Probe set region Chromosome region

108-672

656-1260

8160-8805

47096244-47146892

120004976-120033563

95722575-95788869 chr20 chr8 chr8 chr20

MMP9

MYC

CCNE2

SRC

+

+

-

+

1171-1782

674-1182

13207-13777

27895-28533

44070953-44078606

128817497-128822855

95961627-95976659

35406501-35467234

Table 2S. Representative amplified genomic loci and genes by aCGH analysis.

Chromosome Region Location chr20

Representative Genes p13 p12.3

0-5M

5-6M

TCF15, PSMF1, SNRPB, TMC2, NOP56, EBF4, PTPRA, GNRH2,

MRPS26, OXT, AVP, UBOX5, FASTKD5, GFRA4, ADAM33, CENPB,

CDC25B, ANK2, SMOX, ADRA1D, PRND, PRNT, RASSF2, SLC23A2,

PCNA, CDS2

PROKR2, CHGB, TRMT6, MCM8, CRLS1, LRRN4, FERMT1 p12.2 p12.1

10-11M JAG1, BTBD3

16-17M SNRPB2, OTOR, BFSP1, DSTN, RRBP1, BANF2, SNX5, SNORD17,

OVOL2 p11.21-23 20-25M CD93, NXT1, GZF1, NAPB, CST11, CST8, CST2, CST5, CST7, ACSS1,

VSX1, ENTPD6, PYGB, NLP q11-q13 29-62M BCL2L1, PLAGL2, SNTA1, E2F1, TP53INP2, NCOA6, HMGB3L1,

MMP24, UQCC, CEP250, SRC, NNAT, STK4, TP53TG5, MMP9, NCOA5,

CD40, CDH22, TP53RK, NCOA3, B4GALT5, SNAI1, CEBPB, PTPN1,

BCAS4, ATP9A, BCAS1, BMP7, PTK6, SRMS, TNFRSF6B, SAMD10 chr8 chr7 chr13 p11.22 39M ADAM5, ADAM3A q21.13q24.3

80M-

146M

ESRP1, CCNE2, TP53INP1, UQCRB, RPL30, SNORA72, STK3, COX6C,

YWHAZ, SAMD12, TNFRSF11B, MYC, TG, SLA, PTK2, GPR20,

LYPD2, CYP11B1, CYP11B2, MAPK15, EPPK1, PARP10 p14-p22.3 0-30M MMD2, RNF216L, RBAK, WIPI2, SLC29A4, RPA3, CDCA7L, IL6,

CCDC126, STK31, NPY, MPP6, DFNA5, OSBPL3, CYCS, C7orf31, NPVF, q22.1 100M

NFE2L3, CBX3, SNX10, SKAP2, CREB5, CPVL, CHN2, PRR15 , NOD1

LRCH4, FBXO24, PCOLCE, MOSPD3, TFR2, GNB2, GIGYF1, POP7,

EPO, ZAN q14.11 40-41M KIAA0564 q21.33 72-73M C13orf34, DIS3, PIBF1, KLF5, KLF12 q22-q31 74-95M LMO7, KCTD12, BTF3L1, CLN5, FBXL3, MYCBP2, SCEL, SLAIN1, q32

EDNRB, POU4F1, RBM26, SPRY2, GPR180

95-104M STK24, SLC15A1, UBAC2, GPR18, GPR183, FKSG29, TM9SF2, CLYBL,

PCCA, TMTC4 q33-q34 109-115M CARKD, CARS2, ING1, SOX1, ATP11A, F10, ATP4B, GRK1, GAS6,

RASA3, CDC16 chr5 chr19 chr17 chr11 chr1 p15.33 0-1M CEP72, TPPP, ZDHHC11 p13.3-p12 31-45M CDH6, PDZD2, SPEF2, IL7R, CAPSL, SKP2, GDNF, EGFLAM, LIFR,

DAB2, SEPP1, HMGCS1, CCL28, NNT q13.11 32-35M UQCRFS1, POP4, CCNE1 q13.12-33 35-49M PDCD5, ANKRD27, SLC7A9, CCDC123, CEBPA, CEBPG, PEPD, GPI,

PDCD2L, WTIP, SCGBL, BCL3, CBLC q12 q25.3 p11.2 q11 q13.3 q21.2q21.3

34-36M STARD3, PNMT, PERLD1, ERBB2, GRB7, PSMD3, CSF3, MSL1, CASC3,

CDC6, RARA, GFBP4, TNS4

77M ANAPC11, NPB, SIRT7, MAFG, LOC92659, PYCR1, NOTUM

45M PHF21A

55M OR4C11,OR4P4,OR4S2,OR4C6

68M-69M MRPL21, GHMBP2, CCND1, ORAOV1, FGF19, FGF4, FGF3, ANO1,

149M-

151M

FADD

SEMA6C, PSMB4, SNX27, TNRC4, MRPL9, OAZ3, LINGO4, RORC,

THEM5, LCE3C, LCE1D chr3 chr15 chr22 chr18 chr6 q26.2q26.31

170M MDS1, TERC, SAMD7, SEC62, GPR160, PHC3, PRKCI, SKIL, CLDN11,

SLC7A14 q11.1 18-19M CXADRP2, POTEB, OR4M2, OR4N4 q11.21 22M GSTT1, LOC391322, GSTTP2 q11.1 17-18M MIB1, GATA6, CTAGE1 p21.33 32M HLA-DRB5

Table 3S Representative deleted genes in loss regions by aCGH analysis.

Chromosome Region Location chr19 chr14 chr22 chr11 chr1 chr9 chr4 chr6 chr16 chr17 chr18 chr3 q13.42

q13.42

q13.43

56M

59M

60M

Representative Genes

SIGLEC14

LILRA3, KIR3DP1

KIR2DL4

KIR2DL2, KIR2DL5A,

p13.3 q11.2

0-1M

19M

KIR2DL5B, KIR3DS1

OR4Q3, OR4M1, OR4N2, OR4K2,

OR4K5, OR4K1

HEATR4

q24.2 q11.22

q13.1 p15.4

p15.4 q44

p31.1

73M

22M

37M

5M

55M

LOC391322, GSTT1, GSTTP2

APOBEC3A, APOBEC3B

OR52N5

OR4C11, OR4P4, OR4S2,OR4C6

246M OR2T10, OR2T11, OR2T34

71M NEGR1 p24.1

p21.3

8M

21M

PTPRD

C9orf53, CDKN2A p14.1 69M UGT2B17

p26.31

172M GALNTL6 p21.33 32M

p25.2

3M q12.2

q23.1

54M

76M

HLA-DRB5

HLA-DRB6

CES4

WWOX q21.31 41M q21.1 46M p14.2 59M

KIAA1267

SMAD4

FHIT

Table 4S. Association of co-gain of MYC and TNFRSF11B with clinicopathological parameters in gastric cancer patients

Characteristic

Original cohort

No. of patient

Age at surgery-year

Sex

Male

Female

Tumor stage

I+II

III+IV

T stage

1+2

3+4

N stage

Negative

Positive

Differentiation

Moderately differentiated

Poorly differentiated

Vascular invasion

V(-)

V(+)

Location

Cardia

Non-cardia

Validation cohort

No. of patient

Age at surgery-year

Sex

Male

Non-gain Signature Co-gain Signature P Value

20

57.05±9.71

21

62.43±8.55 0.032

12

8

8

12

8

12

34

84

5

15

10

8

5

15

131

59.64±11.62

86

45

17

4

1

20

1

20

27

129

4

17

7

14

7

14

168

61.05±10.24

121

47

0.232

0.022

0.764

0.022

0.023

0.886

0.378

0.236

<0.001

Female

Tumor stage

I+II

III+IV

T stage

1+2

3+4

N stage

Negative

Positive

Differentiation

Moderately differentiated

Poorly differentiated

46

85

24

107

35

96

34

92

37

131

13

155

30

138

40

122

0.012

0.006

0.065

0.659

Vascular invasion

V(-)

V(+)

Location

Cardia

Non-cardia

51

71

31

100

56

101

54

114

0.296

0.107

Table 5S Characteristic parameters analysis in two cohorts

Characteristic aCGH cohort

Original cohort

No. of patient (%)

Age at surgery

Sex

Male

Female

Tumor stage

I+II

III+IV

Differentiation

Well-moderately differentiated

Poorly differentiated

Vascular invasion

V(-)

V(+)

Location

Cardia

Non-cardia

129

60.5

94

35

39

90

39

90

50

72

39

90

QGP cohort

384

58.4

264

120

122

262

99

273

145

215

112

272

P Value

0.081

0.378

<0.001

0.886

0.891

0.818

Download