Pseudomonas fluorescens Characterization of non-fluorescent mutants of A506

advertisement

Characterization of non-fluorescent mutants of

Pseudomonas fluorescens

A506

Student researcher:

Kevin Hockett

Mentor:

Dr. Virginia Stockwell

USDA ARS

Loper Lab

Why is the bacterium A506 important?

•Commercial biocontrol agent for fire blight

•Fire blight is a bacterial disease of pear and apple trees caused by Erwinia amylovora

• $68,000,000 in damage in Oregon and Washington due to fire blight in 1998

Background information

•A506 produces an antibiotic toxic to containing excess iron

E. amylovora only in media

•In several experiments in orchards, adding iron to A506 improved control of fire blight

•Received two mutants of A506 always make the antibiotic in culture

(iron is no longer required). These mutants are non-fluorescent .

Background information

•A graduate student in the lab created a collection of twenty-three mini-Tn fluorescent

5 km mutants of A506 that are nonparental strain

A506

Tn 5 non-fluorescent mutant number 8

A506 Genome mini-Tn5 mini-Tn5

A506 Genome

A506 Genome

Fluorescence of Pseudomonas fluorescens

•Fluorescence under UV is caused by a pyoverdine

•Pyoverdines are a class of siderophores (chelating compounds produced by organisms)

•Siderophores are produced in iron-deficient environments, such as aerial plant surfaces

O receptor

NH

2

A506

Fe II

O

H

N

N

O

N

H

N

H

2

N

N

H O

OH

OH

Fe III O

H O

H

3

C

H

N

OH

H O

O

N

H

O

N

H

O

NH

NH

CH

3

O

O

O

CH

3

A link between pyoverdine and antibiosis?

•Two non-fluorescent mutants of A506 do not require iron to make the antibiotic in culture (from California)

•Of 23 non-fluorescent, mini-Tn 5 mutants:

11 no longer required iron for antibiosis

12 still required iron for antibiosis

A subset of 8 mutants chosen for further evaluation based on phenotype

•Is there a relationship between antibiosis and pyoverdine production in A506?

•Which gene(s) were affected by Tn 5 insertion?

•Do all mutants of the same phenotype have similar mutations or are all different?

•Single, double or triple insertion?

Hypothesis: At least one mutant that does not require iron for antibiosis contains a single insertion in a regulatory gene

Investigating phenotypes of non-fluorescent mutants of

A506

Cross-feeding assay : Determine if the non-fluorescent mutants can utilize the iron bound to the pyoverdine of A506 in iron-limited media

Siderophore-mediated Iron Uptake by

A506

EDDHA

FeEDDHA

Pyoverdine+Fe

Pyoverdine

Receptor

A506

Pyoverdine

EDDHA

Fe III

Utilization of a Pyoverdine by Non-fluorescent Mutants

A506

Pvd

Pvd -

A506

Mutant 8 Four non-fluorescent mutants

Conclusions

•No receptor/uptake mutants

•Mutant 8 produced a compound that cross-feed other mutants, though not a pyoverdine

 8 was a mutant that produced the antibiotic irrespective of iron

Next step

•Investigate the gene that has been disrupted

Putative regulatory gene disrupted by mini-Tn5 insertion

X mini-Tn5 +

Mutant A506 Genome

Antibiotic

Pyoverdine

How to achieve?

Southern Analysis: Used to estimate the number of insertions and the uniqueness of their location

Steps

First: digest genomic DNA of mutants with various restriction enzymes

A506 Mutants :

NcoI,SphI, BglI-Single cut

XbaI,MluI,SpeI-No cuts

Second: separate digested

DNA on gel based on size mini-Tn5

NcoI SphI

*Not good representation

Digested Genomic DNA

Third: Blot the gel (transfer DNA from gel to a nylon membrane)

Southern analysis continued:

Hybridization

After probe is applied, membrane is washed in a visualization solution

7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Mutant #

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

SphI-digest

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

NcoI-digest membrane

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Flipped compared to the gel gel

Southern analysis continued:

Mutant Size of Bands

3 <23130

4 15000

5 <23130

6 7200

7 6900, 4300

8 -

3 4 5 6 7 8

Size markers

23,130 bp

9,416 bp

6,557 bp

4,361 bp

2,322 bp

2,027 bp

Interpretation from Southern Blotting

Of the 8 mutants:

7 single insertions, 1 double insertion

All band patterns were unique- no insertions were in the exact same spot with in the genome

Number Representative Enzymes

Mutant: of insertions NcoI SphI PstI

8 1 4150, 9144 2690, 6400 810, 1720, 4512

7 2 1200, 5500 1768, 6860,

9039, 11094

6 1 <564, 8800 5084, 7136

Inverse PCR

Inverse PCR: a method to amplify DNA adjacent to mini-Tn 5 for sequencing

Steps: i. Cut genomic DNA with restriction enzyme mini ii.

Ligate digested genomic DNA into circular DNA mini mini iii. Run PCR rxn.

Why is it called inverse-PCR?

Inverse PCR continued:

Forward Primer

Normal PCR:

Reverse Primer

End Primer

Inverse PCR: mini

Rev. Primer

Run amplified DNA on a gel, extract, and send DNA for sequencing.

Perform a BLAST search on sequence with GenBank to help determine identity of the disrupted gene.

Progress in inverse PCR for non-fluorescent mutants

Found

•NcoI, PstI, and SphI are good restriction enzymes for inverse PCR for these mutants

•Primers have been developed and obtained for inverse PCR from the mini-Tn5

Conclusions:

1. 22 of 23 non-fluorescent mutants of A506 were unable to grow on media amended with EDDHA

2. One mutant grew on EDDHA and cross-fed all other mutants

3. All non-fluorescent mutants could be cross-fed on iron-depleted media by the parental strain A506.

4. Of eight mutants evaluated with Southern analysis, seven had a single insertion of Tn5

5. Of 8 mutants evaluated with Southern analysis, each yielded a distinct band pattern with several restriction enzymes. Each mutant may have an unique insertion.

•Next step is to amplify fragments containing insert so flanking DNA can be sequenced

Acknowledgements

Howard Hughes Medical Institute Summer Fellowship Program

Dr. Kevin Ahern

USDA-Western Regional Integrated Pest Management Program

OSU Dept. of Botany and Plant Pathology

Dr. Virginia Stockwell

USDA/ARS Horticulture Crops Research Laboratory

Dr. Joyce Loper

Todd Temple

Brenda Schaffer

Marcella Henkels

Meg Roche Larsen

Amy Davis

Andy Mumford

Download