Catching RIP in the act. Part I: A PCR assay to detect DNA methylation Paul Donegan Freitag Lab Biochemistry and Biophysics Department Oregon State University Background • MUTAGENESIS: Mutations of base pairs in genetic material – Induced by UV, X-ray, viruses, etc. – Spontaneous occurrence – triggers DNA repair • Hypermutagenesis – Induced and controlled by cells – Not spontaneous --AID deaminase --ApoBec (HIV) --RIP Identical Sequences RIP • RIP = Repeat Induced Point Mutation • Genomic defense mechanism – Silences repetitive DNA (no expression) RIP triggered by repeated sequence • Targets duplicated DNA segments – linked or unlinked sequences • Induces C to T transition mutations Mutated Sequences GCATATCAGTCATGCTCAGCGCACCTA GCATATCAGTCATGCTCAGCGCACCTA C to T point mutations induced by RIP GTATATCAGTTATGTTCAGTGCACTTTA GCATATTAGTTATGTTTAGCGCATTCTA Relevance We are interested in RIP because we want to: – gain insights into evolutionary mechanisms that shape genomes. – understand genome defense mechanisms and mutagenesis. Summer Research Objective • To differentiate between two possible molecular mechanism that can explain RIP Neurospora crassa QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Rosette of sexual spores, nuclei labelled with GFP Possible Mechanisms for C to T Mutations caused by RIP (1) QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. H3C Quic kTime™ and a TIFF (Unc ompres sed) dec ompres sor are needed to see this pic ture. METHYLATION C QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. DEAMINATION CMe T Methyl Group Donor- S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) • Methylation by a specific cytosine DNA methyltransferase, followed by deamination Possible Mechanisms for C to T Mutations caused by RIP (2) DEAMINATION QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. z QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. Enz C Intermediate U • Cytosine is never methylated but instead deaminated to uracil, which will be replaced with thymine by DNA replication or repair RIP timeline FERTILIZATION • RIP occurs during the sexual cycle • RIP occurs after fertilization but before karyogamy. • ~10 mitotic divisions while RIP can occur. KARYOGAMY RIP ZONE! Image from: Shiu et al. (2001) Cell Methylation Assay Timeline • DNA was extracted during the expected RIP timeframe • Methylation of interest should occur between fertilization and karyogamy (nuclear fusion). RIP ZONE (between fertilization and karyogamy) Controls Days of Interest 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAY PCR after Digest Digest with Sau3AI Unmethylated site Methylation-sensitive vs. methylation-insensitive restriction enzymes: Sau3AI tests for cytosine methylation, based on the presence or absence of bands GATCme GATC Digest PCR DpnII is not sensitive to cytosine methylation: -cuts regardless -control (never amplifies) Bands cannot be amplified when site is cut Methylated site Mutations in the RFP region RFP • ‘tdimerRed’ has two identical segments that trigger RIP • integrated into the Neurospora genome (not in WT) • here, we look for DNA methylation induced by RIP • EVIDENCE OF METHYLATION SUGGESTS MECHANISM 1 RFP amplification Genomic DNA (Neurospora) Plasmid DNA RFP+ ABC wild type Primers: A B C ** ** * * Primers: * * 1 ** * Bands from 5/6 appear in all genomic DNA’s but are absent in both plasmids * 3 RFP region ** Control * 5 2 RFP+ ABC * Experimental Primers 1+3 (A) and 2+3 (B) amplified RFP bands only from RFP+ strain Primers 5+6 (C) amplified control gene (hpo) RFPABC hpo 6 BUT: Assay never worked with positive controls of methylated DNA G S hpo D G Positive control: Methylated region D Negative control: Unmethylated region Expected band in S lane, but no band in D lane 25 cycles S Expected no band in S or D lane 28 cycles G = genomic DNA, no digest S = Sau3AI, C-methylation sensitive D = DpnII, C-methylation insensitive 31 cycles Catching RIP in the act. Part II: Tagging of duplicated DNA with fluorescent DNA binding proteins Goals • Tag DNA of Neurospora crassa with fluorescent proteins: – to visualize pairing of duplications during RIP; – to track chromosome territory movement (e.g., centromeres, telomeres, nucleolar DNA, specific genes) – to track movements of DNA binding proteins from nucleus to nucleus – to target enzymes to specific regions on chromosomes Protein tags Tagging with RFP or GFP Specific DNA binding proteins recognize target sequences (binding sites, BS). Tag = translational fusion of a DNA binding domain (DBD) to RFP or GFP. Binding sites recruit DBD-GFP or DBD-RFP fusion; co-localization = yellow. During RIP GFP DBD BS Protein DNA GFP RFP GFP RFP GFP RFP GFP RFP BS DBD RFP Protein DNA Construction of protein tags 1 Amplified DBD from Aspergillus AflR and AlcR by PCR 2 Generated translational fusions by cloning into gfp and rfp plasmids 3 Transformed E. coli 4 Purified plamids, digested DNA and confirmed correct plasmids 5 Linearized plasmid and transformed into Neurospora his-3 mutant 6 Selected His+ Neurospora transformants that showed fluorescence AlcR-RFP AflR-GFP Fusion proteins localized in nuclei Construction of DNA binding sites 2 Binding site: DNA sequences specifically recognized by AflR or AlcR AflR:TCGNNNNNCGA AlcR: GCGGRRCCGC Need 200+ copies of recognized sequence to bind enough fluorescent protein for visibility. Summary 1 PCR assay: Did not work in many attempts. We need a new approach. 2 DNA tagging: The protein tags are expressed, binding sites still needed. Acknowledgements • HHMI (Howard Hughes Medical Institute) • URISC (Undergraduate Research, Innovation, Scholarship & Creativity) • Kevin Ahern • Michael Freitag • Kristina Smith • Freitag Lab