SNPs Assays: Discriminating Between Annual and Perennial Ryegrass Cultivars Travis Behrend Dr. Laurel Cooper Dr. Reed Barker USDA-ARS Grass Genetics 3450 SW Campus Way Corvallis, OR 97330 HHMI 2007 Background: The Market Demand We Want the Pretty Perennial in Our Lawn!! Perennial -Greener -Softer -Finer -Used for Turf The Problem ? As a result of both accidental and deliberate intercrossing, many L. perenne (perennial) cultivars contain a certain percentage of alleles from L. multiflorum (annual). Intercrossing Perennial Annual Background: Farmer Economics -Plants with the appearance of annual ryegrass are unacceptable in high-quality turf and seed producers are penalized for annual ryegrass contamination Farmer Joe 100% Perennial 0% Contamination $50 per bushel Farmer Bob 90% Perennial 10% Contamination $45 per bushel Farmer Bill 80% Perennial 20% Contamination $40 per bushel Seed Growers lose $5-7 million annually! Background: Seed Testing Currently, the Fluorescence test is used to determine seed purity Problem Fluorescence test is less effective as a result of the two species intermingling and tends to overestimate the annual types. i.e It docks the farmer’s pay more than necessary = Grrrr ! Solution Use genetic markers (SNP) to discriminate between annual and perennial ryegrass The gene LpID1 is involved in the transition from flowering to vegetative growth, a distinguishing characteristic between annuals and perennials SNP = Single Nucleotide Polymorphism SNP = DNA sequence variations that occur when a single nucleotide (A, T, G, or C) in the genome sequence is altered1 RE Site AGGCTAGAATTCCATTCGAGTC AGGCTAGAATTGCATTCGAGTC In our assay, the SNP is used as a diagnostic tool. 1 http://www.everythingbio.com/glos/definition.php?word=single+nucleotide+polymorphism+(SNP) Project Purpose: SNP Detection Objective: Compare and contrast the speed, reliability, and costs of three different methods of SNP detection SNP Detection Methods Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequence (CAPS) Taqman® Allelic Discrimination Assay (Real-Time PCR) AcycloPrime®-FP SNP Detection Assay (VICTOR®) Predictions 1. The CAPS assay will be the cheapest. 2. The Taqman Allelic Discrimination Assay will be the fastest. Note: 1. Results may vary depending on the amount of throughput. 2. Results may vary depending upon the unknowns of the design process. Background: LpID1 Gene 0.85 Kb Exon 1 0.45 Kb Intron SNP Exon 2 1.3 Kb EcoR1 Site Annual Consensus Sequence: CGTGAGCGA……………………………………………GA[A]TTC…………………………CCTTCTGTGTG Perennial Consensus Sequence: CGTGAGCGA……………………………………………GA[T]YTC…………………………CCTTCTGTGTG Ambiguous Pyrimidine (C or T) Notes: -The consensus sequences shown both run 5’ to 3’ (left to right)…they are not complements! -Indeterminate Gene, LpID1, is involved in the transition from flowering to vegetative growth -There are more differences (SNPs, deletions, etc…) than shown in the figure; this is a simplification. Methods: The CAPS Assay PCR Product EcoR1 Site Perennial Consensus Sequence: CGTGAGCGA……………………………………………GA[T]YTC…………………………CCTTCTGTGTG Amplification of Genes of interest by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) DNA Extraction 1. Add EcoR1 2. Gel Electrophoresis 1.5 kb1.0 kb0.8 kb- Perennial Allele Annual or Hybrid Allele CGTGAGCGA……………………………………………GA[A]TTC…………………………CCTTCTGTGTG DNA Marker Annual Consensus Sequence: Methods: AcycloPrime-FP SNP Assay A Primer Acyclonucleotides* T [A/T] * Acyclonucleotides require special polymerase Template (PCR Product) Ideal Results AT A – FP AA FP = Fluorescence Polarization TT (-) controls T - FP Results: AcycloPrime-FP Assay Difficulties Control Reactions Assign Clusters Plate of 96 Reactions 150 140 Assign Clusters Homozygous Perennial 150 130 120 110 Heterozygotes TAMRA (mP) 100 Homozygous Annual TAMRA (mP) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 50 30 Non-template Controls 20 10 0 0 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 0 50 100 150 R110 (mP) R (Intensity Ratio) Problem: 1. Heterozygotes are between the homozygotes 2. Too much variability Troubleshooting: 1. Varied number of cycles 2. Varied concentrations and amounts of reagents 3. Florescent plate reader recalibration Methods: Taqman® AD-Assay Reference: http://www.appliedbiosystems.com/ Results: Taqman® AD-Assay Perennial Allele (96 well plate rxn) Annual Allele Reliability: CAPS vs. Taqman® SNP Detection Reliability 100 90 80 70 60 CAPS Assay Homozygous Annual Percent 50 CAPS Assay Heterozygous CAPS Assay Homozygous Perennial 40 Taqman AD Assay Homozygous Annual Taqman AD Assay Heterozygous 30 Taqman AD Assay Homozygous Perennial 20 10 0 Perennial-like Intermediate Annual-like Morphologies Gulf Speed of Detection Methods (based on 96 well plate) Taqman Setup Run Total 0.5 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 7.0 hrs Time Calculations of Detection Methodologies 8 7 6 5 0.75 2.0 2.75 hrs Acyclo-FP Setup PCR Clean-Up Rxn Acyclo Rxn Total Time (hrs) CAPS Setup PCR Gel Digest Gel Scoring Total 4 3 2 0.75 1.5 0.75 1.0 4.0 hrs 1 0 CAPS Taqman Detection Methodologies Acyclo-FP Cost of Detection Methods Cost of Detection Methodologies CAPS $0.50/rxn Taq Pol. EcoR1 Agrose Plastics (dollars) 2 Cost Taqman $0.63/rxn Probe Optical plate Optical film Plastics 2.5 1.5 1 0.5 Acyclo-FP $2.00/rxn Kit (all inclusive) Plastics 0 CAPS Taqman Detection Methodologies Acyclo-FP Conclusions • CAPS assay is cheapest, but takes a long time (PCR, restriction digestion, gel electrophoresis), good reliability • AcycloPrime®-FP was expensive, needed a lot of troubleshooting, much more difficult to perform, questionable reliability. • LpID1 Taqman® assay is more expensive, but much faster, is easy to perform, good reliability Acknowledgments Special THANKS! to the following: • Dr. Laurel (Lol) Cooper • Dr. Reed Barker • Dr. Kevin Ahern • Dr. Mary Slabaugh • Lori Evans-Marks • Howard Hughes Medical Institute