Mata kuliah Dosen Pembuat Tahun : J0754 - Pengelolaan Organisasi Entrepreneurial : D3122 - Rudy Aryanto : 2009 Kepemimpinan dalam Mengatasi Perubahan Situasi Chapter 16 Learning Objectives – Compare situational factors used in discussions of the contingency and path-goal approaches to leadership – Identify assumptions made about followers of the path-goal and the leader-member exchange theories Situation Favorableness Situational Characteristics I II III IV V VI VII VIII Good Poor Poor Poor Poor Situation Leader-member relations Good Good Good Task structure High High Low Low High High Low Low Strong Weak Strong Weak Strong Weak Strong Weak Position power Preferred leadership styles Very Favorable Task-motivated (Low LPC) Relationship-motivated (High LPC) Low LPC Very Unfavorable Changing Situations to Fit Leaders • Modify Leader-Member Relations – – – – Spend more (or less) informal time with subordinates Request particular people for your group Volunteer to direct difficult or troublesome subordinates Suggest or affect transfers of particular subordinates into or out of your unit – Raise morale by obtaining positive outcomes for subordinates Changing Situations to Fit Leaders • Modify Task Structure – To work with less structured tasks • Ask the boss to give you new or unusual problems • Bring problems and tasks to your group and ask members to contribute to planning and decisionmaking – To work with highly structured tasks • Ask for more structured tasks or more detailed instructions • Break jobs into subtasks that can be more highly structured Changing Situations to Fit Leaders • Modify Position Power – To raise your position power • Fully exercise the powers that the organization provides • Channel information through you – To lower your position power • Allow group members to participate in planning and decision-making • Let assistants exercise more power Path-Goal Leadership Model • Leaders are effective because of their positive impact on followers’… – Motivation – Ability to perform – Satisfaction • This model focuses on how the leader influences followers’ perceptions of… – Work goals – Self-development goals – Paths to goal attainment Path-Goal Leadership Model • Specifies four specific leader behaviors – – – – Directive Supportive Participative Achievement-oriented Path-Goal Leadership Model • Leader behavior is effective – To the extent that subordinates perceive such behavior as a source of immediate or future satisfaction • Leader behavior is motivational if it – Makes satisfaction of subordinates’ needs contingent on effective performance – Provides the guidance, clarity of direction, and rewards necessary for effective performance Path-Goal Leadership Model Follower Characteristics Locus of control Experience Ability Leader Behavior Directive Supportive Participative Achievementoriented Follower Perceptions Motivation Environmental Factors Tasks Formal authority Work group Outcomes Satisfaction Performance Path-Goal Situational Factors • Contingency variables – Personal characteristics of subordinates • Perceptions of ability • Locus of control – Environmental pressures and demands • The tasks • The formal authority of the organization • The work group Path-Goal Situational Factors • A leader who reduces the uncertainties of the job is a motivator – Increases subordinates’ expectations that effort leads to desirable rewards Situational Leadership Model • Emphasis is on followers and their level of maturity – Leaders must judge followers’ maturity levels, then use appropriate leadership style • Readiness is the ability and willingness of followers to take responsibility for directing their own behavior – Job readiness – Psychological readiness Situational Leadership Model • Hersey and Blanchard developed four leadership styles: – – – – Telling Selling Participating Delegating Situational Leadership Model Degree of follower’s readiness to assume personal responsibility: R1 R2 R3 R4 Unable Unwilling Unable Willing Able Unwilling Able Willing S1 S2 S3 S4 Telling: Instructing & supervising Selling: Explaining & clarifying Participating: Sharing & facilitating Delegating: Coaching & assisting Leadership behavior appropriate to the situation Leader-Member Exchange Theory • There is no consistent leader behavior across subordinates – Each relationship has a uniqueness – One-on-one relationships determine subordinates’ behaviors • Subordinates are classified into groups – In-group members – Out-group members Learning Objectives In-Group Members • Share a common bond and value system • Interact with the leader regularly • Get more challenging assignments and more meaningful rewards • Are more positive about the organization • Have higher job performance and satisfaction Out-Group Members Have less in common with the leader Have limited interaction with the leader Receive less challenging work and little positive reinforcement Become bored Often quit Comparing Situational Approaches Model Leader Qualities Contingency Task- or relationship-oriented. The job should be engineered to fit the leader’s style. Path-Goal Can increase followers’ effectiveness by applying proper motivational techniques. Situational Leadership Must adapt style in terms of task and relationship behavior on the basis of followers. LeaderMember Exchange Must be adaptive, because there is no such thing as consistent leader behavior across subordinates Comparing Situational Approaches Model Assumptions About Followers Contingency Prefer different leadership styles, depending on task structure, leader-member relations, and position power Path-Goal Have different needs that must be fulfilled with the help of a leader Situational Leadership Maturity (readiness) to take responsibility and ability influence the leadership style that is adopted LeaderMember Exchange Categorized as in-groups and out-groups Comparing Situational Approaches Model Leader Effectiveness Contingency Determined by the interaction of the environment and personality factors Path-Goal Effective leaders are those who clarify for followers the paths or behaviors that are best Situational Leadership Effective leaders are able to adapt directing, coaching, supporting, and delegating style to fit the followers’ levels of maturity LeaderMember Exchange The perceptive leader is able to adapt his/her style to fit followers’ needs